Podcast thumbnail for ONE MORE MISSION

ONE MORE MISSION

Claim This Podcast

by JusticeForVeterans.uk

17 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇬🇧

Podcast Overview

<p><i>One More Mission</i> is a <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://JusticeForVeterans.uk" target="_blank">JusticeForVeterans.uk</a> podcast about what happens after service — when veterans and their families are dragged back into legacy cases with no new and compelling evidence, and the process becomes the punishment. We speak to veterans, lawyers, MPs, historians, and campaigners to cut through legal fog and political spin, ask plain questions about sovereignty and accountability, and defend a simple principle: duty offered, loyalty owed. This is not a culture-war show. It’s a serious conversation about fairness, finality, and what today’s serving personnel learn from how we treat yesterday’s.</p>

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

11/27/2025

1 verified contact email on file for ONE MORE MISSION

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for The State’s Duty Does Not End When Service Does

July 6, 2026

The State’s Duty Does Not End When Service Does

<p>In this episode of <b>One More Mission</b>, JusticeforVeterans.uk speaks with former Parachute Regiment officer <b>Lt Col Simon Barry</b> about one of the central questions in the Northern Ireland legacy debate:</p><p><b>What obligations does the state continue to owe those it sent into harm's way?</b></p><p>The conversation examines the Armed Forces Covenant, retrospective investigations, military law, trust between government and the Armed Forces, and the wider implications for those serving today.</p><p>Topics include:</p><p>• The state's duty to those who serve.<br />• The Armed Forces Covenant and whether it is being honoured.<br />• Repeated legacy investigations.<br />• Retrospective application of legal standards.<br />• Accountability, finality and the rule of law.<br />• The role of regimental associations.<br />• The impact on serving personnel, recruitment and retention.<br />• Whether current legacy proposals strengthen or weaken trust in government.<br />• What a balanced legacy process might look like.</p><p>Rather than focusing on personalities or political rhetoric, this discussion explores the principles that underpin the relationship between the nation and those who serve it.</p><hr /><p><b>About One More Mission</b></p><p><i>One More Mission</i> is the podcast from JusticeforVeterans.uk, featuring in-depth conversations on the Northern Ireland legacy debate, military service, law, public policy and the Armed Forces Covenant.</p><p>The aim is simple: to provide context, evidence and thoughtful discussion on issues affecting veterans and the wider military community.</p><p>If you found this discussion valuable, please consider liking the video, subscribing to the channel and sharing it with others interested in these issues.</p><p>#JusticeForVeterans #OneMoreMission #OperationBanner #NorthernIreland #ArmedForcesCovenant #Veterans #MilitaryHistory #BritishArmy #RuleOfLaw #Legacy</p>

Episode thumbnail for What Carns and Healy Reveal and State Obligations Not Met

June 21, 2026

What Carns and Healy Reveal and State Obligations Not Met

<p>Former Parachute Regiment officer Lieutenant Colonel Simon Barry joins One More Mission to discuss the resignations of John Healey and Al Carns, Britain's defence readiness, the Armed Forces Covenant and the future of the Northern Ireland legacy debate.</p><p>Topics include:</p><p>• Why Al Carns' resignation matters</p><p>• Military leadership and "falling on your sword"</p><p>• Defence spending and national readiness</p><p>• Lessons from Ukraine</p><p>• Defence procurement and military capability</p><p>• The Armed Forces Covenant</p><p>• Veterans and trust in public institutions</p><p>• Northern Ireland legacy investigations</p><p>• The future of the campaign for fairness for veterans</p><p>• What "One More Mission" means today</p><p>Whether discussing defence policy, leadership or the treatment of veterans, this conversation centres on a simple question: what obligations does a nation owe those it asks to serve?</p><p>If you find the discussion valuable, please like, subscribe and share.</p><p>#Veterans #BritishArmy #ParachuteRegiment #Defence #Military #NorthernIreland #ArmedForcesCovenant #NationalSecurity #OneMoreMission</p>

Episode thumbnail for Healey Resigns: The Defence Question Will Not Go Away

June 11, 2026

Healey Resigns: The Defence Question Will Not Go Away

<p>John Healey’s resignation as Defence Secretary has been presented as a dispute over budgets and spending targets. </p><p>In reality, it raises a much larger question: is Britain prepared to match its security challenges with the resources, policies and political decisions required to meet them?</p><p>Healey reportedly concluded that it was not. </p><p>His departure follows a prolonged disagreement over defence spending, with concerns that investment is not keeping pace with the threats facing the UK and its allies. Coming ahead of a major NATO summit, the resignation inevitably focuses attention on Britain’s defence posture and long-term preparedness.</p><p>JusticeforVeterans.uk asked former SAS commanders Dr Robert Parr and George Simm for their reaction.</p><p>Both argued that defence cannot be reduced to equipment programmes and spending percentages alone. </p><p>They pointed to broader concerns about morale, retention, legal uncertainty, and the treatment of veterans. </p><p>Dr Parr argued that Britain faces growing pressure from adversaries operating in the grey zone between peace and conflict, while simultaneously undermining confidence among those who serve and have served. </p><p>George Simm described Healey’s resignation as the act of a politician following conviction rather than convenience and suggested that the disagreement over funding may have been only one part of a broader frustration with the direction of policy.</p><p>Whether one agrees with their assessment or not, the underlying issue remains. Defence is ultimately about credibility. </p><p>Potential adversaries judge not only military hardware and budgets but also political resolve, national cohesion, and a country's willingness to support those it asks to serve. </p><p>Healey’s resignation does not end that debate. It may simply have made it harder to avoid.</p>

17 total episodes available

Similar Podcasts

Discover related shows you might enjoy

Deep-dive analytics for ONE MORE MISSION

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is ONE MORE MISSION?
<p><i>One More Mission</i> is a <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://JusticeForVeterans.uk" target="_blank">JusticeForVeterans.uk</a> podcast about what happens after service — when veterans and their families are dragged back into legacy cases with no new and compelling evidence, and the process becomes the punishment. We speak to veterans, lawyers, MPs, historians, and campaigners to cut through legal fog and political spin, ask plain questions about sovereignty and accountability, and defend a simple principle: duty offered, loyalty owed. This is not a culture-war show. It’s a serious conversation about fairness, finality, and what today’s serving personnel learn from how we treat yesterday’s.</p>
How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates daily.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.