Readings on politics, socialism, and other things from The People's Line. <br/><br/><a href="https://www.peoplesline.org?utm_medium=podcast">www.peoplesline.org</a>
5
Podcast Authority
BetaPoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality10
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement0
Podcast Overview
Readings on politics, socialism, and other things from The People's Line. <br/><br/><a href="https://www.peoplesline.org?utm_medium=podcast">www.peoplesline.org</a>
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
11/24/2021
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
5
Podcast Authority
BetaPoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality10
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement0
5
Excellent Areas
3
Good Performance
11
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Episode Length
8 minutes
Performing excellently!
good
Show Notes Quality
3.0/5
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
poor
Publishing Consistency
Every 333 days
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
+16 More Metrics
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report
See how your show performs across every key metric
Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Secure Sponsorships
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Grow Your Audience
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
1 verified contact email on file for Carl Beijer
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
July 20, 2025
Why read Carl when you can listen to him?
<p>Now that The People’s Line has launched, we’re trying something new: our periodic audio wrap-up.</p><p>We’ve received occasional emails from folks with vision problems who’ve asked for something like this, and we know that a lot of you would rather listen to a podcast or stream a video in the background, so this is what we’ve put together.</p><p>Substack already offers an AI reader for articles, but our reader has been specifically trained by the author him/herself to replicate their voice. These episodes also have much higher production values than Substack’s auto-reader, though it’s going to take some time to increase the polish and get them where we want them. Depending on the response we get we may also start bringing guests on in the future for live conversations.</p><p>In the future this will be a subscriber-only benefit, but for now enjoy this episode completely free! </p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.peoplesline.org/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">www.peoplesline.org/subscribe</a>
August 22, 2024
The limits of political "strategy"
<p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.carlbeijer.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">www.carlbeijer.com/subscribe</a>
December 1, 2021
"Authoritarian" is an analytically useless concept
<p>Guess the term: some scholarly works of history and political theory use it in specific and coherent ways, but almost no one else does. Instead, its primary role in our discourse is to demonize political opponents and shut down debate by vaguely invoking the memory of Nazi Germany and other violent, repressive regimes. In this use, it appeals to a concept that is just too vague and subjective to explain or describe anything; in this use, it never moves the conversation forward or contributes to any kind of substantive analysis. It seems to be favored, in practice, by bomb-throwing demagogues and juvenile college partisans who want to vilify people and ideas without engaging in meaningful criticism.</p><p>If the word that comes to mind here is <em>fascist</em> then you have undoubtedly heard a Republican talk at some point in the past six years; delegitimizing this term has been a major project on the right since at least 2015.</p><p>But curiously, this description is an even better fit for a term it is almost never applied to: <em>authoritarian</em>. As with <em>fascist</em>, there is indeed a relatively obscure literature that defines the term <em>authoritarian</em> in ways that are specific and rigorous enough to be useful. But if <em>fascism</em>-so-defined is an endangered species in our discourse, meaningful use of <em>authoritarian </em>is virtually extinct.</p><p>As we usually encounter it in the discourse, <em>authoritarian </em>is analytically useless. It brings to mind images of Nazis barking orders and Big Brother propagandizing on the big screen, comparisons that understandably trigger a fight-or-flight reflex in decent people; but it gives us no real way to evaluate whether these comparisons are fair or reasonable. Understood literally, any imaginable form of authority — sensible or unreasonable, beneficial or malevolent, legitimate or illegitimate, trivial or expansive — can be related to history’s greatest monsters insofar as both are <em>authoritarian</em>.</p><p>***</p><p>Another point in common with <em>fascism </em>and <em>authoritarian</em>: both suffer less from a lack of definition than from a surplus of definitions. There are almost as many <em>authoritarianisms </em>as there are political traditions, which means that even though they use the same term they are often describing very different and often incompatible ideas. Let’s look at some of them.</p><p>* The Frankfurt School uses <em>authoritarian </em>to describe a certain kind of personality, or rather a kind of psychological complex. Its political and cultural expressions are often quite unpredictable, and even innocuous; interest in astrology, for example, is authoritarian and can be directly related with the rise of early twentieth century fascism. In fact, the Frankfurt School occasionally uses the terms <em>authoritarian </em>and <em>fascist </em>interchangeably, which brings us to a broader tendency.</p><p>* Particularly in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust, a whole genre of writers like Arendt and Orwell set out to explain the horrors of early twentieth century fascism as a problem of a certain kind of authority that has certain kinds of powers. In “What Is Authority?”, for example, Arendt objects to the liberal “confusion of authority with tyranny, and of legitimate power with violence,” but insists that she does not have in mind “‘authority in general,’ but rather a very specific form”.</p><p>* The anarchist tradition, of course, makes “authority in general” its central concern — though even among anarchists the takes are notoriously diverse. Chomsky, for example, insists that there are cases where authority can be justified, and <a target="_blank" href="https://chomsky.info/20130528/">specifically argues</a> that “the state…provides devices to constrain the much more dangerous forces of private power.” Proudhon, meanwhile, writes that “Authority, Government, Power, State, — these words all denote the same thing…there will be no liberty…till in the political catechism the renunciation of authority shall have replaced faith in authority.” (Confessions p.7)</p><p>* In contrast with Chomsky, libertarians and Objectivists argue that private power should not be understood as a kind of authority at all, that capitalism is in fact a direct expression of liberty, and that authoritarianism should be exclusively understood as a problem of state power.</p><p>There is no real through-line in any of these theories of authoritarianism; or if there is, it is utterly trivial, achieving consensus on only the most blatant and obvious problems (once again Nazi Germany comes to mind). So it’s revealing that in conversations about authoritarianism, there is rarely any effort whatsoever to establish a shared intellectual framework, or to even clarify what framework one is operating in. When the Objectivist casually refers to taxes as authoritarian, this is not a real attempt to communicate some underlying analysis that one can accept or reject; it’s no different from when an Objectivist refers to taxes as fascist. Both are much better understood as exercises in guilt-by-association with oppressive regimes.</p><p>Even when it comes from perspectives other than Objectivism, <em>authoritarian </em>usually suffers from the same kind of problem. Disagreements about whether something is authoritarian usually express a conflict between different political perspectives; but instead of talking about those perspectives directly, the speaker just assumes them in the way he uses <em>authoritarian</em> and expects his critics to accept it.</p><p>***</p><p>Within capitalism, the term <em>authoritarian </em>seems to play a special role. Since it vaguely gestures towards some abstract, in-general problem that can afflict both public and private power, it seems in that sense ideologically neutral, existing outside the petty dogmatisms of capitalism and socialism alike. For this same reason, descriptions of the state as authoritarian suggest a false equivalence with the authoritarianism of private power, as if both are the same in consequence and justification. Contemporary debates about Covid vaccination requirements, for example, routinely suggest that a mandate imposed by the state is <em>authoritarian </em>in the same sense as a requirement imposed by private employer.</p><p>And yet at the same time, the libertarian account of <em>authoritarianism </em>is still ideologically dominant. By default, our discourse usually proceeds as if there is really no such thing as private authority; within capitalism everyone associates voluntarily, and can move on to a new job, advance to a new position, or find another business to patronize at their leisure. To the extent that authoritarianism has infected the private sector, this is understood as a problem of state authority insofar as it is acknowledged at all; the dystopian menace of employers demanding vaccinations, for example, only really started to make headlines given the possibility that the government would require them to do so.</p><p>There are always much more rigorous and productive ways to talk about these problems. When we are talking about the private sector, for example, we can get extraordinary insight into the power dynamics at work and the roles of various actors within a system of authority if we specifically talk about capitalism; if you have a problem with employer vaccination requirements, for example, you can talk about how this is really just what happens when workers do not control the means of production and have to bow to the will of some rich capitalist who does. When we are talking about the state, we can talk specifically about whether and how state authority is diverging from democracy’s mandate, or we can talk about whether some “right” to not be vaccinated should outweigh the common good. None of these conversations need to resort to vague rhetoric about <em>authoritarianism</em> — and in fact, when you see that term emerge, it’s often a good sign that these substantive conversations are being avoided in favor of hyperbolic, demonizing attacks on the state.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.carlbeijer.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">www.carlbeijer.com/subscribe</a>
4 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for Carl Beijer
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Carl Beijer?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.