Anti-SLAPP Motions and SLAPP-back Actions
California SLAPP Law
Claim This Podcastby Aaron Morris: Anti-SLAPP Attorney
4.9(15 reviews)
35 episodes
Updated Weekly
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
22
Podcast Authority
BetaPoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality23
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement51
Podcast Overview
Anti-SLAPP Motions and SLAPP-back Actions
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
4/14/2014
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
22
Podcast Authority
BetaPoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality23
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement51
5
Excellent Areas
3
Good Performance
11
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Episode Length
4 minutes
Performing excellently!
good
Show Notes Quality
3.0/5
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
poor
Publishing Consistency
Every 115 days
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
+16 More Metrics
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report
See how your show performs across every key metric
Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Secure Sponsorships
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Grow Your Audience
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
1 verified contact email on file for California SLAPP Law
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
April 21, 2025
SLAPP035 – Understanding the Public Interest Requirement
<br /> In Episode 35 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we take a deep dive into what constitutes a matter of public interest under the anti-SLAPP statute. It is apparent from the motions we are defeating that counsel is sorely lacking an understanding of this important point. As was held in the Supreme Court case of FilmOn v. DoubleVerify, it’s not enough to simply point to some amorphous matter of public interest. The challenged speech must be “closely related” to that public interest, AND it must somehow “advance the discussion” on the public interest.<br /> We also discuss the craziest appeal Morris & Stone has ever faced. The defendant’s anti-SLAPP motion was denied, but only because of a procedural snafu. The patient Judge denied the motion without prejudice, and invited opposing counsel to refile the motion. No harm, no foul. So why did the attorney instead file an appeal? And is the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion even appealable when it was denied without prejudice?<br /> Listen to Episode 35 for the answers.<br />
April 15, 2024
SLAPP034 – Are Calls to the Police Still Protected Speech?
<p>In Episode 34 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we examine the amendment to Civil Code section 47, which changed calls to the police from being absolutely privileged, to only conditionally privileged. Attorneys who sue for calls to the police, do so at their peril, as opposing counsel learned. And we are happy to report […]</p> <p>The post <a href="https://californiaslapplaw.com/2024/04/slapp034-are-calls-to-the-police-still-protected-speech/">SLAPP034 – Are Calls to the Police Still Protected Speech?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://californiaslapplaw.com">California SLAPP Law</a>.</p>
September 19, 2022
SLAPP033 – How to Defeat an anti-SLAPP Motion with Inadmissible Evidence
<p>In Episode 33 of the California SLAPP Law Podcast, we revisit the California Supreme Court decision of Sweetwater Union High School District v. Gilbane Building Co. Our client was sued by an attorney, and we had the action dismissed by way of an anti-SLAPP motion. The attorney appealed, and in his briefs, he never mentioned […]</p> <p>The post <a href="https://californiaslapplaw.com/2022/09/slapp033-how-to-defeat-an-anti-slapp-motion-with-inadmissible-evidence/">SLAPP033 – How to Defeat an anti-SLAPP Motion with Inadmissible Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://californiaslapplaw.com">California SLAPP Law</a>.</p>
35 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for California SLAPP Law
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is California SLAPP Law?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 10 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Information about guest appearances is not available.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.