
Podcast Overview
<p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">乾隆三十三年敕撰,共一百一十六卷,(附唐桂二王本末三卷)。编年记事,上起太昊伏羲氏,下讫明代,清高宗亲作御批,又称《御批历代通鉴辑览》。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">此书在史书中虽无特殊价值,但剪裁和内容组织上都很精当,篇幅适中,既不像《<a target="_blank" style="color:#4990E2;text-decoration:none;">纲鉴易知录</a>》那样仅具梗概而略显乏味,又不像《<a target="_blank" style="color:#4990E2;text-decoration:none;">资治通鉴</a>》那样篇幅浩大,头绪繁多,难于卒读。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">是清代通行的历史读本,民国初年也颇为流行。<a target="_blank" style="color:#4990E2;text-decoration:none;">王文濡</a>又补入清代史事,称为《增修补正正续历代通鉴辑览》,共140卷。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">最后定本的《御批通鉴辑览》起自远古伏羲氏,止于明末,一百十六卷,后附南明唐王、桂王事迹本末四卷,即唐王一卷、桂王三卷。 仿《资治通鉴纲目》体式,但"纲"与"目"皆用大字书写,而用双行小字补叙史事、附记轶事异说、注明人物、诠释地名、考辩史实、引述前人注释和评论等等,并间或撰有馆臣的考释评述。正文、《凡例》与批语对包括《资治通鉴》、《资治通鉴纲目》在内的各种史书皆有指摘,而自称本书"尽善尽美,集史学之大成,实足表里六经,准式万世",成为撰史、评史的圭臬。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">《御批通鉴辑览》在编纂和修订中,于义例、书法、是非褒贬等极其认真,对史实也不乏精湛的考辩,却仍未能全脱官修之书众手不齐之弊,《四库全书》和《四库全书荟要》两种版本及《评鉴阐要》所载清高宗的批语数量各不相同、在一些重要内容上互有遗漏,文字也有错讹,盖写定之时各书未能协同校对。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">书中内容亦有与《凡例》抵牾处,例如《凡例》明确批评贺善等人的史论"文芜义浅",要"并加刊消,以省繁文",而卷二十二却引贺善评汉光武帝的赞语,称相信图谶为其"盛德之累",这恰与清高宗在上一卷的批语相违背。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;"><span>御批通鉴辑览序》经精心结撰,对清以前的历史作一系统的清理,成为官方述史、论史的的圭臬,而居于尊崇的地位。清高宗自诩其书"于凡正统偏安、天命人心、系属存亡,必公必平,惟严惟谨,而无所容心曲徇于其间。观是书者,凛天命之无常,知统系之应守,则所以教万世之为君者,即所以教万世之为臣者也",将此书看成为万世君臣的政治教科书。而辑录清高宗批语的《评鉴阐要》,《四库提要》称其"圣鉴精详,无幽不烛……斥前代矫诬之行,辟史家诞妄之词,辨核舛讹,折衷同异,其义皆古人所未发而敷言是训,适协乎人心天理所同然",是"读史之玉衡"、"传心之宝典",甚至认为此书一成,起到"日月著明,爝火可息,百家谰言,原可无存"的作用。 按照这个说法,清以前的任何历史名著,均无法与之相比。</span></p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;"><span> 免责声明:本书院为非营利性机构。以方便网友为主,仅供学习研究。<br />内容由热心网友提供和网上收集,不保留版权。若侵犯了您的权益,来信即刪。srn2188@sina.com<br /><br /></span></p>
Language
🇨🇳
Publishing Since
6/18/2020
1 verified contact email on file for 御批历代通鉴辑览卷
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes

December 9, 2021
否认罪责就意味着重犯

October 26, 2021
白话文对照文言文御批歴代通鉴辑览卷一百二十

October 20, 2021
白话文对照文言文御批歴代通鉴辑览卷一百十九
358 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for 御批历代通鉴辑览卷
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is 御批历代通鉴辑览卷?
<p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">乾隆三十三年敕撰,共一百一十六卷,(附唐桂二王本末三卷)。编年记事,上起太昊伏羲氏,下讫明代,清高宗亲作御批,又称《御批历代通鉴辑览》。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">此书在史书中虽无特殊价值,但剪裁和内容组织上都很精当,篇幅适中,既不像《<a target="_blank" style="color:#4990E2;text-decoration:none;">纲鉴易知录</a>》那样仅具梗概而略显乏味,又不像《<a target="_blank" style="color:#4990E2;text-decoration:none;">资治通鉴</a>》那样篇幅浩大,头绪繁多,难于卒读。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">是清代通行的历史读本,民国初年也颇为流行。<a target="_blank" style="color:#4990E2;text-decoration:none;">王文濡</a>又补入清代史事,称为《增修补正正续历代通鉴辑览》,共140卷。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">最后定本的《御批通鉴辑览》起自远古伏羲氏,止于明末,一百十六卷,后附南明唐王、桂王事迹本末四卷,即唐王一卷、桂王三卷。 仿《资治通鉴纲目》体式,但"纲"与"目"皆用大字书写,而用双行小字补叙史事、附记轶事异说、注明人物、诠释地名、考辩史实、引述前人注释和评论等等,并间或撰有馆臣的考释评述。正文、《凡例》与批语对包括《资治通鉴》、《资治通鉴纲目》在内的各种史书皆有指摘,而自称本书"尽善尽美,集史学之大成,实足表里六经,准式万世",成为撰史、评史的圭臬。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">《御批通鉴辑览》在编纂和修订中,于义例、书法、是非褒贬等极其认真,对史实也不乏精湛的考辩,却仍未能全脱官修之书众手不齐之弊,《四库全书》和《四库全书荟要》两种版本及《评鉴阐要》所载清高宗的批语数量各不相同、在一些重要内容上互有遗漏,文字也有错讹,盖写定之时各书未能协同校对。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;" data-flag="normal">书中内容亦有与《凡例》抵牾处,例如《凡例》明确批评贺善等人的史论"文芜义浅",要"并加刊消,以省繁文",而卷二十二却引贺善评汉光武帝的赞语,称相信图谶为其"盛德之累",这恰与清高宗在上一卷的批语相违背。</p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;"><span>御批通鉴辑览序》经精心结撰,对清以前的历史作一系统的清理,成为官方述史、论史的的圭臬,而居于尊崇的地位。清高宗自诩其书"于凡正统偏安、天命人心、系属存亡,必公必平,惟严惟谨,而无所容心曲徇于其间。观是书者,凛天命之无常,知统系之应守,则所以教万世之为君者,即所以教万世之为臣者也",将此书看成为万世君臣的政治教科书。而辑录清高宗批语的《评鉴阐要》,《四库提要》称其"圣鉴精详,无幽不烛……斥前代矫诬之行,辟史家诞妄之词,辨核舛讹,折衷同异,其义皆古人所未发而敷言是训,适协乎人心天理所同然",是"读史之玉衡"、"传心之宝典",甚至认为此书一成,起到"日月著明,爝火可息,百家谰言,原可无存"的作用。 按照这个说法,清以前的任何历史名著,均无法与之相比。</span></p><p style="color:#333333;font-weight:normal;font-size:16px;line-height:30px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;hyphens:auto;text-align:justify;"><span> 免责声明:本书院为非营利性机构。以方便网友为主,仅供学习研究。<br />内容由热心网友提供和网上收集,不保留版权。若侵犯了您的权益,来信即刪。srn2188@sina.com<br /><br /></span></p> - How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Information about guest appearances is not available.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.
