Global Polarity

About Global Polarity

Global Polarity podcast covers the global transition to multipolarity and the geoeconomics and geopolitical events, news and diplomacy that transpires. globalpolarity.substack.com (https://globalpolarity.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast)

Publisher

Critical analysis of international relations and the emerging multipolar order

Category

news · news

Language

en

Explicit

No

First episode

13 Jul 2024

Latest episode

17 Apr 2026

Latest episodes

12 episodes in the feed.

1. 

   17 Apr 2026

   BRICS+ and the New West Asian Security Architecture

   American decline is increasingly characterised by military overextension, immense debt, and political instability, with Middle Eastern conflicts like those in Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan acting as catalysts for this decline. The US struggles to maintain its unipolar hegemony against emerging rivals, using waning military dominance to secure interests, often resulting in “forever wars” that exhaust resources, diminish global credibility, and damage the domestic economy. Key Aspects of US Decline in the Middle East: * Military Overreach and Failed Wars: The US has suffered losses or failed to achieve long-term success in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, with ongoing interventions in West Asia (e.g., Syria, Yemen, and Iran) exhausting financial and military resources. * The Iran Conflict and Diminishing Power: Recent confrontations with Iran are seen as a high-risk attempt to assert dominance, with analysts arguing that escalating wars in the region under the Trump administration is accelerating American decline and proving the end of US hegemony and turn to imperium. * Economic Strain: The US faces significant economic challenges, including a national debt surpassing $34 trillion, which restricts its ability to maintain its global military presence (750+ bases). * Geopolitical Shifts: Regional actors and rivals like China and Russia are exploiting US limitations in West Asian, while allies are increasingly drifting from US influence and post WWII world order. * Internal Turmoil: The decline is not just external; deep internal political polarisation, the 2021 Capitol riot, and economic inequality are cited as signs of a “decaying empire”. Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

2. 

   24 Mar 2026

   On Iran and Trump's Taco Tuesday

   Despite Trump’s offer to negotiate a “complete total resolution” of hostilities, for Iran, no-one believes anything the US president says. Bitter experience has led Iran and many other countries, especially those of the Global South, not to place any credence on his diplomacy or negotiation tactics. The original threat, issued on Saturday, warned that the U.S. would “obliterate” Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure if the Strait of Hormuz was not fully reopened to all shipping traffic. Key Details of the “Backdown” * Five-Day Reprieve: Trump instructed the Department of War to postpone all military strikes for a five-day period to allow for ongoing negotiations. * Diplomatic Channels: Trump stated that his envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, had been in talks with a “respected” Iranian leader. However, Iranian officials, including Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, denied that any formal negotiations had occurred, dismissing the claims as “fake news”. * Retaliation Threats: The reversal followed a stark warning from Tehran that it would strike power and desalination plants across the Middle East—specifically those supplying U.S. military bases—if the U.S. targeted Iranian infrastructure. * Economic Impact: Following the announcement of the pause, global oil prices plunged and major U.S. stock indexes saw significant gains as market fears of an immediate escalation eased. While Trump framed the delay as a chance for peace, he maintained a aggressive stance, telling reporters that if talks fail, “we’ll just keep bombing our little hearts out”. “TACO” is a Wall Street acronym standing for “Trump Always Chickens Out,” used to describe Donald Trump’s tendency to threaten strict tariffs or foreign policy actions, only to back down or delay them later. Coined around May 2025, it refers to the “TACO trade”—buying stocks low during the initial threat and selling higher after the reversal. Key Aspects of TACO: * Meaning: Trump Always Chickens Out. * Context: Used in the financial sector regarding trade wars and tariff threats (e.g., against China or Europe) that are subsequently reversed or reduced. * Wall Street Reaction: Investors often use this pattern to predict market rebounds, treating the threats as negotiations rather than permanent policy. * Trump’s Response: Trump has criticized the term as “nasty,” arguing that his actions are not backing down but rather a “negotiation” tactic of starting with high demands. * Origin: The term gained prominence in May 2025 regarding the “Liberation Day” tariffs. The term is often applied to foreign policy situations where threat reversals occur, such as situations concerning Iran or Greenland. Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

3. 

   24 Aug 2025

   Alaska Summit Freezes Expectations

   The recent talks between Russia and the United States in Alaska, followed closely by the U.S.–Ukraine–Europe meeting in Washington, may have concluded, but their impact continues to unfold. Where does the Russia–Ukraine conflict go from here? After the Alaska meeting, what kind of new diplomatic contest will unfold among the U.S., Europe, Russia, and Ukraine? Host Ge Anna joins Josef Mahoney, Professor of Politics and International Relations at East China Normal University; Li Yaqi, Research Assistant, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; George Tzogopoulos, Director of EU-China Programmes and Senior Research Fellow, at European Institute of Nice. CGTN Radio (https://radio.cgtn.com/podcast/news/1/Panel-Alaska-talks-end-new-diplomatic-struggle-begins/571520) Melting Ice and Deep Waters Author(s): Ekrem Korkut and Lara B. Fowler Source: Natural Resources & Environment, FALL 2019, Vol. 34, No. 2, Mining the Land, Mining the Sea (FALL 2019), pp. 27-30 Published by: American Bar Association Arctic is not US' backyard Washington's overreaction shows hegemonic mind-set By Zhang Yao In August of this year, as summer temperatures gradually rose in the Arctic, the geopolitical temperature in the region also seemed to climb. The US conducted four consecutive military exercises in the Arctic in July and August, including the key "Operation Polar Dagger" and "Northern Edge 2025." At the same time, Washington hyped up the so-called "China threat" in the Arctic, particularly when five Chinese research vessels were operating in or near the Arctic around Alaska on scientific missions. The US even dispatched Coast Guard ships and aircraft for surveillance and harassment. In recent years, the US has attached increasing importance to the strategic value of the Arctic. Since the Barack Obama administration released the first National Strategy for the Arctic Region in 2013, various US government departments and military branches have issued their own Arctic strategies. The latest of these is the 2024 Arctic Strategy. A common feature of these documents is the growing emphasis on geopolitics and military deployments, while portraying the presence and activities of China and Russia in the Arctic as "threats" to US interests. The US has been continuously boosting its military deployments in the Arctic and increasing joint exercises with its allies. Alaska, the US' Arctic territory, has become one of its most important military bases, hosting many military facilities. It also has more fifth-generation fighters than anywhere in the world. The US Navy also reactivated its Second Fleet, with the Arctic as one of its main areas of responsibility. This further deepens NATO's confrontation with Russia in the Arctic. The Pentagon's 2024 Arctic Strategy outlines core goals, including strengthening Arctic military capabilities, deploying high-tech sensors and radar to eliminate blind spots, and cooperating with NATO allies to operate over 250 aircraft that could be deployed for Arctic Operations by 2030. The document explicitly designates Russia as a security threat while accusing China of expanding its influence in the Arctic. Since the Donald Trump administration took office, Washington's focus on the Arctic has intensified. The US even floated the idea of making Canada the "51st US state." While such ambitions remain fanciful for now, Canada's defense has long been integrated with the US military. For instance, North American Aerospace Defense Command oversees the airspace of both the US and Canada, and radar stations are deployed across Canada and Greenland. Recently, Denmark signed an agreement with the US that, while maintaining sovereignty over Greenland, effectively allows Washington to expand its defense presence on the island with few restrictions. Not long ago, a US nuclear submarine docked for the first time in history in Reykjavik, the capital of Iceland. The Trump administration's renewed Arctic focus stems partly from economic considerations: The US has long emphasized traditional energy development and its associated benefits. With Europe cutting energy ties with Russia following the Ukraine conflict, it has been forced to import costly US energy, and the Arctic's abundant resources fit neatly into US' energy agenda. Moreover, about 80 percent of US rare earth imports come from China, which Washington views as a strategic vulnerability in its trade rivalry with Beijing. Thus, tapping into the Arctic's rare earth potential has become part of the US' long-term strategic considerations. Strategically, enhancing US military deployments in the Arctic and seeking military superiority there are also important tools for containing Russia. As the US increasingly views the Arctic as an arena of great-power competition and relies ever more heavily on military means to maintain its dominance, the region has gradually become a new hotspot of geopolitical confrontation. This has heightened tensions and raised the risks of conflict. Although the US seems intent on treating the Arctic as its hegemonic preserve, under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other relevant international treaties, China and all other countries are fully entitled to conduct scientific research and other legitimate activities in the Arctic. The US' overreaction to the activities of China and others in the region ultimately reflects a classic hegemonic mindset. The Arctic is not America's private domain. NB: The author Zhang Yao is deputy director of the Academic Committee and senior researcher of Shanghai Center for RimPac Strategic and International Studies. China Military (http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/2025xb/W/A_251464/16404357.html) Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

4. 

   24 Jul 2025

   UNESCO - US versus Paris

   Featured contributor Prof. Josef Mahoney joined CGTN (https://www.linkedin.com/company/cgtn/) Radio to discuss Trump quitting #unesco (https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?keywords=%23unesco&origin=HASH_TAG_FROM_FEED) for a second time. Trump cited UNSECO’s support for “woke, divisive cultural and social causes” and its “globalist, ideological agenda” as key reasons for withdrawal. What are these causes There have been a couple of UNESCO projects that run contrary to Trump’s conservatism, including a "anti-racism toolkit" (2023) and a program challenging gender norms, called "Transforming MEN'talities” (2024). He's also alleged it’s anti-Israel because UNESCO accepted Palestine as a member (2011). Conversely, UNESCO points to the work its done promoting Holocaust remembrance and combating antisemitism, winning praise from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and the World Jewish Congress. Trump's abandoned many commitments. The question here is, why did he wait until now? It's likely he's sequenced this to maximize political impact, especially now given the fact that many Republicans are angry with his about-face on releasing the Epstein list. Is this a retreat from global leadership or an attempt to reshape international norms? While much of Trump’s base has been reified to hate the UN and UNESCO, many Americans simply believe the US is no longer able to pay for international programs, whatever their quality. Further, many Americans also believe the US is morally bankrupt and has no business spreading culture to others. As for norms: Trump might be hostile to the very concept of an international norm. However, he believes he can bully others to follow his lead. In this way he might be trying to establish new norms, even if he’s more of a destructive agent than a constructive one. This is the third time the US has withdrawn from UNESCO, with previous exits in 1984 and 2017. How do they reflect the deeper trends in US foreign policy? Reagan quit in 1984, citing high overhead costs, the need for reform, and anti-American bias, asserting UNESCO favoured the USSR and socialist concepts of statehood. Trump quit in 2017, then also alleging anti-Israel bias and claiming UNESCO was simply out of step with his America-first foreign policy. In fact, US conservatives have long hated the UN, not just UNESCO. McCarthy, Goldwater, Reagan, Trump and many others. They often malign the UN directly but don't have the guts to quit it--the seat on UNSC is too much power to abandon. Instead they target UNESCO or other affiliated organizations as part of their culture war. How might this latest exit affect UNESCO’s operations? Previously, the US was a significant contributor. UNESCO diversified its funding in 2017. Now, the US contribution represents about 8%. Programs the US championed might be scaled back, but others will move forward, including those the US discourages, like establishing global standards for AI ethics. #china (https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?keywords=%23china&origin=HASH_TAG_FROM_FEED) has already become UNESCO's largest financial contributor and by some accounts has actively sought to use the organization to promote its own interests, including the #bri (https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?keywords=%23bri&origin=HASH_TAG_FROM_FEED). World Today (https://radio.cgtn.com/podcast/news/1/Being-Americas-friend-in-2025what-does-it-take-Japan-the-Philippines-seal-deals-with-US/565850) ① What does the launch of island-wide independent customs operations in Hainan Free Trade Port this December mean for China’s opening-up? (00:47)② What was discussed during the video meeting between China’s commerce minister and the EU trade commissioner ahead of the China–EU summit? (13:18)③ Being America’s friend in 2025—what does it take? U.S. President Donald Trump announces trade deals with Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. (24:30)④ Japanese PM Ishiba denies talks of his imminent resignation. (35:03)⑤ Why is the U.S. pulling out of UNESCO again—for the third time? (43:55) Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

5. 

   16 Jun 2025

   Western and Israeli Coercions Diminishing Returns

   Industry experts examine Iran's resilience against Western coercion over four decades, highlighting diplomatic adaptation, economic strategies, and military posture amid regional tensions, revealing the limitations of hegemonic pressure in this interview.

6. 

   10 May 2025

   Global Peace 80 Years After WWII: Continuity or Change?

   Chinese President Xi Jinping has embarked on a state visit to Russia, scheduled between Wednesday and Saturday. This visit coincides with Russia’s Victory Day celebrations on May 9, marking the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945, which brought an end to the Second World War in Europe. This year also marks the 80th anniversary of victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, signifying the complete triumph of the global fight in the World Anti-Fascist War. How will President Xi's visit to Russia further deepen bilateral strategic ties? Why are stable China-Russia relations crucial for regional and global stability? And will the world draw lessons from 80 years ago to preserve peace, or are we heading toward a more turbulent future? For these and more, I speak with Chen Weihua, EU bureau chief of China Daily; Eugen Pavlov, journalist with Sputnik News in Beijing; and Angelo Giuliano, a Swiss-Italian political analyst based in Hong Kong. XU YAWEN (https://substack.com/@xuyawen) Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

7. 

   28 Mar 2025

   EU Fragmentation and Corrupt Political Elites

   EU fragmentation refers to the increasing division and challenges within the European Union, encompassing economic, political, and social disparities, as well as a decline in the single market's effectiveness and a weakening of the EU's influence on the global stage. Here's a more detailed look at the different aspects of EU fragmentation: 1. Economic Fragmentation: * Internal Market Challenges: The single market, once a cornerstone of EU integration, faces hurdles due to diverging national regulations, hindering free movement of goods, services, capital, and people. * Geoeconomic Fragmentation: The EU's high degree of openness to global trade makes it vulnerable to fragmentation as geopolitical tensions disrupt supply chains and trade flows. * Financial Fragmentation: The euro area's financial markets have experienced fragmentation, with a lack of confidence in national debt sustainability and country-specific financial market issues undermining the transmission of monetary policy. * Capital Market Union: The lack of a fully integrated capital market union is hindering the flow of capital across the EU, impacting businesses and investors. * Supply Chain Disruptions: The weaponization of critical supply chains, as seen with Russia's actions regarding energy, highlights the risks of trade fragmentation and its potential impact on inflation and economic resilience. 2. Political Fragmentation: * Weakening of the EU's Role: The EU's influence on the global stage is declining, partly due to internal divisions and a lack of a unified foreign policy. * Rise of Nationalism: The resurgence of nationalist and populist movements within EU member states poses a challenge to the EU's unity and its ability to act collectively. * Increased Polarization: Growing political polarization within the EU and member states makes it harder to reach consensus and implement effective policies. * Fragmentation of the European Parliament: The next European Parliament elections in June are predicted to lead to a more fragmented parliament, which could hinder the ability to form stable coalitions and pass legislation. 3. Social and Cultural Fragmentation: * Migration and Integration: The EU faces challenges in managing migration flows and integrating diverse populations, leading to social tensions and divisions. * Cultural Differences: The EU's diverse cultural landscape can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts, making it harder to build a shared identity. * Disparities in Living Standards: Significant differences in economic development and living standards between EU member states can create social and political tensions. 4. Environmental Fragmentation: * Habitat Fragmentation: Land use changes, urban sprawl, and infrastructure development lead to habitat fragmentation, reducing biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. * Forest Fragmentation: Forest fragmentation, particularly in certain EU member states, can have negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. * Policy Measures: Policy measures to protect certain areas can be effective in preventing fragmentation, particularly in protected areas. Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

8. 

   13 Feb 2025

   How far could U.S. game of tariffs go?

   Some say it’s the art of the deal. Others argue it’s merely extortion and blackmail. As US President Donald Trump wields his tariff stick around the world, how big will it impact the U.S. domestic market and the global economy? What can the rest of the world do in response? How far will the U.S. tariffs go? And what’s the outlook for Trump achieving the vision of revitalizing manufacturing? Host Tu Yun joins Dr. Josef Mahoney, a professor of politics and international relations at East China Normal University, Dr. Qu Qiang, a Fellow of the Belt and Road Research Center, Minzu University of China, and Dr. Christis Tombazos, Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Monash University for a close look at the issue on this episode of Chat Lounge. https://radio.cgtn.com/podcast/news/5/How-far-could-US-game-of-tariffs-go/2714659 (https://radio.cgtn.com/podcast/news/5/How-far-could-US-game-of-tariffs-go/2714659) Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

9. 

   15 Jan 2025

   The Chair Live Episode 9

   DGB365 discusses how the rapid turnover of G7 leaders and global economic turmoil are fueling a perfect storm of US sanctions and tariffs, threatening the world's largest trade partnership between China and ASEAN.

10. 

    19 Dec 2024

    Belt and Road update

    Belt and Road update Episode 8 covers Cambodia's Techo Funan Canal & China's involvement & investment attitude as well as an update on risks to the Belt & Road in West Asia, Red Sea, Mediterranean, Africa & Ukraine. Check out my Multipolar Peace friends on YouTube below. Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

11. 

    15 Jul 2024

    Multipolar Peace Now!

    On The Chair Live - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyq54_T9bRJYe_LcHfIu70A) We are forming a global alliance against globalism, and neutrality studies is part of that. Don't get confused, let's just live with the contradiction. This morning we held a first panel of independent social media contributors, discussing the new multipolarity we are now in, why we think that the collective west is being collectively stupid about it, and what we—and you—can do to oppose the lunacy. The Basics: * Multipolarity is not only an emerging reality, it is also a preferable foundation for global order. * Neutrality is an important tool within the overall mix of how nations view themselves and position themselves in the context of integrated and indivisible security. * NATO is a dangerous organisation and its expansion globally is undesirable and contrary to achieving a sustainable peace. Work in progress. More here: Multipolarpeace.com (https://www.multipolarpeace.com/) Contributors: Dr. Warwick Powell Dr. Pascal Lottaz: Neutrality Studies Jerry Grey: Jerry's Take on China Youtube,    (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_DHAzg3miuwH9NMEUCY0Ow) / @jerrystakeonchina799   (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_DHAzg3miuwH9NMEUCY0Ow) Arnaud Bertrand: Twitter, https://twitter.com/rnaudbertrand?s=2... (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbVZWVHZWQ0EyR0tVb3dQMXNtRlFrRXJRRW1MUXxBQ3Jtc0trSzhrOWhDRHFMWV9PSXZhcW1zWjJHR0paTzNwX0tiaUJfZkNsaFdtZndjYUpEc1QzQl9ockRCRk1zS1p5VHk2cTFJZWR6TFBvQ1VvdkU3ZlZQNm4wVkdzSVlNUUE0ZGs2ajZremw4dTNQZUdfRHFlSQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Frnaudbertrand%3Fs%3D21%26t%3DHa0PfGlCnOB-Qrg9CjHrcg&v=kg8_YXt580c) Dr. Jeff Rich: Burning Archive Youtube,    (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzmI2CEnbKq0yswTpqdQfyg) / @theburningarchive   (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzmI2CEnbKq0yswTpqdQfyg) Substack, Dr. Digby Wren Substack, https://substack.com/@digbywren (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbm01RVVQLXZGQ0t3M3dXSm9LTzRVbkJGbXYwQXxBQ3Jtc0tuanpsVDUxVzI2aF84emtpc0VHVGZTZHBTQktwNndKeWE0VDl6VWJCX0sxSE9ELXlJWDVkZVAyMktCcDBJbVFib0JZajVUS2gwSjUwbERBc09LZmRxV3RCVUJnSC1hcFdvLXZOcGRnd18tenU1S2VtTQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2F%40digbywren&v=kg8_YXt580c) Dr. David Oualaalou: Geopolitical Trends Youtube,    (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAlDvZvtHsjbGJPvqlO8BEg) / @geopoliticaltrends   (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAlDvZvtHsjbGJPvqlO8BEg) S.L. Kanthan Substack, Twitter, https://twitter.com/kanthan2030?s=21&... (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqa193T3gzeXdiOEVmSHRUeUZ3bFdiOFJhUTRSUXxBQ3Jtc0tuMW1tZnFMWV9pYUJOM1hMblloQ05SZDZyb2NuamgxejRyVzZTM0tLOXdWWDdURnBJUEg4TWtBSzM0VmhNM2NITnd3S2wxemRJeW9FNTRnR2xTMnJQblBPRE9udjJjT0RzbEp5SzFkUVRuWThkV1ZzNA&q=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fkanthan2030%3Fs%3D21%26t%3DiiQMumWJaSchlcOqeum8xA&v=kg8_YXt580c) Einar Tangen Linkedin, https://www.linkedin.com/in/ehtangen/... (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbFJ6UnNsZERPMlB4NFZQSDl3cjQwZmJlby1YUXxBQ3Jtc0ttbTktaFRLQ1pVbGNqVndyTXI3eU9LLXBWbFZHVjhHWGNNZFd1QlZKVW1ZekYwSXJBYTdvTmdEMWVNSk5NcURkVlNsdHFGRUVHOFJGOXRZLUFMVkJjanhWeC1jZ2JzazJuQzJGNlNyQ2IxcTlPcXJiUQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fehtangen%2F%3Flocale%3Dzh_CN&v=kg8_YXt580c) Dr. John Pang Twitter, https://twitter.com/jynpang?s=21&t=Oe... (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqa1FHQ0QyeEJaT2x0WXlINUNEcDNYYm1wU1dMUXxBQ3Jtc0ttSHRNOHpqOWszT0FaZ2U2QkplTE5MTUltMkppZ2ZqTW9aZC1Td205cXcxRy0zdnV5cDJQSWdKZDN3Q0N0Z05Nc0puQ0JpSGF4MjBzbEtrRWZuUFVJUGpxSG5Ca1dwMXNMclM3RXAxcXFWRlJFV1Nkdw&q=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fjynpang%3Fs%3D21%26t%3DOeME2_0KAfLV6NADW8DPGg&v=kg8_YXt580c) Global Polarity is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

12. 

    13 Jul 2024

    Panel: Does Asia Pacific welcome NATO’s footprint?

    NATO is boosting its visibility in the Asia Pacific region. For three years in a row, leaders or representatives of four Asia Pacific countries – Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand – have attended the annual summit of the military alliance. The outgoing NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has been an ardent advocator of Asia Pacific outreach, and his argument has been echoed by US officials as Washington, DC hosted this year’s NATO summit.What is behind NATO’s growing interest in Asia Pacific? Will NATO be a force for good if it establishes a sizeable footprint in the region? Host Ding Heng is joined by Digby James Wren, External Relations Advisor to the Royal Academy of Cambodia; Lee Pei May, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the International Islamic University Malaysia; Professor Shen Dingli from the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University. Listen to original here (https://radio.cgtn.com/podcast/news/1/Panel-Does-Asia-Pacific-welcome-NATOs-footprint/494754). Transcript below. Global Polarity is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Global Polarity at globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe (https://globalpolarity.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4)

Podcast Authority Score: 7 / 100

A composite of feed quality, social presence, YouTube performance and engagement. Read the methodology.

Quality

13

Social presence

0

YouTube

0

Engagement

0