Administrative Remedies

About Administrative Remedies

Because you can't fix what you don't understand. The rules governing your daily life - from the medications you take to the air you breathe, from workplace safety to financial regulation - weren't made by Congress. They were made by federal agencies operating under delegated authority. And there's an entire body of law governing how that power works, when it can be challenged, and what happens when it goes wrong. Administrative Remedies explains that law. Professor Gwendolyn Savitz and Dean Marc Roark of the University of Tulsa College of Law break down the doctrines behind the headlines - Chevron, the major questions doctrine, Jarkesy, due process, agency enforcement - using real-world analogies and current Supreme Court cases. For law students, practitioners, and anyone who wants the administrative state to actually make sense. New episodes weekly.

Publisher

Gwendolyn Savitz and Marc Roark

Category

education · government

Language

en

Explicit

No

First episode

1 Nov 2025

Latest episode

6 Oct 2026

Latest episodes

5 of 43 episodes have a transcript.

1. 

   6 Oct 2026TRANSCRIPT

   Is Anything Ever Really Final? Finality, Guidance, and Bennett v. Spear

   Host Gwen and Marc explore the concept of finality in administrative law, using Bennett v. Spear to explain how agencies control legal challenges to their guidance.

2. 

   29 Sept 2026TRANSCRIPT

   National Park Service v. National Trust: Who Gets to Sue Over the Ballroom

   Host Marc and guest Alison Hoagland, architectural historian and National Trust board member, analyze the Supreme Court's decision on standing in National Park Service v. National Trust, exploring the implications for historic preservation.

3. 

   22 Sept 2026TRANSCRIPT

   Someday Isn't Imminent: Standing and Who Gets to Sue an Agency

   Host Gwen and guest Marc explain the legal doctrine of standing, detailing its elements and historical development through landmark Supreme Court cases.

Inside a recent episode

Is Anything Ever Really Final? Finality, Guidance, and Bennett v. Spear

Published 6 Oct 2026 · Transcript excerpt

[…] The government's own brief admitted this because departing from a biological opinion creates serious legal exposure. So the label said advice, but the effect was actually a command. So Scalia opening the courthouse to ranchers suing under the Endangered Species Act, not the lineup anyone would have predicted. And it was unanimous too. This is Bennett v. Spear. Most people meet Bennett v. Spear in a standing course. This is the zone of interest holding that we talked about before, but it matters for finality too. Here's the important part. As a general matter, two conditions must be satisfied for agency action to be final. […]

Reach and audience

Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.

Apple Podcasts (US)

5.0 / 5

5 ratings

Spotify

5.0 / 5

3 ratings

Contact Administrative Remedies

Guest appearances

Does not typically book guests

Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.

Questions about Administrative Remedies