Hosts Amy Odom, attorney at Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, and Amy Kretkowski, attorney at The Law Office of Amy B. Kretkowski, delve into the most important recent cases in veterans law coming out of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. As experienced VA disability lawyers, Amy and Amy offer listeners careful analyses of these cases and provide insights into their potential impacts on VA law.

Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod
Claim This Podcastby CCK Law
Podcast Authority
Beta
Podcast Overview
Hosts Amy Odom, attorney at Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, and Amy Kretkowski, attorney at The Law Office of Amy B. Kretkowski, delve into the most important recent cases in veterans law coming out of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the Federal Circuit. As experienced VA disability lawyers, Amy and Amy offer listeners careful analyses of these cases and provide insights into their potential impacts on VA law.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
10/2/2023
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
Podcast Authority
Beta
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
See how your show performs across every key metric
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
3 verified contact emails on file for Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes

February 5, 2026
Hamill v. Collins: The Future of the Implicit Denial Doctrine
<p><strong>In this episode of Arguendo</strong>: The Veterans Law Podcast, Amy Kretkowski and Amy Odom examine Hamill v. Collins, a closely watched Federal Circuit case addressing whether the Appeals Modernization Act’s enhanced notice requirements can coexist with the long-standing implicit denial doctrine. They explore the legal background of the case, the statutory framework governing VA decision notices, the arguments presented by both sides at oral argument, the broader implications for veterans seeking benefits, and more.</p><p><strong>Note</strong>: The case “Hamill v. Collins” was decided on February 4, 2026. This episode was recorded prior to this decision but accurately predicted its outcome.</p> <p>For more information, visit our websites at <a href="https://cck-law.com/?utm_source=podcast" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">cck-law.com</a> and <a href="https://abkveteranslaw.com" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">abkveteranslaw.com</a></p>

September 26, 2025
Chisholm, Adams, Ingram, and More: Your NOVA Questions Answered
This special episode brings NOVA Fall Conference questions to the mic. Amy Odom and Amy Kretkowski walk through key precedential cases like Chisholm, Adams, Ingram, and Rice, while exploring broader issues of supplemental claims, implicit denial, and how advocates can best serve veterans navigating the VA system. <p>For more information, visit our websites at <a href="https://cck-law.com/?utm_source=podcast" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">cck-law.com</a> and <a href="https://abkveteranslaw.com" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">abkveteranslaw.com</a></p>

July 18, 2025
Boehringer v. Collins: Can Supplemental Claims Trigger Continuous Pursuit?
<p>In this episode of Arguendo, Amy Odom and Amy Kowski analyze Boehringer v. Collins, a case testing whether a veteran can trigger AMA’s continuous pursuit rules by filing a supplemental claim within a year of a legacy Board decision. They break down the statutory argument under Section 2(x) of the AMA, the government’s position on finality, and the broader implications for effective dates in a dual-system world. A must-listen for those tracking how AMA and legacy rules intersect.</p><p>For more information, visit our websites at <a href="https://cck-law.com/?utm_source=podcast" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">cck-law.com</a> and <a href="https://abkveteranslaw.com" target="_blank" rel="ugc noopener noreferrer">abkveteranslaw.com</a></p>
9 total episodes available with 7 transcripts
Deep-dive analytics for Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Arguendo: The Veterans Law Pod?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 8 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.