Judging Judy | the world's top fake courtroom comedy podcast

About Judging Judy | the world's top fake courtroom comedy podcast

Experience America’s favorite least favorite TV judge with the Judging Judy comedy podcast, the only show that turns the tables to decide if Judy Shendlin is innocent — or guilty. Each week, we take a fun look back at an episode from the extensive, 25+ year archives of Judge Judy telecasts. You’ll get a refresher for what was going on in the world when the episode originally aired plus a one-of-a-kind play-by-play of the cases that came before Judy that day in court. More importantly, and more hilariously, you’ll get a critique of Judy herself: her antics, her decisions, her mood and much, much more. For fans of podcasts like Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang, Cinephobe and All Fantasy Everything, Judging Judy is the nostalgic, pop-culture podcast that takes seriously its duty to judge Judy. Comments, questions or complaints? judgingjudypod@gmail.com

Publisher

Judging Judy

Category

comedy · tv & film · tv & film

Language

en

Explicit

No

First episode

7 Sept 2025

Latest episode

25 May 2026

Latest episodes

38 episodes in the feed.

1. 

   25 May 2026

   Judging Judy 38 - Homeward Hound?

   She was looking for a new house in Vegas, so she left her dog with her neighbor. Now, that neighbor says the dog is her’s to keep! Will Judy side with the lady who lost her dog or the neighbor who cared for it free? And will we find Judy innocent or guilty? Because, of course, this is the Judging Judy podcast, the only podcast that turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite Judge. Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy (http://tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy). Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss. This week’s episode comes to us from 2008, when the times were real bad. You remember 2008, right? Or has the therapy worked and you’ve completely blanked it out. Either way, this case is about a lady who needed a few months to find a house. She claims her neighbor agreed to watch her dog and her jewelry, but that when she came back, the neighbor claimed it all as her own. Now she wants her money, and her dog, back. Judy’s going to if she gets it and we’re going to have to decide if Judy did her job or not. Did she really, truly deliver justice? Not just to the plaintiff and to the defendant, but to all of us! Judging Judy is in the spirit of other popular comedy podcasts like the Doughboys and All Fantasy Everything, but it offers a perspective all its own by examining the world through the lens of Judy Shendlin, a cultural icon for over three decades. She’s had the opportunity to judge us, and in the process, she’s made an enormous impact on our society. But we’ve never had the opportunity to judge her in turn — until now.

2. 

   18 May 2026

   Judging Judy 37 - Toe Be or Not Toe Be

   This week, we’ve got two cases: one over an engagement ring after a failed engagement and one about a dog with one missing toe. Judy’s going to have to decide whether the defendant was right to sell the ring in the first case. Then, she’ll have to decide whether the dog owner should get a discount. And, more importantly, we’ll have to decide if Judy is innocent, because this is Judging Judy, the comedy podcast that finally, after all these years, turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite Judge. Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy (http://tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy). Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss. Our first case has a couple whose engagement lasted than six months. When things were over, she gave him a check that covered some of the cost of the ring, but not the ring itself. She says she deserved some of the money herself both because she worked hard to find the ring and she owed her boss a kickback for helping her get it. The plaintiff says that since he can’t get the ring back, he wants to be paid in full. Meanwhile, our second case has an elderly woman complaining the dog that she bought to breed didn’t come as promised because it’s missing a toe. Her claim is that now she won’t able to get more puppies out of it. The breeder says he’s more than happy to pay her back; but only if he gets the dog back. Judy’s going to have to decide who gets paid and who doesn’t. We’re going to have to decide whether Judy delivered justice. If so, she’s innocent. But if not, she’s guilty. Judging Judy is an ideal podcast for fans of Stephen Colbert, the Doughboys, All Fantasy Everything, and Cinephobe. Equal parts witty commentary and biting parody, Judging Judy examines America through the lens of Judy Shendlin, long-time cultural icon. For decades, she’s judged us. Now it’s our turn to judge her. ˜

3. 

   11 May 2026

   Judging Judy 36- So You Think You'd Wear Pants

   Welcome back to 2008, and welcome to Judging Judy! This case comes to us from May 1st, and features cases about stolen phones and wrecked cars. We’ve got a divorced couple fighting it out and two former friends doing battle. We’ve got lots of yelling, care of Judy, too! But, will we have justice?! That’s for us to decide, because this is the comedy podcast that finally turns the tables on America’s favorite, least favorite TV judge. This, of course, is Judging Judy. Enjoying the pod? Consider supporting us by sending a dollar or two our way at tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy (http://tiptopjar.com/judgingjudy). Or don’t. Whatever. I’m not your boss. In our first case, the plaintiff says her ex-husband stole her son’s phone and ran up a big bill. She also says he didn’t pick up their kids from day care, resulting in her getting fined. What does he say? Not much of anything — and it seems to be paying off for him, too! Which side of this broken home will Judy side with? Our second case has a plaintiff who says her car got wrecked by a jealous girlfriend. The defendant says that it wasn’t her fault and that the plaintiff parked there at her own risk. There’s also the matter of the defendant’s boyfriend cheating on her and not wearing pants in the courtroom, but we’ll let Judy sort out that mess! All of this, of course, leads up to the most important part of the show: when we get to Judge Judy. Because Judy shouldn’t be the only one making a ruling! For over 25 years, Judy has cast judgement on us without nary an opportunity for us to do the same. Well, that’s over! Each week, we look at Judy’s words, her actions, her behavior, her rulings and her attitude to decide if she truly delivered justice. If so, she’s innocent. But if not, she’s guilty! A refreshing, unique comedy podcast that re-examines culture and society through the lens of daytime TV, fans of the Doughboys, Comedy Bang Bang, Stephen Colbert, Kazuo Ishiguro and Hot Pockets will fall in love with Judging Judy. Equal parts pop culture commentary and witty take-down, Judging Judy is for fans of the original show and folks who’ve never heard of Judge Judy alike.

Reach and audience

Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.

Apple Podcasts (US)

5.0 / 5

2 ratings

Contact Judging Judy | the world's top fake courtroom comedy podcast

Guest appearances

Does not typically book guests

Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.

Shows with a similar audience

• 

  The People’s Court Podcast

• 

  Betrayal

• 

  Forensic Files

• 

  Dateline NBC