Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 8 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Artificial Ignorance

Claim This Podcast

by Charlie Guo

3.7(3 reviews)

7 episodes

Updated Weekly

Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸

Podcast Overview

Interviews with founders, investors, and deep thinkers on artificial intelligence and its impact on our world. For more deep dives and news stories, visit www.ignorance.ai. <a href="https://www.ignorance.ai?utm_medium=podcast">www.ignorance.ai</a>

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

10/18/2023

Visit Website View on Apple Podcasts RSS Feed

1 verified contact email on file for Artificial Ignorance

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

See contact details

Recent Episodes

August 7, 2024

How a $2000/hour escort uses AI to automate sex work

As someone who grew up with the Internet, I’ve occasionally found myself in strange corners of it. But more often than not, I’ve walked away from those experiences with more knowledge than before, and a constant reminder to stay open-minded.So when I stumbled upon <a target="_blank" href="https://www.adelynmoore.com/blog-2-1/blog-post-title-one-akyn3">Adelyn Moore</a>, an escort who charges over $2000 per hour and tweets about using AI for sex work, I wanted to learn more. In our candid and thought-provoking interview, Adelyn - a self-described "<a target="_blank" href="https://x.com/AdelynMooreNY">autistic courtesan</a>" - offers a fascinating glimpse into the world of modern sex work and its intersection with technology.As the adult industry grapples with the rise of AI-generated content and "digital girlfriends," Adelyn sheds light on the complex interplay between authenticity, technology, and human connection. Her experiences challenge common assumptions about sex work and reveal how the world’s oldest profession can leverage its newest technology.“When choosing a profession, I took the Lindy Effect literally.”– Adelyn MooreThree key takeawaysAI-generated adult content still struggles with realism. While there are attempts to create ever more realistic AI porn, the current technology still struggles to produce convincingly realistic images and videos. The skin doesn't look real. The video quality at AI right now is mediocre. Image generation always looks weird - it looks like hentai often. It's not like at a point right now where it's good enough in the ways that you can actually be like utilized.Likewise, imperfection and "realness" are increasingly valued in the adult industry. As “perfect” photos and videos become more prevalent, there's a growing appreciation for content that shows authenticity and flaws.A lot of times I'll just disregard [online] photos because I'm like, “Okay, this photo just looks too manicured.” It's just boring. There's this heightened level of sensitivity because people see so little of just being messy.I have a video on my OnlyFans where I'm awkwardly… like, I wish I could do a sexy thing where I like rip open a condom with my teeth and I'm just trying and I'm like, I can't. I don't know if that's particularly sexy. But I like that stuff.The escort-client relationship offers a unique form of intimacy that may be difficult to automate away. The controlled environment and strict boundaries of these interactions allow for a rare level of openness and vulnerability than in other social contexts.When I first started [escorting], I thought it was always interesting how like people would tell me stuff that like, they were honest, that they didn't tell anyone else in their lives.…People often have a certain amount of vulnerability with me immediately. It's also this weird thing where it's, you have this parasocial relationship because they've met me and they've often people will be like, “I've been following you for like a year. I've been following you on Twitter for like months,” or like the fact that people will be like “I created a special anon account just to follow you.” And it's just that you immediately have this degree of intimacy that I have not seen replicated in any other part of my life.And three things you might not know:* Escorts hang out on social media just like everyone else; that thirst trap you’re scrolling past might actually be content marketing.* While most text-to-image generators like Midjourney have strict filters on nudity and adult content, other projects are working diligently to enable fully uncensored AI images.* Sex workers can perform pretty thorough background checks and screening on potential clients - including requiring IDs, phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles.Artificial Ignorance is reader-supported. If you found this interesting or insightful, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Artificial Ignorance at <a href="https://www.ignorance.ai/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4">www.ignorance.ai/subscribe</a>

June 27, 2024

Saving the world with AI and government grants

At OpenAI's DevDay, I had the pleasure of meeting Helena Merk, the CEO and founder behind <a target="_blank" href="https://streamlineclimate.com/">Streamline Climate</a>. Streamline is rethinking the way climate tech startups secure vital government funding, but leveraging AI to navigate, automate, and optimize the labyrinthine grant application process.In our interview from March (before the release of GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet), Helena shares insights on how Streamline Climate is not just saving time, but potentially accelerating our global response to climate change. From tackling bureaucratic hurdles to leveling the playing field for innovators, discover how AI is reshaping the landscape of climate tech funding and possibly our planet's future.Four key takeawaysBureaucracy is a silent killer. In Helena's experience, many climate grants are ineligible right out of the gate because of incorrect clerical errors or misunderstandings of the grant's eligibility criteria. Ultimately, this wasted time and effort compounds across an entire industry.Half of the reason you would get rejected is because of a clerical error on submitting your files correctly, or filing for something for which you're not eligible, the grant was never meant for you. So people are spending, on average, over 100 hours on a single grant application. And half of those have zero chance of ever winning.Prompt engineering wins out over fine-tuning. OpenAI's advice to Streamline (which mirrors what I've seen elsewhere) is that prompt engineering can get you much farther than you may think. Most people believe they need fine-tuned models, but they really want things to "just work."We've thought a lot about the trade offs and performance benefits of, training on models, fine tuning, etc. And what we've kind of come up with, and this was definitely also part of the advice from OpenAI, is that prompt engineering would get us there fastest in the cheapest way. And probably perform just as good, if not better than training our own models.Besides automating grant writing, there are many potential optimizations in the climate tech space. I learned a ton about the ecosystem around government grants, and we discussed some of Streamline's roadmap beyond just "AI for grant writing."You don't get the money when you win a grant: you have to report on your progress, file all your receipts. After you spend money, you have to get reimbursed. What this means startups is that they have to go get a loan. And that's silly. There's no way the government is going to change this process because of their own risk, but it means that every single company who's winning these grants needs to go get a working capital loan. There's people who provide, specific financing vehicles for this, and we can easily play matchmaker [between grant recipients and financing companies].Mission-driven founders have to strike a balance between mission and monetization. Helena and I talked about balancing prioritizing the mission with dealing with the incentives inherent in taking VC funding and pursuing growth as a for-profit startup.I've heard people refer to this as missionary versus mercenary type founders. Missionary founders, they're obsessed with whatever mission they're on and they don't really care about anything else. Mercenary founders are really just driven by "I'm going to build a bit of business that like, It goes to the moon."And that is how most of, I think, the Bay area operates. And it leads to pretty decent business outcomes in one way. But I realized that that is never going to be enough for me. I would so much rather run out of money and keep grinding on something that I care deeply about t han pivot into something that's going to be profit generating and maximize returns.I think I learned that when I was working on my first company, Glimpse, where we were working on a video chat company during the pandemic. A pretty safe bet. And I care very deeply about what we started on, which was helping to connect communities of people having deep conversations. It then turned into helping connect remote teams. And the further we got, the more transactional it felt. And I found it really hard.Artificial Ignorance is reader-supported. If you found this interesting or insightful, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Artificial Ignorance at <a href="https://www.ignorance.ai/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4">www.ignorance.ai/subscribe</a>

April 24, 2024

Getting to the top of the GPT Store (and building an AI-native search engine, too)

Back in January, I wrote about what business models might make sense with OpenAI’s GPT Store:As part of that, I included a screenshot of the featured GPTs, which included Consensus, the number one “Research & Analysis” GPT since day one. That said, the company existed well before the GPT Store - they’ve been working for years on an AI-native search engine for research papers. They’re also a part of the latest <a target="_blank" href="https://aigrant.com/">AI Grant</a> cohort. So, I was pleasantly surprised to learn that one of Consensus's founders, Christian Salem, was a reader! I was equally impressed with our conversation - while I’ve included some key takeaways below, it’s a pretty wide-ranging interview covering RAG and search engine architecture, the value of the GPT Store, how the NFL thinks about product management (and might use AI in the future), and more.Three key takeawaysVector search is not a silver bullet. Rather, it’s another tool that engineers can use as they build search infrastructure. It enables some new capabilities, but it also comes with tradeoffs.Search engines are so much more than just semantic similarity. The vector databases, they're amazing - some of these encoding models are getting better and better. But there's so much that goes into finding relevant documents that isn't just about the distance between two points in vector space. There's things like phrase matching, applying filters, finding synonyms. Sometimes we suggest queries to users. There's fuzzy matching - if you screw up and did a typo, it's kind of weird, but a lot of the vector and encoding models are not as good at typos and fuzzy matching can play tricks on them. There’s real value in the GPT Store. I was surprised to discover that the GPT Store has driven many new users for Consensus, and they currently have ~50% higher retention than other channels. That said, Consensus can capture some value by converting users to paid subscriptions, which isn’t true of free services.So actually we get some of our best users from ChatGPT, which is not something that I would have predicted when we set out doing this. But I think the last time I looked, our day 30 retention is, I want to say like 50 percent higher for users who we acquired through ChatGPT than every other channel. … It's actually turned into awesome users for us who not only use us in ChatGPT, but then come back to our website and use the web application day after day, and many of those users have converted to our premium subscription. So, so far it's resulted in a ton of value.LLMs are not one size fits all. Christian’s comments on using multiple models were similar to the ones from my <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ignorance.ai/p/interview-andrew-lee-shortwave-firebase">interview with Andrew Lee </a>- to build a fast, efficient system, you’ll likely need different LLMs for different use cases. There are so many tradeoffs around speed, cost, and quality that it’s hard for one model to win at all three.We were just counting this out the other day, 15 features powered by LLMs are in the product. Only three of them use OpenAI models. The rest all use open source models that we hand fine tune.…When we're assessing which models to use for a new feature or a new task within the product, I think there's a few really important criteria to go through. One, how similar is the task to OpenAI training data? If the task is, “hey, take a bunch of text and summarize it,” GPT-4 is so good at that task. It's seen that over and over and over again. So many users have asked it to do that in ChatGPT. And so they have RLHF on that. And for like a super basic summarization task that is very similar to some core GPT behavior.…Another thing that you obviously have to look at is cost. So, when you ask a question in Consensus for the top 20 papers that we return, we always do a RAG answer from the paper relevant to your question. That is very similar to something that GPT-4 could probably do pretty well. However, it would not be, economical to make 20 OpenAI calls on every single search for both premium and free users.And three things you might not know:* There still isn’t a great way for LLMs to parse structured PDF data, especially in table format. In the case of Consensus, it’s still a human-powered task.* The GPT Store has started <a target="_blank" href="https://help.openai.com/en/articles/9119255-monetizing-your-gpt-faq">testing monetization</a> with a handful of US-based creators but is not yet broadly available.* While the NFL may look like any other company, its "shareholders" are the 32 team owners, meaning new product launches often have to get the approval of owners and their friends and family.Artificial Ignorance is reader-supported. If you found this interesting or insightful, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Artificial Ignorance at <a href="https://www.ignorance.ai/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_4">www.ignorance.ai/subscribe</a>

7 total episodes available

Deep-dive analytics for Artificial Ignorance

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is Artificial Ignorance?: Interviews with founders, investors, and deep thinkers on artificial intelligence and its impact on our world. For more deep dives and news stories, visit www.ignorance.ai. <a href="https://www.ignorance.ai?utm_medium=podcast">www.ignorance.ai</a>
How often does this podcast release new episodes?: This podcast updates weekly.
Where can I listen to this podcast?: This podcast is available on 8 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
Does this podcast accept guests?: Information about guest appearances is not available.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.