Pan-Political is a podcast exploring what the next wave of the gender equality movement should look like.
It brings compassion to the issues faced by people of all genders. Instead of simply reacting to gender-related problems after they arise, we're asking a much bolder question: what is causing these problems in the first place, and how can we prevent them entirely?
The podcast envisions a world where no one is judged or limited by their gender — a world free from sexism, gendered violence, and avoidable gendered patterns. It champions genuine equality of opportunity for everyone and argues that the challenges faced by all genders must be addressed together, not in isolation.
Expect thoughtful, sometimes challenging conversations that will leave you inspired and hopeful for real progress.
Leave comments and interact with Pan Political on X: https://x.com/Pan_Political (https://x.com/Pan_Political)
Who cheats more? Come to Pleasure Island and find out. Part 1/2.
We’ve all seen the headlines and the angry comment sections. Men cheat more. Women cheat more. No-one can be trusted! Everyone’s lying. In this two-parter we slow down, look at the actual numbers, and ask a quieter question: what if the story we’ve been told doesn’t quite match what’s happening? And is there any way we can cut through the clutter?
Is there any way we can have better relationships, better relationship agreements, and better gender relations?
In Part 1 we take a tour of Pleasure Island — a simple logical framework with which we can explore the numbers. We also bring in less reported-on but more reliable information sources so that we know what's going on... which brings us to the question of why the media hates everyone, and all genders, with such passion.
In Part 2 we step away from the cold hard numbers and enter the warm and less sharply defined worlds of psychology and the social sciences. Why do affairs happen even when almost no one sets out to have one? What role do limerence, hormones, and our relatively new expectations of relationships play? And what practical options exist — before, during, or after — that don’t rely on shame or simplistic blame?
No one is coming for you if you’ve been in any of these roles, because all things happen for a reason. This is about understanding the terrain better, not about deciding who the villains are.
What do you agree with? What did we get wrong? Leave a comment on the episode post on X — we may come back to it in a future show.
X: https://x.com/Pan_Political (https://x.com/Pan_Political)
And if you'd like to contribute via Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/curiousconversationsaboutsex (https://www.patreon.com/curiousconversationsaboutsex)
28 Sept 2026
Answers to Your Questions: Density, Relief, and Gendered Awards.
This is a responses episode — three themes that consistently keep coming up when people talk about show, and one question that needed a proper sit-down about: Business awards for women.
What do you agree with? What did we get wrong? Leave a comment on the episode post on X — we may come back to it in a future show.
X: https://x.com/Pan_Political (https://x.com/Pan_Political)
And if you'd like to contribute via Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/curiousconversationsaboutsex (https://www.patreon.com/curiousconversationsaboutsex)
30 Aug 2026
Gender Separate Spaces 3 of 3: "Sort it Out For Yourselves", and What Happens Next
In this third and final episode of the trilogy on gender-separate spaces, we look exclusively at what happens when well-intentioned men are told to "sort if out for yourselves".
We follow an imaginary man called Dave — the kind of guy the gender-equality movement should find easy to reach. He wants the softer skills that often live in women-run community and self-development spaces: listening, belonging, emotional literacy, better sex and relationships. Then he finds those rooms closed to him, and the message is some version of “go sort it out with other men.” We walk five paths he might take: success, nothing happening, anger, the less healthy parts of the men’s movement, and a possible future of legal challenges.
We also look at sexuality education, the near impossible bind that many women find themselves in when they need women-only spaces and also want safer, more skilled men.
What are your thoughts on this? What do you agree with, and disagree with? What did we get wrong? What did we leave out? We want to hear from you, over on X: https://x.com/Pan_Political (https://x.com/Pan_Political)
Support Pan-Political on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/curiousconversationsaboutsex (https://www.patreon.com/curiousconversationsaboutsex) Your support helps me continue creating thoughtful, in-depth episodes without compromise. Thank you!
Reach and audience
Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.
Apple Podcasts (US)
3.3 / 5
6 ratings
Spotify
4.3 / 5
17 ratings
Podcast Authority Score: 27 / 100
A composite of feed quality, social presence, YouTube performance and engagement. Read the methodology.
Pod Engine is an independent podcast discovery and analytics service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by this podcast. Artwork and show content belong to their owners. Full legal notice.
Explore this show Podcast research with Pod Engine
