Major Pandemic's Bunker Bar Podcast

About Major Pandemic's Bunker Bar Podcast

A blend of entertainment, survival, hunting outdoors and gun reviews. www.majorpandemic.com (https://www.majorpandemic.com?utm_medium=podcast)

Publisher

Major Pandemic - Spread the Pandemic

Category

education · leisure

Language

en

Explicit

Yes

First episode

8 Feb 2024

Latest episode

29 Sept 2026

Latest episodes

111 episodes in the feed.

1. 

   29 Sept 2026

   FRT - Forced Reset Triggers Tested - AS Design, Deez Nuts, and Atrius

   This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com (https://www.majorpandemic.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7) FRT Trigger Testing: Are Forced Reset Triggers Reliable, Practical, or Just a Damn Good Range Toy? Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Major Pandemic’s Bunker Bar Forced reset triggers—better known simply as FRTs—are having a moment. They promise a shooting experience that can produce an incredibly fast cadence while still operating around an individual trigger function for each shot. That sounds great on paper, but I wanted to answer a much more practical question: Are FRTs actually reliable, easy to live with, and worth putting into an AR—or are they mostly an entertaining range toy that requires more patience than most shooters expect? To find out, I tested several different FRT-style systems from Deez Nuts Tactical, AS Designs, and Atreus across multiple AR platforms. And after moving these systems between different rifles, triggers, bolt-carrier groups, buffer configurations and gas systems, I came away with one overwhelmingly clear conclusion: FRTs can be an absolute blast—but they are not necessarily plug-and-play. What Is an FRT Trigger? An FRT, or forced reset trigger, mechanically assists the trigger reset as the firearm cycles. The result is a dramatically faster potential firing cadence than you would normally get from a conventional semi-automatic trigger. That does not automatically mean every rifle equipped with one behaves identically. Far from it. One of the biggest lessons from my testing was that the rifle itself becomes part of the FRT system. Small variations in components, tolerances, gas delivery and cycling characteristics can have a surprisingly large impact on reliability. That means an FRT that runs beautifully in one AR may be troublesome when those same basic components are moved into another. The Three FRT Systems I Tested For this project, I deliberately chose several different approaches. Deez Nuts Tactical FRT The Deez Nuts Tactical system represents what I would consider the more traditional or straightforward FRT approach. The design is relatively simple, and the examples I tested appeared well made. That last part matters. There are a lot of FRT-style components available today, and quality can vary considerably. With a mechanism operating at this speed, I don’t believe questionable parts are the place to save a few dollars. The Deez Nuts system was attractive because it provided a comparatively simple entry into the FRT experience without requiring an elaborate build. And simplicity turned out to be valuable. AS Designs FRT The AS Designs FRT was another system that performed well during my testing. Of the more advanced setups I tried, I generally experienced fewer problems with the AS Designs configuration once the rifle and trigger combination were behaving properly. One reason may simply be that the system narrows the number of variables involved. When you start introducing radically different trigger geometries and highly specialized aftermarket components, you create additional variables that can affect timing and cycling. The AS Designs setup felt comparatively predictable. Atreus FRT The Atreus system was probably the most interesting of the three. From a design standpoint, it offered some of the flexibility I liked most because it potentially opens the door to a broader selection of aftermarket triggers. That includes some of the lighter, performance-oriented trigger options many shooters already prefer. But that flexibility comes with a tradeoff. In my testing, Atreus also proved to be somewhat more sensitive to the particular rifle in which it was installed. I could get the system running extremely well in some rifles while another specific build simply refused to behave the same way. That experience perfectly illustrates one of the most important things anybody considering an FRT should understand. Every AR Is Different AR owners sometimes assume that because two rifles share the same basic pattern, they should behave identically. With FRTs, that assumption can get frustrating very quickly. I tested systems across several different rifles and discovered that a combination that ran beautifully in one firearm did not necessarily produce the same result when transferred into another. In one older, generously gassed AR configuration, virtually everything seemed happy. Other rifles were considerably more particular. That does not necessarily mean there is something wrong with the FRT. It also does not necessarily mean something is wrong with the rifle. It means you are dealing with a system where timing, cycling energy and component tolerances matter more than they do with a conventional semi-automatic trigger. That is probably the single biggest takeaway from this entire experiment. FRT Reliability: How Reliable Were They? This is where things get interesting. Once properly matched to a rifle, several of the FRT configurations I tested were highly reliable. But none of them gave me the same absolute confidence that I would expect from a quality conventional semi-automatic trigger. There is simply more happening mechanically. More interaction between components means more opportunities for tolerances, fouling, ammunition differences or cycling characteristics to affect performance. During testing, I encountered situations where the rifle would experience an issue while using the FRT mode but would immediately return to normal operation when switched back to conventional semi-automatic fire. That tells you something important. The rifle itself may be perfectly functional while the additional timing requirements of the FRT system push it outside its happy operating window. Are FRTs Good for Home Defense? For me, the answer is straightforward: I would not choose an FRT-equipped rifle as my primary defensive rifle. That conclusion is not because I think FRTs are inherently bad. It is because defensive firearms occupy a completely different category. For a defensive rifle, my priorities are boring: Reliability. Predictability. Simplicity. I want something that works every single time under the worst possible circumstances. During my testing, the FRT systems could achieve very high reliability once sorted out, but I still occasionally encountered problems. I therefore would not personally put them in the same reliability category as a proven conventional trigger setup. The transcript testing reached the same bottom line: even when reliability was in the high-90-percent range, occasional issues remained, and the recommendation was not to treat these systems as first-choice defensive equipment. Where FRTs Make Perfect Sense: Range Toys and Clone Builds Now we get to the fun part. Because as a range toy? Absolutely. This is where I think FRTs shine. Put one into an appropriate recreational AR, get the rifle functioning reliably, bring a pile of ammunition and prepare to start laughing. There is something inherently entertaining about the cadence these systems can produce. Bang-gety-bang-gety-bang-gety-bang. It sounds less like somebody methodically shooting an AR and more like somebody turned a sewing machine loose on the firing line. And yes, ammunition disappears accordingly. Very quickly. For a clone build, novelty rifle or dedicated range gun, however, that may be exactly the point. The testing ultimately came down strongly in favor of this role: build a range toy, have fun and enjoy the FRT experience, rather than assuming it needs to serve a serious defensive purpose. The Cheap FRT Range-Gun Argument One thing became increasingly obvious during this project: You do not necessarily need to put an FRT into your most expensive AR. In fact, I would argue there is a pretty compelling reason not to. Rapid strings of fire create heat. Heat creates wear. And lots of rapid shooting burns ammunition at a rate capable of making your credit card whimper. That makes a reasonably priced dedicated range rifle an interesting platform for an FRT. Instead of taking an expensive precision-oriented or carefully balanced rifle and changing its operating characteristics, I would rather start with something I am comfortable treating like a recreational machine. Shoot it. Enjoy it. Maintain it. And if you eventually wear out a component, replace it. When the ammunition bill eventually becomes substantially larger than the cost of the barrel, worrying excessively about barrel life starts becoming somewhat academic. FRTs Are Not Necessarily Drop-In Components If there is one misconception I would eliminate, it is the idea that every FRT is simply: Buy it. Drop it in. Shoot it. Sometimes that may happen. Sometimes it won’t. My testing showed enough variation between rifles that anyone considering an FRT should expect that compatibility and reliability may differ considerably from one firearm to another. This is especially relevant for highly customized AR builds. A beautifully balanced rifle that has been optimized around a particular combination of components may not automatically be the ideal host for an FRT. And personally, I would hesitate before changing an expensive, perfectly functioning rifle simply to accommodate one. FRT Safety Deserves Serious Attention The speed of these systems makes proper function particularly important. During testing, I encountered combinations where the relationship between cycling and trigger behavior did not inspire enough confidence for me to continue using that particular configuration. That is a good reminder that these systems should not be treated casually simply because they are entertaining. Component quality matters. Proper function matters. Testing matters. And if something does not seem mechanically correct, stop. One specific lesson from my testing was that I would be especially conservative about experimenting with platforms where bolt timing and lockup operate differently from a conventional AR-15 system. The transcript itself records that concern after bench testing showed trigger-reset timing occurring before the action appeared fully in battery on one configuration, prompting the decision not to pursue that setup. Which FRT Did I Like Best? There isn’t a single universal winner because the three systems represent somewhat different philosophies. Deez Nuts Tactical impressed me as a straightforward, comparatively inexpensive entry point. AS Designs gave me some of the most consistent experiences among the more sophisticated systems I tested. Atreus offered perhaps the most interesting flexibility, particularly for shooters interested in different aftermarket trigger options, but in my testing it could also demand more patience depending on the host rifle. And that is ultimately the recurring theme: The rifle matters almost as much as the FRT. Are FRT Triggers Worth It? If you’re buying an FRT because you expect it to transform your primary AR into some sort of ultimate fighting rifle, I would temper those expectations. If you’re buying one because you want to build an outrageously fun range rifle that produces a ridiculous firing cadence? Now we’re talking. That is where I think these systems belong. They are mechanically interesting. They’re hilariously entertaining. They can run extremely well. But they also introduce another layer of complexity into a firearm platform that is otherwise remarkably reliable. Final Verdict: Fun? Absolutely. Necessary? Probably Not. After testing multiple FRT systems across several different AR builds, my conclusion is pretty simple. Would I put an FRT in every rifle I own? No. Would I put one in my primary defensive rifle? No. Would I build another dedicated FRT range gun? Abso-freaking-lutely. That is the sweet spot. Forget trying to turn every rifle into something it isn’t. Build yourself a fun gun. Bring ammunition. Bring more ammunition than you think you need. And enjoy the completely ridiculous experience of: Bang gety.Bang gety.Bang gety bang. Welcome to Major Pandemic’s Bunker Bar. SEO TITLE FRT Trigger Review: Forced Reset Trigger Reliability, Testing & Range Performance META DESCRIPTION We tested FRT forced reset trigger systems from Deez Nuts Tactical, AS Designs and Atreus across multiple AR platforms. Here’s what we learned about reliability, compatibility, safety and whether FRT triggers are best suited for range use. SUGGESTED URL SLUG /frt-trigger-review-forced-reset-trigger-testing-reliability PRIMARY SEO KEYWORD FRT trigger review SECONDARY KEYWORDS FRT triggerforced reset triggerFRT reliabilityFRT testingFRT AR-15FRT range gunSuper Safety triggerAS Designs FRTAtreus FRTDeez Nuts Tactical FRTforced reset trigger reviewAR-15 FRT reliability SUGGESTED EXCERPT Are FRT forced reset triggers reliable—or are they mainly spectacular range toys? Major Pandemic tests multiple FRT systems across several AR platforms and finds out where they shine, where they struggle and whether they belong on a defensive rifle. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it. Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

2. 

   6 Sept 2026

   MDT AAC Premier 10/22 Chassis - Simply the Best 10/22 chassis ever

   This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com (https://www.majorpandemic.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7) MDT ACC Premier Gen2 10/22 Chassis: Upgrading a Legend Without question, the Ruger 10/22 is one of my favorite .22s of all time. I have shot the crap out of these rifles over the years, built more of them than I can count, and I keep coming back to the platform for one reason: the 10/22 can become almost anything you want it to be. It can be a cheap backyard plinker, a lightweight field rifle, a suppressor host, a steel-challenge gun, or an absolutely ridiculous precision build. And once you move into that last category, the chassis starts to matter a lot. That brings us to the MDT ACC Premier Gen2 chassis for the Ruger 10/22. This is a chassis I have wanted MDT to build for years, and for PRS-style rimfire, NRL22, NRL22X, bench shooting, or anyone obsessed with squeezing every last bit of accuracy out of a custom 10/22, this is about as serious as it gets. I Have Been Waiting for This One My history with MDT goes way back. Around 2009, I was introduced to MDT and its LSS chassis, a compact billet-aluminum system designed to lock an action solidly into place. The results were impressive, and I became a believer pretty quickly. Since then, MDT has grown into one of the biggest names in precision rifle chassis systems. But for years I kept asking one question: Where is the Ruger 10/22 inlet? The concern was understandable. Would people really spend serious money putting a premium precision chassis around a 10/22? My answer was always yes. Anyone deep into custom 10/22s knows these rifles can go far beyond the factory gun sitting on the rack at a sporting-goods store. Add a premium receiver, match barrel, bolt, trigger, optic and competition hardware, and suddenly you have a rifle capable of some truly stupid levels of accuracy. That kind of build deserves a chassis to match. Fixing the 10/22’s Biggest Weakness The basic 10/22 action was never designed around the idea of becoming a heavy precision competition rifle. One of its limitations is the way the action mounts into the stock. The system relies heavily on a single primary mounting point, and when you’re chasing tiny groups, any movement in the receiver becomes something you want to eliminate. Over the years, manufacturers have attacked that problem with rear tangs, wedges, tension screws and other solutions. MDT took a different approach. The ACC Premier Gen2 uses a yoke-style system at the rear of the receiver to help lock the action solidly into the chassis. That is the part of this design I really like. Instead of just machining a 10/22-shaped hole into an existing chassis and calling it good, MDT actually addressed one of the fundamental weaknesses of the platform. The result is a receiver that feels properly supported and locked in place. Heavy Is the Point This is not a lightweight squirrel rifle chassis. And it isn’t supposed to be. The ACC Premier Gen2 is designed around stability. For bench shooting, barricades, bags, bipods and PRS-style competition, weight is often your friend. A heavier rifle moves less. A rigid chassis flexes less. A properly supported action stays consistent. That doesn’t mean adding weight magically makes a rifle more accurate, but if you already have an extremely accurate barreled action, a stable platform helps you take advantage of what that rifle can do. I had already seen this with MDT’s more affordable Oryx chassis, where some of my best 10/22 groups came from a heavy, rigid setup. The ACC Premier Gen2 takes that concept and adds far more adjustability and competition-oriented refinement. For carrying through the woods all day? Probably not. For bench work, NRL22, NRL22X or a ridiculous custom precision build? Absolutely. Built Around the Shooter The appeal of a premium chassis isn’t simply that it’s a giant piece of aluminum. You’re paying for adjustability, ergonomics, balance and mounting options. Comb height matters. Length of pull matters. Bipod position matters. How the rifle balances on a bag matters. The ACC Premier Gen2 gives you the ability to tune the rifle around the shooter instead of forcing the shooter to adapt to the rifle. Pair it with an ARCA-mounted bipod and you end up with an exceptionally stable platform. M-LOK and other attachment options give you plenty of room to configure the rifle exactly how you want it. That’s the difference between a stock and a true precision chassis. Yes, It Is Expensive We’re talking about roughly an $1,100 chassis. That is a lot of money to wrap around a .22 LR action. But context matters. Once you start talking about premium receivers, match barrels, custom triggers, bolts and quality optics, a high-end 10/22 build can easily climb into several thousand dollars. At that point, spending serious money on the chassis isn’t nearly as crazy as it sounds. The better question is whether the ACC Premier Gen2 earns its place in that build. For me, it does. This feels like lifetime-quality equipment. It is not something I look at and expect to feel outdated in five or ten years. There is a difference between expensive and overpriced. This is expensive. I don’t think it is overpriced. The Rest of the Build Still Matters Obviously, the chassis is only one part of the equation. Start with a good receiver. Add a quality barrel from somebody like Feddersen, Proof Research, KIDD, Volquartsen or another proven rimfire barrel maker. Use a good match bolt. Install a legitimately good trigger. Then lock everything into the ACC Premier Gen2. At that point, you have the foundation for an absolutely ridiculous precision 10/22. And don’t forget the optic. For rimfire work, parallax adjustment is a big deal. I strongly prefer an optic that adjusts down to at least 25 yards, and 10 yards is even better. Then comes ammunition. A great 10/22 can make cheap ammunition look surprisingly good, but when you start feeding it Lapua, SK or other quality match ammo, that’s when the magic really starts. Final Thoughts I’ve wanted MDT to build a serious 10/22 chassis for years. Now they finally have, and they didn’t simply check the box. They addressed the receiver lockup, brought the adjustability and stability of a serious precision chassis to the 10/22 platform, and created something that feels completely at home underneath a high-dollar rimfire build. The MDT ACC Premier Gen2 10/22 chassis is big, heavy, rigid, adjustable and unapologetically built for precision. It isn’t for the guy throwing together a casual plinker. It’s for the shooter who already understands just how far a custom 10/22 can be pushed. For that guy, MDT finally built the chassis I’ve been asking for. And they didn’t just knock it out of the park. They shot the damn ball to the moon. Upgrade a legend. Build the 10/22 you always wanted. Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it.

3. 

   25 Aug 2026

   StellAR Arms - Possibly the Best AR I have Owned

   This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com (https://www.majorpandemic.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7) Stellar Arms: The Rare AR That Actually Surprised Me After more than 20 years around the firearms industry, I have become pretty difficult to impress. That is not necessarily because the products are bad. The problem is that genuine innovation in the AR market is rare. There are an incredible number of very good rifles available today, but much of what gets marketed as “new” is usually another variation of something we have already seen. Different handguard. Different coating. Different furniture. Maybe a new logo carved into the receiver. Warm it over, change a couple things, and call it innovation. So when something genuinely catches my attention, I pay attention. That is exactly what happened with Stellar Arms. Stumbling Into Something Different My introduction to Stellar was almost accidental. I had previously noticed some of their rifles hanging on the wall at 88 Tactical’s massive facility in Nebraska. Later, while wandering around Lincoln, I remembered the name and decided to look them up. That little detour turned into one of the more interesting discoveries I have made in the AR world in a long time. The first thing that struck me was the level of machining. This was not simply another billet receiver set with some aggressive styling carved into it. Stellar was doing things I had rarely seen executed this well on a production-class AR. The handguard indexes into the upper receiver so precisely that visually it can be difficult to see where one component ends and the other begins. Then an additional locking system ties the assembly together into something approaching the rigidity of a monolithic upper. The mating surfaces were nearly perfect. And coming from somebody who has built a ridiculous number of ARs over the years, that got my attention immediately. Aerospace Manufacturing Shows There is a reason these rifles feel different. Stellar’s roots are in aerospace manufacturing. Their previous firearms branding was MASP, operating under the broader aerospace manufacturing operation, and they have been working on these guns for roughly 13 years. That matters. Walk through the manufacturing capability and you begin to understand why the rifles look the way they do. Five-axis machining, advanced machining centers, metal 3D printing and an operation capable of producing extremely complex parts are all part of the equation. This is not a company buying receivers, handguards and controls from half a dozen suppliers and assembling another AR. They manufacture a significant portion of the rifle themselves. Upper receivers. Lower receivers. Handguards. Gas blocks. Muzzle brakes. Selectors. Magazine releases. Magazine catches. End plates. Charging handles. And numerous other components. There are obviously parts sourced from outside manufacturers where it makes sense. Stellar uses B5 furniture, for example, and Elfman Tactical triggers across the lineup. Springs, detents and several smaller components are sourced as well. But even there, the emphasis is clearly on premium components and premium finishes. The result feels less like an assembled rifle and more like a rifle that was engineered as a complete system. Fit and Finish That Shouldn’t Be Remarkable — But Is Anyone who has assembled enough billet ARs knows that “premium” does not automatically mean “everything fits perfectly.” Sometimes it means exactly the opposite. Specialized receivers can introduce tolerance stacking. Upper and lower receivers may need adjustment. Handguards may require some persuasion. Anodizing thickness can change fitment just enough to create problems. With both of the MASP receiver sets I built, none of that happened. Everything went together exactly as it should. That includes an anodized green receiver set where the upper-to-lower fit remained exceptionally tight after finishing. Think about what that means. If two precision-machined components still fit properly after anodizing, the manufacturer accounted for the dimensional change introduced by the coating process. That is the kind of detail you expect from aerospace manufacturing. The receivers even include provisions for a nylon-tipped tensioning screw between the upper and lower. The funny part? You don’t need it. The fit is already that good. The Stellar Lineup Stellar essentially builds three main production tiers, followed by some extremely high-end custom offerings. The Technician is the entry point at roughly $1,866. Calling an almost $1,900 rifle “entry level” tells you immediately where Stellar is positioning itself. Even the Technician uses billet construction and many of Stellar’s in-house components. This is not a stripped-down economy gun intended to get customers through the door. The next step is the Specialist, priced around $2,400. That is the rifle I ended up with. Above it sits the Executive, beginning somewhere in the roughly $3,200-$3,400 range depending on configuration. Then things start getting wild. Stellar also builds custom rifles and packages stretching considerably higher, including configurations approaching the $12,000 level. Clearly, competing with inexpensive ARs isn’t the goal. The goal is building some of the most premium AR-platform rifles available. The Executive Is Essentially Machined Jewelry The Executive is where Stellar’s manufacturing capabilities become almost ridiculous. One of its signature details is an extensive crosshatch machining treatment covering essentially the entire exterior surface of the rifle. Not just a decorative panel. Not just the magazine well. The contours of the rifle receive this incredibly detailed machining treatment. That process can consume roughly an entire day of machine time. Machine time is expensive. But the result is absolutely stunning. I have seen some extraordinary custom rifles over the years. I have been fortunate enough to work on high-dollar firearms projects, including guns auctioned to raise around $100,000 for the Lone Survivor Foundation. I have handled and built some fairly crazy stuff. The Stellar Executive still stopped me. It genuinely looks like jewelry. Calling it the most beautiful production-class custom AR I have personally seen would not be an exaggeration. Building the Specialist Eventually I decided I needed one. During my visit I built a Stellar Specialist under their supervision, which gave me an opportunity to see the rifle from a perspective that simply handling a completed gun cannot provide. Everything went together correctly. No weird surprises. No machining issues. No tolerance problems. No parts that suddenly required fitting despite supposedly being designed for one another. Apparently I did well enough assembling it that the guys suggested I could get a job building rifles. I’ll take the compliment. I even managed to show them one of my own little assembly tricks they hadn’t seen before. Pandemic teaching the aerospace guys something. I’ll take that one too. A Charging Handle That Actually Solves Something One component I particularly liked was Stellar’s Throttle charging handle. Mount an LPVO on an AR and charging-handle access can become annoying quickly. Your fingers end up fighting around the optic while trying to get enough purchase on the handle. Stellar addressed that problem with an extended design specifically intended to provide better access around optics. But the interesting part is the gas management. Their vented version routes excess gas toward the right side, moving it away from the shooter’s face. That is a small detail, but it illustrates the broader theme of the rifle. Somebody actually thought about how the component would be used. It isn’t different just so Stellar can advertise something different. It solves a legitimate problem. Premium Components Where They Matter The Specialist continues that philosophy throughout the rifle. The trigger is from Elfman Tactical. The bolt carrier group is a premium Sand Cutter-style unit. The barrel is a premium 5.56 barrel. The bolt carrier groups receive high-pressure testing and magnetic-particle inspection. The controls are well positioned. There aren’t sharp edges where there shouldn’t be sharp edges. The lower receiver is heavily stylized without becoming uncomfortable or awkward. And there is no forward assist. Stellar’s reasoning is straightforward: on this class of rifle, they don’t believe the forward assist is necessary. I tend to agree. I cannot remember the last time I actually needed one. If a cartridge refuses to chamber, my inclination is not to force it harder into the chamber. Something is wrong, and I would rather remove the round and determine why. The slab-side upper also contributes to the rifle’s clean appearance. One Area I Would Like to See Evolve If there is one area where I think the rifle could move forward, it is the muzzle-device mounting system. Stellar currently uses an ASR-pattern threaded QD brake, although without the traditional ratcheting mechanism. It is beautifully machined and visually fits the rifle extremely well. The issue is simply where the suppressor market seems to be moving. A lot of shooters are shifting toward smaller, lighter mounting standards such as Plan B-style systems and compact options such as YHM’s SRX. Stellar told me they are working on some Plan B-oriented designs, although nothing was officially released at the time. That would make a lot of sense. If they bring the same level of engineering to a more compact suppressor mounting system, I would absolutely like to see it. The Difference Between Expensive and Engineered There are plenty of expensive ARs. Expensive does not automatically mean exceptional. Sometimes you’re paying for a brand name. Sometimes you’re paying for a coating. Sometimes you’re paying for a collection of premium aftermarket components installed on somebody else’s receivers. Stellar feels different. The machining is theirs. The engineering is theirs. The components are increasingly theirs. The tolerances appear intentional rather than accidental. And the entire rifle feels like it was developed over years instead of assembled from whatever happened to be fashionable this season. That 13-year development history becomes obvious once you start handling the guns. Consider Me Interested Being impressed after a quick look is one thing. I have now built with Stellar/MASP components, spent time inside the manufacturing operation and come away with a Specialist of my own. My impression hasn’t changed. If anything, it has gotten stronger. The fit and finish are exceptional. The manufacturing capability is legitimate. The engineering includes several genuinely thoughtful ideas, and the company clearly has no interest in racing competitors toward the bottom of the AR market. They are building premium rifles because they want to build premium rifles. And in an industry where I have become pretty jaded about claims of innovation, Stellar Arms managed to surprise me. That doesn’t happen very often anymore. There will be more time behind the Specialist, more testing, and eventually I want to get the Stellar team onto the show to dig deeper into how they arrived here. For now, though, Stellar Arms has my attention. And after more than two decades of looking at ARs, that may be one of the stronger compliments I can give them. More to come from Major Pandemic’s Bunker Bar. Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Reach and audience

Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.

Apple Podcasts (US)

5.0 / 5

1 ratings

Podcast Authority Score: 34 / 100

A composite of feed quality, social presence, YouTube performance and engagement. Read the methodology.

Quality

69

Social presence

0

YouTube

0

Engagement

0

Contact Major Pandemic's Bunker Bar Podcast

Guest appearances

Books guests

Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.

Questions about Major Pandemic's Bunker Bar Podcast