

Running: A FEVER
Hosted by host and RAF · Michael Davis
3.8from 6 ratings
- 486
- Episodes
- 6
- Ratings
- Weekly
- Cadence
- 2017
- First episode
- 65K
- YouTube views
About Running: A FEVER
Running: A FEVER is a podcast about fitness, diet, and medicine. The goal is to live a long, happy, healthy, active life right up to the very end. The host is not an expert but a fellow traveler on the journey to a physically fit lifestyle. Do you love your life enough to make it last as long as possible?
- Publisher
- Michael Davis
- Category
- health & fitness · health & fitness
- Language
- en
- Explicit
- No
- First episode
- 19 Nov 2017
- Latest episode
- 5 Nov 2026
Latest episodes
486 episodes in the feed.

5 Nov 2026
RAF485: Root Canals - Not as Bad as You Think
Welcome to Running: A FEVER. My name is Michael Davis, and this is a show about fitness, diet, and medicine. My goal is to live a long, healthy, happy, active life right up to the very end. It's all about livin' long and lovin' life. Today's topic is one a lot of people dread before they ever sit in the chair: the root canal. I'm going to tell you what it actually is, how the modern procedure works in plain English, why someone needs one, a little history, why the reputation got so scary, and what has changed in roughly the last thirty years. I'll also talk about my own root canal, which I had last week. A root canal (the treatment, not the anatomy) is endodontic therapy. Endodontics is the branch of dentistry that deals with the inside of the tooth. Inside every tooth is a soft tissue called the pulp. The pulp is made up of nerves, blood vessels, and connective tissue. It sits in a chamber up in the crown of the tooth and runs down thin tunnels in the roots. Those tunnels are the root canals. When the pulp gets irreversibly inflamed or infected, that living tissue can die. Bacteria can travel out the tip of the root into the bone and create an abscess. A root canal treatment removes that diseased pulp, cleans and shapes the canal system, disinfects it, and seals it. The only alternative is extraction. Saving a restorable natural tooth is usually preferable to pulling it: you keep your bite, your neighboring teeth stay put, and you avoid the cascade of replacement options. People hear "root canal" and think you're removing the roots. You're not. The roots stay. You're cleaning the canals inside them. How does it work? Diagnosis first. Your dentist or an endodontist (a specialist in this work) looks at symptoms, tests the tooth, and takes images. That might be ordinary dental X-rays; in trickier cases it can include cone-beam CT, which gives a three-dimensional look at the roots and surrounding bone. Then anesthesia. Local anesthetic numbs the tooth and the soft tissue around it. Modern local anesthetics and supplemental techniques are a big reason the old horror stories don't match most modern visits. The American Association of Endodontists' patient messaging is blunt on this point: with today's anesthetics, the discomfort of a root canal is often similar to getting a filling, once you're numb. In my case, I was completely numb, and there was no pain whatsoever during the procedure, just a little pressure and vibration. Isolation. A thin sheet called a rubber dam goes around the tooth so saliva stays out and the field stays clean and dry. That is infection control, not theater. The cool thing about this is that you don't have a bunch of stuff trying to go down your throat. It all stays above the rubber sheet, where they suction it off. Access. The dentist makes a small opening through the chewing surface or the back of the tooth into the pulp chamber. In my case, he had to go straight down through the top because I had a crown on that tooth. I also had a root canal 10 years ago in one of my front teeth. In that case, they went in through the back of the tooth. Clean and shape. Tiny instruments remove the pulp and shape the canals so irrigants can reach the full length. Older practice leaned heavily on hand files. Modern practice often uses flexible nickel-titanium rotary or reciprocating files that follow curved canals more predictably. Irrigate. Chemical irrigants, commonly sodium hypochlorite among others, flush out bacteria, debris, and leftover tissue. Activation methods can help those irrigants work deeper into the canal system. Shaping alone does not clean everything; chemistry matters. Fill. Once the canals are cleaned and dried, they're filled, most classically with a rubber-like material called gutta-percha plus a sealer. Newer bioceramic sealers are part of the modern toolkit. The idea is a dense, biocompatible seal so bacteria don't have an open highway back in. Then a temporary filling goes on top. Because a tooth that needed a root canal is often structurally weakened by deep decay, a crack, or a big old filling, a permanent crown is frequently the final protection, especially on back teeth that take heavy bite force. Timing and materials are between you and your dentist. I already had a crown on this tooth, and the endodontist was skilled enough not to damage it during the procedure, so I didn't have to get another crown. One visit or two is common. Complex anatomy, severe infection, or a tough retreatment can take longer. Your clinician's plan wins over any podcast timeline. Today I went to my regular dentist to get a permanent filling to replace the temporary one the endodontist put in. No numbing was required, and it was a quick, easy, inexpensive visit. The reason for this two-step process is specialization in the modern dental world. An endodontist is a specialist in what he does. Your regular dentist is a specialist in tooth restoration. Why would you need a root canal? The usual culprits: Deep decay that reaches the pulp A crack or fracture that opens a path for bacteria Trauma, a blow to the mouth that damages the pulp even if the tooth looks okay on the outside A failing restoration that lets bacteria under the seal An abscess that has already formed at the root tip The pain people associate with "needing a root canal" is usually the infection and inflammation talking: pressure, throbbing, lingering sensitivity to hot or cold, pain on biting, and swelling. The modern procedure itself, when you're properly numb, is not supposed to be the torture chamber of pop culture. Untreated infection is the problem you don't want to sit on. A tooth abscess does not reliably "go away" on its own; if it drains, the pain can drop and fool you into thinking you're fine while the infection is still there. The infection is the real source of the pain. My endodontist started me on antibiotics several days before the procedure, and the pain went away before we even got to it. Before that, my regular dentist had prescribed hydrocodone, which completely took the pain away so I could get by until my first visit with the endodontist. But antibiotics alone don't clean the inside of a tooth, so you still need to see your dentist and get it taken care of. Here's some history I think is interesting. People have been poking at infected teeth for a very long time. Archaeological finds include ancient attempts at drainage and even a bronze wire in a tooth from roughly the second or third century BC, interpreted by some researchers as an early effort to treat an infected pulp. For centuries, the practical options were crude drainage or extraction. Pain relief often meant pulling the tooth. In the early modern European tradition, figures like Pierre Fauchard in the 1700s pushed dentistry toward a more systematic craft. That was still a world away from what we do now, but it was a step out of pure folk practice. In the 1800s, instruments improved. Edwin Maynard is often credited with adapting watch-spring tools into early root canal instruments. Around the middle of the century, gutta-percha, the same rubber-like material still used in evolved form today, entered endodontic filling practice. Then germ theory changed the mental model. Willoughby D. Miller and others in the late nineteenth century connected oral bacteria to disease inside the tooth and beyond, replacing the old "tooth worm" stories. X-rays in the early twentieth century let dentists see what they were treating. Effective local anesthesia made the work humane. Endodontics organized as a community in the 1940s. The American Association of Endodontists traces its founding to 1943, and the American Dental Association later recognized endodontics as a specialty. The twentieth century turned "try to save the tooth scientifically" into a real discipline. If you grew up after 1976, you may not need me to explain why "root canal" sounds like a threat. Marathon Man, the film with Dustin Hoffman and Laurence Olivier, burned dental torture into popular culture with the line "Is it safe?" It wasn't a documentary about endodontics. It was a thriller using dentistry as horror. But cultural scars stick. Pair that with our grandparents' memories of dentistry before reliable anesthesia, high-speed drills, and modern infection control, and you get a reputation that outruns the current procedure. There's a second reputation problem, and it's pseudoscience with a long half-life. In the 1920s, dentist Weston A. Price pushed a version of the "focal infection" idea: that teeth treated with root canals harbored bacteria and toxins that caused systemic diseases such as arthritis, heart disease, you name it. His studies were poorly controlled by modern standards. Better work in the following decades did not support his claims. A mid-century review in the Journal of the American Dental Association famously criticized that research for lacking proper controls and for using extreme bacterial doses that don't map to real patients. The damage was still real: an era of needless extractions sold as prevention. Those myths keep getting rebooted. The documentary Root Cause recycled the panic for a streaming audience, presenting root canals as a hidden cause of serious illness, plus meridian-line claims that are not how anatomy works. Dental organizations pushed back hard, and the film was pulled from Netflix in 2019 amid that criticism. McGill University's Office for Science and Society has a clear, readable defense of root canal treatment that walks through Price, the documentary, and why extraction on principle is not evidence-based care. The American Association of Endodontists' patient myth pages say the quiet part out loud: there is no valid scientific evidence linking root canal treatment to cancer or to systemic disease elsewhere in the body. Modern endodontic care removes the infected tissue; it does not plant a time bomb. Remember that oral health and overall health are connected. Gum disease and chronic oral infection are not trivial. That is not the same claim as "a properly treated root canal will give you cancer." Don't let a scary documentary talk you into pulling a savable tooth without a real clinical reason. And don't take a podcast as your treatment plan. Talk to a dentist or endodontist you trust. What's changed in the last 30 years? This is the part the Marathon Man generation never got: Better local anesthetics and supplemental anesthesia techniques for when a hot, infected tooth is harder to numb Nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating files that flex through curves instead of fighting them with stiff stainless steel the whole way Routine rubber-dam isolation as the standard of care Digital radiography and, when needed, CBCT for three-dimensional diagnosis Operating microscopes, with magnification and light so the clinician can actually see fine anatomy, missed canals, and cracks Improved irrigants and activation so disinfection isn't just "file and hope" Bioceramic sealers and better obturation materials and techniques Often shorter, more predictable visits than the multi-appointment marathons of earlier eras My endodontist and his assistant took X-rays during the procedure to track their progress. The AAE's public line is worth repeating: for most patients who are adequately numb, a root canal today should feel like it's in the same ballpark as a routine filling. Tenderness for a few days afterward can happen as the tissues calm down, but that's different from the procedure itself being medieval. None of this means every case is easy. Anatomy varies. Retreatment of an old, failing root canal is its own challenge. Some teeth can't be saved. But the average experience in 2020s endodontics is not your grandfather's drill-and-suffer story. If you're staring down a root canal recommendation, get the facts from your clinician, not from a thriller or a streaming scare piece. Ask about the diagnosis, whether the tooth is restorable, what the restoration plan is after the canals are filled, and what recovery should look like for you. Saving a tooth when you can is often the path that keeps you chewing, training, and living without a hole in your smile, which fits the whole point of this show: livin' long and lovin' life. Until next time, if you've got the fever, keep it burning, and if you don't, catch the fever, and I will talk to you next time on Running: A FEVER. References: AAE: Root canal treatment (patient hub): https://www.aae.org/patients/root-canal-treatment/ AAE: What is a root canal?: https://www.aae.org/patients/root-canal-treatment/what-is-a-root-canal/ AAE: Myths about root canals: https://www.aae.org/patients/root-canal-treatment/myths-root-canals/ AAE: Root canal safety: https://www.aae.org/specialty/clinical-resources/root-canal-safety/ AAE: Endodontic history: https://www.aae.org/specialty/endodontic-history/ AAE: Specialty and association histories: https://www.aae.org/specialty/about-aae/aae-history/specialty-association-histories/ Mayo Clinic: Root canal treatment: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/tooth-abscess/in-depth/root-canal/art-20585454 Mayo Clinic: Tooth abscess (symptoms and causes): https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/tooth-abscess/symptoms-causes/syc-20350901 Mayo Clinic: Tooth abscess (diagnosis and treatment): https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/tooth-abscess/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20350907 McGill Office for Science and Society: In Defence of the Maligned Root Canal: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/health-and-nutrition/defence-maligned-root-canal Marathon Man (film), Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon_Man_(film) PMC: Modern Endodontics: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9857497/ PMC: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Microbiological Aspects of Endodontics: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6313668/ Show notes and references: https://runningafever.com/485 Subscribe / follow: • Website: http://RunningAFEVER.com • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@runningafever • Apple Podcasts / Spotify: search Running: A FEVER

29 Oct 2026
RAF484: 20 Years Since My First Podcast
Welcome to Running: A FEVER. My name is Michael Davis, and this is a show about fitness, diet, and medicine. My goal is to live a long, healthy, happy, active life right up to the very end. It's all about livin' long and lovin' life. Recently I was preparing for our upcoming 500th episode and thinking about how I got started in podcasting. And I realized that this year marks 20 years since my first podcast. It wasn't Running: A FEVER, though. The show was called Everything Money, and my idea was to give personal financial advice to people who would call in to an 800 number. Unfortunately, nobody called in, and the show ended after only six episodes. There is currently a podcast called Everything Money, but it has nothing to do with me. In this episode, I play a clip from one of those original episodes. I talked for about 20 minutes in that episode about gold, debt, and credit scores. It's interesting to hear myself say that gold was at an all-time high of over $600. It was recently over $6,000, so yes, things have changed. I had a website, everythingmoney.org, and you can still see its skeletal remains, along with a few blog posts, on the Wayback Machine (link below). That domain has changed hands a few times since then, of course. I remember being inspired by the first podcast I ever listened to, Free Talk Live, which started as, and continues to be, a syndicated radio show. I haven't listened to it in many years, but I recently looked it up, and it turns out one of its original hosts is serving a federal prison sentence in a cryptocurrency case. Anyway, that was the first time I had heard of this thing called a podcast. My other inspiration was a radio show simply called The Money Show, hosted by Harry Browne. Harry's claim to fame was writing the book How You Can Profit from the Coming Devaluation, published in 1970, which correctly predicted massive inflation and the devaluation of the U.S. dollar. People who followed his advice became very rich. Later he ran as the Libertarian Party candidate for President of the United States in 1996 and 2000. He favored a conservative strategy of investing in equal weights of gold, stocks, bonds, and cash. And Harry Browne actually died during the short run of my first podcast, in March of 2006. I thought podcasting was a cool idea. I had always loved radio. I hung out at the local rock station when I was in high school, where most of the DJs were high school students or recent graduates making minimum wage. Then in college I was a DJ and later programming director of WRNV, the student-run school radio station. So the microphone and I were already friends. YouTube was barely a year old, and I had never even looked at the site, much less published on it. Podcasting itself was in its infancy. At the time there were far fewer podcasters relative to listener demand, so I think I had plenty of listeners, even though none of them were calling my 800 number. I opened each show by playing a big chunk of a popular song. I remember using one of Elvis Costello's songs, with no idea about copyright issues. In radio, that wasn't much of a concern, because stations play those songs anyway. I'd like to say I've been podcasting for 20 years, but I really didn't do anything for the next 10 years, until I teamed up with Tom Rohr and started the Padua Podcast Network. Still, it's cool to be able to say I was one of the early hosts, back when there were only tens of thousands of podcasts and single-digit millions of listeners in the U.S. According to The Podcast Host, Spotify lists nearly 7 million podcasts today, including active and inactive ones, and Apple lists 3.1 million valid listings. Even so, fewer than 500,000 publish an episode at least every 90 days. We've come a long way. So there's a little history about your host. I hope you enjoyed this look into my podcasting past, even though it has nothing to do with fitness, diet, or medicine. You can expect more of that in the next episode. Until next time, if you've got the fever, keep it burning, and if you don't, catch the fever, and I will see you next time on Running: A FEVER. References: https://web.archive.org/web/20070922111841/http://everythingmoney.org/ https://share.google/aimode/X75GHtM2sqH2weom3 https://share.google/aimode/O0Vjpg9yONPTPCjVz Show notes and references: http://RunningAFEVER.com/484 Subscribe / follow: • Website: http://RunningAFEVER.com • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@runningafever • Apple Podcasts / Spotify: search Running: A FEVER

22 Oct 2026
RAF483: GLP-1s and Muscle Loss
Welcome to Running: A FEVER. My name is Michael Davis, and this is a show about fitness, diet, and medicine. My goal is to live a long, healthy, happy, active life right up to the very end. It's all about livin' long and lovin' life. Today's topic is one a lot of people are quietly living through right now: weight-loss shots — the GLP-1 medications — and what they may be doing to your muscle. You've heard the brand names. Ozempic. Wegovy. Mounjaro. Zepbound. Semaglutide. Tirzepatide. Millions of Americans are on them, and for good reason: they can drop blood sugar and body weight in a way diet alone often can't. I'm not here to bash the drugs. I'm here because the other half of the story is finally catching up — the muscle half. What is a GLP-1 drug, in plain English? These medicines mimic hormones that help regulate appetite and blood sugar. You feel fuller. You eat less. Weight comes off. That part works. Here's the catch. When you lose weight fast on a big calorie cut — whether it's from a shot, surgery, or a crash diet — you don't only lose fat. You lose lean mass too. Lean mass includes muscle. Studies and clinical summaries commonly put that lean-mass share somewhere around a quarter to as much as about forty percent of the weight lost if you don't specifically protect muscle. That means the scale can look like a victory while your strength, metabolism, and long-term resilience quietly take a hit. And it's not just the scale composition. At ENDO 2026 (the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society), researchers using wearable tracker data reported that adults on GLP-1 medications actually moved less after starting treatment — fewer steps, less moderate-to-vigorous activity. A lot of people assume that once the pounds come off, you'll naturally get more active. This study said: not so fast. Activity went down, and that matters because activity — especially resistance training — is one of the main ways you keep muscle while the weight falls. Why should you care if you're "only" losing a little muscle? Muscle is not vanity. Muscle helps you get out of a chair, climb stairs, catch yourself when you trip, and keep your metabolism from crashing. Older adults already fight sarcopenia — age-related muscle loss. Pile rapid weight loss on top of that without a plan, and you're trading one problem for another. So what do the people who study this recommend? 1. Protein. Guidance that keeps showing up for adults on GLP-1 therapy during active weight loss is about 1.2 to 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day — if your kidneys are healthy and your doctor agrees. Spread it across meals. Think roughly 20 to 40 grams per eating occasion when you can. When appetite is crushed, a protein shake isn't cheating — it's strategy. 2. Resistance training. Not endless cardio. Lifting, bands, machines, bodyweight — two to three sessions a week with progressive overload. Compound moves: squats, hinges, presses, rows. Cardio still matters for the heart. Strength work matters for the meat on your bones. 3. Don't race the dose. Some clinicians are advising slower escalation when weight is falling extremely fast, and monitoring how you feel — energy, strength, dizziness, vomiting. Rapid loss plus lots of vomiting is a red flag to call your doctor. 4. Watch the micronutrients. When you barely eat, vitamins can fall behind. Thiamine — vitamin B1 — has been in the news with rare but serious neurological problems tied to prolonged vomiting and rapid loss on these drugs. I'm not saying panic. I'm saying: if you're sick for weeks, get medical help and ask about nutrition, not just the next dose. 5. Creatine and recovery tools. Creatine monohydrate has strong evidence for strength and is showing up in a lot of "protect the muscle" conversations around GLP-1 users. Sleep and recovery still count. Talk to your clinician before adding supplements, especially if you have kidney disease. Personally, I care about living long and loving life — strong enough to keep walking trails, lifting groceries, and not becoming fragile at 70 or 80. If a medicine helps your weight and blood sugar, fantastic. Pair it with a plan that keeps the muscle that makes the rest of life possible. Bottom line: GLP-1 drugs can be powerful tools. They are not a complete program by themselves. Protein plus resistance training is the one-two punch that keeps the weight loss from eating your strength. Talk with your doctor, especially before changing dose, diet, or supplements. Until next time, if you've got the fever, keep it burning, and if you don't, catch the fever, and I will talk to you next time on Running: A FEVER. References: https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2026/maharjan-press-release-endo-2026 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12661421/ https://www.ccjm.org/page/aace-2026/wernicke-encephalopathy https://nypost.com/2026/09/11/health/2-popular-glp-1-drugs-linked-to-rare-life-threatening-brain-disorder/ https://nypost.com/2026/09/11/health/doing-3-minutes-of-key-exercise-beats-90-mins-of-cardio-study/ Show notes and references: http://RunningAFEVER.com/483 Subscribe / follow: • Website: http://RunningAFEVER.com • YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@runningafever • Apple Podcasts / Spotify: search Running: A FEVER
Reach and audience
Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.
- YouTube views
- 64,549
- Score snapshot 15 Sept 2025
- Apple Podcasts (US)
- 3.8 / 5
- 6 ratings
Podcast Authority Score: 54 / 100
A composite of feed quality, social presence, YouTube performance and engagement. Read the methodology.
- Quality
- 48
- Social presence
- 0
- YouTube
- 76
- Engagement
- 77
Contact Running: A FEVER
- Guest appearances
- Does not typically book guests
Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.
Questions about Running: A FEVER
Who hosts Running: A FEVER?
host and RAF host the show. Published by Michael Davis.
How often do new episodes come out?
The show publishes weekly, based on its RSS feed.
Does Running: A FEVER take guests?
The show does not typically feature guests, based on episode analyses.
Host of Running: A FEVER?
Claim your podcast to manage its listing and keep your show details accurate.
Pod Engine is an independent podcast discovery and analytics service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by this podcast. Artwork and show content belong to their owners. Full legal notice.
Explore this show
Podcast research with Pod Engine