De TRUMP Trials

About De TRUMP Trials

De TRUMP Trials Wat staat je te wachten in deze podcast serie "De TRUMP Trials"? In De TRUMP Trials zal Boudewijn van Eijck, met zijn rijke achtergrond in zowel de advocatuur (bekend o.a. van de MH17-zaak) als in documentaire productie, je meenemen op een reis door de meest aangrijpende en significante juridische en politieke verhalen van onze tijd. Bereid je voor op een serie die niet alleen informeert maar ook intrigeert, geleid door een host wiens levenswerk is gewijd aan het ontrafelen van complexe verhalen. Als sidekick is podcastmaker Rik Bouman van de partij en er zal tevens bij iedere aflevering een Amerika specialist zijn of haar toegevoegde waarde laten blijken. Blijf Luisteren: Abonneer je nu op "De TRUMP Trials" om geen enkele aflevering te missen. Sluit je aan bij Boudewijn van Eijck en de Amerika specialisten terwijl zij de diepten van de Amerikaanse politiek en rechtspraak verkennen, met de verhalen die vorm geven aan onze wereld vandaag de dag.

Publisher

Boudewijn van Eijck en Rik Bouman

Category

history · news · news

Language

nl

Explicit

No

First episode

4 Dec 2022

Latest episode

5 Nov 2026

Latest episodes

93 episodes in the feed.

1. 

   5 Nov 2026

   TRUMP'S PLAYBOOK: Special Episode: I Describe the Midterm Upset and Why Democracy Won

   I report that the principal outcome was a large Democratic victory in the midterm elections, the most significant shift I have observed in my lifetime. We attribute this change chiefly to concerns about affordability, including high gasoline and grocery prices, and to a reversal of Latino support away from Donald Trump. We note that high turnout among minorities and other voters was decisive. I explain that Democrats now control both the House and the Senate with healthy majorities, enabling them to set the legislative agenda and to launch investigative committees. We caution that President Trump retains the power to veto legislation and to issue executive orders, and that overriding a veto requires two-thirds majorities and some Republican defections. I conclude that the coming period will test whether Congress focuses on addressing affordability and passing laws that can withstand vetoes and judicial scrutiny, or whether it pursues politically risky investigations. I describe a watershed moment for American democracy and the rule of law, one that we interpret as the most significant midterm shift many of us have witnessed within our lifetimes. I articulate how prevailing institutional resilience manifested through robust turnout, with minorities mobilizing and electoral mechanisms functioning at a high standard. I analyze the political calculus that precipitated the change, comparing the diminution of one figure's popular standing to historical precedents such as Nixon, and I situate that decline within a broader context of governance missteps and public disaffection. I emphasize affordability as the proximate catalyst of voter behavior — daily experiences at the gasoline pump and at the grocery store crystallized an economic anxiety that Democratic messaging successfully harnessed. I also explicate the reversal among Latino voters, arguing that immigration enforcement practices and perceived cruelty by federal agencies produced a palpable backlash that reconstituted previous electoral alignments. Throughout, I maintain that these elements combined to yield an outcome that, while celebratory for defenders of democratic norms, will now confront the practical realities of translating electoral mandates into durable policy outcomes and legal permanence. Takeaways: I believe this midterm election produced the largest change I have seen, comparable to 1974, which underscores a profound shift in public sentiment. We emphasize that affordability concerns, particularly gas prices, groceries, and healthcare costs, motivated many voters and shaped election outcomes. I note that the Latino electorate shifted away from Trump largely because of aggressive immigration enforcement and the fear it generated. We now control both chambers and therefore can set the legislative agenda, but overcoming presidential vetoes will require bipartisan cooperation. I stress that executive orders remain constrained by courts and constitutional limits, so durable policy will depend on enacted legislation and broad support.

2. 

   1 Nov 2026

   Trump's PLAYBOOK; Episode 29: We Discuss Whether the Diesel Deal Will Shape the Midterms

   We open by stating that the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued General License 135 authorizing the sale, delivery, and importation of Russian diesel into the United States until April 7, 2027, and this raises a grave legal question about whether the executive branch may permit what Congress has prohibited. I examined the document and found it surprisingly brief, comprised of only two short paragraphs and a single signature, with no explicit legal reasoning provided. We explain that the authorization appears politically timed ahead of the midterm elections and that opponents argue it will materially benefit Russia and President Putin. We assess that the license may not withstand judicial scrutiny because the relevant sanctions statute contains strict certification requirements regarding Russian withdrawal, threats to NATO, and Ukrainian sovereignty. We also address the botched execution attempt of Christina Pike, the Eighth Amendment and due process concerns it raises, and our view that these developments are unlikely to substantially change midterm outcomes. We will continue to follow these legal and political issues and address further implications in subsequent episodes. We scrutinize General License 135 and its legal implications with measured urgency. I describe the license as a terse two-paragraph authorization that purports to permit the sale, delivery and importation of Russian diesel into the United States through April 7, 2027. I explain that the Office of Foreign Assets Control implemented the measure under Treasury authority, and I question whether an executive agency may effectively permit conduct that Congress has legislatively restricted. We raise the statutory framework established by the bipartisan sanctions statute associated with Senator Lindsey Graham, and I identify the enumerated conditions that the President must certify to invoke exceptions: Russian withdrawal from occupied territory on terms acceptable to Ukraine, absence of an immediate threat to NATO members, and recognition of Ukraine’s sovereign right to choose its government. I emphasize that the license lacks substantive reasoning and procedural explanation, and I forecast that the measure will face legal challenge because it appears to rely on a national security exception that is difficult to justify given the facts on the ground. We conclude that the authorization reads as a political instrument more than as a legally robust exercise of delegated authority. We pivot to domestic political effects and to the distinct human and constitutional questions raised by recent capital punishment developments. I recount our discussion of the highly publicized botched execution attempt and of Christina Pike’s legal situation, noting that we described the episode as chaotic and potentially constitutionally problematic under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. I explain that we examined procedural failures, medical warnings about vascular access, and the subsequent preservation orders by a Tennessee judge, and we assess the realistic avenues for clemency or moratorium. Concurrently, I address how these matters intersect with electoral politics: I argue that although the administration’s controversial actions and rhetoric on executions and other high-profile orders provoke moral and legal outrage, we do not see conclusive evidence that they will decisively shift national voter behavior ahead of the midterms. We conclude by urging reliance on institutional checks, transparent legal process and measured public scrutiny as the remedies most likely to restore constitutional balance and public confidence. Takeaways: We described that Treasury's OFAC General License 135 authorized importation of Russian diesel until April 7, 2027. I expressed concern that the two paragraph license lacks detailed legal reasoning and may face court challenges. We argued that the diesel price problem arises from disruptions in the Middle East, not from Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries. I warned that allowing Russian diesel imports would materially aid Russian revenues and strategic position. We discussed that the controversial political timing suggests the move is driven by midterm politics and perception management, rather than immediate practical supply solutions. Companies mentioned in this episode: SpaceX Starlink

3. 

   19 Oct 2026

   Trump's PLAYBOOK: Episode 28: Buddying-up and mid-terms

   I believe that economic conditions—above all inflation and rising fuel costs driven in part by the Iran war—will decide the forthcoming midterm elections. I recount my recent return to Pennsylvania and describe local campaign dynamics in Lancaster, where enthusiasm for voting in the midterms is unusually high. We explain the structure of the contests at stake, from all 435 House seats to a third of the Senate and multiple governorships, and why turnout and independent voters matter. I assess that a Democratic pickup of the House is plausible and that winning the Senate is more difficult but not impossible. We also examine the legal battles over voter data and voting rights, which I characterize as lawfare and which have produced injunctions and intense court scrutiny. I conclude that economic grievances will be the dominant driver of voter behavior and that independents are likely to tip several competitive races. I traveled back to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and I report on what I saw and felt during the final weeks before the midterms. I describe the local atmosphere, the autumn rituals, and the rhythms of daily life that frame political feeling. I note that campaigning in Lancaster felt difficult because the local Democratic organization is disordered and the county is a strong Republican stronghold. I also relate small moments of normal life, such as attending high school football games and watching overlapping sports seasons, to show how civic life and leisure coexist as voters prepare to decide. I convey a clear sense of heightened energy around voting that is unusual for midterms. I say that mail‑in and early voting are already active in many places and that turnout will hinge on whether disaffected independents and mobilized Democrats actually cast ballots. I end with a cautious forecast: local impression suggests Democrats can retake the House and possibly contend for the Senate, but success depends on turnout and the broader economic mood. Takeaways: I traveled to Lancaster and I observed low local party organization and limited campaigning this midterm season. We heard that economic issues such as high gasoline prices, rising inflation, and mortgage rates are motivating voters more than other topics. I explained that midterm turnout patterns often favor Democrats and that independents and voter turnout will likely decide control of the House. We described repeated legal battles over alleged noncitizen voter registrations, and I noted that courts have blocked federal access to sensitive state voter data. I argued that the Iran conflict and tariffs have raised fuel and goods prices, which I believe will shape voter decisions in many districts.

Reach and audience

Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.

Spotify

4.6 / 5

21 ratings