Oakland Report provides reasoned, evidence-based analyses and critiques of the policies, actions, and inactions of our city, county, and state governments. <br/><br/><a href="https://www.oaklandreport.org?utm_medium=podcast">www.oaklandreport.org</a>
Oakland Report Podcast
Claim This Podcastby Oakland Report
10 episodes
Updated Weekly
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
Podcast Overview
Oakland Report provides reasoned, evidence-based analyses and critiques of the policies, actions, and inactions of our city, county, and state governments. <br/><br/><a href="https://www.oaklandreport.org?utm_medium=podcast">www.oaklandreport.org</a>
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
10/6/2024
1 verified contact email on file for Oakland Report Podcast
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
June 13, 2026
'Our babies are drinking lead and we wonder why they’re fighting at First Friday'
<p>Oakland Recap provides summaries of public meeting proceedings that catch our attention. In this installment, we review the comments made by Oakland city council members at yesterday’s special budget meeting. </p><p>Editor’s note</p><p>City Council special budget meeting, <a target="_blank" href="https://oakland.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=1417796&GUID=AE056E70-9CFA-4A82-8769-C0B04B27175F&Options=info|&Search=">June 12, 2026</a>.</p><p>Yesterday the Oakland city council voted to declare a “severe and unanticipated financial event,” ten days after voters rejected Measure E.</p><p>Measure E was a $34-million-per-year parcel tax that was initially conceived and designed by city council members. </p><p>It then dropped off the council’s agenda, and later reappeared as a ‘citizen-sponsored’ initiative — written and funded by the city’s public employee unions — that only required a simple majority vote instead of the two-thirds required by state law for council-sponsored special taxes. </p><p>Oakland voters rejected the tax, with 54% opposed as of the latest tally.</p><p>Yesterday’s city council declaration of an “unanticipated financial event” suspended voter-approved protections on previous voter-approved tax measures in order to divert those promised tax funds to other purposes.</p><p>Read this related article:</p><p>The council also voted to make amendments to mayor Barbara Lee’s proposed budget and advance it to a final council vote for approval by June 30.</p><p>Notably, the budget amendments council approved yesterday included $2.4 million to purchase fire trucks with money from the General Purpose Fund. The Yes on Measure E campaign previously claimed that the Measure E parcel tax was needed to fund the purchase of fire trucks. </p><p>At various times during the Yes on E campaign, firefighters union representatives threatened that fire services would be decreased if the measure did not pass.</p><p>Read this related article:</p><p>Another point of contention among council members was a recommended $250,000 gift to Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) to assist with lead abatement at schools where unsafe levels of lead were found in the drinking water. </p><p>After a series of public comments demanding that the council give more funding to senior centers, council member Kevin Jenkins proposed giving $200,000 of the money to the senior centers instead.</p><p>Also during the meeting, council member Zac Unger made clear that he intends to continue to pursue pay raises for city employees despite the city’s budget challenges, and falsely alluded that Oakland Report claimed that pay raises had already been given. </p><p>Council member Noel Gallo later noted that the city was in the midst of union contract negotiations, “and it’s gonna cost us millions.” </p><p>Read this related article:</p><p>Gallo also reminded the council that the city has around 800 fully funded but vacant positions (valued at an estimated $136 million) with no clear plan to fill them.</p><p>Gallo then stated that, “I just don’t want to make the mistakes that other cities do — they go bankrupt.”</p><p>The video at the top of this article compiles the council members’ remarks that caught our attention. Transcripts of their remarks are provided below.</p><p><p>Don’t miss a beat. Subscribe for free to Oakland Report.</p></p><p>‘Our babies are drinking lead and we wonder why they’re fighting at First Friday.’</p><p>CARROLL FIFE: </p><p>[…]</p><p>I don’t know what is happening with OUSD, but it is unconscionable that our babies are drinking lead and we wonder why they’re fighting at First Friday. </p><p>Right? </p><p>And at the same time, we need to hold OUSD accountable for what they’re doing with their budget. Council member Gallo talks about it all the time. </p><p>So while we’re in a budget crisis, I find it very difficult to support financially what other public agencies are doing if they’re if they’re mismanaging their budgets. I’m troubled by that. </p><p>And, I know, I heard our seniors. I have two senior centers here. I am the elected representative of the downtown Oakland Senior Center and the West Oakland Senior Center. </p><p>West Oakland [senior center] has not been opened. It’s so behind schedule, and they’re talking about not being able to feed seniors. </p><p>I’m concerned about the senior food program and hopefully the program I’m putting together today, the pilot program will be able to help assist with getting food out to the seniors. It’s the fastest growing population in the city of Oakland, and we are not serving them. </p><p>So even though $250,000, $200,000 is a drop in the bucket, it’s more than they anticipated getting today. And so, I want to see what we can do to support those seniors. </p><p>And then we need to go back to the school board. We might need to be going to some school board meetings, and meeting with our counterparts for District 3 and District 7, about how our our babies are being served.</p><p>[…]</p><p>‘Absolutely embarrassed that our seniors have to come here and do the song and dance’</p><p>KEVIN JENKINS</p><p>[…]</p><p>This is my fourth year on council. I’m [a] senior member of city council and just absolutely embarrassed that our seniors have to come here and do the song and dance every single year. </p><p>It’s absolutely imperative that we find a long-term funding source so that we can support our seniors in their golden years. </p><p>Council member Houston, I want to just absolutely applaud you for wanting to extend the hours every single year. They come here every single year, and we do this again, and again, and again. </p><p>I think it’s time for us to put our heads together and figure out how we can support our seniors going forward. </p><p>So with that, I want to change the allocation of the sugar-sweetened beverage [tax], from $250,000 to OUSD, to $50,000 going to OUSD and $200,000 going to support our seniors, and we need to continue to work to support our seniors.</p><p>[…]</p><p>‘I don’t want to make the mistake that other cities do — they go bankrupt’</p><p>NOEL GALLO:</p><p>[…]</p><p>Remember, I have six unions we got to settle with, and it’s gonna cost us millions. </p><p>Also, I have 800 and something vacancies that we approved last year, but we never filled them. </p><p>I can’t get my streets cleaned, man. I can’t buy my trucks. I can’t take care of law enforcement to help me on the street. </p><p>But we’re going to sit here and do a lot more talking. </p><p>I need to have a management budget that’s clear before I start approving all these other things. I’m going to do this, do that over here. </p><p>Then I wind up once again with the public, “Well, I can’t take care of your street because I don’t have the money.” </p><p>I just don’t want to make the mistake that other cities do — they go bankrupt. </p><p>We’re right now discussing making agreements, but you don’t know what you have in terms of money because we haven’t settled the biggest challenge, and that’s going to be settling our union contracts: fire department, police department and all the other unions that we got to settle. </p><p>That’s not going to be, you know, a 25-cents deal that we got to come up with. </p><p>We’re going to have to find out, what can I do additionally for a service, once I take care of my employees…</p><p>[Jenkins interrupts: Call the question.] </p><p>…and so anyways.</p><p>[…]</p><p>‘I love that new fire engine smell’</p><p>ZAC UNGER:</p><p>[…]</p><p>I sat here a year ago and talked about the “nobody’s happy budget.” You know, today, I think I’m happy to sit here and say that our council amendments constitute the “nobody’s crazy budget.” </p><p>Our amendments from the budget team are a model that is reasonable, accountable and sane. </p><p>And, you know, I’m not going to belabor the details here because I think my colleagues have done a great job with highlighting all of the all of the council amendments. </p><p>But a couple of things that I do want to focus on are the $2.5 million in safe parking and hotel vouchers for our our unhoused neighbors, which I think is an incredibly important thing. </p><p>The $50 million in already approved bond money that we accelerated towards affordable housing production. </p><p>And, of course, I also love that new fire engine smell. So adding two fire rigs is is crucial. </p><p>But I think that the values that we lead with as a council budget team are key here. We’re doing things in a way that we haven’t always done in the past. </p><p>We added no new employees to the general fund in our council amendments. We funded no recurring expenses out of one time revenues. We brought four voter approved measures out of fiscal emergency and into full compliance with voter mandates. And our single biggest line item expenditure in the council amendments was an investment in paying down our long term pension obligations. </p><p>While I am hopeful that we can pass a budget here today, I want to emphasize that we are by no means done. </p><p>Despite what you may have been told by some reports about Oakland, our non-sworn employees did not receive a raise last year. Zero percent. We are losing valuable, talented workers because of this. </p><p>And speaking for myself here, I commit to working to make sure that we can offer a compensation package to all of our employees, both sworn and non-sworn, that like our council budget amendments, is reasonable, accountable and sane. </p><p>So I thank you all for everybody’s work on this. I thank you for your participation.</p><p>[END OF TRANSCRIPT]</p><p>A video of the council members’ comments appears at the top of this article. A link to the full video of the city council special budget meeting is available in Endnote 1.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.oaklandreport.org?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1">www.oaklandreport.org</a>
June 2, 2026
Oakland city union warns of a strike if city council does not approve pay raises, other demands
<p>Oakland Recap provides summaries of public meeting proceedings that catch our attention. In this installment, we review the comments made by members of city union International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE) Local 21 at this morning’s city council special budget meeting. </p><p>‘I stood in a photo with you before I knocked doors for Measure E.’</p><p>City Council special budget meeting, <a target="_blank" href="https://oakland.granicus.com/player/clip/7538?meta_id=648718">June 1, 2026</a>.</p><p>This morning, representatives from Oakland public employee union IFPTE Local 21 demanded that the city deliver promised pay raises, abandon proposed benefit changes, fill vacant positions (around 25 percent of IFPTE-represented positions are vacant), and extend work-from-home policies.</p><p>The union members also demanded that the city convert sworn police positions to ‘civilianized’ roles that would be filled by IFPTE union members.</p><p>Over a series of comments, IFPTE union members reminded the city council of their union’s support for Measure E. </p><p>IFPTE has donated over $120,000 to the Yes on E campaign, and its members have assisted with campaign rallies and door-to-door canvassing efforts.</p><p>“Mayor Lee, council member Wang, council member Ramachandran, I stood in a photo with you before I knocked doors for Measure E on Saturday. Will you stand in actual solidarity with us now, with your workforce? </p><p>“To the other council members who have received support, endorsement from the city's unions, will you stand in solidarity with us? Your actions are what matter now.”</p><p>— Elliot Goodrich, city transportation engineer and IFPTE Local 21 member, June 1, 2026</p><p><p>Don’t miss a beat. Subscribe for free to Oakland Report.</p></p><p>“Labor organizations have worked really hard to help elect many of the people sitting around in this room.”</p><p>IFTPE union members also reminded the mayor and council members of the union’s past political support for their election campaigns.</p><p>“Many of you have described yourselves as labor-friendly leaders, and labor organizations have worked really hard to help elect many of the people sitting around in this room. </p><p>“We're asking you to demonstrate that commitment by standing with the workers who keep this city functioning every single day. </p><p>“I'm asking council to direct the city's bargaining team back to the table with a serious commitment to retaining workers and reaching a fair agreement.”</p><p>— Noel Pond-Danchik, transportation planner and IFPTE chapter membership director</p><p>“Whispers of the S-word: strike”</p><p>One of the union members issued a warning that the union is so disgruntled about the city’s negotiations over the upcoming union contract renewal, that there are “whispers” of a union strike.</p><p>“As of late last week, the city administration's bargaining team has requested that Oakland city workers not only receive no cost of living adjustment, as well as reduced health care, pension and other benefits. </p><p>“They have rejected our telework proposal, which is a no-cost proposal. At the very least, they should be able to accept something that's no cost. </p><p>“We were asked to work for less and with less. The administration has offered these takeaways to most bargaining units and people are so upset, all I've heard is whispers of the S-word, strike. </p><p>“This is not a threat.”</p><p>— Cody Meschinger, construction engineer and IFPTE chapter vice president, June 1, 2026</p><p>A video of the union members’ comments appears at the top of this article. A link to the full video of the city council special budget meeting is available in endnote 1.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.oaklandreport.org?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1">www.oaklandreport.org</a>
May 19, 2026
'We have a spending plan... that is a plan.' Mayor Barbara Lee, public unions hold a rally for Measure E
<p>Mayor Barbara Lee, city council president Kevin Jenkins, and firefighters union boss Seth Olyer held a rally today with public employee unions to gin up support for Measure E.</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.oaklandreport.org?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_1">www.oaklandreport.org</a>
10 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for Oakland Report Podcast
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Oakland Report Podcast?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 6 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.