Norplant was the first subdermal implantable contraceptive device. It consisted of six silicone rubber rods filled with a hormone. When it was inserted under the skin of a woman's arm, Norplant prevented pregnancies for up to five years. This podcast examines Norplant’s history, and more specifically the way governmental institutions used the contraceptive device to control certain populations of women’s bodies.

Choice or Coercion: The Biography of Norplant
Claim This Podcastby Justina Licata
Podcast Overview
Norplant was the first subdermal implantable contraceptive device. It consisted of six silicone rubber rods filled with a hormone. When it was inserted under the skin of a woman's arm, Norplant prevented pregnancies for up to five years. This podcast examines Norplant’s history, and more specifically the way governmental institutions used the contraceptive device to control certain populations of women’s bodies.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
5/2/2020
Reach the team behind Choice or Coercion: The Biography of Norplant
Verified contact details for this show aren't on file yet — sign up to get notified when they land.
Recent Episodes

June 4, 2020
Episode Four: The Welfare Incentive Proposals
This episode examines state lawmakers’ efforts to implement programs that would pay welfare recipients to use Norplant. The politicians proposing these programs argued that no woman would be pressured into choosing Norplant. Conversely, reproductive justice activists maintained that paying poor women to choose one contraceptive over another took the choice out of their decision. This episode also features some of my conversation with the reproductive justice activist, Brandi Collins-Calhoun.

May 28, 2020
Episode Three: Baltimore's Norplant Program
In 1992, Baltimore's health commissioner initiated a program that allowed some public school's health clinics to prescribe Norplant to their teenage students. The local government hoped this program would lessen the city's high teenage pregnancy rates, but they failed to predict the contentious debate it would produce. This episode features portions of my conversation with six UNC Greensboro students. To see visuals related to this episode, please follow us on Instagram at @choice_or_coercion.

May 21, 2020
Episode Two: Darlene Johnson's Case
One month after Norplant’s FDA approval, in January 1991, Howard Broadman, a California county judge ordered Darlene Johnson, a twenty-eight-year-old African American pregnant mother of four, to have Norplant inserted into her arm for three years as part of her probation. This episode examines Johnson's case and the complicated national debate it generated. Thank you to Frank Licata for lending his voiceover skills to this episode.
5 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for Choice or Coercion: The Biography of Norplant
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Choice or Coercion: The Biography of Norplant?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.
