LawPod is a weekly podcast based in the Law School at Queen’s University Belfast. We provide a platform to explore law and legal research in an engaging and scholarly way.

LawPod
Claim This Podcastby Queen's University - School of Law
Podcast Authority
Beta
Podcast Overview
LawPod is a weekly podcast based in the Law School at Queen’s University Belfast. We provide a platform to explore law and legal research in an engaging and scholarly way.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
2/1/2018
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
Podcast Authority
Beta
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
See how your show performs across every key metric
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
1 verified phone number on file for LawPod
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes

July 16, 2026
Number 51
In this deeply moving testimonial, author <strong>Marie Therese Rogers</strong>, whose memoir The Sins of the Mother chronicles her life story, reflects on a childhood shaped by adoption, institutional care, secrecy, and a lifelong search for answers. Born in the early 1950s to an unmarried mother in County Donegal, Marie Therese was separated from her family shortly after birth. After a brief placement with an adoptive family, she was returned to institutional care and spent most of her childhood in <strong>Nazareth House, Belfast</strong>, where she became known not by her name, but by a number: <strong>51</strong>. Marie Therese describes growing up in a world of strict discipline, silence, and emotional deprivation. She recalls the daily routines, the lack of affection, limited education, and the psychological impact of never knowing who she was or where she came from. Her testimony offers a powerful personal insight into the experience of many children raised in religious institutions across Ireland during the twentieth century. As an adult, Marie Therese embarked on a decades-long journey to uncover the truth about her origins. Through persistent requests for records, conversations with former staff, and her own investigative efforts, she gradually pieced together fragments of her family history. Along the way, she discovered unknown siblings, met members of her birth family, and uncovered evidence that challenged what she had previously been told about her adoption. Her story speaks directly to many of the themes explored in our episodes on <strong>Adoptee Rights and Access to Records</strong>, including: <ul><li>The importance of access to birth and adoption records.</li><li>The lifelong impact of institutionalisation and family separation.</li><li>The barriers adoptees often face when seeking information about their origins.</li><li>The emotional consequences of secrecy and withheld records.</li><li>The need for recognition, accountability, and support for those affected by historical adoption practices.</li></ul><br/> Despite repeated setbacks, Marie Therese's determination to uncover her past ultimately led her to write The Sins of the Mother, ensuring that her experiences—and those of many others—would not be forgotten. <h3>Related LawPod Episodes</h3> <ul><li><strong>Adoptee Rights and Access to Records in Northern Ireland</strong><a href="https://lawpod.org/podcast/adoptee-rights-and-access-to-records-in-northern-ireland/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://lawpod.org/podcast/adoptee-rights-and-access-to-records-in-northern-ireland/</a></li><li><strong>Adoptee Rights and Access to Records – Part II</strong><a href="https://lawpod.org/podcast/adoptee-rights-and-access-to-records-part-ii/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://lawpod.org/podcast/adoptee-rights-and-access-to-records-part-ii/</a></li></ul><br/> <h3>Further Reading</h3> <strong>Marie Therese Rogers Moloney, The Sins of the Mother</strong> A memoir detailing Marie Therese's experiences of adoption, institutional care, and her search for identity and belonging. <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sins-Mother-Marie-Therese-Rogers-Moloney/dp/1780730659" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sins-Mother-Marie-Therese-Rogers-Moloney/dp/1780730659</a> <h3>Content Note</h3> This episode contains personal accounts relating to adoption, family separation, institutional care, emotional and physical abuse, and trauma. Some listeners may find the content distressing. Support is available through adoption and counselling services for anyone affected by the themes discussed.

June 25, 2026
Humanitarian Forensics and the Disappeared: Oran Finegan on Dignity, Trust, and Accountability
LawPod host <a href="https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/persons/lauren-dempster/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr Lauren Dempster</a> speaks with Oran Finegan, director of <a href="https://forensicactioninternational.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Forensic Action International</a>, about his 25+ years as a forensic specialist in humanitarian and human rights work across 50+ global contexts with agencies including the United Nations (UN), The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and the The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Finnegan describes beginning in Bosnia in 1998, where documenting mass atrocities underscored both the worst of humanity and the drive to return identities to the dead and support accountability. He emphasises building domestic forensic capacity, culturally and religiously sensitive practice, and trust-building through communication with families and communities, including collaboration with Islamic law scholars on field concerns like autopsy. The discussion covers applications beyond conflict, migration and climate disasters, along with risks, underfunding, and political will. Finegan outlines humanitarian forensics as integrating dignity, system strengthening, and accountability, and shares his current work on planned recovery and analysis at Tuam in Ireland following findings linked to 796 deaths and commingled infant remains.

May 20, 2026
From Copyright Infringement to Superintelligence: The Legal and Philosophical Future of AI
What happens when the law meets a general-purpose cultural machine? In this episode, hosts Matteo Iuorio and Sofia Debernardi sit down with intellectual property expert Professor <a href="https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/persons/giancarlo-frosio/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Giancarlo Frosio</a> to unpack the massive legal battleground surrounding generative AI. We start with the immediate legal technicalities—separating the liability of tech companies training models from the liability of users prompting them—before sliding into the gripping, high-stakes philosophical landscape of what happens to human labor, law, and purpose as we race toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and superintelligence. <h3>Key Takeaways</h3> <ul><li><b>The Two Legal Battlegrounds:</b>Copyright issues with AI are split into two distinct phases: the<b>Training Stage</b>(ingesting data to extract patterns) and the<b>Output Stage</b>(whether an AI-generated result is "substantially similar" to a protected work).</li><li><b>Strict Liability & The Neutral Tool Dilemma:</b>Copyright is a strict liability offense. Professor Frosio shares his perspective that AI labs are placing "neutral, general-purpose tools" on the market. Therefore, legal liability for an infringing output should ideally sit with the user prompting it—provided the developer implemented standard safeguards.</li><li><b>The Geopolitical AI Arms Race:</b>Stricter text and data-mining copyright regulations in regions like Europe can function as a bottleneck for local tech development, inadvertently pushing the dominance of the AI "arms race" exclusively toward the US and China.</li><li><b>The Looming Threat to Purpose:</b>As the operational capabilities of AI shift from narrow tasks to holistic human replication (AGI) and beyond (superintelligence), society faces a massive conundrum: if artificial entities can outperform human intellectual labor completely, what is left for humanity's sense of purpose?</li></ul><br/> <h3>Terminology Glossary</h3> <blockquote><b>LLM (Large Language Model):</b> <i>Note: Mentioned contextually as "LMS" during the interview recording.</i> These are AI programs trained on vast amounts of text data to understand, summarize, generate, and predict new content. <b>Substantial Similarity:</b> A fundamental legal doctrine used by courts to determine if an unauthorized reproduction has taken too much protectable expression from an original copyrighted work. <b>AGI vs. Superintelligence:</b> Narrow AI handles specific single tasks. Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) can holistically apply knowledge to any task like a human. Superintelligence refers to a theoretical future entity whose collective intellect far surpasses the capacity of the human brain.</blockquote> <h3>References & Links to Explore</h3> <ul><li>Learn more about Professor Frosio's work and research at the<a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/research-centres/giptech/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Global Intellectual Property and Technology Centre (GIP Tech)</a>.</li><li>Check out the landmark pending litigation referenced in the episode:<a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Getty-Images-v-Stability-AI.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Getty Images v. Stability AI</a>in the UK.</li><li>Learn about the European Union's framework discussed by reading the official documentation on the<a href="https://artificialintelligenceact.eu" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act)</a>.</li><li>To explore the philosophical warnings mentioned by the "Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton on AGI and systemic alignment risks, check out his<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDE9DjpcSdI" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nobel Prize lectures</a>and r<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUGHMx7iAxk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ecent AI safety advocacy</a>.</li><li>Read up on the historic sci-fi themes referenced at the end of the episode via Isaac Asimov’s classic<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_(novel_series)" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Foundation Series</a>.</li></ul><br/>
251 total episodes available
Recent guests on LawPod
Guests from recent episodes — sign up to see every guest that has ever appeared on this show.
Erin Bijl
Guest
Major Steven van de Put
Guest
James Orr
Guest
Dean Blackwood
Guest
Bonyan Gamal
Guest
Kristine Beckerle
Guest
Professor Luke Moffett
Guest
Philip Armstrong
Guest
Professor Máximo Sozzo
Guest
Dr Shari Eppel
Guest
Professor Jack Anderson
Guest
Mark Lattimer
Guest
Deep-dive analytics for LawPod
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is LawPod?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 9 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Information about guest appearances is not available.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.