Known for their regular commentary on Court TV's Closing Arguments, MK True Crime, Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and local news, Josh Kolsrud and Claudia King discuss the true crime cases that have everyone talking. They'll examine cases through the eyes of an attorney (Josh) and a former law enforcement officer and current Domestic Violence Expert (Claudia). Not only does this duo bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in their respective fields, they share a unique bond: they are both victims of traumatic incidents/domestic violence. But don't let their bonds fool you: Josh and Claudia don't hold back in sharing how they feel about each case, and disagreements are more common than a No Contest plea in court.
No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report
Claim This Podcastby Josh Kolsrud, Claudia King, Holland Reid
14 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
Podcast Overview
Known for their regular commentary on Court TV's Closing Arguments, MK True Crime, Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and local news, Josh Kolsrud and Claudia King discuss the true crime cases that have everyone talking. They'll examine cases through the eyes of an attorney (Josh) and a former law enforcement officer and current Domestic Violence Expert (Claudia). Not only does this duo bring a wealth of knowledge and experience in their respective fields, they share a unique bond: they are both victims of traumatic incidents/domestic violence. But don't let their bonds fool you: Josh and Claudia don't hold back in sharing how they feel about each case, and disagreements are more common than a No Contest plea in court.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
1/11/2026
1 verified contact email on file for No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
July 24, 2026
Nolan Wells Update & MN vs Hendrix
<p>Two cases dominating headlines. Two important reminders that criminal investigations and courtroom decisions are often far more complicated than they appear online.</p> <p>In this episode of No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report, former federal prosecutor Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King break down the latest developments in the Shiloh Hendrix case and the investigation into the death of Nolan Wells.</p> <p>First, Claudia and Josh examine why Minnesota prosecutors charged Shiloh Hendrix with disorderly conduct following the viral confrontation at a Rochester playground. Josh explains why the prosecution focused on Hendrix’s conduct as a whole and whether it disturbed the peace, rather than attempting to criminalize one specific racially charged word.</p> <p>They also discuss:</p> <p>• Why Hendrix was not charged with a hate crime and how the First Amendment protects even deeply offensive speech<br> • The difference between protected speech and conduct that may constitute disorderly conduct<br> • Why the jury may have found Hendrix guilty of the count involving the child’s father but not guilty of the count involving the child<br> • What the split verdict may reveal about how jurors evaluated each individual interaction</p> <p>Claudia and Josh then turn to the ongoing investigation into the death of 18-year-old Nolan Wells, whose body was discovered after a Fourth of July trip to Horn Island, Mississippi.</p> <p>They examine the early law enforcement missteps that fueled suspicion and concern, while also discussing why mistakes or poor communication do not automatically prove corruption, a cover-up, or criminal intent.</p> <p>The conversation also covers:</p> <p>• What the two autopsies have revealed and why no final cause or manner of death has been determined<br> • Why toxicology and additional forensic testing could be critical<br> • Questions surrounding the friends who were with Nolan before his disappearance<br> • The danger of forming emotional conclusions before investigators have collected all the evidence<br> • Why retaining an attorney early is a smart protective decision and should never be treated as proof of guilt</p> <p>This episode separates legal analysis from social media speculation and explains why waiting for evidence is not the same as ignoring legitimate questions.</p> <p>Listen now for a thoughtful, fact-based breakdown of the Shiloh Hendrix verdict and the continuing search for answers in the Nolan Wells case.</p> <p>Keywords: Shiloh Hendrix trial, Shiloh Hendrix verdict, Shiloh Hendrix guilty, Minnesota disorderly conduct, Rochester racial slur case, First Amendment law, hate crime charges, protected speech, Nolan Wells case, Nolan Xavier Wells, Nolan Wells autopsy, Nolan Wells toxicology, Horn Island death investigation, Mississippi investigation, Ben Crump, criminal investigation, legal analysis, true crime news, Claudia King, Josh Kolsrud, No Contest Podcast</p> <p><p>Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts.</p><p> </p><p><i><strong>Your No Contest Hosts:</strong></i></p><p><strong>Claudia King,</strong> Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com</p><p><strong>Joshua Kolsrud</strong>, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com</p></p>
July 20, 2026
Karmelo Anthony: Post-Conviction Recap
<p>A jury has spoken, but the legal battle over the Karmelo Anthony case is far from over.</p> <p>In this episode of No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report, attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King break down Anthony’s murder conviction and 35-year prison sentence for the fatal stabbing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf at a Texas high school track meet.</p> <p>Josh and Claudia examine one of the trial’s most controversial decisions: keeping cameras out of the courtroom. Would greater public access have helped combat misinformation and allowed people to evaluate the evidence for themselves, or was limiting courtroom coverage necessary to protect the integrity of the proceedings?</p> <p>They also explain what is legally required for a viable self-defense claim, including the importance of reasonable belief, proportional force, provocation, and whether someone can initiate or escalate a confrontation and later justify deadly force as self-defense. Did the evidence support Anthony’s claim that he feared for his life, or did his own words and actions undermine his defense?</p> <p>Editor’s Update: This episode was recorded before Karmelo Anthony formally appealed his conviction. His legal team has filed a notice of appeal, officially beginning the appellate process.</p> <p>Listen for a detailed, evidence-based discussion of the Karmelo Anthony verdict, the Austin Metcalf case, Texas self-defense law, courtroom transparency, criminal appeals, and what may happen next.</p> <p>Keywords: Karmelo Anthony, Karmelo Anthony appeal, Karmelo Anthony conviction, Austin Metcalf, Austin Metcalf murder case, Karmelo Anthony trial, Karmelo Anthony verdict, Karmelo Anthony sentence, self-defense law, Texas self-defense law, murder conviction appeal, notice of appeal, courtroom cameras, criminal trial analysis, legal analysis, true crime podcast, No Contest Podcast, Kolsrud and King Report, Josh Kolsrud, Claudia King</p> <p><p>Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts.</p><p> </p><p><i><strong>Your No Contest Hosts:</strong></i></p><p><strong>Claudia King,</strong> Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com</p><p><strong>Joshua Kolsrud</strong>, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com</p></p>
July 9, 2026
Tyler Robinson: Preliminary Hearing
<p><strong>Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing: Strategy, Evidence, and What Happens Next</strong></p> <p>The preliminary hearing in the Tyler Robinson case is revealing far more than just the evidence: it is providing a rare look at the strategies both sides are using as this high-profile prosecution moves toward trial.</p> <p>In this episode of <strong>No Contest: Kolsrud and King Report</strong>, criminal defense attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer and legal analyst Claudia King break down the biggest developments so far from the preliminary hearing and explain what they mean from a legal perspective.</p> <p>Why did prosecutors choose a preliminary hearing instead of presenting the case to a grand jury? Why was the hearing scheduled for five days when most preliminary hearings conclude in a single day? What is the defense hoping to accomplish through extensive cross-examination?</p> <p>Josh and Claudia also evaluate the investigative work presented in court, discussing where law enforcement excelled, particularly with video tracking, and where evidence collection may leave room for defense challenges. They talk about conspiracy theories and whether the prosecution is subtly quashing them through this hearing, and if they'll do the same during the trial. They also examine whether prosecutors may eventually consider removing the death penalty in exchange for a plea agreement, along with alleged prosecution missteps, including issues surrounding the court's gag order.</p> <p>Whether you've been following every development or are just catching up, this episode provides an experienced legal analysis of one of today's most closely watched criminal cases.</p> <p><strong>In this episode:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Why prosecutors chose a preliminary hearing instead of a grand jury</li> <li>Why this hearing lasted five days</li> <li>The defense's strategy during cross-examination</li> <li>Strengths and weaknesses of the investigation</li> <li>Could a plea deal remove the death penalty?</li> <li>Alleged prosecution missteps</li> <li>What happens next in the Tyler Robinson case</li> </ul> <p>Subscribe for weekly legal analysis of the nation's biggest criminal cases from criminal defense attorney Josh Kolsrud and former law enforcement officer Claudia King.</p> <p><p>Josh and Claudia can be seen regularly on Court TV, Nancy Grace, and local News programs. No Contest features the true crime cases currently in the public spotlight. No Contest provides legal and social commentary. All opinions are those of the hosts.</p><p> </p><p><i><strong>Your No Contest Hosts:</strong></i></p><p><strong>Claudia King,</strong> Law/Crime TV Analyst, Domestic Violence Expert @realclaudiaking youarestrongenough.com</p><p><strong>Joshua Kolsrud</strong>, Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Attorney @joshua_kolsrud kolsrudlawoffices.com</p></p>
14 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is No Contest: The Kolsrud and King Report?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.