Future Ready Lawyer: AI and the Evolution of Legal Practice
Armin Alimardani, Mark Bennett, Alexandra Vost
- 8
- Episodes
- Monthly
- Cadence
- 2025
- First episode
About Future Ready Lawyer: AI and the Evolution of Legal Practice
A commute-length podcast (30–40 minutes) that cuts through the AI noise for the legal community. Each episode blends a swift news roundup—new tools, real-world case studies, and controversies worth unpacking—with a deeper dive on a single theme, from courtroom use of generative AI to law-school curricula, in-house adoption, and day-to-day workflow design. Hosted by voices from academia and legal operations, with regular guest contributors, we focus on clarity, practical takeaways, and critical thinking over hype. Whether you teach law, study it, or practice in firms, courts, or corporate teams, you’ll leave informed, sparked with ideas, and better equipped for where legal work is headed. Hosts: Dr Armin Alimardani, Senior Lecturer in Law and Emerging Technologies, Western Sydney University A/Prof Mark Bennett, Associate Dean of Students, Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka Alexandra Vost, Senior Manager, Legal Optimisation Consulting, MinterEllison
- Publisher
- Armin Alimardani, Mark Bennett, Alexandra Vost
- Category
- education · news
- Language
- en
- Explicit
- No
- First episode
- 24 Oct 2025
- Latest episode
- 4 Sept 2026
Latest episodes
8 episodes in the feed.
4 Sept 2026
Superjustice: Ben Alarie on AI, Abundant Legal Help and the Future of Lawyers
What would justice look like if legal help were abundant rather than scarce? In this episode, Armin Alimardani and Mark Bennett speak with Professor Benjamin Alarie, Osler Chair in Business Law at the University of Toronto and co-author of Superjustice: Law in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Ben presents a provocative vision of AI-enabled justice that could make legal guidance and dispute resolution more accessible, personalised and responsive - not only to legal rights and material outcomes, but also to whether people feel heard and respected. The conversation explores what superjustice would look like, whether machines can exhibit empathy or support the exercise of discretion, why human values must be built into AI systems through “algorithmic constitutionalism”, and what might happen when legal AI becomes difficult for an individual lawyer or judge to confidently override. It also examines the future of lawyers and legal education: the enduring value of critical thinking, multidisciplinarity, intellectual and social maturity, and learning to work with powerful AI tools while retaining human responsibility for the institutions, values and guardrails that shape justice. Guest Benjamin Alarie is Professor of Law and Osler Chair in Business Law at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law. His research lies at the intersection of tax law, artificial intelligence, legal theory and judicial decision-making. He is also CEO and co-founder of Blue J, a University of Toronto spinout founded in 2015 that applies artificial intelligence to tax research. Guest links University of Toronto institutional profile: https://jackmanlaw.utoronto.ca/people/benjamin-alarie (https://jackmanlaw.utoronto.ca/people/benjamin-alarie) SSRN author page: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=384494 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=384494) LinkedIn profile: https://ca.linkedin.com/in/aitaxman (https://ca.linkedin.com/in/aitaxman) Personal website: https://www.benjaminalarie.com/ (https://www.benjaminalarie.com/) The book Superjustice: Law in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, by Samuel I. Becher and Benjamin Alarie: https://superjustice.com/ (https://superjustice.com/) Open-access introduction on SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6552638 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6552638) Published by Oxford University Press on 30 July 2026, Superjustice argues that AI will transform law but will not automatically produce justice. The book examines how legal systems might be redesigned to make justice more abundant, accessible and responsive while protecting human flourishing, procedural legitimacy and institutional accountability. Blue J About Blue J: https://www.bluej.com/about-us (https://www.bluej.com/about-us) Blue J Academic Access Programme: https://www.bluej.com/academic-access (https://www.bluej.com/academic-access) Blue J is an AI-powered tax research platform serving practitioners in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Its Academic Access Programme provides eligible faculty at accredited institutions in those countries with complimentary access for teaching and academic research.
10 Aug 2026
Curiosity, Confidence and Caution: Amy Salyzyn on AI, Legal Ethics and Legal Education
Generative AI is already reshaping legal practice, not only through new tools, but through fake cases, misstated authorities, longer AI-generated submissions, and new pressures on courts, tribunals, regulators, lawyers, and law schools. In this episode, Armin Alimardani and Mark Bennett speak with Associate Professor Amy Salyzyn from the University of Ottawa about how AI is appearing in Canadian legal practice and litigation, what courts and regulators are doing in response, and why cost consequences, personal costs orders, discipline, and professional responsibility are now part of the AI conversation. The discussion also turns to legal education: how to teach AI in law school and professional responsibility courses, why students still need to “do the reps” of reading cases, writing, and legal analysis, and how to avoid cognitive deskilling or “cognitive foreclosure”. Amy closes with a practical mindset for lawyers and students navigating this moment: curiosity, confidence, and caution. Guest Prof. Amy F. Salyzyn is an Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law, Common Law Section. Her work focuses on legal ethics, lawyer regulation, legal technology, AI in the legal profession, and access to justice. She teaches Torts and upper-year seminars in legal ethics and AI and the legal profession, is a regular legal ethics columnist at Slaw.ca (http://Slaw.ca), and co-authors Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics in Canada. (University of Ottawa (https://www.uottawa.ca/faculty-law/common-law/faculty/salyzyn-amy-f)) Guest links University of Ottawa institutional profile: https://www.uottawa.ca/faculty-law/common-law/faculty/salyzyn-amy-f (https://www.uottawa.ca/faculty-law/common-law/faculty/salyzyn-amy-f) SSRN author page: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1956286 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1956286) LinkedIn profile: https://ca.linkedin.com/in/amy-salyzyn-a86264222 (https://ca.linkedin.com/in/amy-salyzyn-a86264222) Slaw.ca (http://Slaw.ca) author page: https://www.slaw.ca/author/salyzyn/ (https://www.slaw.ca/author/salyzyn/) Prof Salyzyn’s related work and references Amy Salyzyn, “AI and Legal Ethics”, in Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3733952 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3733952) Amy Salyzyn and Florian Martin-Bariteau, Legal Ethics in a Digital Context, Canadian Bar Association: https://www.cba.org/getmedia/d68b09a5-d4e6-4393-be6b-7d87e9cd8381/LegalEthicsInaDigitalContext.pdf (https://www.cba.org/getmedia/d68b09a5-d4e6-4393-be6b-7d87e9cd8381/LegalEthicsInaDigitalContext.pdf) Amy Salyzyn, “Deceptive Dynamics of Generative AI: Beyond the ‘First-Year Associate’ Framing”, Slaw.ca (http://Slaw.ca), 28 October 2025: https://www.slaw.ca/2025/10/28/deceptive-dynamics-of-generative-ai-beyond-the-first-year-associate-framing/ (https://www.slaw.ca/2025/10/28/deceptive-dynamics-of-generative-ai-beyond-the-first-year-associate-framing/)
29 Apr 2026
S2|E2: Building AI-Native Law Firms: Insights from Helen Fan
Most lawyers using AI today are typing questions into a chatbot and reading the answer. But what if AI could act more like a team of junior colleagues working alongside you? In this episode of the Future Ready Lawyer podcast, we're joined by Helen Fan, a California lawyer and founder of the Silicon Valley Legal Tech Frontier Community, to discuss her experiments building an AI-powered law firm. Helen set up two AI Agents, Morgan, a senior associate, and Cleo, a junior, and gave them a real legal research task. To her surprise, they divided up the work, debated each other, and even created additional helpers on their own. We explore what this means for supervision, accountability, and trust when AI starts taking action rather than just answering questions. Helen also shares her vision for the AI-native law firm, why smaller firms are leading the way, and her advice for law students. Helen Fan — Personal & Community Helen Fan | LinkedIn — link (https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenfanlegalai) Helen's Legal AI Lab — link (https://helenlab.com/) Helen's Substack — link (https://helenfan1.substack.com/) Silicon Valley Legal Tech Frontier — link (https://svlegaltechfrontier.com/) Helen's Own Writing "Claude for Legal — Webinar Summary" — Helen breaks down how legal professionals can use Claude's Skills feature to build reusable, domain-specific workflows for document review and client communication. — link (https://helenfan1.substack.com/p/claude-for-legal-webinar-summary) "AI-Native Law Firm Workflow at OpenClaw Law LLP" — A behind-the-scenes look at Helen's experimental multi-agent "law firm in a group chat," documenting how Morgan (senior associate) and Cleo (junior associate) agents collaborate on client work. — link (https://www.linkedin.com/posts/helenfanlegalai_openclawlaw-100daysofailaw-activity-7450554854693019650--jjN) "California Lawyer Tests AI-Law Firm Model with First Client" — Helen recounts the real-world test of OpenClaw Law LLP with its first client, including how she configured risk flags and decision rules for the AI agents. — link (https://www.linkedin.com/posts/helenfanlegalai_legaltech-ai-futureoflaw-activity-7433866404145324032-LpMP) OpenClaw & Agentic AI "OpenClaw Surpasses GitHub Records, Raises Security Concerns" — Coverage of OpenClaw hitting #1 on GitHub Trending and the security conversations it sparked in legal tech circles. — link (https://www.linkedin.com/posts/helenfanlegalai_legaltech-ai-futureoflaw-activity-7435032252432125952-Z2qS) Related Viral Legal AI Discussions "Lawyer Uses Claude Skills, Legal World Loses It…" — link (https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2026/03/02/lawyer-uses-claude-skills-legal-world-loses-it/) "I Interviewed the Claude-Native Lawyer Whose Viral Post Broke the…" — link (https://www.lawdroidmanifesto.com/p/i-interviewed-the-claude-native-lawyer)
18 Feb 2026
S2|E1: The Verification-Value Paradox - With Joshua Yuvaraj
There’s been plenty of discussion about how GenAI might boost lawyers’ efficiency. But does it actually help lawyers deliver work faster? In this episode of the Future Ready Lawyer podcast, we’re joined by Dr. Joshua Yuvaraj, Senior Lecturer at Auckland Law School and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Intellectual Property, to discuss his paper, “The Verification Value Paradox: A Normative Critique of GenAI in Legal Practice.” Yuvaraj proposes a simple test: AI’s net value equals the time saved minus the cost of verifying its work. In legal practice, however, using AI to gain efficiency can demand more verification, given lawyers’ strict duties to courts and clients. He explains how GenAI can be unreliable and opaque, creating risks that go well beyond fake citations, including subtle errors about what cases actually say. We compare AI review to supervising junior lawyers, examine what “good enough” might mean in AI x legal work, and explore real-world examples of AI implementation in legal process (including Garfield AI). The conversation also touches on liability and insurance questions, and why legal expertise and AI literacy matter more than ever. Dr. Joshua Yuvaraj, Faculty webpage https://profiles.auckland.ac.nz/joshua-yuvaraj (https://profiles.auckland.ac.nz/joshua-yuvaraj) Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuayuvaraj/ (https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuayuvaraj/) The Verification-Value Paradox https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20109 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20109) 'Lawyers, think hard before you use AI' (Newsroom NZ, 7 Nov 2025): https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/11/07/lawyers-think-hard-before-you-use-ai/ (https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/11/07/lawyers-think-hard-before-you-use-ai/) Other mentions: Deloitte AI incident https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/06/deloitte-to-pay-money-back-to-albanese-government-after-using-ai-in-440000-report (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/06/deloitte-to-pay-money-back-to-albanese-government-after-using-ai-in-440000-report) Garfield Human versus AI experiment https://www.garfield.law/press/garfield-ai-featured-on-channel-4-dispatches-human-vs-ai-experiment (https://www.garfield.law/press/garfield-ai-featured-on-channel-4-dispatches-human-vs-ai-experiment) Professional Legal Training Bell CJ speech PDF (28 Aug 2025): https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Publications/Speeches/2025-speeches/bellcj/BellCJ-20250828.pdf (https://supremecourt.nsw.gov.au/documents/Publications/Speeches/2025-speeches/bellcj/BellCJ-20250828.pdf)
7 Dec 2025
Misuse of Generative AI in Courts - With Vicki McNamara
In this episode of Future Ready Lawyer, hosts Alex, Armin, and Mark, are joined by Vicki McNamara, Senior Research Associate at the UNSW Centre for the Future of the Legal Profession, to discuss the growing global trend of generative AI misuse in litigation. The conversation centers on Vicki’s upcoming research, which identifies over 470 cases across common law jurisdictions where AI has generated "hallucinated" citations or procedurally flawed documents. The panel explores the resulting strain on court resources, the phenomenon of "verification drift" where users become too confident in AI outputs to verify them, and the potential long-term risks of eroding critical legal thinking and creativity among junior lawyers. They conclude by discussing the necessity of better public education and the "average effect" of AI on legal excellence, looking ahead to a future where AI errors may become more subtle than blatant hallucinations. Show Notes & Links Guest & Organizations Vicki McNamara: UNSW Staff Profile (https://www.unsw.edu.au/staff/vicki-mcnamara); LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/vicki-mcnamara/) UNSW Centre for the Future of the Legal Profession: Website (https://www.unsw.edu.au/law-justice/centre-future-legal-profession) GenAI, Fake Law & Fallout Report Website (https://www.unsw.edu.au/news/2025/11/genai-fake-law-and-fallout-report) Cases & Legal Resources Mentioned Mata v. Avianca: The "ChatGPT Lawyer" Case (https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2022cv01461/575368/54/) (The US case regarding fake citations mentioned early in the episode) May v Costaras [2025] NSWCA 178: Case Judgment (https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/19882d91516a00f487b15f20) (The NSW Court of Appeal case mentioned involving Chief Justice Bell) New Zealand Courts - Generative AI Guidelines: Guidelines for Lawyers, Judges, and Non-Lawyers (https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/going-to-court/practice-directions/practice-guidelines/all-benches/guidelines-for-use-of-generative-artificial-intelligence-in-courts-and-tribunals) Fair Work Commission (Australia): Website (https://www.fwc.gov.au/) (Cited for good plain language material) NZ Parliamentary Counsel Office: AI Chatbot Initiative (https://www.pco.govt.nz/about-us/legislative-data-and-technology/Could-a-chatbot-be-developed-to-help-users-of-the-NZ-legislation-website)
19 Nov 2025
Evolution vs Revolution: how is AI changing legal practice and legal education?
This episode of "Future Ready Lawyer: AI and the Evolution of Legal Practice" explores the rapidly shifting landscape of AI in legal education and practice. The conversation covers the impact of generative and agentic AI on legal job roles, the prospect of "AI-first" companies, the productivity paradox of AI tools, the changing nature of graduate legal work, and the enduring need for deep expertise and human judgment in law. We review recent empirical research, legal market hiring trends, sector skepticism about full automation, and the new skills required as legal workflows evolve. Show note sources: Thomson Reuters, 2025 Generative AI in Professional Services Report https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/how-ai-is-transforming-the-legal-profession/ (https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/how-ai-is-transforming-the-legal-profession/) Luis von Ahn (Duolingo), Duolingo "AI-first" company coverage (2025) https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/17/business/duolingo-luis-von-ahn.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/17/business/duolingo-luis-von-ahn.html) Financial Review (AFR), LinkedIn, Law firms take more graduates even as AI does the grunt work https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/law-firms-take-more-graduates-even-as-ai-does-more-grunt-work-20250626-p5malv (https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/law-firms-take-more-graduates-even-as-ai-does-more-grunt-work-20250626-p5malv) Princeton researchers (Knight First Amendment Institute) AI as Normal Technology https://knightcolumbia.org/content/ai-as-normal-technology (https://knightcolumbia.org/content/ai-as-normal-technology) Gary Marcus Generative AI's most prominent skeptic https://www.project-syndicate.org/magazine/generative-ai-fundamentally-unreliable-and-with-no-apparent-solution-by-gary-marcus-2025-06 (https://www.project-syndicate.org/magazine/generative-ai-fundamentally-unreliable-and-with-no-apparent-solution-by-gary-marcus-2025-06) METR: Becker, J., Rush, N., Barnes, B., & Rein, D. Measuring the impact of early-2025 AI on experienced open-source developer productivity https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/ (https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/) Centre for Legal Innovation, Women + AI APAC Summit Women + AI APAC Summit 2025 (panel and conference) https://events.humanitix.com/women-ai-summit-apac-2025 (https://events.humanitix.com/women-ai-summit-apac-2025)
3 Nov 2025
AI in Legal Practice: Navigating Adoption and Challenges
In the second episode of 'Future Ready Lawyer: AI and the Evolution of Legal Practice,' the discussion revolves around the adoption and challenges of generative AI in legal practice. The episode touches on the current state of AI use in legal firms and specific applications of generative AI. Hosts discuss the varied adoption rates, the effectiveness of AI tools, and the impact of AI on legal efficiency. They point out issues related to cost and training that hinder widespread adoption. Show note sources: Damien Charlotin ‘AI Hallucination Cases’ https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/ (https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/) Thomson Reuters ‘2025 Generative AI in Professional Services Report’ https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/reports/2025-generative-ai-in-professional-services-report (https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/reports/2025-generative-ai-in-professional-services-report) Dye & Durham ‘Lawyers face work-life paradox as AI adoption soars across the profession’ https://dyedurham.com.au/lawyers-face-work-life-paradox-as-ai-adoption-soars-across-the-profession/ (https://dyedurham.com.au/lawyers-face-work-life-paradox-as-ai-adoption-soars-across-the-profession/) Clayton Utz ‘Clayton Utz adopts Harvey in next step of AI journey’ https://www.claytonutz.com/about/media-releases/2025/september/media-release-clayton-utz-adopts-harvey-in-next-step-of-ai-journey (https://www.claytonutz.com/about/media-releases/2025/september/media-release-clayton-utz-adopts-harvey-in-next-step-of-ai-journey) Webb, Julian and Paterson, Jeannie Marie, THE EVOLUTION OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE WORK IN AN AGE OF BRILLIANT(?) TECHNOLOGIES: FROM ROBO-LAWYER TO DIGITAL LAW CLERK (April 02, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5371536 (https://ssrn.com/abstract=5371536) or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5371536 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5371536) Open AI ‘How we’re responding to The New York Times’ data demands in order to protect user privacy’ https://openai.com/index/response-to-nyt-data-demands/ (https://openai.com/index/response-to-nyt-data-demands/)
24 Oct 2025
An Introduction
The first episode of 'Future Ready Lawyer: AI and the Evolution of Legal Practice,' sets the stage for a series of in-depth discussions on AI's role in transforming legal processes, education, and professional practice. In this episode, Mark Bennett, Alex Vost, and Armin Alimardani discuss the impact of artificial intelligence on the legal field. They analyse the challenges of AI literacy among lawyers, instances of AI misuse in courtrooms, and the future of legal education and practice. They also explore how AI can enhance efficiency, the role of law firms in training graduates on new technology, and the shifting landscape of legal work.
Contact Future Ready Lawyer: AI and the Evolution of Legal Practice
- Guest appearances
- Books guests
Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.
Host of Future Ready Lawyer: AI and the Evolution of Legal Practice?
Claim your podcast to manage its listing and keep your show details accurate.
Pod Engine is an independent podcast discovery and analytics service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by this podcast. Artwork and show content belong to their owners. Full legal notice.
Explore this show
Podcast research with Pod Engine