Journalcast

About Journalcast

A look at new and interesting academic papers, across the fields. This content was generated with the assistance of AI and may contain inaccuracies and incorrect information.

Publisher

Acidalia

Category

education

Language

en

Explicit

No

First episode

12 Sept 2026

Latest episode

13 Sept 2026

Latest episodes

11 episodes in the feed.

1. 

   13 Sept 2026

   Quantum Telescopes: What Must Survive Before Light Becomes Data

   Four connected physics papers examine how quantum memories and shared reference states could change astronomical measurement. We follow phase recovery in diamond spins, a rubidium-memory interferometer using a twenty-kilometre fibre link, the resource requirements for useful distributed measurements, and a proposal to process stored light from a bright star and faint planet. The episode builds the necessary optics and quantum measurement concepts alongside the experiments: interference visibility, empty optical modes, heralding, phase references and information per observing hour. It separates what has been demonstrated from proposed imaging gains, including the difference between fibre length and physical telescope separation. Research discussed: - Stas et al. (2026), Nature: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10171-w (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10171-w) - Wang et al. (2026), Physical Review Letters: https://doi.org/10.1103/qpzn-h7p9 (https://doi.org/10.1103/qpzn-h7p9) - Zhang and Jennewein (2025), Physical Review Research: https://doi.org/10.1103/bf51-tj3j (https://doi.org/10.1103/bf51-tj3j) - Mokeev et al. (2025), theoretical preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09465v3 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09465v3) Script and narration produced with AI assistance. Experimental findings and theoretical predictions are identified separately. Full source and adaptation notes accompany the transcript. Chapters 00:00:00 — A phase measurement in two memories 00:04:52 — What two telescopes need to share 00:10:18 — Empty modes and the measurement you must avoid 00:15:28 — How the diamond experiment moves the phase 00:21:02 — Contrast, false heralds and information per hour 00:26:17 — Rubidium memories and a twenty-kilometre fibre link 00:31:18 — Thermal photons, coincidence windows and delayed arrival 00:36:18 — Entanglement and a common phase reference 00:41:38 — Designing the resource instead of counting Bell pairs 00:46:28 — Storing a spatial state before taking its picture 00:51:31 — Learning a faint source through collective measurements 00:56:44 — What would make this a useful telescope?

2. 

   12 Sept 2026

   Salmon After the Dams: Measuring Recolonization and Reproduction

   Chinook salmon entered and spawned in the reopened Klamath River soon after four dams were removed. What do these early observations establish about population recovery? We examine Goodman and colleagues' 2026 Klamath paper alongside Pess and colleagues' 2024 Elwha study. Imaging sonar, species probabilities and ground surveys explain how researchers measured adult passage and spawning. Brood years, hatchery origin and returning offspring explain what is still needed to establish sustained reproduction. A close reading of the methods, findings and limits of two dam-removal studies, following the evidence from newly accessible habitat to the next generation of salmon. Papers: Goodman et al. (2026), Scientific Reports: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-65437-0 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-65437-0) Pess et al. (2024), Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.121041028 (https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1241028) Chapters: 00:00 Salmon entering the reopened river 03:18 What the sonar could measure 07:11 What the spawning surveys established 09:33 Following offspring back from the ocean 13:31 What the Elwha records revealed 17:20 Measuring the years between spawning and return

3. 

   12 Sept 2026

   What a chain of thought is evidence of

   A decodable answer, a difficulty threshold, an unmarked important step, and an argument about the word "reasoning". Kyle Cox, Darius Kianersi, and Adria Garriga-Alonso, "Post-Hoc Reasoning in Chain of Thought: Decoding and Steering Pre-Committed Answers," arXiv:2603.01437 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01437 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01437) Siddharth Boppana, Annabel Ma, Max Loeffler, Raphael Sarfati, Eric Bigelow, Atticus Geiger, Owen Lewis, and Jack Merullo, "Reasoning Theater: Disentangling Model Beliefs from Chain-of-Thought," arXiv:2603.05488 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05488 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05488) Kevin Du, Alexander Hoyle, Laura Ruis, and Acyr Locatelli, "Legibility is Not Interpretability: Comparing Judged and Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning," arXiv:2609.04194 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04194 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04194) Subbarao Kambhampati, Kaya Stechly, Karthik Valmeekam, Lucas Saldyt, Siddhant Bhambri, and colleagues, "Position: Stop Anthropomorphizing Intermediate Tokens as Reasoning/Thinking Traces!", arXiv:2504.09762 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09762

4. 

   12 Sept 2026

   Biological ageing clocks: what moves them, and what a clock is worth

   Ageing clocks: a randomised cash transfer, a network study, a drug trial read through proteomics, and the one experiment with a hard endpoint. Laurel Raffington, Yayouk E. Willems, Jessica F. Sperber, et al., "Effects of a randomized controlled trial of unconditional cash transfers on epigenetic measures of ageing and cognition in children and mothers," Nature Human Behaviour (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02568-4 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02568-4) Byungkyu Lee, Gabriele Ciciurkaite, Siyun Peng, Colter Mitchell, and Brea L. Perry, "Negative social ties as emerging risk factors for accelerated aging, inflammation, and multimorbidity," PNAS 123(8) (2026). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2515331123 (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2515331123) Alex Zhavoronkov, Fedor Galkin, Shan Chen, Vadim N. Gladyshev, et al., "Integration of proteomic aging clocks in a phase 2a clinical trial supports simultaneous geroprotective assessment," Nature Biotechnology (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03286-y (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03286-y) Yufan Feng, Marine Barthez, Yifei Wang, et al., "Late-life semaglutide treatment slows ageing and extends lifespan in female mice," Nature (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10940-7

5. 

   12 Sept 2026

   The judge that can't repeat itself, and the benchmark that was wrong

   The instruments we measure language models with: repeatability, a blind spot, the reliability a decision requires, and a defective reference standard. Haoyuan Zhu and Jie Zhang, "Clean Engineering, Unstable Measurement: A Preregistered Reliability Failure of Black-Box LLM Observers on Shared Endpoints," arXiv:2609.04198 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04198 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04198) Sebastian Fox, Luke Markham, Ryan Lail, and Michael Karotsieris, "LLM Judges Verify Presence, Not Absence: Omission Blindness in AI Clinical Notes and What Recovers It," arXiv:2608.31016 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31016 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31016) Xing Zhang, Yanwei Cui, Guanghui Wang, Peiyang He, Ziyuan Li, Wei Qiu, and Bing Zhu, "Ratchet: How Reliable Must an LLM Judge Be to Retire a Skill?", arXiv:2605.22148 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22148 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22148) Sihan Hu, Lyuhan Huang, Youjin Deng, and Kun Chen, "SciCode-Verified: How Benchmark Defects Underestimated the Scientific-Coding Ability of Language Models," arXiv:2608.04975 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04975

6. 

   12 Sept 2026

   Your agent's context is an attack surface

   The agent harness as an attack surface: context assembly, the network path, crash recovery, and a defence that holds by construction. Zichuan Li, Jian Cui, Ashley Chen, Xiaojing Liao, and Luyi Xing, "What's in Your Agent's Context? Context Privilege Escalation Attacks against AI Agent Harness," arXiv:2609.01222 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01222 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01222) Hanzhi Liu, Chaofan Shou, Hongbo Wen, Yanju Chen, Ryan Jingyang Fang, and Yu Feng, "Your Agent Is Mine: Measuring Malicious Intermediary Attacks on the LLM Supply Chain," arXiv:2604.08407 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08407 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08407) Guanlong Wu, Dahui Li, Ke Jiang, Jianyu Niu, Cong Wang, and Yinqian Zhang, "Safe to Resume? Breaking Execution Continuity of Agent Execution via Rollback," arXiv:2608.29381 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29381 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29381) Edoardo Debenedetti, Ilia Shumailov, Tianqi Fan, Jamie Hayes, Nicholas Carlini, Daniel Fabian, Christoph Kern, Chongyang Shi, Andreas Terzis, and Florian Tramer, "Defeating Prompt Injections by Design," arXiv:2503.18813 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18813

7. 

   12 Sept 2026

   Attention and inflammation, the serotonin story, and two natural experiments

   Evidence for surprising health claims: a manipulation, a synthesis, and two natural experiments. Nofar Mizrachi, Menachem Rottem, and Liron Rozenkrantz, "Voluntary attention regulates acute immune responses in humans," Nature Human Behaviour (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02541-1 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02541-1) Joanna Moncrieff, Ruth E. Cooper, Tom Stockmann, Simone Amendola, Michael P. Hengartner, and Mark A. Horowitz, "The serotonin theory of depression: a systematic umbrella review of the evidence," Molecular Psychiatry 28, 3243-3256 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01661-0 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01661-0) Fabiana Corsi-Zuelli, Fang Li, Rachel Upthegrove, John A. Todd, Betty Raman, Paul J. Harrison, and Maxime Taquet, "Recombinant shingles vaccination and the risk of cardiovascular events," Nature Medicine (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04606-0 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04606-0) Chen Zhu and Weilong Zhang, "Early-life sugar restriction causally reduces adult cancer incidence and slows biological aging," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2026). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2610287123

8. 

   12 Sept 2026

   Model collapse, and the shrinking diversity of how we write

   What generated text does to models and to people: collapse, curation, and lost diversity. Matthias Gerstgrasser, Rylan Schaeffer, Apratim Dey, Rafael Rafailov, Dhruv Pai, Henry Sleight, John Hughes, Tomasz Korbak, Rajashree Agrawal, Andrey Gromov, Daniel A. Roberts, Diyi Yang, David Donoho, and Sanmi Koyejo, "Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data," arXiv:2404.01413 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01413 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01413) Xuekai Zhu, Daixuan Cheng, Hengli Li, Kaiyan Zhang, Ermo Hua, Xingtai Lv, Ning Ding, Zhouhan Lin, Zilong Zheng, and Bowen Zhou, "How to Synthesize Text Data without Model Collapse?" arXiv:2412.14689 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14689 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14689) Ali Falahati, Mohammad Mohammadi Amiri, Kate Larson, and Lukasz Golab, "Curated Synthetic Data Doesn't Have to Collapse: A Theoretical Study of Generative Retraining with Pluralistic Preferences," arXiv:2605.07724 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07724 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07724) Zhivar Sourati, Farzan Karimi-Malekabadi, Meltem Ozcan, Colin McDaniel, Alireza Ziabari, Jackson Trager, Ala N. Tak, Meng Chen, Fred Morstatter, and Morteza Dehghani, "The Shrinking Landscape of Linguistic Diversity in the Age of Large Language Models," arXiv:2502.11266 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11266

9. 

   12 Sept 2026

   Mind viruses and the interaction tax: what happens when agents talk

   What emerges when language-model agents interact. Summer Eunhyung Ann, Haokun Liu, and Chenhao Tan, "The Interaction Tax: When Communication Erases Diversity in Multi-Agent Teams," arXiv:2608.23541 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23541 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23541) Vassilis Papadopoulos, McNair Shah, Sam Zimmerman, and Jack Lindsey, "Mind Viruses: Self-Propagating Ideas in Multi-Agent LLM Systems," arXiv:2608.10218 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10218 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10218) Zeyuan Li, Lukas Petersson, Alessandro Acquisti, and Michiel A. Bakker, "Emergent Misaligned Communication in Long-Horizon Multi-Agent LLM Commerce," arXiv:2608.14825 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14825 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14825) Subhadeep Pal, Fiona Y. Wang, and Markus J. Buehler, "SwarmWorld: Stigmergic technological evolution in societies of language-model agents," arXiv:2608.26081 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26081

10. 

    12 Sept 2026

    Watermarks, hidden messages, and stolen reasoning traces

    Signals hidden in text: watermarking machine output, hiding messages in cover text, and stealing concealed reasoning. John Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz, Ian Miers, and Tom Goldstein, "A Watermark for Large Language Models," arXiv:2301.10226 (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10226 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10226) Sumanth Dathathri, Abigail See, Sumedh Ghaisas, Po-Sen Huang, Rob McAdam, et al., "Scalable watermarking for identifying large language model outputs," Nature 634, 818-823 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08025-4 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08025-4) Antonio Norelli and Michael Bronstein, "LLMs can hide text in other text of the same length," arXiv:2510.20075 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20075 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20075) Alexander Panfilov, David Schmotz, Ilia Shumailov, Luca Beurer-Kellner, Joachim Schaeffer, Ameya Prabhu, Jonas Geiping, and Maksym Andriushchenko, "Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs," arXiv:2608.09867 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09867

11. 

    12 Sept 2026

    The reasoning you can't see: filler tokens and illegible chains of thought

    What a chain of thought does and does not reveal. Jacob Pfau, William Merrill, and Samuel R. Bowman, "Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Models," arXiv:2404.15758 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15758 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15758) Vatsal Baherwani, Tom Goldstein, and Ashwinee Panda, "Not All LLM Reasoning is Visible in the Chain-of-Thought," arXiv:2607.22925 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22925 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22925) Kaley Brauer, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, and Samuel Marks, "Reading Between the Dots: Decoding Hidden Computation across Filler Tokens," arXiv:2607.03502 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03502 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03502) Arun Jose, "Reasoning Models Sometimes Output Illegible Chains of Thought," arXiv:2510.27338 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27338

Contact Journalcast

Guest appearances

Does not typically book guests

Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.