No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report

About No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report

Known for their regular commentary on Court TV's Closing Arguments, MK True Crime, Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and local news, Josh Kolsrud and Claudia King discuss the true crime cases that have everyone talking. They'll examine cases through the eyes of an attorney (Josh) and a former law enforcement officer and current Domestic Violence Expert (Claudia). Not only does this duo bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in their respective fields, they share a unique bond: they are both victims of traumatic incidents/domestic violence. But don't let their bonds fool you: Josh and Claudia don't hold back in sharing how they feel about each case, and disagreements are more common than a No Contest plea in court.

Publisher

Josh Kolsrud, Claudia King, Holland Reid

Category

education · news · true crime

Language

en

Explicit

Yes

First episode

11 Jan 2026

Latest episode

24 Sept 2026

Latest episodes

16 episodes in the feed.

1. 

   24 Sept 2026

   Lindsay Clancy: The Juror Debate

   The Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial, but the legal battle is far from over. In this episode of No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report, attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King take a close look at the controversy surrounding the lone holdout juror and the motions now being pursued by Clancy’s defense team. Josh and Claudia break down what happened inside the jury room, what we know about the 11–1 split, and the legal significance of a single juror refusing to join the other eleven. They also examine defense attorney Kevin Reddington’s efforts to challenge what happened during deliberations and investigate the holdout juror. Josh explains the legal hurdles involved, what a defense team must establish when raising allegations of juror misconduct, and why courts are generally cautious about interfering with jury deliberations. Claudia and Josh also discuss Reddington’s public approach toward the holdout juror and whether aggressively targeting a juror after a mistrial could have consequences beyond this case. Could the way jurors are treated after controversial verdicts or mistrials make ordinary citizens think twice about serving? Then, they look ahead. Could the case be dismissed? Could Lindsay Clancy face another trial? What happens if the court finds evidence of juror misconduct? And what legal arguments are likely to matter most when the parties return to court? PLUS, in Overtime: Even if Lindsay Clancy is ultimately found not criminally responsible, does that mean she will someday leave psychiatric treatment? Josh and Claudia discuss what continued commitment could look like, what courts consider when determining whether someone remains a danger to themselves or others, and why an insanity verdict does not automatically mean someone simply walks free. No Contest breaks down the law behind the headlines and the questions that remain unanswered in one of the most closely watched criminal cases in the country. Keywords: Lindsay Clancy, Lindsay Clancy trial, Lindsay Clancy mistrial, Lindsay Clancy juror, Lindsay Clancy holdout juror, Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy motions, juror misconduct, hung jury, mistrial, insanity defense, not criminally responsible, postpartum psychosis, Massachusetts criminal law, retrial, double jeopardy, jury deliberations, criminal defense, true crime podcast, legal analysis, Claudia King, Josh Kolsrud, No Contest Podcast Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com

2. 

   30 Aug 2026

   Lindsay Clancy: In Control?

   Attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer Claudia King examine the Lindsay Clancy case as the jury considers whether she should be held criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. Josh and Claudia review the evidence presented by the prosecution and defense, the strongest moments through the trial, and the questions facing jurors after more than 10 hours of deliberations across the first two days. They explain the legal definition of Not Criminally Responsible in Massachusetts and why the state’s standard differs from the insanity defense used in many other jurisdictions. They also discuss Lindsay Clancy’s role in managing her treatment, including the difficult question of personal responsibility when mental illness and medication are central to the defense. The conversation also examines notable juror behavior, including a juror who cried during the prosecution’s closing argument and another who reportedly took no notes throughout the trial. Finally, Josh and Claudia consider how long deliberations could continue and when the possibility of a hung jury and mistrial may become a serious concern. No Contest provides legal analysis and former law enforcement insight into one of the most difficult and closely watched criminal cases in Massachusetts. Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com

3. 

   24 Jul 2026

   Nolan Wells Update & MN vs Hendrix

   Two cases dominating headlines. Two important reminders that criminal investigations and courtroom decisions are often far more complicated than they appear online. In this episode of No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report, former federal prosecutor Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King break down the latest developments in the Shiloh Hendrix case and the investigation into the death of Nolan Wells. First, Claudia and Josh examine why Minnesota prosecutors charged Shiloh Hendrix with disorderly conduct following the viral confrontation at a Rochester playground. Josh explains why the prosecution focused on Hendrix’s conduct as a whole and whether it disturbed the peace, rather than attempting to criminalize one specific racially charged word. They also discuss: • Why Hendrix was not charged with a hate crime and how the First Amendment protects even deeply offensive speech • The difference between protected speech and conduct that may constitute disorderly conduct • Why the jury may have found Hendrix guilty of the count involving the child’s father but not guilty of the count involving the child • What the split verdict may reveal about how jurors evaluated each individual interaction Claudia and Josh then turn to the ongoing investigation into the death of 18-year-old Nolan Wells, whose body was discovered after a Fourth of July trip to Horn Island, Mississippi. They examine the early law enforcement missteps that fueled suspicion and concern, while also discussing why mistakes or poor communication do not automatically prove corruption, a cover-up, or criminal intent. The conversation also covers: • What the two autopsies have revealed and why no final cause or manner of death has been determined • Why toxicology and additional forensic testing could be critical • Questions surrounding the friends who were with Nolan before his disappearance • The danger of forming emotional conclusions before investigators have collected all the evidence • Why retaining an attorney early is a smart protective decision and should never be treated as proof of guilt This episode separates legal analysis from social media speculation and explains why waiting for evidence is not the same as ignoring legitimate questions. Listen now for a thoughtful, fact-based breakdown of the Shiloh Hendrix verdict and the continuing search for answers in the Nolan Wells case. Keywords: Shiloh Hendrix trial, Shiloh Hendrix verdict, Shiloh Hendrix guilty, Minnesota disorderly conduct, Rochester racial slur case, First Amendment law, hate crime charges, protected speech, Nolan Wells case, Nolan Xavier Wells, Nolan Wells autopsy, Nolan Wells toxicology, Horn Island death investigation, Mississippi investigation, Ben Crump, criminal investigation, legal analysis, true crime news, Claudia King, Josh Kolsrud, No Contest Podcast Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com

4. 

   20 Jul 2026

   Karmelo Anthony: Post-Conviction Recap

   A jury has spoken, but the legal battle over the Karmelo Anthony case is far from over. In this episode of No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report, attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King break down Anthony’s murder conviction and 35-year prison sentence for the fatal stabbing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a Texas high school track meet. Josh and Claudia examine one of the trial’s most controversial decisions: keeping cameras out of the courtroom. Would greater public access have helped combat misinformation and allowed people to evaluate the evidence for themselves, or was limiting courtroom coverage necessary to protect the integrity of the proceedings? They also explain what is legally required for a viable self-defense claim, including the importance of reasonable belief, proportional force, provocation, and whether someone can initiate or escalate a confrontation and later justify deadly force as self-defense. Did the evidence support Anthony’s claim that he feared for his life, or did his own words and actions undermine his defense? Editor’s Update: This episode was recorded before Karmelo Anthony formally appealed his conviction. His legal team has filed a notice of appeal, officially beginning the appellate process. Listen for a detailed, evidence-based discussion of the Karmelo Anthony verdict, the Austin Metcalf case, Texas self-defense law, courtroom transparency, criminal appeals, and what may happen next. Keywords: Karmelo Anthony, Karmelo Anthony appeal, Karmelo Anthony conviction, Austin Metcalf, Austin Metcalf murder case, Karmelo Anthony trial, Karmelo Anthony verdict, Karmelo Anthony sentence, self-defense law, Texas self-defense law, murder conviction appeal, notice of appeal, courtroom cameras, criminal trial analysis, legal analysis, true crime podcast, No Contest Podcast, Kolsrud and King Report, Josh Kolsrud, Claudia King Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com

5. 

   9 Jul 2026

   Tyler Robinson: Preliminary Hearing

   Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing: Strategy, Evidence, and What Happens Next The preliminary hearing in the Tyler Robinson case is revealing far more than just the evidence: it is providing a rare look at the strategies both sides are using as this high-profile prosecution moves toward trial. In this episode of No Contest: Kolsrud and King Report, criminal defense attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King break down the biggest developments so far from the preliminary hearing and explain what they mean from a legal perspective. Why did prosecutors choose a preliminary hearing instead of presenting the case to a grand jury? Why was the hearing scheduled for five days when most preliminary hearings conclude in a single day? What is the defense hoping to accomplish through extensive cross-examination? Josh and Claudia also evaluate the investigative work presented in court, discussing where law enforcement excelled, particularly with video tracking, and where evidence collection may leave room for defense challenges. They talk about conspiracy theories and whether the prosecution is subtly quashing them through this hearing, and if they'll do the same during the trial. They also examine whether prosecutors may eventually consider removing the death penalty in exchange for a plea agreement, along with alleged prosecution missteps, including issues surrounding the court's gag order. Whether you've been following every development or are just catching up, this episode provides an experienced legal analysis of one of today's most closely watched criminal cases. In this episode: Why prosecutors chose a preliminary hearing instead of a grand jury Why this hearing lasted five days The defense's strategy during cross-examination Strengths and weaknesses of the investigation Could a plea deal remove the death penalty? Alleged prosecution missteps What happens next in the Tyler Robinson case Subscribe for weekly legal analysis of the nation's biggest criminal cases from criminal defense attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer Claudia King. Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com

6. 

   7 Jul 2026

   Michael Jackson: Controversy Reignited?

   Michael Jackson on Netflix: The Trial, The Documentary, and Why the Jury Said Not Guilty The new Netflix documentary on Michael Jackson has reignited one of the most controversial criminal cases in modern history. But does the documentary tell the whole story? In this episode of No Contest: Kolsrud and King Report, criminal defense attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King break down the documentary, examine the evidence presented at trial, and explain why a jury ultimately found Michael Jackson not guilty on every count. From the prosecution's biggest mistakes to the defense strategy that proved successful, Josh and Claudia separate fact from emotion and discuss how high-profile cases can be shaped by media coverage, public opinion, and courtroom realities. Whether you watched the Netflix documentary or simply want a clearer understanding of one of the most debated celebrity trials in history, this episode provides a balanced legal analysis from two experienced professionals. Topics discussed include: The new Netflix Michael Jackson documentary The criminal allegations against Michael Jackson Why the prosecution struggled The defense strategy that resonated with jurors Key evidence presented during the trial The role of media coverage in high-profile criminal cases Why the jury returned not guilty verdicts Lessons for today's criminal justice system Subscribe for bi-weekly discussions covering today's biggest criminal cases, legal headlines, and courtroom controversies. Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com

7. 

   18 Jun 2026

   Brian Hooker: New Evidence?

   In this episode of No Contest: Kolsrud and King Report, attorney Josh Kolsrud and former police officer and domestic violence expert Claudia King examine the latest developments in the Brian Hooker case and discuss newly reported evidence that could play a critical role in the investigation. The conversation explores an Apple Watch allegedly belonging to the victim and an infrared camera reportedly connected to Brian Hooker, raising important questions about what investigators know and what they may still need to prove. Josh and Claudia break down the legal and investigative challenges facing prosecutors in a case where a body has not been recovered, discussing why determining cause of death, manner of death, and time of death can be crucial in a homicide prosecution. They also examine the role of circumstantial evidence, the realities of building a criminal case without a body, and whether additional evidence could strengthen or weaken the allegations against Hooker. Throughout the discussion, Josh and Claudia emphasize a principle at the heart of the justice system: the victim's family deserves answers and justice, and Brian Hooker deserves a fair process, whether that ultimately leads to exoneration or accountability. Plus, they discuss the growing influence of public opinion, trial-by-media, and how a suspect's actions can shape perceptions long before a jury hears the evidence. If you're following the Brian Hooker investigation, true crime cases, criminal law, missing persons investigations, homicide prosecutions, or high-profile criminal cases making headlines, this is an episode you won't want to miss. Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

8. 

   3 Jun 2026

   Mackenzie Shirilla: Was Justice Served?

   Mackenzie Shirilla: Was Justice Served? The Mackenzie Shirilla case shocked the nation and continues to spark heated debate among true crime followers, legal experts, and victims' advocates alike. In this episode of The No Contest Podcast: Kolsrud, King & Reid Report, attorney Josh Kolsrud, domestic violence expert and former police officer Claudia King, and pop culture analyst Holland Reid take a deep dive into one of the most controversial criminal cases in recent memory. Was justice truly served in the deaths of Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan? Did the defense strategy help shape public perception of Mackenzie Shirilla? What role did family dynamics and parental enabling play before and after the deadly crash? And why did Shirilla's appeal face significant legal hurdles? Our panel examines the prosecution's theory, the defense's courtroom strategy, Mackenzie Shirilla's behavior before and after the crash, the sentence imposed by the court, the controversy surrounding her appeal, and the broader societal questions raised by the case. Most importantly, we explore a question that affects countless victims and families navigating the criminal justice system: If a court outcome doesn't bring peace, how can victims redefine justice and healing for themselves? Topics discussed: • Mackenzie Shirilla trial analysis • Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan case • Defense strategy and criminal trial tactics • Sentencing controversy • Criminal appeals and legal procedure • Parental enabling and accountability • Victim advocacy and trauma recovery • High-profile criminal cases • True crime legal analysis • Justice vs. healing for victims Subscribe for expert legal analysis, true crime discussions, courtroom breakdowns, and conversations that go beyond the headlines. #MackenzieShirilla #TrueCrimePodcast #LegalAnalysis #JusticeServed #CourtroomAnalysis #VictimAdvocacy #CriminalJustice #NoContestPodcast Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

9. 

   18 Apr 2026

   D4VD: Inside the Case

   A 14-year-old girl’s decomposed remains were found bagged in the frunk (front trunk) of a rising star’s abandoned Tesla, and yesterday, that star, D4vd (David Burke), was arrested on suspicion of her murder. In this episode of No Contest, co-host Claudia King, former law enforcement officer and domestic violence expert, sits down with high-profile defense attorney and co-host Josh Kolsrud to break down the explosive new developments in the Celeste Rivas Hernandez case. We examine the significant holes in the prosecution’s circumstantial case, the critical importance of presumption of innocence, the unusual procedural path from grand jury to yesterday’s arrest, and what happens when the DA reviews the case on Monday. Josh and Claudia also discuss potential statements from friends in D4vd’s circle, the family dynamics surrounding Celeste’s multiple runaway reports, and the question of whether her parents could face any legal scrutiny for the circumstances leading up to her disappearance. Was this grooming, trafficking, domestic abuse, or simply an accident covered up in the worst way? From forensic challenges caused by advanced decomposition to coercive control red flags in the relationship, this conversation cuts through the headlines with legal insight, investigative perspective, and a commitment to due process. Timely, unfiltered, and essential listening as this high-profile case moves forward. Drop your thoughts in the comments — what stands out to you most about the evidence so far? #D4vd #CelesteRivas #TrueCrime #NoContestPodcast Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

10. 

    3 Apr 2026

    Courtney Clenney: OnlyFans Abuser or Strong Survivor?

    In this explosive episode of No Contest, hosts Claudia King, Josh Kolsrud, and Holland Reid break down the shocking OnlyFans model Courtney Clenney (aka Courtney Tailor) murder case. Charged with second-degree murder in the April, 2022, stabbing death of her boyfriend, Christian Obumseli, Clenney claims self-defense, but her story raises major red flags. How did a thrown knife allegedly plunge 3 inches deep into Obumseli’s chest from across the room? We dissect her bizarre account, the forensic evidence that challenges it, and the toxic relationship dynamics at play. Was this a clear case of domestic violence with one abuser and one victim, or were both Courtney Clenney and Christian Obumseli caught in a mutually abusive cycle? We also tackle the racial undertones of the case, with Clenney being white and Obumseli black, and whether the defense will steer clear of this dynamic or try to use it in their case. Plus, we explore the darker side of true crime fandom: Why are so many people drawn to writing letters to killers behind bars? And in the age of social media, do we ever really know anyone? With curated highlight reels showing only the best versions of ourselves, how often are people living completely different realities offline? From Miami luxury apartment to courtroom delays (with the trial now pushed to August, 2026), this high-profile case is full of twists, contradictions, and uncomfortable questions about love, violence, and authenticity. If you love deep dives into controversial true crime cases, domestic violence debates, and the psychology of crime and attraction, this is one you don’t want to miss. Tune in to No Contest with Claudia King, Josh Kolsrud, and Holland Reid. Self-defense or something more sinister? Who do you think was the real abuser? Subscribe for more unfiltered true crime discussions, hit the notification bell, and leave a review on your favorite podcast app! Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

11. 

    18 Feb 2026

    Nancy Guthrie: Did the DNA Deliver?

    Nancy Guthrie missing update February 17 2026 – Day 17 of the shocking abduction of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie, mother of TODAY show anchor Savannah Guthrie, from her Tucson, Arizona home. In this urgent No Contest episode, our attorney and former law enforcement officer break down the latest twists in the Nancy Guthrie case. Key revelations: Glove DNA yields NO matches in CODIS national database (and doesn't match unknown home DNA) – what this dead end means for the investigation. FBI secures a federal warrant for a major search near the scene, but reports of friction between FBI and Pima County Sheriff's Office raise questions about coordination in this high-profile kidnapping. Another anonymous Bitcoin ransom demand hits TMZ (the fourth so far) – our experts explain why paying ransom could be dangerous and counterproductive, per FBI protocols. We dive into the real motive: Is it a botched burglary gone wrong, personal grudge, fame-related obsession tied to Savannah Guthrie, or something else? No leading theory yet, but we break down why some options are more likely than others. The Bluetooth "sniffing" tech – FBI deploys advanced signal sniffers (including helicopter-mounted devices) to hunt Nancy Guthrie's pacemaker MAC address for location clues. Why going public with this high-tech tool was likely a misstep that could tip off the suspect and what it could have forced them to do. Plus: The 16 total gloves collected near the home – most discarded by volunteers and searchers, contaminating the scene and complicating forensics...was it sloppiness or was there a deeper meaning? Why limited camera footage in the Catalina Foothills area (no widespread surveillance) is hurting the case, and what investigators are doing next. Attorney insights on warrants, evidence admissibility, motive in prosecutions, and why family clearance shifts focus. Former LEO perspective on suspects inserting themselves into investigations, additional possibilities with the DNA on the glove, and why the Sheriff may have wanted to take a step back once the FBI came in. If you're searching for Nancy Guthrie update, Nancy Guthrie abduction latest, Savannah Guthrie mom kidnapped, Nancy Guthrie glove DNA no match, Nancy Guthrie FBI warrant, Nancy Guthrie bitcoin demand, Nancy Guthrie pacemaker bluetooth sniffer, Nancy Guthrie motive theories, or Nancy Guthrie missing person case analysis – this episode delivers the facts, legal breakdowns, and investigative realities you need. Subscribe for ongoing coverage of this baffling true crime story. Share responsibly – if you have info, contact FBI tips (tips.fbi.gov) or Pima County Sheriff's at 520-351-4900. Help bring Nancy home. #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #SavannahGuthrieMom #NancyGuthrieAbduction #TrueCrimePodcast #KidnappingCase #FBIInvestigation Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

12. 

    12 Feb 2026

    Nancy Guthrie: Gone Forever?

    Nancy Guthrie Missing: Savannah Guthrie's Mom Abducted – Timeline, Masked Intruder Video, Person of Interest Detained & Released, Motive Theories | No Contest Podcast In this gripping episode of No Contest, we break down the shocking disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of TODAY show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie. Nancy Guthrie was abducted from her Tucson, Arizona home on February 1, 2026 – we walk through the full timeline, from her last sighting on January 31 to the chilling Nest doorbell camera footage showing a masked individual with a gun tampering with the camera. We dive deep into the latest developments: a person of interest detained south of Tucson (near Rio Rico) during a traffic stop, his home searched under a sealed warrant, and his release without charges after hours of questioning. Was he truly cleared? We explore Miranda rights, the role of polygraphs in investigations like this, and why authorities haven't charged anyone yet. Is Nancy Guthrie still alive? Her family believes she is and has offered to pay ransom, but with no confirmed contact from kidnappers and her medical vulnerabilities (limited mobility, daily medications, pacemaker), time is critical. We analyze whether this was a professional kidnapping or an amateur operation – the "amateurish" camera tampering, lack of immediate ransom demand, and botched elements raise red flags...but what do those red flags mean? Join us as we discuss the real motivation behind the crime: personal grudge, obsession tied to Savannah Guthrie's fame, botched robbery gone wrong, or something else? If you're searching for Nancy Guthrie update, Savannah Guthrie mom missing, Nancy Guthrie abduction details, masked gunman doorbell cam, person of interest Nancy Guthrie, or theories on why Nancy Guthrie was kidnapped – this episode has the analysis you want from the people you can trust to always deliver their thoughts, no holds barred. Subscribe for more deep dives into law, culture, and breaking true crime stories. Share responsibly and contact the FBI tip line if you have information. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #MissingNancyGuthrie #KidnappingCase #TrueCrimePodcast Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

13. 

    25 Jan 2026

    Brendan Banfield and the ICE Controversy

    VA vs Brendan Banfield: Is the Defense Giving Reasonable Doubt? ICE in MN: Law and Order or Bullies with Weapons?

14. 

    18 Jan 2026

    Charlie Kirk and Free Speech

    Charlie Kirk's assassination set off a firestorm of opinions: some felt he deserved to die because of his beliefs, while others believed he was murdered by a left-wing radical who was afraid of Kirk's growing popularity among young men. In this episode of No Contest, we talk about the overarching concept of free speech. We talk about what it really means legally and socially, and we debate whether Kirk was spreading hate or debating with others to allow conflicting viewpoints to be heard and discussed. We also talk about the possibility of conspiracy charges for people who may have encouraged or helped Tyler Robinson along the way. Don't be fooled: Our panel often disagrees and argues passionately, and this episode is no different. Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

15. 

    12 Jan 2026

    Ohio Dentist Murders and Minnesota ICE Shooting: Part TWO

    Welcome to No Contest, the podcast that deep dives into notable true crime cases and provides analysis and commentary from legal and social perspectives. Part Two is here! Josh, Claudia, and Holland will talk about the recent ICE shooting of Renee Good, discussing the legalities of Good's actions before the shooting, ICE's duties in general, and whether or not Good's wife might face charges as part of this deadly incident. In Part One, Josh, Claudia, and Holland break down the arrest of Michael David McKee for the murders of Ohio dentist Spencer Tepe and his wife, Monique. The three discuss possible motives for the crime, potential defenses for McKee, and how domestic violence might have played a role in the crime. Please note: All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

16. 

    11 Jan 2026

    Ohio Dentist Murders and MN ICE Shooting: PART ONE

    Welcome to No Contest, the podcast that deep dives into notable true crime cases and provides analysis and commentary from legal and social perspectives. In the premiere episode, Josh, Claudia, and Holland break down the arrest of Michael David McKee for the murders of Ohio dentist Spencer Tepe and his wife, Monique. The three discuss possible motives for the crime, potential defenses for McKee, and how domestic violence might have played a role in the crime. In Part Two of the episode (dropping soon!), Josh, Claudia, and Holland will talk about the recent ICE shooting of Renee Good, discussing the legalities of Good's actions before the shooting, ICE's duties in general, and whether or not Good's wife might face charges as part of this deadly incident. Please note: All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Josh, Claudia, and Holland can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases they covered on the past Friday's show or other cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts. Your No Contest Hosts: Claudia King, Domestic Violence and Trauma Recovery Specialist @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com Joshua Kolsrud, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com 480.428.1865 Holland Reid, Pop Culture and Social Media Expert, Photographer, Actress @official_holland_reid Follow No Contest on Instagram @thenocontestpodcast

Contact No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report

Guest appearances

Does not typically book guests

Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.