A site for interesting stuff on the fight between Good and Evil on the earth that God created, particularly in United States Politics. From God's special revelation of the Good News of Jesus Christ, to General Revelation in my specialty, the teaching of College/University Chemistry, and other subjects of interest. <br/><br/><a href="https://efdouglass.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast">efdouglass.substack.com</a>
Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Claim This Podcastby Eugene F Douglass, MS MDiv PhD
364 episodes
Updated Weekly
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
Podcast Overview
A site for interesting stuff on the fight between Good and Evil on the earth that God created, particularly in United States Politics. From God's special revelation of the Good News of Jesus Christ, to General Revelation in my specialty, the teaching of College/University Chemistry, and other subjects of interest. <br/><br/><a href="https://efdouglass.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast">efdouglass.substack.com</a>
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
12/20/2021
1 verified contact email on file for Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
February 27, 2026
Hamm v. Smith (Capital Punishment) No. 24-872 [Arg: 12.10.2025 Transcript Audio]
<p>Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efd</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/hamm-v-smith-4/">Hamm v. Smith (Capital Punishment)</a> No. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-872.html">24-872</a> [Arg: 12.10.2025 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-872_b07d.pdf">Transcript </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-872">Audio</a>]</p><p> Issue(s): Whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an <a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Atkins_v_VA_OT02.pdf">Atkins</a> claim.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/court-to-consider-the-role-of-iq-tests-in-ban-on-executing-people-who-are-intellectually-disabled/"> Case Preview </a>• <a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/court-appears-divided-on-whether-lower-courts-properly-found-death-row-inmate-to-be-intellectually-disabled/">Argument Analysis</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://efdouglass.substack.com">The Contemporary Battle of Good v Evil in Politics</a> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe</a>
February 27, 2026
National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission (Campaign Finance) No. 24-621 [Arg: 12.09.2025 Transcript Audio]
<p>Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efd</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/national-republican-senatorial-committee-v-federal-election-commission/">National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission (Campaign Finance)</a> No. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-621.html">24-621</a> [Arg: 12.09.2025 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-621_q86b.pdf">Transcript </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-621">Audio</a>]</p><p>Issue(s): Whether the limits on coordinated party expenditures in <a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/USCODE-2023-title52-subtitleIII-chap301-subchapI-sec30116.pdf">52 U.S.C. § 30116</a> violate the First Amendment, either on their face or as applied to party spending in connection with "party coordinated communications" as defined in <a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/CFR-2025-title11-vol1-sec109-37.pdf">11 C.F.R. § 109.37</a>.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://efdouglass.substack.com">The Contemporary Battle of Good v Evil in Politics</a> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe</a>
February 27, 2026
Trump v. Slaughter (Independent Agencies) No. 25-332 [Arg: 12.08.2025 Transcript Audio]
<p>Yes, I enjoy listening to SCOTUS Oral Arguments on my walks….. Enjoy - efd</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/olivier-v-city-of-brandon-mississippi/">Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi</a> No. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-993.html">24-993</a> [Arg: 12.03.2025 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-993_1a7d.pdf">Transcript </a><a target="_blank" href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-993">Audio</a>]</p><p> Issue(s): (1) Whether this court’s decision in <a target="_blank" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/512/477/">Heck v. Humphrey</a> bars claims under <a target="_blank" href="https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/USCODE-2023-title42-chap21-subchapI-sec1983.pdf">42 U.S.C. § 1983</a> seeking purely prospective relief where the plaintiff has been punished before under the law challenged as unconstitutional; and (2) whether Heck v. Humphrey bars Section 1983 claims by plaintiffs even where they never had access to federal habeas relief.</p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://efdouglass.substack.com">The Contemporary Battle of Good v Evil in Politics</a> is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.</p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">efdouglass.substack.com/subscribe</a>
364 total episodes available
Similar Podcasts
Discover related shows you might enjoy
Deep-dive analytics for Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Battle of the Titans/Theology/God's Creation/Education/Political Musings Newsletter & Podcast?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 8 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.