边缘漫游，在知识的边界上随便走走。
边缘漫游是一档专注于交叉、多元视角下人文社科学术知识的播客节目。和两位研究兴趣广泛的博士生一起探索，将无意义的人生思考融入学术，将有偏狭性的学术问题回归生活。
/主播简介/ Anqi: PhD在读，人机交互研究 Jiahua: PhD在读，城市研究
/联系我们/ jiahuaddd@gmail.com
边缘漫游 Edgerunner
Claim This Podcastby jiahua&anqi
10 episodes
Updated Bi-weekly
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇨🇳
Podcast Overview
边缘漫游，在知识的边界上随便走走。 边缘漫游是一档专注于交叉、多元视角下人文社科学术知识的播客节目。和两位研究兴趣广泛的博士生一起探索，将无意义的人生思考融入学术，将有偏狭性的学术问题回归生活。 /主播简介/ Anqi: PhD在读，人机交互研究 Jiahua: PhD在读，城市研究 /联系我们/ jiahuaddd@gmail.com
Language
🇨🇳
Publishing Since
2/8/2024
1 verified contact email on file for 边缘漫游 Edgerunner
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
December 1, 2025
E.10 触觉何以构建亲密？——从情感触觉到动物型陪伴机器人的人机交互
<p>这一期我们邀请了清华大学未来实验室的博士生、长期研究情感触觉的何丽雯。我们共同探讨触觉如何成为情感的传递与编码媒介——作为人机交互的新兴方向，触觉正在重塑长期由视觉与听觉主导的交互范式。本期话题从触觉技术在日常计算中的嵌入方式谈起，延伸到动物型机器人如何通过触觉反馈与社交信号，与人构建自然而细腻的情感联系的互动未来。</p><p><strong>/时间轴 Timeline/</strong></p><p>01:50 情感在人机交互中扮演怎样的角色</p><p>04:20 可识别情绪的交互技术</p><p>06:13 为何将情感触觉作为研究路径与切入点</p><p>07:59 什么是触觉通道</p><p>10:12 情感和触觉的连接，触觉相比于其他感官的独特性</p><p>14:13 触觉交互的研究史</p><p>17:49 情感计算</p><ul><li><p>从声音、表情、姿态等信号的模式识别谈起</p></li><li><p>机器如何区分 affect / emotion / feeling？</p></li><li><p>离散语言如何被转译为计算可读的变量？</p></li></ul><p>29:36 情感触觉的研究重点</p><p>31:19 多感官交互趋势</p><p>39:58 被低估的触觉</p><p>44:24 动物型机器人的研究在做什么</p><p>47:33 为什么人会选择动物型机器人作为陪伴者</p><ul><li><p>人与真实的小动物的关系以及人与机器人的关系</p></li></ul><p>50:32 如何与动物型机器人发展、维系情感与亲密关系</p><p><strong>/参考书目 Reference/</strong></p><ul><li><p>丽雯发表的文章</p></li></ul><p>He, L., Guo, Z., Mo, Y. et al. Exploring embodied emotional communication: a human-oriented review of mediated social touch. CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact. 7, 188–212 (2025). <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-024-00169-6">doi.org</a></p><p>Liwen He, Zhou Fang, Boxue Shan, Dangxiao Wang, and Yun Wang. 2025. Understanding Affective Responses to Directional Tactile Motion via a Wearable Pneumatic Interface. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST Adjunct '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 175, 1–3. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3746058.3758383">doi.org</a></p><p>Zhou Fang, Liwen He, Ran Zhao, and Yun Wang. 2025. HapEmoji: Enhancing Emotional Experiences in Remote Collaboration through Haptic Communication. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9, 7, Article CSCW426 (November 2025), 37 pages. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3757607">doi.org</a></p><ul><li><p>Social Robot</p></li></ul><p>Breazeal, C. (2004). Designing sociable robots. MIT press.</p><p>Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and autonomous systems, 42(3-4), 167-175.</p><ul><li><p>Affective Haptics</p></li></ul><p>Yohanan, S., & MacLean, K. E. (2012). The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: Human intent and expectations in touching the haptic creature. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(2), 163-180.</p><p>Kim, E., & Schneider, O. (2020, April). Defining haptic experience: foundations for understanding, communicating, and evaluating HX. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13).</p><p><strong>/找到我们 Contact/</strong></p><p>Instagram: jiahuaddd</p><p>Instagram: arrowanneee</p><p>Email: jiahuaddd@gmail.com</p>
September 24, 2025
E.9 空间科学里的公园研究：从社会逻辑到计算机视觉
<p>公园不仅是休闲绿地，更映射城市的社会与人类行为模式。从伦敦街头绿地到纽约中央公园，从黄石国家公园到加拿大班夫，本期节目讨论“公园”如何作为社会与空间的实验场。</p><p>我们邀请到在加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学（UBC）攻读博士，即将前往MIT City Science交换的陈铭泽（<a href="https://mingzechen.com/">个人主页</a>），他将景观设计、社会正义与新兴的计算机视觉方法结合起来，研究人与环境的互动。节目中，我们从历史与政治的角度审视国家公园的制度逻辑，也探讨了空间句法、遥感、社交媒体与视觉语言模型如何拓展城市研究的可能性。</p><p><strong>/时间轴 Timeline/</strong></p><p><strong>01:13 嘉宾介绍</strong></p><p><strong>01:41 对人居环境领域的研究兴趣</strong></p><ul> <li>社会公平议题纳入建成环境的研究</li> <li>最新的空间研究方法，基于传感器视觉技术的人类活动研究</li></ul><p><strong>09:01 美国、加拿大景观规划的公园体系</strong></p><ul> <li>公园起源：从皇家园囿到公共开放</li> <li>纽约中央公园：工人阶级共享绿地的象征，却伴随绅士化矛盾</li> <li>高线公园：当代城市叙事的新范式</li> <li>美国国家公园体系：自然奇观、文化记忆与政治符号</li></ul><p><strong>24:41 方法论：从空间句法到计算机视觉</strong></p><ul> <li>空间句法是什么？</li> <li>可见性图分析（VGA）的发展与应用</li> <li>与计算机视觉结合：街景图像分割、绿色可见度的量化</li></ul><p><strong>35:09 空间句法的局限性与新城市科学，从空间形态到社会互动的解释力</strong></p><p><strong>38:11 遥感、三维扫描重建、无人机等等新技术对人的行为的捕捉</strong></p><p><strong>41:57 社交媒体数据、大语言模型驱动现代城市规划</strong></p><p><strong>45:23 定量的研究结果如何在实际的规划中起效，传感器与智慧公园的规划启示</strong></p><p><strong>50:16 公园体系的政治性，不同政府/民间机构对于公园的管理，国家、地方与原住民治理</strong></p><p><strong>/参考书目 Reference/</strong><br>Bill Hillier, Julienne Hanson, The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, 1984)<br>Michael Batty, The New Science of Cities (MIT Press, 2013)<br>Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space (Blackwell, 1991)<br>David Harvey, Social Justice and the City (University of Georgia Press, 2009)<br>罗雨翔，《纽约空间与制度观察》，（上海三联书店·后浪，2024）</p><p>Ratti, C. (2004). Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(4), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3019</p><p><strong>/找到我们 Contact/</strong><br>Instagram: jiahuaddd<br>Instagram: arrowanneee<br>Email: jiahuaddd@gmail.com</p>
May 24, 2025
E.8 文化研究与数字女性主义：社媒网络话语分析的复杂性与虚假的赋权
Cultural researcher Jane, a PhD from the Chinese University of Hong Kong, examines the complexities of online discourse and digital feminism, including the role of platforms like Xiaohongshu in shaping gender power dynamics, in this interview episode.
10 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for 边缘漫游 Edgerunner
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is 边缘漫游 Edgerunner?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates bi-weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 6 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.