Welcome to Texas at The Voice of College Football Network, your home for In-depth discussion, debate, & analysis on all things Texas. We have you covered from offseason all the way to game day. Join us as we embark on another season!Hook 'Em!For business inquiries please contact: Markrogerstv@gmail.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Texas at The Voice of College Football
Claim This Podcastby The Voice of College Football Network
Podcast Authority
Beta
Podcast Overview
Welcome to Texas at The Voice of College Football Network, your home for In-depth discussion, debate, & analysis on all things Texas. We have you covered from offseason all the way to game day. Join us as we embark on another season!Hook 'Em!For business inquiries please contact: Markrogerstv@gmail.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
8/17/2024
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
Podcast Authority
Beta
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
See how your show performs across every key metric
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
3 verified contact emails on file for Texas at The Voice of College Football
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes

August 5, 2026
Is Steve Sarkisian ACTUALLY On The Hot Seat / Texas Longhorns LIVE 113
<p><strong>Texas Longhorns LIVE 113 Episode Notes</strong> <strong>Hosts:</strong> Matthew Miller & Thomas “Tommy” Bresee <strong>Show:</strong> TexasVOCFB / Voice of College Football <strong>Sponsored by:</strong> FanDuel <strong>Focus:</strong> Is Steve Sarkisian actually on the hot seat? + Fall camp breakout candidates, X-factors, and Coaches Poll reaction</p> <h3>0:00 – Intro & Ohio State Betting Talk</h3> <ul> <li>Welcome to another edition of Texas Longhorns Live. Testing 7 p.m. ET slot on Tuesdays.</li> <li>Brought to you by FanDuel.</li> <li>Quick look at the Week 2 Ohio State game: Texas favored by 1.5. Over/under is <strong>47.5</strong>. <ul> <li><strong>Tommy</strong>: Leans under. Early-season games + two defenses that lost a lot of production often stay lower-scoring.</li> <li><strong>Matthew</strong>: Leans over. Both quarterbacks have a year under their belts and Texas has more offensive weapons. Last year’s 14-7 was an offensive stinker; expects a higher-scoring affair.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h3>1:18 – Is Steve Sarkisian on the Hot Seat?</h3> <p><strong>Core question raised around SEC Media Days.</strong></p> <p><strong>Tommy’s take (firm no):</strong></p> <ul> <li>People pushing the narrative largely don’t want Texas to succeed and are planting the “hot seat” seed early so they can claim foresight later.</li> <li>Context is critical: Texas was stuck around .500 and mediocre for over a decade (2010–2021 era under previous coaches). Sarkisian has the program closer to a title than it has been in a long time.</li> <li>High expectations are fair (Texas should have them), but Sark has more runway/slack than critics admit.</li> <li>Even a 9-3 year that barely makes (or misses) the playoff would not get him fired. Something closer to 7-5 or worse with a healthy roster would be required.</li> <li>Longer-term view matters: firing him after a short-term disappointment risks tanking the recruiting pipeline and setting the program back for 2028–29 when the roster should again be elite.</li> <li>More likely outcome than a mid-season or end-of-year firing: Sark goes on a deep run / wins a title and then leaves for the NFL (possible package deal involving Arch Manning or similar).</li> </ul> <p><strong>Matthew’s take (also no, with conditions):</strong></p> <ul> <li>Not on the hot seat unless the season completely bottoms out — which the talent level makes very unlikely short of catastrophic injuries.</li> <li>This is the year before true hot-seat territory. Minimum bar for 2026: make the playoff and win at least one game. Anything less and 2027 becomes much more pressurized (possible need for SEC title or national title appearance).</li> <li>Sark has set the standard by reaching the Final Four twice. Dropping significantly below that will invite questions, but Texas is not firing him over a solid-but-not-championship year.</li> <li>If results disappoint, the more realistic short-term moves are staff changes (Kyle Flood is the name most often mentioned first; possible OC hire is the next step). Chris Del Conte (CDC) likes Sark and would only move if he already had a strong replacement lined up.</li> <li>Possible future names floated hypothetically (distant): Kenny Dillingham (if Arizona State has a big year), Will Stein (Kentucky), Eric Morris later.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Additional context discussed:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Best skill players under Sark have largely been Tom Herman holdovers or transfers (Xavier Worthy the clearest pure Sark recruit who became a star). Newer classes (Ryan Wingo, Kalik Lockett, Daylon McCutcheon, etc.) will answer whether the developmental pipeline is fully online over the next 2–3 years.</li> <li>Overall consensus of both hosts: Hot-seat talk is overblown. Sark has proven he can put a team in national title contention; the remaining step is finishing the job (or getting a couple of breaks).</li> </ul> <h3>10:48 – Fall Camp Breakout Candidates</h3> <p><strong>Tommy’s #1:</strong> <strong>Justice Terry</strong> (DT)</p> <ul> <li>Up to 290 lbs while still moving extremely well. Can play multiple techniques (3-tech, 4i, etc.).</li> <li>Expects him to be a major contributor this year and, alongside Elijah Griffin, form one of the best DT tandems in the SEC (or country) by 2027.</li> <li>Could push/work into the rotation behind (or with) the current starters and eventually take more snaps from Alex January.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Matthew’s picks:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Kalik Lockett</strong> (WR) – Make-or-break year. Has the talent to post 300–400 yards + 4–5 TDs as the WR4/rotation piece. Needs to stay healthy and force his way into a crowded group. Similarities noted with Cam Coleman (especially ball skills).</li> <li><strong>Jermaine Bishop Jr.</strong> (WR) – Extremely versatile (took DB reps this summer). Can play multiple spots; hard to keep off the field. Strong candidate to work into the rotation and potentially settle as a key depth/special-teams contributor who earns more offensive snaps.</li> <li><strong>Kobe Black</strong> (CB/S) – Needs a big year after a brief portal flirtation. Versatile enough to play boundary or nickel/safety. One of the primary candidates for the third corner/outside spot alongside Bo Mascoe and Grayson Littleton. Long, physical, good hip-flip traits.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Additional names discussed:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Jonah Williams</strong> (S) – Fully healthy after baseball-related issues. Has drawn consistent rave reviews whenever healthy. Safety room is fluid; he is one of several candidates (alongside Kobe Black, Derek Williams, etc.) who could solidify the back end next to Jelani McDonald.</li> <li><strong>Colton Vossick</strong> (Edge) – Pure health question. Elite length and high-end ability; needs to stay healthy enough to carve out edge rotation snaps behind Lance Jackson and Colin Simmons. Behind him sit several athletic pieces (Richard Wesley, Jamarian Carlton, etc.).</li> <li><strong>Tyler Atkinson</strong> (LB) – Freshman who has reportedly found his groove. Linebacker room has competition (Ty Anthony Smith, Rasheen Biles, Justin Cryer, Darius Snow, Rocky Cummings, Marcus Boswell). Could work into the LB3/LB4 role and potentially higher by season’s end.</li> <li><strong>Nick Townsend</strong> (TE) – Tight end room has seen a lot of positive buzz (Michael Masunis, Spencer Shannon also mentioned). Townsend viewed as the most well-rounded and the one most likely to earn consistent snaps, especially in 11 personnel. Athletic upside (11-second 100m at his size) is unique.</li> </ul> <h3>24:00-ish – Fall Camp X-Factors</h3> <p><strong>Matthew’s primary X-factor:</strong> <strong>Nick Townsend</strong></p> <ul> <li>Freak athlete at tight end who can also block. Ceiling to be a B+ SEC tight end and unlock more of the offense (similar impact Gunnar Helm had in 2024). Offense will be good either way; a true difference-maker at TE elevates it to elite.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Broader X-factors:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Freshman class as a whole</strong> — Especially Tyler Atkinson, Derek Cooper, and Jermaine Bishop Jr. Meaningful contributions from a few of these players are viewed as important for the team to reach its ceiling (not necessarily All-Stars, but impactful snaps, special teams, short-yardage, etc.).</li> <li><strong>Will Muschamp’s adaptation</strong> — How he mixes coverages, pressures, and personnel against modern offenses (particularly versus Ohio State and Jeremiah Smith). Personnel allows multiple looks; the scheme/adjustment period will be telling early.</li> <li><strong>Leadership & connectivity</strong> — Key returning leaders identified: Arch Manning, Trevor Goosby, Ryan Wingo, Colin Simmons, Jelani McDonald. Need them to fully integrate transfers and new pieces so the team stays cohesive through a long, tough schedule. Hosts feel leadership is better than last year, with Arch taking a bigger step.</li> <li><strong>Red-zone efficiency</strong> — Persistent issue since Bijan Robinson’s era. Team will create explosives, but must convert longer drives against elite defenses (Ohio State, Georgia, playoff opponents) to win a title. Derek Cooper, Michael Terry, Amari Winston, and better O-line play are potential solutions.</li> <li><strong>Staying healthy into Week 1</strong> — Balance of preparation vs. avoiding soft-tissue or other injuries to key pieces (Rasheen Biles, Trevor Goosby, etc.). Roster is special; needs to stay intact.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Other notes:</strong> Cole Hudson (if available) viewed as a valuable non-starter leader who can help the O-line room. Michael Terry could see creative usage (RB/TE/X) as they evaluate best long-term fit.</p> <h3>38:30 – Coaches Poll Reaction</h3> <p><strong>Top 5 released:</strong> 1. Ohio State, 2. Oregon, 3. Georgia, 4. Texas, 5. Notre Dame.</p> <p><strong>Hosts’ consensus:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Texas at No. 4 is acceptable. Both group Oregon / Texas / Notre Dame as the three most talented rosters. Georgia’s placement is understandable given Kirby Smart’s track record and recent results vs. Texas.</li> <li>Strong disagreement with Ohio State at No. 1. Viewed as similar to last year’s Texas team (heavy losses on defense, high expectations, questions about fully replacing generational talent). Matthew feels good about a 9-3 prediction for the Buckeyes.</li> <li>Top 7 is a tight cluster that can be ordered almost any way. A&M (8), Oklahoma (9), and Ole Miss (10) are viewed as more vulnerable — especially A&M and Ole Miss, which both hosts expect to take steps back relative to preseason ranking.</li> <li>Notable other rankings mentioned: Alabama 11, Texas Tech 12, LSU 13, USC 14, BYU 15, Michigan 16, Penn State 17, Tennessee 18, Washington 19, SMU 20, Utah 21, Iowa 22, Clemson 23, Houston 24, Missouri 25.</li> <li>Surprises / teams that could move: Louisville belongs in the top 25 conversation. Michigan under Kyle Whittingham (with a strong run game) could be dangerous, especially if they beat Oklahoma. Clemson and Missouri were the two ranked teams the hosts were least convinced by.</li> </ul> <h3>Closing</h3> <ul> <li>Episode 113 of Texas Longhorns Live.</li> <li>New permanent time: Tuesdays at 7 p.m. ET.</li> <li>Call to action: Like, subscribe, drop hot-seat opinions, breakout candidates, X-factors, and ranking takes in the comments.</li> <li>Hook ’em.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Overall tone of the episode:</strong> Measured and optimistic on Sarkisian’s job security and the roster’s upside, with clear eyes on the remaining developmental and scheme questions that will be answered in fall camp and early in the season.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>

July 22, 2026
Sec Media Poll Preview / Texas Longhorns LIVE 112
<p><strong>Episode Notes: Texas Longhorns LIVE #112 – SEC Media Poll Preview</strong> <strong>Hosts:</strong> Matthew Miller & Thomas Bresee (Tommy) <strong>Show:</strong> TexasVOCFB <strong>Length:</strong> ~31 minutes <strong>Date:</strong> Aired shortly before SEC Media Days (July 2026 context)</p> <h3>Episode Summary</h3> <p>The 112th episode of Texas Longhorns LIVE focuses on two main topics: the surprising potential return of former Texas offensive lineman Cole Hudson and a preview of SEC Media Days + the SEC Media Poll. The hosts discuss roster implications for Texas, broader NCAA eligibility issues, excitement around Media Days, and their predictions for how the media will rank SEC teams.</p> <h3>Key Segments & Highlights</h3> <p><strong>1. Cole Hudson Situation (Opening ~15 minutes)</strong></p> <ul> <li>Cole Hudson (OL) is in Browns rookie minicamp but is appealing for an extra year of eligibility under the new "five to play five" rule.</li> <li>Hosts view this as <strong>a net positive for Texas</strong> due to much-needed interior offensive line depth.</li> <li>Hudson brings significant experience (48 games, 23 starts).</li> <li>Depth benefit: Hudson + Dylan Sikorski + Lawrence Seymour provides solid interior options.</li> <li>Consensus: Hudson is unlikely to start immediately. Lawrence Seymour is seen as the better current player and better pass protector. Hudson would likely serve as a high-floor veteran backup/mentor.</li> <li>Discussion on precedent: Not ideal for college football optics, but the rule exists and others have benefited. Likely a one-off rather than a trend.</li> <li>Speculation on who initiated contact and NIL/pay considerations (Texas likely offering more than practice squad).</li> </ul> <p><strong>2. SEC Media Days Preview</strong></p> <ul> <li>Texas speaks later in the week (Sark one of the last coaches).</li> <li>Players expected: Arch Manning, Colin Simmons, Trevor Goosby.</li> <li><strong>Biggest anticipated moments:</strong> <ul> <li>Colin Simmons: Guaranteed to deliver headlines/trash talk.</li> <li>Arch Manning: Tone shift expected as a returning starter; media hype will be intense.</li> <li>Steve Sarkisian: Expected to emphasize Texas’s tough strength of schedule (3rd toughest per FPI) and show confidence.</li> <li>Trevor Goosby: Valuable insight on the rebuilt offensive line (Seymour, Siani, etc.) as a veteran leader.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Freshmen class (Jermaine Bishop Jr., Derek Cooper, etc.) expected to get significant buzz.</li> </ul> <p><strong>3. SEC Media Poll Predictions</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Hosts’ expected media top 5:</strong> Georgia, Texas, LSU, Alabama/Ole Miss/A&M mix.</li> <li><strong>Matthew Miller’s predicted media order:</strong> Texas, Georgia, LSU, Alabama, Oklahoma.</li> <li><strong>Tommy’s lean:</strong> Georgia 1, Texas 2, then Ole Miss/LSU/A&M heavy.</li> <li>Agreement on Georgia/Texas as clear 1-2 (order TBD; hosts lean Georgia until Texas beats them).</li> <li>Debate on 3-7 tier: LSU (high roster talent/hype), Alabama (lingering brand power but some skepticism on Kalen DeBoer), Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Ole Miss.</li> <li>Concerns: Ole Miss coaching changes (Lane Kiffin departure, offensive scheme shift); A&M O-line integration.</li> <li>Bottom of the league: Arkansas predicted last; Vanderbilt second-to-last. High respect for conference depth overall.</li> </ul> <h3>Notable Quotes / Takeaways</h3> <ul> <li>On Hudson: “It can only be a good thing… provides a very good floor for this Texas offensive line.”</li> <li>On Seymour vs. Hudson: Lawrence Seymour is the better player right now.</li> <li>On Colin Simmons: “He is going to make headlines… will take a shot at someone.”</li> <li>On Sark: Expected to fire up strength-of-schedule conversation.</li> <li>General vibe: Cautious optimism for Texas entering the season; excitement for fall camp and freshmen impact.</li> </ul> <h3>Closing</h3> <ul> <li>Standard calls to like/subscribe + comment predictions for #1 and #16 in the SEC poll.</li> <li>Next episode time change note: Moving to 7 p.m. ET.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Overall Tone:</strong> Balanced, insightful, and Texas-centric but realistic about Georgia and the gauntlet of the SEC. Strong focus on offensive line depth as a key variable for Texas’s ceiling.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>

July 16, 2026
Texas Longhorns LIVE 111/ Will Monshun Sales Pick Texas?
<p><strong>Episode Notes: Texas Longhorns LIVE #111</strong> <strong>Title:</strong> Will Monshun Sales Pick Texas? <strong>Hosts:</strong> Matthew Miller & Thomas Bresee (TexasVOCFB) <strong>Format:</strong> Special Wednesday edition (sponsored by FanDuel) <strong>Length:</strong> ~52 minutes (based on transcript timestamps)</p> <h3>Key Segments & Takeaways</h3> <p><strong>1. World Cup Final Preview (Spain vs Argentina)</strong></p> <ul> <li>Spain favored at -156, Argentina +136.</li> <li>Hosts lean Spain but acknowledge Argentina’s magic (Messi factor) and recent luck/skill.</li> <li>Excitement around Messi vs. young star Lamine Yamal.</li> </ul> <p><strong>2. Recruiting: Top Remaining Targets</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Monshun Sales (Top Priority)</strong>: Commits Friday. Texas vs. Indiana toss-up (51/49 lean Texas). Staff closing ability highlighted (Atkinson, Wingo precedents). Possible flip potential post-commitment. ~80% chance Texas lands Sales or Easton Royal; ~25% both.</li> <li><strong>Easton Royal</strong>: Fits Sark system well; LSU pushing hard. X-receiver emphasis (importance of dominant X like AD Mitchell/Golden).</li> <li><strong>Landen Williams-Callis (RB)</strong>: Missouri pushing (early playing time, NIL). Texas favored for development/winning upside. Comp to supercharged Jaden Blue. High priority; commitment expected before season.</li> <li><strong>Other Names to Watch</strong>: <ul> <li>Josiah Poyer (LB, USC commit, St. John Bosco).</li> <li>Honor (or similar; USC safety commit).</li> <li>Toa Tosi-Taylor (LB, Oregon commit) – high-upside target.</li> <li>DJ Jacobs (#1 player overall) – Long shot but Texas in mix if Sales misses.</li> <li>Jalen Brewster – Low probability due to Texas Tech NIL (land deal).</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>3. Texas Recruiting Outlook</strong></p> <ul> <li>Class at ~22 commits; targeting ~25. Headliners: Sales, Williams Callas, Royal.</li> <li>Strong recent momentum (Pat McAfee show commitments).</li> <li>Portal strategy emphasized for LB depth.</li> <li>Broader context: NIL landscape, constant fighting until signing day.</li> </ul> <p><strong>4. Top 5 Players Texas Cannot Lose to Injury (for Natty Contention)</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>#5 (Bresee)</strong>: Jelani McDonald (S) – Versatility, communication key for aggressive defense.</li> <li><strong>#5 (Miller)</strong>: Cam Coleman (WR) – Gravity, YAC, elevates Wingo/others; game-changer like AD Mitchell.</li> <li><strong>#4</strong>: Rasheem Biles (LB) – Chess piece, playmaking (tackles, sacks, INTs).</li> <li><strong>#3-4</strong>: Colin Simmons (Edge) – Best defensive player in country; forces extra attention.</li> <li><strong>#2</strong>: Brandon Baker (OL) or Trevor Goosby (OL) – Injury protection + elite play (Baker’s versatility at G/T).</li> <li><strong>#1 (Both)</strong>: Arch Manning (QB) – Ceiling-raiser; backup KJ Lacey unproven for full Natty run.</li> </ul> <p><strong>5. Roster Discussion: "Flawless"?</strong></p> <ul> <li>Consensus: No flawless rosters in modern CFB (NIL/portal era).</li> <li>Texas has the <strong>best roster in the country</strong> (talent, experience, coaching) but holes remain: <ul> <li>Linebacker depth (thin after transfers).</li> <li>Offensive line depth/guard questions.</li> <li>Safety (if Williams regresses).</li> </ul> </li> <li>Strengths: Elite QB, RBs, WRs, defensive stars (Simmons, etc.).</li> <li>2026 outlook: Potential rebuild; this year is the peak window.</li> </ul> <p><strong>6. Closing & Viewer Interaction</strong></p> <ul> <li>Like/subscribe calls; FanDuel promo.</li> <li>Emphasis on living up to high expectations (likely top-3 preseason ranking).</li> <li>Sark’s job: Close small gaps (1-5 plays per game).</li> </ul> <p><strong>Overall Tone</strong>: Optimistic on Texas’ 2026-27 outlook, realistic about challenges. Heavy focus on recruiting urgency and key personnel. Strong chemistry between hosts with data-driven analysis mixed with fan passion.</p> <p><strong>Notable Quotes</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>On Sales/Royal: “I would put that at about eighty percent [landing one].”</li> <li>On roster: “You have as many answers as anyone in the country.”</li> <li>On Arch: “If he gets hurt, Texas wins the national championship? ... one percent chance.”</li> </ul><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>
177 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for Texas at The Voice of College Football
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Texas at The Voice of College Football?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.