Cold Logic Podcast is a cinematic investigative series that blends cutting-edge storytelling with AI-assisted research to probe the world’s most elusive events, suppressed narratives, and unexplained global phenomena. From vanishing civilizations and black-budget experiments to digital propaganda and psychological warfare, each episode uncovers hidden threads woven into the fabric of history, power, and control.AI is used in the procurement and analysis of information, helping us detect buried connections and forgotten records that traditional reporting often misses. But it’s the storytelling—guided by logic, shadowed by mystery—that drives this journey through the unknown.With each episode, Cold Logic invites listeners to follow the trail of evidence into a world where truth is fragmented, facts are filtered, and reality may be stranger than fiction.Follow the logic. Question everything.
Podcast Overview
Cold Logic Podcast is a cinematic investigative series that blends cutting-edge storytelling with AI-assisted research to probe the world’s most elusive events, suppressed narratives, and unexplained global phenomena. From vanishing civilizations and black-budget experiments to digital propaganda and psychological warfare, each episode uncovers hidden threads woven into the fabric of history, power, and control.AI is used in the procurement and analysis of information, helping us detect buried connections and forgotten records that traditional reporting often misses. But it’s the storytelling—guided by logic, shadowed by mystery—that drives this journey through the unknown.With each episode, Cold Logic invites listeners to follow the trail of evidence into a world where truth is fragmented, facts are filtered, and reality may be stranger than fiction.Follow the logic. Question everything.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
7/19/2025
3 verified contact emails on file for Cold Logic Podcast
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
May 26, 2026
Cold Logic The Ocean Floor Blackouts: Why Deep-Sea Cables Keep Getting Cut
COLD LOGIC — Episode 6 The Ocean Floor Blackouts: Why Deep-Sea Cables Keep Getting Cut Cold Logic is the investigative podcast that follows the signal — tracking the intersection of suppressed science, frontier research, and the questions that powerful institutions would rather you not ask. Each episode builds a case from documented evidence and follows it wherever it leads. not through satellites or wireless signals — but through submarine fiber-optic cables on the ocean floor. Over eight hundred thousand miles of them. Carrying SWIFT financial transactions, NATO communications, Five Eyes intelligence sharing, and every email, video stream, and cloud interaction in the world. In Episode 6 of Cold Logic, we trace the architecture of this invisible infrastructure — and the pattern of incidents that governments and telecommunications companies have been characterizing as accidents. We document the specific incidents: the West African cable cluster failures in January 2022; the Eastern European disruptions as Russian forces massed on Ukraine's border in February 2022; the severing of the Gotland cable within days of the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage in October 2022; the Baltic Sea cable damage in November 2024 and the Chinese-flagged Yi Peng 3 that anchored in international waters for weeks while NATO nations sought to board it for investigation. We examine Russia's GUGI deep-water research directorate and the Yantar oceanographic vessel documented operating directly above Atlantic cable routes. We look at the Belgorod submarine — designed to carry deep-water midget submarines capable of reaching any cable in the Atlantic or Arctic. We examine Chinese cable ownership stakes, deep-water autonomous vehicle capability, and PLA exercises focused specifically on cutting Taiwan's fourteen submarine cables. Then we ask the question neither governments nor cable companies want to answer directly: at what point does a pattern of anchor damage in geopolitically sensitive locations at geopolitically sensitive moments stop being a coincidence — and start being warfare that nobody is acknowledging? This isn't conspiracy theory. It's Cold Logic. Ninety-nine percent of global internet traffic runs through cables on the ocean floor. They keep getting cut — in clusters, near geopolitical flashpoints, in ways that official explanations don't fully account for. Cold Logic Episode 6 follows what happens when the signal disappears. submarine cable sabotageundersea cable securityinternet ocean floor cablesBaltic Sea cable damage 2024Yi Peng 3 cable incidentGUGI Russian submarine cablesTaiwan undersea cables vulnerabilityNord Stream cable sabotageNATO undersea infrastructure why do submarine cables keep getting cut geopoliticsRussia GUGI Yantar submarine cable surveillance operationsYi Peng 3 Baltic Sea cable damage China investigation 2024Taiwan submarine cables vulnerability PLA conflict scenarioBelgorod submarine deep water midget submarine cable operationsNord Stream Gotland cable sabotage connection October 2022NATO Coordination Cell Undersea Infrastructure Northwood 2023Chinese entities owning submarine cable systems security riskUNCLOS submarine cable protection legal inadequacyreflexive control Russian doctrine information warfare cablesWest African submarine cable failures January 2022 patternhow deep can submarines access submarine cablesprivate company ownership submarine cables Google Meta Amazonsubmarine cable repair ship fleet contestation conflictZimmermann Telegram British cut German telegraph cables WWI How much of the internet travels through submarine cables? A: Approximately ninety-nine percent of international internet traffic travels through submarine cables on the ocean floor — not through satellites or wireless signals. There are over four hundred active submarine cables worldwide, stretching more than eight hundred thousand miles, carrying financial transactions, government communications, military data, and all everyday internet traffic between continents. Who damaged the Baltic Sea cables in 2024? A: In November 2024, two submarine cables in the Baltic Sea were damaged — one connecting Finland to Germany and another connecting Sweden to Lithuania. Maritime tracking data placed the Chinese-flagged vessel Yi Peng 3 near the cables at the time of the damage. The vessel anchored in international waters for weeks while Swedish, Finnish, German, and Danish authorities sought to conduct an investigation. China declined to cooperate. No official cause was confirmed and the ship eventually departed. What is Russia's GUGI and what does it do? A: GUGI — Russia's Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research — operates a fleet of specialized deep-water submarines and submersibles designed for operations near underwater infrastructure, including cable tapping, cable monitoring, and potentially cable disruption. The Yantar, an oceanographic research vessel associated with GUGI, has been documented operating directly above submarine cable routes in the Atlantic and near UK cable landing stations. Russia also operates the Belgorod submarine, which can carry deep-water midget submarines capable of reaching cables at depth without the Belgorod approaching the target directly. Are Taiwan's submarine cables vulnerable to China? A: Taiwan is connected to the global internet by fourteen submarine cables, twelve landing in Taiwan itself. In any military conflict scenario involving Taiwan, disruption of these cables would degrade Taiwan's ability to coordinate its defense and communicate with allied nations. In 2023, two cables connecting Taiwan's Matsu Islands were severed by Chinese fishing vessels within days of each other, temporarily taking the islands largely offline. The PLA has conducted exercises specifically focused on cutting Taiwan's undersea communications infrastructure. Was the Gotland cable cut connected to Nord Stream? A: In October 2022, the Nord Stream pipelines were sabotaged beneath the Baltic Sea. Within days of the pipeline explosions, a submarine communications cable connecting Gotland island to Sweden was also severed. The incidents occurred in the same geographic theater. While they were not officially characterized as coordinated, several European intelligence agencies assessed the coincidence of timing and location as potentially significant. Is it legal to cut a submarine cable? A: Deliberately cutting a submarine cable is a crime under most national legal frameworks and under Article 113 of UNCLOS. However, proving deliberate intent at depth is extremely difficult, attribution to a specific state actor is rarely achievable with certainty, and the penalties under existing law are insufficient to deter state actors with strategic objectives. The regulatory and legal framework was designed for a commercial infrastructure era and has not been updated to address the adversarial environment submarine cables now operate in. What is NATO doing to protect submarine cables? A: In 2023, NATO established a new Coordination Cell for Undersea Infrastructure at its maritime command in Northwood, England, specifically tasked with monitoring and protecting submarine cables and energy infrastructure. The European Union followed with its own Critical Undersea Infrastructure Protection initiative. Both moves represented public acknowledgment that the ocean floor has become a contested operational environment and that existing frameworks were inadequate. Cold Logic Episode 6 covers the following documented and verifiable content: the global submarine cable network — four hundred cables, eight hundred thousand miles, ninety-nine percent of international internet traffic; cable construction and depth profiles; SWIFT financial messaging cable dependency; NATO and Five Eyes communications cable dependency; cable chokepoints at Cornwall/Widemouth Bay landing stations, Red Sea corridor (fifteen to seventeen cables, seventeen percent of global traffic), and Singapore (twenty-plus cables); the pattern of incidents including West Africa January 2022, Eastern Europe February 2022, Nord Stream/Gotland October 2022, and Baltic Sea November 2024; the Yi Peng 3 incident and Chinese non-cooperation; Russia's GUGI directorate and the Yantar oceanographic vessel; the Belgorod submarine and deep-water midget submarine capability; NSA Upstream cable tapping program (Snowden 2013); Chinese deep-water AUV capability and cable ownership stakes; Taiwan's fourteen cables and PLA exercises; the 2023 Matsu Islands cable incident; the Zimmermann Telegram as historical infrastructure warfare parallel; Russian reflexive control doctrine; Chinese informatized warfare doctrine; NATO Coordination Cell for Undersea Infrastructure (Northwood, 2023); EU Critical Undersea Infrastructure Protection initiative; UNCLOS Article 113; ICPC limitations; private cable ownership by Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft; the global cable repair fleet of approximately thirty vessels; and the strategic implications of cable repair contestation in conflict. EPISODE TAGS cold logic, submarine cables, undersea cable security, internet infrastructure, cable sabotage, Yi Peng 3, Baltic Sea cables 2024, GUGI Russia, Yantar submarine, Belgorod submarine, Taiwan cables PLA, Nord Stream Gotland, NATO undersea infrastructure, reflexive control Russia, Chinese cable ownership, UNCLOS cable law, Five Eyes communications, SWIFT cable dependency, cable chokepoints Red Sea, Singapore cable hub, Cornwall cable landing, WWI telegraph cables, Zimmermann Telegram, informatized warfare China, cable repair ships, private cable ownership, investigative podcast, cold logic podcast, fuzzy life studios See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
May 19, 2026
COLD LOGIC "The Shadow Insurance Market: Betting on Disasters Before They Happen"
COLD LOGIC The Shadow Insurance Market: Betting on Disasters Before They Happen SERIES POSITIONING STATEMENT Cold Logic is the investigative podcast that follows the signal — tracking the intersection of suppressed science, frontier research, and the questions that powerful institutions would rather you not ask. Each episode builds a case from documented evidence and follows it wherever it leads. Before the storm makes landfall, before the evacuation orders go out, before the cameras arrive — the financial markets are already moving. In Episode 5 of Cold Logic, we trace the architecture of the global catastrophe finance market: a multi-hundred-billion-dollar system in which institutional investors hold financial positions tied to whether specific natural disasters occur, priced by proprietary catastrophe models whose outputs flow to capital market participants before they reach the communities in the disaster's path. We trace the history from Hurricane Andrew in 1992 — which nearly collapsed the American property insurance market and catalyzed the development of catastrophe bonds — through the growth of the cat bond secondary market to over forty billion dollars in outstanding positions. We examine the catastrophe modeling firms whose products are probability: RMS, AIR Worldwide, and Karen Clark and Company, whose proprietary outputs feed financial positioning decisions that the general public cannot access. We examine the full architecture of insurance-linked securities — cat bonds, weather derivatives, collateralized reinsurance, and industry loss warranties — and the regulatory vacuum that governs them. We draw the parallel to mortgage-backed securities and credit default swaps, tracing the documented arc from legitimate risk management tool to complex, opaque, systemically significant market operating ahead of its regulatory framework. We examine the climate dimension — a warming world that expands the catastrophe finance market while the capital in that market flows away from mitigation. And we ask the question the industry has no institutional incentive to answer: at what point does proprietary disaster probability data become information that the people in the disaster's path have a right to know? This isn't conspiracy theory. It's Cold Logic. catastrophe bonds explainedcat bond market investingdisaster finance marketweather derivatives tradingreinsurance market explainedHurricane Andrew insurance collapsedisaster information asymmetryclimate finance catastropheinsurance-linked securitiescold logic podcast how catastrophe bonds work and who invests in themwhat is the cat bond secondary market and how does it tradeRMS AIR Worldwide catastrophe modeling firms proprietary datainsurance-linked securities market size and structureHurricane Andrew 1992 insurance industry near collapseHurricane Katrina reinsurance market absorption lossesweather derivatives speculation vs hedgingBermuda reinsurance market catastrophe risk capitalregulatory gap catastrophe finance SEC CFTC jurisdictioninformation asymmetry natural disaster financial marketscredit default swaps mortgage backed securities comparison catastrophe bondsclimate change catastrophe bond market expansionwho profits from natural disasters financial marketGoldman Sachs Paulson subprime short position parallel catastropheproprietary disaster probability data public disclosure obligation What are catastrophe bonds and how do they work? A: Catastrophe bonds — or cat bonds — are financial instruments that transfer catastrophic risk from insurance and reinsurance companies to capital market investors. A sponsor creates a special purpose vehicle that issues bonds to investors, who receive above-market interest payments in exchange for accepting the risk of losing their principal if a defined catastrophic event — such as a hurricane of specified intensity or an earthquake above a certain magnitude — occurs. The cat bond market has grown to over forty billion dollars in outstanding positions. Who buys catastrophe bonds? A: The primary buyers of catastrophe bonds are institutional investors including hedge funds, pension funds, university endowments, and dedicated insurance-linked securities funds. These investors are attracted primarily by the uncorrelated return profile — cat bond performance is largely independent of stock and bond market movements, since natural disasters don't respond to interest rate policy or economic cycles. What is the reinsurance market and why does it exist? A: Reinsurance companies — including Swiss Re, Munich Re, Lloyd's of London, and Hannover Re — provide insurance coverage to primary insurance companies, allowing them to transfer catastrophic risk that exceeds their capital reserves. Without the reinsurance layer, a single major hurricane or earthquake could generate losses large enough to bankrupt multiple primary insurers simultaneously. Hurricane Andrew in 1992 caused eleven primary insurers to fail, directly driving the development of more sophisticated risk transfer mechanisms including catastrophe bonds. What are weather derivatives? A: Weather derivatives are financial contracts whose value is tied to measurable weather variables including temperature, rainfall, snowfall, frost days, and wind speed. Originally developed to allow weather-dependent businesses to hedge revenue exposure, they are also used for pure speculation on weather outcomes. The global weather derivatives market carries hundreds of billions of dollars in notional value. What are insurance-linked securities? A: Insurance-linked securities (ILS) is a broad category of financial instruments that transfer insurance risk to capital market investors. The category includes catastrophe bonds, collateralized reinsurance, industry loss warranties, and sidecars. The total ILS market is measured in the hundreds of billions and has attracted sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, and university endowments seeking diversification into returns uncorrelated with traditional financial markets. Is there a regulatory gap in catastrophe finance markets? A: Yes. The catastrophe finance market operates across jurisdictions — the SEC oversees domestic securities, the CFTC oversees derivatives, FEMA oversees emergency management — but no single regulatory body has clear authority over the intersection of catastrophe finance and emergency management. Catastrophe bonds issued through offshore special purpose vehicles in Bermuda or the Cayman Islands may fall outside direct SEC jurisdiction. There is no framework requiring catastrophe modeling firms to disclose proprietary disaster probability outputs to the public before financial participants act on them. How does climate change affect the catastrophe bond market? A: Climate change expands the catastrophe bond market by increasing the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, creating more risk to transfer and more instruments to issue. While catastrophe finance institutions face genuine exposure from extreme climate events that exceed historical loss parameters, the market simultaneously benefits from a worsening climate through higher premiums, expanded instrument categories, and growing demand for risk transfer capacity. The capital flowing into ILS markets is capital that could alternatively fund climate mitigation infrastructure. Cold Logic Episode 5 covers the following documented and verifiable content: the reinsurance market structure and major firms including Swiss Re, Munich Re, Lloyd's of London, Hannover Re, and Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance; Hurricane Andrew's 1992 industry impact and eleven insurer insolvencies; the 1994 first modern catastrophe bond issuance; Hurricane Katrina's one hundred and twenty-five billion dollar economic loss and reinsurance absorption; the cat bond secondary market and real-time disaster probability pricing; catastrophe modeling firms RMS, AIR Worldwide, and Karen Clark and Company; the Bermuda reinsurance market formation post-Andrew; weather derivatives and their speculative applications; insurance-linked securities categories including collateralized reinsurance, industry loss warranties, and sidecars; the forty billion dollar outstanding cat bond market; the Goldman Sachs subprime short position and Paulson and Company trades as information asymmetry parallels; the credit default swap market growth from nine hundred billion to sixty-two trillion dollars 2001–2007; SEC, CFTC, and FEMA jurisdictional gaps in catastrophe finance oversight; the climate change — catastrophe market expansion dynamic; multi-asset portfolio exposure to disaster outcomes across insurance, reconstruction, and commodities; and the material information disclosure question at the intersection of proprietary catastrophe modeling and public emergency management. cold logic, catastrophe bonds, cat bonds, reinsurance market, insurance-linked securities, weather derivatives, disaster finance, Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Katrina, catastrophe modeling, RMS, AIR Worldwide, Bermuda reinsurance, information asymmetry natural disaster, climate change finance, cat bond secondary market, disaster investing, Swiss Re Munich Re Lloyd's, SEC CFTC regulatory gap, material information disaster, 2008 financial crisis parallel, credit default swaps comparison, mortgage backed securities parallel, Goldman Sachs subprime short, financial market opacity, investigative finance podcast, cold logic podcast, fuzzy life studios The Shadow Insurance Market: Betting on Disasters Before They Happen (primary)Cat Bonds: The Forty-Billion-Dollar Market That Profits When Disasters StrikeBefore the Storm: How Financial Markets Price Catastrophe Before the News DoesThe Disaster Trade: Who Profits From Natural Catastrophe — and What They Know FirstInformation Asymmetry: The Catastrophe Finance Market's Most Valuable Asset See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
May 12, 2026
COLD LOGIC The Great Food Illusion: Are We Eating Real Food Anymore?
COLD LOGIC EPISODE TITLE The Great Food Illusion: Are We Eating Real Food Anymore? SERIES POSITIONING STATEMENT Cold Logic is the investigative podcast that follows the signal — tracking the intersection of suppressed science, frontier research, and the questions that powerful institutions would rather you not ask. Each episode builds a case from documented evidence and follows it wherever it leads. Sixty percent of American calories now come from ultra-processed foods. Most people have no idea what that actually means — or what it costs them. In Episode 4 of Cold Logic, we break down the architecture of the modern food system: the flavor chemistry that replaced real ingredients, the behavioral science that engineered your cravings, and the regulatory framework that was designed to protect you and was captured by the industry it was supposed to oversee. We trace the concept of the bliss point — the sugar-salt-fat combination calibrated to bypass satiety signals — from food scientist Howard Moskowitz's original work for Pepsi to its adoption as the industry standard across every product category in the grocery store. We examine vanishing caloric density, acoustic engineering for crunch, and colorant use to manipulate flavor perception. We look at the FDA's GRAS self-certification system, which allowed over ten thousand additives into the American food supply — many never independently reviewed for safety. We document the Sugar Research Foundation's deliberate funding of Harvard research to redirect dietary science away from sugar and toward fat, a deception concealed for fifty years and discovered only when internal documents surfaced in 2016. We examine the consistent findings across multiple large-scale studies linking ultra-processed food consumption to cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and all-cause mortality. And we ask the question the industry's marketing infrastructure was designed to prevent: who designed the environment in which your food choices are made, and who profits from the choices you make? This isn't conspiracy theory. It's Cold Logic. ultra processed food dangersfood additives safety concernsengineered food bliss pointnatural flavors deceptionFDA GRAS system problemssugar industry cover upfood desert health impactare we eating real foodprocessed food health effectscold logic podcast what is the bliss point in food science and how is it usedare natural flavors on food labels actually naturalFDA GRAS self-certification food additive safety problemsSugar Research Foundation Harvard study 1965 cover upultra processed food linked to cardiovascular disease BMJ studyvanishing caloric density chips engineered to make you eat morefood additives never independently reviewed for safety NRDCpotassium bromate banned Europe legal United Statesfood deserts ultra processed food health disparitiesNOVA classification ultra processed food Carlos Monteirohow food companies use behavioral science to engineer cravingsrevolving door FDA food industry regulatory capturehow flavor companies design food taste International Flavors Fragrancesbrominated vegetable oil FDA GRAS revoked 2023what percentage of American calories come from ultra processed food Are natural flavors on food labels actually natural? A: Not necessarily. Under FDA regulations, a "natural flavor" is any flavoring derived from plant or animal material — but can involve extensive chemical processing, compound isolation, and reconstruction. Natural flavors are the fourth most common ingredient on American food labels and can include complex mixtures of chemically processed components from sources completely unrelated to the food being flavored. Companies are not required to disclose the specific compounds involved. What is the bliss point in food science? A: The bliss point is the combination of sugar, salt, and fat that produces the maximum desire to continue consuming a food — not the point at which it tastes best, but the point at which it most effectively bypasses the brain's satiety signals. The concept was developed by food scientist Howard Moskowitz and became a standard framework for product development across the American food industry. Is the FDA GRAS system safe? A: The GRAS — Generally Recognized As Safe — system allows food companies to self-certify the safety of additives without independent FDA review or approval before the substance enters the food supply. A 2010 Government Accountability Office investigation found the FDA could not ensure the safety of all substances being added to food. A 2013 NRDC report identified over 10,000 additives in the food supply, many never independently reviewed for safety. Did the sugar industry really cover up research linking sugar to heart disease? A: Yes. Internal documents obtained by UC San Francisco researchers and published in 2016 revealed that the Sugar Research Foundation paid Harvard scientists in 1965 to publish a review concluding that fat — not sugar — was the primary driver of heart disease. The funding source was not disclosed. The resulting research shaped American dietary guidelines for decades and contributed to the low-fat reformulation movement that increased sugar content across thousands of food products. What are ultra-processed foods and why are they dangerous? A: Ultra-processed foods are defined by the NOVA classification system as industrial formulations made from substances extracted from foods with little intact food remaining. Research consistently links high ultra-processed food consumption to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, depression, and all-cause mortality. A 2019 BMJ study found each 10% increase in ultra-processed food intake was associated with a 10% increase in cardiovascular disease risk. The average American now gets over 60% of daily calories from ultra-processed foods. What food additives are banned in Europe but allowed in the US? A: Several additives permitted in the United States are banned or restricted in Europe. Potassium bromate, used in bread dough, is banned in the EU, UK, Canada, China, and Brazil but remains legal in the US. Brominated vegetable oil had its GRAS status revoked by the FDA only in 2023, decades after European and Japanese bans. Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6 require warning labels about effects on children's attention and activity in the EU but carry no such warnings in the US. Q: What is a food desert and how does it affect health? A: A food desert is an area — typically low-income and urban — where access to affordable, nutritious food is severely limited, often with no full-service grocery store within a reasonable distance. Approximately 19 million Americans live in food deserts. Research shows that diet-related diseases linked to ultra-processed food consumption — including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease — cluster disproportionately in these communities, where ultra-processed food is often the only affordable and accessible caloric option. Cold Logic Episode 4 covers the following documented and verifiable content: the industrial transformation of the American food supply through processing and formulation; the flavor chemistry industry including International Flavors and Fragrances, Givaudan, Firmenich, and Symrise; FDA natural flavor regulations and their limitations; Howard Moskowitz and the bliss point concept; vanishing caloric density engineering; acoustic engineering of chip crunch; colorant use for flavor perception manipulation; the FDA GRAS self-certification system; the 2010 GAO report on FDA additive oversight failures; the NRDC 2013 report identifying 10,000+ additives; specific additives including maltodextrin, carrageenan, TBHQ, potassium bromate, brominated vegetable oil, and artificial colorants; the Sugar Research Foundation's 1965 funded Harvard study; the 2016 UC San Francisco document disclosure; the NOVA food classification system; the 2019 BMJ ultra-processed food cardiovascular study; the 2022 longitudinal study analysis; the 2023 European Heart Journal study; regulatory capture and the revolving door in food regulation; the Nutrition Facts label history; food deserts and geographic health disparities; and agricultural subsidy policy and its effects on food access equity. cold logic, ultra processed food, food additives, bliss point, natural flavors, FDA GRAS, food industry deception, sugar research foundation, dietary guidelines cover up, food science engineering, engineered cravings, food deserts, processed food health risks, NOVA classification, vanishing caloric density, potassium bromate, brominated vegetable oil, Red 40 warning labels, regulatory capture FDA, revolving door food industry, Howard Moskowitz, Carlos Monteiro, real food vs processed food, food system critique, investigative podcast, fuzzy life studios, cold logic podcast See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
63 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for Cold Logic Podcast
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Cold Logic Podcast?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.