Podcast thumbnail for Hello, Uterverse!

Hello, Uterverse!

Claim This Podcast

by Jen & Heidi from The Uterverse

5.0(12 reviews)
6 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas Sponsors

Podcast Overview

🎙️A journal club, but make it audio! Join us each week to unpack, debate, and bring back to the bedside the latest perinatal research. Jen and Heidi break down new studies, revisit crowd favorites, and weave in real-world stories from life on the unit—because evidence matters, but so does the context we practice in. Designed to help perinatal nurses talk about evidence with confidence and influence practice on their units.

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

5/6/2026

1 verified contact email on file for Hello, Uterverse!

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for Ep. 6: Early AROM: Helpful or Harmful?

May 29, 2026

Ep. 6: Early AROM: Helpful or Harmful?

<p>&nbsp;If your unit implement early AROM due to the ACOG practice bulletin, you might wonder "Does early AROM actually help induced labor progress faster—or does&nbsp;it create more problems than it solves?"</p> <p>In this Birth Nurse Hotline episode, Jen and Heidi answer a listener question about <strong>early artificial rupture of membranes (AROM) during induction</strong> and walk through how they think about the research, physiology, and downstream effects of labor interventions.</p> <p>This is not a conversation about spontaneous labor (hands off!!). It’s a nuanced discussion about induction management, efficiency, labor progress, and how nurses apply evidence in real-world bedside care.</p> <p>We unpack what research on early AROM during induction shows, how physiology changes once membranes are ruptured, and why the “right answer” often depends on the bigger clinical picture...not just whether labor speeds up.</p> <p>We explore why intervention effects may not be equal across all patient populations, and what questions research still hasn’t fully answered.&nbsp;Evidence-based practice requires more than simply applying a study conclusion in isolation.</p> <p><span>⏱️ <strong>TIMESTAMPS</strong></span></p> <p><strong>00:00</strong> – Intro + Birth Nurse Hotline question<br><strong>02:00</strong> – Framing the conversation: induction vs physiologic labor<br><strong>04:00</strong> – What research on early AROM actually shows<br><strong>07:00</strong> – Physiology changes after membrane rupture<br><strong>10:00</strong> – Labor efficiency vs downstream effects<br><strong>13:00</strong> – Pitocin, contractions, and intervention cascades<br><strong>16:00</strong> – Applying research in real bedside care<br><strong>18:00</strong> – Population differences and research gaps<br><strong>20:00</strong> – Final thoughts + key takeaways</p> <p></p> <p><span>Articles in the peisode:</span></p> <p><span>Battarbee, A. N., Glover, A. V., &amp; Stamilio, D. M. (2020). Association between early amniotomy in labour induction and severe maternal and neonatal morbidity.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span>Berry, M., Lamiman, K., Slan, M. N., Zhang, X., Arena Goncharov, D. D., Hwang, Y. P., Rogers, J. A., Pacheco, L. D., Saade, G. R., &amp; Saad, A. F. (2024). Early vs delayed amniotomy following transcervical Foley balloon in the induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</span></p> <p><span>First and Second Stage Labor Management: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span>Halouani, A., Masmoudi, Y., Hamdaoui, R., Hammami, A., Triki, A., &amp; Ben Amor, A. (2023). Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span>🧬 <strong>Key Concepts</strong></span></p> <ul> <li>Early AROM in induction</li> <li>Induction management</li> <li>Labor physiology and interventions</li> <li>Applying research at the bedside</li> <li>Pitocin and labor progress</li> <li>Intervention cascades in labor</li> <li>Fetal positioning and membrane rupture</li> <li>Clinical judgment in obstetric nursing</li> <li>Population differences in intervention effects</li> <li>Research gaps and unanswered questions</li> </ul>

Episode thumbnail for Ep. 5 The Surprising Way Nurses Impact Labor Outcomes

May 20, 2026

Ep. 5 The Surprising Way Nurses Impact Labor Outcomes

<p>&nbsp;Can labor nurses actually influence birth outcomes? And if so… how?</p> <p>In this episode, Heidi surprises Jen with a research study about nurse influence on labor outcomes—and the findings are not what either of us expected.</p> <p>Together, we react in real time to what the research says about bedside nursing, labor progress, interventions, and the factors that may shape patient outcomes in labor and delivery.</p> <p>This conversation goes beyond the simplistic idea that “good nurses get better outcomes” and digs into the more complicated reality of systems, staffing, patient variability, physiology, communication, and bedside decision-making.</p> <p>Along the way, we talk about what nurses can influence, what we probably overestimate, and why conversations about outcomes in labor and delivery deserve more nuance than social media usually allows.</p> <p>If you’ve ever wondered how much impact bedside nurses really have—or felt pressure to personally “own” every outcome—this episode is for you.</p> <p><strong>Why This Matters</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Labor nurses spend more continuous time with patients than almost anyone else on the care team.</p> <p>But conversations about nursing influence on outcomes can quickly become oversimplified—either placing unrealistic responsibility on nurses or ignoring the ways bedside care truly matters.</p> <p>👉 Understanding what research actually says about nurse influence helps support more realistic, evidence-based conversations about labor, teamwork, systems, and patient care.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span>⏱️ </span>TIMESTAMPS</strong></p> <p><strong>00:00</strong><span> – Intro + Heidi surprises Jen with the study</span><br><strong>02:00</strong><span> – First reactions to the research</span><br><strong>05:00</strong><span> – What the study actually found</span><br><strong>08:00</strong><span> – Nurse influence vs system influence</span><br><strong>11:00</strong><span> – The emotional weight nurses carry around outcomes</span><br><strong>14:00</strong><span> – What bedside nurses </span>can<span> influence</span></p> <p><span>Study Links:</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><span>T.Tiwari, E. W.VanGompel, J. P.Selig, et al., “Personal Birth Experiences and Clinician Attitudes About&nbsp;</span><span>Cesarean Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study With Female Labor and Delivery Unit Staff,” Birth (2026):&nbsp;</span><span>1–8, </span><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.70062"><span>https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.70062</span></a><span>.</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Edmonds, J. K., Yehezkel, R., Liao, X., &amp; Simpson, K. R. (2017).&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Variation in cesarean birth rates by labor and delivery nurse&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">staffing. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic &amp; Neonatal Nursing, 46</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">(5), 707–716. </span><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009</span></a></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Roberts, K., &amp; Alba, B. (2025). Work Experience and Attitudes&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">About Birth in Relation to Nurses' Cesarean Rates for&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Journal of obstetric,&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">, </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">54</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">(4),&nbsp;</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">450–460. </span><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.04.004"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.04.004</span></a></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span><br style="font-weight: 400;"><br style="font-weight: 400;"></span></p>

Episode thumbnail for Ep 4: Questioning Attitude? Or Questioning WITH Attitude? The Skill Nurses Need More Of

May 13, 2026

Ep 4: Questioning Attitude? Or Questioning WITH Attitude? The Skill Nurses Need More Of

<p>&nbsp;What happens when nurses stop asking questions?</p> <p>In this episode, Jen and Heidi explore the concept of questioning attitude—a term often used in other high-risk industries, but is not well applied&nbsp;in&nbsp;labor and delivery nursing.</p> <p>We talk about why a questioning attitude is not the same thing as negativity, conflict, or “being difficult,” and why curiosity and critical thinking are essential for safe bedside care. From protocols and routines to unit culture and hierarchy, we unpack the subtle ways nurses can be conditioned to stop questioning things that deserve a second look.</p> <p>This conversation is all about building the confidence to stay curious, think critically, and engage more deeply with the “why” behind clinical decisions.</p> <p>Because good nursing is not just about following directions—it’s about understanding what’s happening, recognizing when something doesn’t fit, and being willing to ask questions when it matters.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span>🔥 <strong>Why This Matters</strong></span></p> <p>Healthcare is complex, fast-paced, and highly protocol-driven—but patients do not always fit neatly into algorithms or routines.</p> <p>When nurses lose the ability (or psychological safety) to question what they’re seeing, important concerns can be missed and critical thinking can erode over time.</p> <p>👉 A questioning attitude supports safer care, stronger clinical judgment, and more thoughtful bedside practice.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><span>⏱️ <strong>TIMESTAMPS</strong></span></p> <p><strong>00:00</strong> – Intro + what is “questioning attitude”?<br><strong>02:30</strong> – Why high-risk industries teach questioning culture<br><strong>05:00</strong> – Nursing hierarchy and psychological safety<br><strong>08:00</strong> – The difference between curiosity and conflict<br><strong>11:00</strong> – Protocols, routines, and critical thinking<br><strong>14:00</strong> – Real-world bedside examples<br><strong>16:30</strong> – Final takeaways + staying curious in practice</p>

6 total episodes available

Similar Podcasts

Discover related shows you might enjoy

Deep-dive analytics for Hello, Uterverse!

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is Hello, Uterverse!?

🎙️A journal club, but make it audio!

Join us each week to unpack, debate, and bring back to the bedside the latest perinatal research. Jen and Heidi break down new studies, revisit crowd favorites, and weave in real-world stories from life on the unit—because evidence matters, but so does the context we practice in. Designed to help perinatal nurses talk about evidence with confidence and influence practice on their units.

How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates daily.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.