Pharma Unscripted explores how evidence is evolving across the biopharma landscape—and what that means for patients, access, and decision-making.
Through expert-led conversations, the series examines how organizations are generating and applying evidence to bring meaningful therapies to the people who need them most.
From patient-centered outcomes and real-world evidence to value demonstration and AI in medical communications, each episode breaks down the trends shaping how therapies move from development to real-world impact.
How can vaccine manufacturers prepare for EU JCA in 2030?
Vaccines are expected to enter the EU Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) framework in 2030, but evidence decisions are being made now. This episode explores why vaccines pose distinct assessment challenges, where clinical development may leave comparative evidence gaps, and how manufacturers can begin preparing while vaccine-specific expectations continue to evolve.
Sandra Talbird and Lacey Lopez join host Peter Wirth to discuss early evidence planning, scientific consultation, and the connection between EU assessment and national vaccine decisions.
Key Topics
EU JCA for vaccines and the 2030 timeline
Comparative evidence gaps and duration of protection
Real-world evidence, modeling, and indirect comparisons
Joint scientific consultation and national vaccine decisions
Early evidence planning and alignment across teams
Continue Exploring Vaccine Evidence Planning
Read the companion article, “Preparing Vaccine Evidence for EU JCA in 2030 (https://www.rtihs.org/resource/insight/vaccine-evidence-access-european-jca),” for practical priorities to guide your next evidence planning discussion.
31 Aug 2026
Delphi Methodology: Turning Expert Judgment into Actionable Evidence
How can Delphi studies address critical evidence gaps?
When traditional evidence is limited or unavailable, Delphi methodology offers a structured way to turn expert judgment into credible, actionable insights.
In this episode, Ash Menon and Mark Price discuss when to use Delphi research, what rigorous study design looks like, and how findings can support publications, regulatory submissions, HTA, and market access strategy.
Key Topics
When Delphi methodology is appropriate
Panel and questionnaire design
Consensus thresholds and iterative rounds
CREDES and ACCORD reporting standards
Regulatory, HTA, and market access applications
Continue Exploring Delphi Methodology
Get a practical, step-by-step approach to designing, conducting, analyzing, and reporting a rigorous Delphi study.
Download the Delphi methodology guide (https://go.rtihs.org/GuideToDelphi)
10 Jul 2026
The First EU JCA Report: Methodological Learnings and Implications for Future Submissions
What can manufacturers learn from the first EU JCA report?
The first EU Joint Clinical Assessment report offers an early look at how evidence may be evaluated under the EU HTA Regulation. This episode explores key methodological learnings from the tovorafenib assessment and what they may mean for future submissions, especially in rare diseases.
Key Topics:
• PICO scope and consolidation
• Systematic literature review expectations
• Indirect treatment comparisons
• Single-arm evidence in orphan diseases
• Future JCA submission planning
Guests:
• Caroline Ling, Vice President, Health Outcomes – Europe
• Vijay D’Souza, Associate Director, European Value and Access
3 Jun 2026
The Patient Experience: Evaluating Tolerability in Oncology Treatments
Why is patient-centered evidence critical in oncology?
As oncology treatments become more targeted and long-term, organizations need evidence that captures real-world patient experience. This episode explores how PROs, tolerability, and patient-centered evidence are shaping adherence, evidence strategy, and market access.
Key Topics:
Real-world patient experience
Tolerability and treatment burden
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
Patient-centered evidence strategy
Adherence and market access
Guests:
Ari Gnanasakthy, Principal Scientist, Patient-Centered Outcomes Assessment
Dawn Odom, Vice President, Biostatistics
Learn more about tolerability research (https://www.rtihs.org/resource/insight/tolerability-strategic-differentiator-oncology)
8 May 2026
AI in Medical Communications: Why Human Expertise Still Matters
This episode is part three of a three-part series featured on Fierce Pharma’s The Top Line podcast.
AI is transforming medical communications, but it’s not replacing human expertise.
In this episode of Pharma Unscripted, we explore how AI is being used across med comms workflows, from literature review to content creation, and where it introduces risk.
Accuracy, context, and scientific integrity remain critical, making human oversight essential in an AI-driven environment.
Key Topics:
AI in medical communications
Scientific accuracy and governance
Risks and limitations of AI-generated content
Role of human expertise
Guests:
Margaret Mathes, Director of Medical Editing
Gabby Dardis, Senior Integrated Evidence Strategist
Frances Ramsey, Manager of Library Services
8 May 2026
From Approval to Value: Evidence Storytelling, HEOR & Market Access
This episode is part two of a three-part series featured on Fierce Pharma’s The Top Line podcast.
Getting a therapy approved is only part of the journey, demonstrating its value is what drives access.
In this episode of Pharma Unscripted, we explore how evidence storytelling is becoming critical in biopharma. From real-world evidence (RWE) to health economics and outcomes research (HEOR), organizations must translate complex data into clear, decision-relevant insights.
As payers and HTA bodies demand stronger value demonstration, how you communicate evidence can directly impact patient access.
Key Topics:
Evidence storytelling in biopharma
HEOR and real-world evidence (RWE)
Value communication for payers and HTAs
Market access strategy
Guests:
Kate Lothman, Director of Medical Writing & Publications
Sara Musetti Jenkins, Principal Medical Writer
Jason Crouch, Graphic Designer
8 May 2026
Putting Patients First: Patient-Centered Evidence & PROs in Biopharma
This episode is part one of a three-part series featured on Fierce Pharma’s The Top Line podcast.
What does it really mean to put patients first in biopharma?
In this episode of Pharma Unscripted, we explore how patient-centered evidence, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs), is reshaping clinical development, regulatory expectations, and market access.
As decision-makers look beyond traditional endpoints, understanding the real patient experience, quality of life, treatment burden, and daily impact, is becoming essential.
Key Topics:
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
Patient-centered evidence generation
Clinical trial design and endpoints
Market access and patient experience
Guests:
Ash Menon, Sr. Medical Affairs Lead
Mark Price, Head of Expert Perspectives
Reach and audience
Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.
Apple Podcasts (US)
5.0 / 5
2 ratings
Contact Pharma Unscripted
Guest appearances
Books guests
Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.
Host of Pharma Unscripted?
Claim your podcast to manage its listing and keep your show details accurate.
Pod Engine is an independent podcast discovery and analytics service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by this podcast. Artwork and show content belong to their owners. Full legal notice.
Explore this show Podcast research with Pod Engine