Podcast thumbnail for PRISM Rounds: Pulmonary Critical Care & Sleep Podcast

PRISM Rounds: Pulmonary Critical Care & Sleep Podcast

Claim This Podcast

by @bronchoscope

5.0(2 reviews)
51 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇨🇦

Podcast Overview

PRISM Rounds is a clinical review series by the PRISM research team. Every other week, we break down a high-impact Pulmonary, Critical Care, or Sleep article into three segments: The Blueprint: Study design and methodology. The Math: Demystifying the statistics. The "So What?": Real-world bedside implications. We bridge the gap between the journal and the clinic/ICU, helping you interpret trials quickly and skip the noise. Learn more about our research and clinical trials at: https://www.prismtrials.com/ For questions and suggestions contact: bronchoscope@gmail.com

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

2/9/2026

1 verified contact email on file for PRISM Rounds: Pulmonary Critical Care & Sleep Podcast

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for S01E50: The MARCH Trial, When ICU Mucoactives Cause Harm Without Benefit

July 23, 2026

S01E50: The MARCH Trial, When ICU Mucoactives Cause Harm Without Benefit

<p>Should mechanically ventilated patients with difficult-to-clear secretions routinely receive carbocisteine or nebulized hypertonic saline?</p><p>In this episode of PRISM Rounds, we examine the MARCH randomized trial, which enrolled 1,956 patients across 71 UK intensive care units. Neither intervention shortened mechanical ventilation or improved major clinical outcomes. However, carbocisteine increased clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, while hypertonic saline increased bronchoconstriction and hypoxemia during nebulization.</p><p>We discuss the trial’s factorial design, the absence of a number needed to treat, and the approximate numbers needed to harm: 88 for gastrointestinal bleeding with carbocisteine, 51 for bronchoconstriction with hypertonic saline, and 26 for hypoxemia during nebulization. We then translate these findings into practical de-implementation strategies for airway care in the ICU.</p><p>Article:<br><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2603406?utm_source=chatgpt.com" target="_new" rel="noopener">https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2603406</a> </p><p>Educational use only. This podcast is not medical advice.</p><p><strong>Tags</strong><br>MARCH trial, carbocisteine, hypertonic saline, mucoactive agents, mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory failure, airway secretions, mucus clearance, hypoxemia, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal bleeding, critical care, intensive care, ICU, respiratory therapy, pulmonary medicine, evidence-based medicine, randomized clinical trial, de-implementation, NEJM, PRISM Rounds</p><p></p>

Episode thumbnail for S01E49: VICTORY Trial, High-Dose Vitamin C in Severe Burns

July 17, 2026

S01E49: VICTORY Trial, High-Dose Vitamin C in Severe Burns

<p>In this episode of <strong>PRISM Rounds</strong>, we review the <strong>VICTORY randomized clinical trial</strong>, published in <strong>JAMA</strong> on June 10, 2026, testing high-dose intravenous vitamin C in patients with severe burn injury.</p><p>The trial randomized adults with deep second- or third-degree burns involving at least 20% total body surface area to high-dose IV vitamin C or placebo. VICTORY was stopped early for futility and harm. Vitamin C did not improve death or persistent organ dysfunction and raised concerning mortality signals.</p><p>We discuss how the trial was conducted, why vitamin C was biologically appealing, what the results showed, and what this means for medical ICU patients with shock, sepsis, ARDS, and inflammatory critical illness.</p><p>Article: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.10616" target="_new" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.10616</a> </p><p>Educational content only; not medical advice.</p><p>Critical Care, ICU, Medical ICU, Burn ICU, Severe Burns, Vitamin C, High-Dose Vitamin C, Ascorbic Acid, VICTORY Trial, JAMA, Randomized Clinical Trial, Organ Dysfunction, Shock, Sepsis, ARDS, Mortality, Evidence Based Medicine, Pulmonary Critical Care, Emergency Medicine, Pharmacy, Nursing, Respiratory Therapy, PRISM Rounds</p><p>Tags</p>

Episode thumbnail for S01E48 | Bicarbonate During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest : The BIHCA Trial

July 10, 2026

S01E48 | Bicarbonate During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest : The BIHCA Trial

<p>In this episode of <strong>PRISM Rounds</strong>, we discuss the JAMA randomized clinical trial <strong>BIHCA</strong>, which tested whether routine sodium bicarbonate improves outcomes during adult in-hospital cardiac arrest.</p><p>Granfeldt and colleagues randomized adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest who had received epinephrine to sodium bicarbonate or placebo. Sustained return of spontaneous circulation occurred in <strong>39% with bicarbonate vs 37% with placebo</strong>, with no significant difference. Survival and favorable neurologic outcome were also not clearly improved, while alkalosis and hypernatremia were more common with bicarbonate. </p><p>We also discuss the accompanying editorial by Clifton Callaway, which asks whether this high-quality trial will change practice, given how deeply bicarbonate remains embedded in code culture despite guideline recommendations against routine use. </p><p><strong>Bottom line:</strong> bicarbonate changed the blood gas, but it did not change the patient-centered trajectory. Routine sodium bicarbonate should not be reflexive during in-hospital cardiac arrest, but targeted use remains appropriate for specific indications such as hyperkalemia or toxicologic sodium-channel blockade.</p><p>Source article: <a href="" target="_new" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.10628</a><br>Editorial: <a href="" target="_new" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.10508</a></p><p>Tags</p><p>critical care, ICU, cardiac arrest, in-hospital cardiac arrest, sodium bicarbonate, bicarbonate, BIHCA, resuscitation, ACLS, code blue, epinephrine, return of spontaneous circulation, ROSC, neurologic outcome, JAMA, clinical trials, randomized trial, evidence-based medicine, emergency medicine, hospital medicine, pulmonary critical care, PRISM Rounds, FOAMed, medical education, CriticalCare, ICU, CardiacArrest, Resuscitation, </p><p></p>

51 total episodes available

Deep-dive analytics for PRISM Rounds: Pulmonary Critical Care &amp; Sleep Podcast

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is PRISM Rounds: Pulmonary Critical Care &amp; Sleep Podcast?

PRISM Rounds is a clinical review series by the PRISM research team. Every other week, we break down a high-impact Pulmonary, Critical Care, or Sleep article into three segments: The Blueprint: Study design and methodology. The Math: Demystifying the statistics. The "So What?": Real-world bedside implications.

We bridge the gap between the journal and the clinic/ICU, helping you interpret trials quickly and skip the noise. Learn more about our research and clinical trials at: https://www.prismtrials.com/ For questions and suggestions contact: bronchoscope@gmail.com

How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates daily.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.