by Incident Prevention Magazine
Come listen to an extension of some of the excellent utility safety & ops safety content published in Incident Prevention magazine. Dive deeper into insightful safety topics by hearing interviews with the some of the best and brightest minds in the industry! Learn more about Incident Prevention magazine at incident-prevention.com
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
1/26/2021
Email Addresses
0 available
Phone Numbers
0 available
May 1, 2025
In this episode of Built In, Not Bolted On, host Doug Hill sits down with safety leader and educator David McPeak to explore the real keys to successful Human and Organizational Performance (HOP). Through storytelling, relatable analogies, and a few laughs, they break down the power of caring leadership, building a just culture, the dangers of overcomplicating safety systems, and the importance of embedding safety into the DNA of an organization. From tools like “E + R = O” to the “village-by-village” model of influence, this episode provides a practical, people-first look at how to make safety initiatives stick—for good. 🔑 Key Takeaways: Culture eats strategy for breakfast. Safety systems must be embedded into the culture—not simply bolted on as compliance requirements. Toxic culture is a showstopper. No safety program will succeed in an environment that lacks trust, respect, and accountability. Success starts with relationships. Building strong, caring teams helps create the psychological safety needed to speak up and improve performance. Don’t overcomplicate safety. Practical, repeatable tools that workers understand and use in context matter more than complex policies. Peer-level champions and simple tools like “E + R = O” and performance mode awareness can drive real change from the ground up. 5 Relevant Questions & Answers: Q1: What’s the key to implementing effective Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) strategies? A1: Commitment and time. It’s not about quick fixes—it’s about embedding care, consistency, and communication into every level of the organization. Q2: Why do many safety programs fail? A2: They’re often implemented in toxic cultures or made too complex. Without foundational trust and simple, relatable tools, programs won’t stick. Q3: How can you tell if a safety initiative is “built in” versus “bolted on”? A3: “Built-in” programs are part of daily work, language, and habits. “Bolted-on” programs feel forced, top-down, and are quickly abandoned. Q4: What role do performance modes play in safety? A4: Understanding if a worker is in skill-, rule-, or knowledge-based mode helps choose the right tool—like saying it out loud, step-by-step checks, or stopping work to seek help. Q5: How can leaders support cultural safety transformation? A5: By modeling desired behaviors, creating a safe space for feedback, understanding how each role sees safety, and helping translate tools into all departments—not just field crews. #BuiltInNotBoltedOn #UtilitySafety #HumanPerformance #SafetyCulture #OrganizationalLeadership #JustCulture Contact Doug: [email protected] Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/ Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/
April 21, 2025
Safety by Design - Empowering Leadership and Employee Involvement with Pam Tompkins CSP, CUSP Read the article - https://incident-prevention.com/blog/safety-by-design-leadership-and-employee-involvement/ In this episode of Safety by Design, we welcome back safety expert Pam Tompkins, CUSP, CSP, to explore the foundational role of leadership and employee involvement in building effective safety systems. Based on her recent article in Incident Prevention magazine, Pam shares candid insights on overcoming middle management roadblocks, building measurable KPIs, and empowering workers at all levels—from new apprentices to seasoned frontline leaders. Tune in as Pam breaks down why involving the workforce is not optional but essential to safety success—and how organizations can align top-down and bottom-up strategies to protect their people and drive meaningful change. Key Takeaways: People are the foundation of safety—rules and programs only work when employees are actively involved in shaping and executing them. Middle management is often the bottleneck in safety performance due to lack of field experience and misaligned priorities. Effective safety systems require alignment across all levels: senior leaders, middle managers, and frontline employees. KPIs must be tailored by role—senior leadership, middle management, and field crews should each have performance metrics tied to their unique influence on safety. Safety is not just policy—it’s integration, and organizations must continuously measure, evaluate, and adapt their systems with employee feedback. ❓ 5 Relevant Questions & Answers: Q1: Why is employee involvement essential to a successful safety system? A1: Without employees, there is no safety system. Engagement ensures processes are practical, understood, and effectively integrated into real-world tasks. Q2: What role does middle management play in the success—or failure—of safety programs? A2: Middle managers often act as a roadblock if they prioritize production over safety or lack a true understanding of field-level risks. Q3: How can senior leaders improve safety outcomes? A3: By understanding the real “look of safety,” engaging directly with field teams, and holding themselves accountable for organizational risk tolerance. Q4: What kind of KPIs are most effective for evaluating safety? A4: Role-specific KPIs—like field engagement for executives or measurable improvements in hazard mitigation for frontline supervisors—are key. Q5: What’s the danger of not aligning top-down and bottom-up safety efforts? A5: It creates a culture of distrust, disengagement, and missed opportunities to improve safety. Full integration is necessary for success. #UtilitySafety #WorkplaceSafety #SafetyLeadership #SafetyCulture #EmployeeEngagement #FrontlineSafety Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/ Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/
April 15, 2025
Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing Written by Derek Sang, CSHEP, QSSP on February 14, 2025. Posted in Worksite Safety. A layered approach that includes FR/AR undergarments can enhance worker safety, comfort and compliance. Read the article here - https://incident-prevention.com/blog/optimizing-arc-flash-protection-the-crucial-role-of-layered-clothing/ Arc flash incidents can happen in a split second, but the right preparation can make all the difference. In this episode of The Deep Dive, we break down the must-know insights from the article “Optimizing Arc Flash Protection: The Crucial Role of Layered Clothing” by Derick Sang, featured in Incident Prevention Magazine. From flame-resistant undergarments to outerwear strategy, we explore why a layered clothing system isn’t just safer — it’s smarter. Learn how layering improves protection, comfort, compliance, and even day-to-day adaptability in the field. Whether you’re in safety leadership or on the front lines, this episode delivers actionable takeaways you can put to work today. ✅ Key Takeaways: Layered Clothing Enhances Protection: Combining base and outer layers boosts defense against arc flash energy more effectively than a single garment. Comfort & Moisture Management Matter: Layering helps regulate temperature and sweat, improving field comfort. Compliance Isn’t Optional: OSHA, NFPA 70E, and ASTM standards mandate FR/AR clothing and recognize layering as an effective strategy. Base Layers Are Often Overlooked: FR-rated undergarments are critical for secondary protection and shouldn’t be substituted with just cotton. Training & Maintenance Are Vital: Proper education on wear and care ensures PPE is used correctly and continues to perform over time. ❓ Five Questions & Answers: Q1: Why isn’t a single flame-resistant garment enough in high-risk environments? A1: While common, single layers can be uncomfortable and might not meet protection needs. Layering offers cumulative protection and energy dissipation. Q2: What role do FR base layers play in arc flash safety? A2: They act as a secondary defense, especially if outerwear shifts or fails during an event, protecting the skin and helping prevent burns. Q3: Are layered systems recognized by safety standards? A3: Yes. OSHA, NFPA 70E, and ASTM F1506 all support layered approaches and place responsibility on employers to provide proper gear. Q4: How does layering improve comfort for utility workers? A4: It regulates body temperature and wicks away moisture, keeping workers dry and more comfortable throughout changing weather conditions. Q5: What training should accompany an FR layered clothing system? A5: Workers should be taught how to wear layers properly, understand when PPE is required, and avoid compromising safety by adding non-FR outerwear. Subscribe to Incident Prevention Magazine - https://incident-prevention.com/subscribe-now/ Register for the iP Utility Safety Conference & Expo - https://utilitysafetyconference.com/ #ArcFlashSafety #FlameResistantClothing #UtilitySafety #WorkplaceProtection #PPECompliance #IncidentPrevention #PPE
Cumulus Podcast Network | VINCE
Wondery
Premiere Networks
iHeartPodcasts
Blaze Podcast Network
The Daily Wire
MeatEater
Todd Conklin
Ryan Lucas
Shawn Ryan
HSI
NPR
The New York Times
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at [email protected] for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.