Podcast thumbnail for Exhibit A-List

Exhibit A-List

Claim This Podcast

by Jasmine Weg

5.0(10 reviews)
42 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas Sponsors

Podcast Overview

Where pop culture gets cross-examined. Hosted by New York attorney Jasmine Weg, Exhibit A-List breaks down the biggest celebrity and entertainment headlines through a lawyer’s lens — from viral lawsuits and Hollywood contracts to the wild legal twists hiding in your newsfeed. Smart, witty, and a little bit savage, this is where the courtroom meets the group chat. New episodes every week. 📌 Instagram (law & BTS): https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq 📌 Instagram (podcast): https://www.instagram.com/exhibitalistpod 🎥 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

10/28/2025

Reach the team behind Exhibit A-List

Verified contact details for this show aren't on file yet — sign up to get notified when they land.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for Chobani's Protein Lie, Elon Musk's $40M NDA, the Jelly Roll Divorce & Diddy's Shrinking Sentence

June 22, 2026

Chobani's Protein Lie, Elon Musk's $40M NDA, the Jelly Roll Divorce & Diddy's Shrinking Sentence

<p>Episode 42 is all about fine print: the fine print on your yogurt, the fine print in a $40 million silence agreement, the fine print of a marriage, and the fine print of a federal prison sentence.</p><p>Danone, the company behind Oikos, just sued Chobani in federal court alleging its 20g Protein line is misleading consumers. The claim is not about ingredients, it is about math. Danone says Chobani inflated its serving sizes so it could clear the magic 20-gram protein threshold, and that under FDA serving size rules the real number on the multi-serve tubs is closer to 18 grams. Jasmine breaks down the false advertising and unfair competition framework, why this is the fourth lawsuit between these two yogurt giants, and the one thing every consumer should do before trusting a protein number: flip the tub over.</p><p>Ashley St. Clair, who shares a son with Elon Musk, revealed she was offered roughly $40 million, $15 million upfront plus $100,000 a month for 20 years, in exchange for a lifetime NDA, and she turned it down. Jasmine breaks down the three legal layers underneath that decision: whether you can contract away your silence, why you cannot privately contract away a child&#39;s rights or a family court&#39;s authority, and why a major legal agreement allegedly presented over disappearing Signal messages makes lawyers very nervous.</p><p>Jelly Roll filed for divorce from Bunnie XO after nearly ten years, and by all accounts it is genuinely amicable, settled in weeks, with Jelly Roll giving Bunnie the compound she designed. But underneath the sweetness is an important lesson: Bunnie financially supported Jelly Roll and invested in his early career before he blew up. Jasmine explains equitable distribution, how the law credits the spouse who bankrolled the other one&#39;s success, and why support has real legal value even when your name was not on the income.</p><p>And Diddy&#39;s projected release date keeps moving up, sending the internet into a spiral about wealth buying freedom. Jasmine explains how federal sentence reduction actually works: good conduct time, First Step Act credits, and the RDAP drug program, all available to every federal inmate, not just the famous ones. Plus why his legal saga is nowhere near over given 70-plus civil lawsuits waiting on the other side.</p><p>And in the debut of a brand new segment, Cease and Assist, Jasmine explains one legal concept you need to actually know: if your job told you that you cannot discuss your salary with coworkers, that rule is probably illegal under the National Labor Relations Act. Your pay is not a secret, and pay secrecy is how pay inequality survives.</p><p>Follow Jasmine:<br>Instagram: ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq%E2%81%A0%E2%81%A0">https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq⁠⁠</a><br>TikTok: ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer%E2%81%A0%E2%81%A0">https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer⁠⁠</a><br>Website: <a href="https://www.wegesq.com">https://www.wegesq.com</a><br>Subscribe, rate, and share Exhibit A-List to stay updated on new episodes.</p><p><br></p>

Episode thumbnail for Tyra Banks v. Netflix, the ChatGPT Murder Evidence & the Blake Lively W

June 15, 2026

Tyra Banks v. Netflix, the ChatGPT Murder Evidence & the Blake Lively W

<p>First things first: the New York Knicks won their first NBA Finals game since 1973 and your born-and-bred New York host needed a moment. Mazel tov to the Knicks and MVP honors to Jalen Brunson.</p><p>Now to the law. Episode 41 covers three stories all tied to the same theme: how a story gets told, who controls the edit, and what the truth is underneath it.</p><p>Tyra Banks is suing Netflix for defamation over the docuseries Reality Check: Inside America&#39;s Next Top Model. She says she sat for a three-and-a-half-hour interview that was cut to just 16 minutes and reassembled to create a false impression that she knowingly allowed a contestant to be sexually assaulted on her show and could not even remember it. Tyra says the raw footage shows her saying I remember her story, and that Netflix cut it to make her look like she forgot. Jasmine breaks down defamation by implication, the actual malice standard for public figures, the Making a Murderer defense comparison, and why the gap between the raw footage and the final edit is going to decide this entire case.</p><p>Former NFL linebacker Darron Lee has been indicted on first-degree murder charges in the death of his girlfriend Gabriella Perpetuo, and prosecutors allege he used ChatGPT to ask how to explain her injuries and avoid police attention. Jasmine uses this case to break down a lesson that applies to everyone: your chatbot history is not private, it is not protected by attorney-client privilege, and it is fully discoverable and admissible evidence if it can be authenticated under Rule 901. Treat everything you type into an AI as a potential courtroom exhibit.</p><p>And finally, the ruling everyone got wrong. Judge Lewis Liman issued his decision on Blake Lively&#39;s motion under California Civil Code Section 47.1, and the headline that Blake won is only half the story. Jasmine explains exactly what Blake lost, the triple and punitive damages, and why she lost it on procedure rather than merit. Then she explains what Blake won, her attorney&#39;s fees, and why it happened: Baldoni&#39;s team had the burden to prove malice and showed up with three depositions about where the movie was filmed. Most importantly, Jasmine explains the appeal waiver buried in the settlement that makes this ruling final with no second chance. The ink is dry.</p><p>Plus a full round of Sustained or Overruled tying every ruling back to the stories.</p><p>Follow Jasmine:<br>Instagram: ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq%E2%81%A0%E2%81%A0">https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq⁠⁠</a><br>TikTok: ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer%E2%81%A0%E2%81%A0">https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer⁠⁠</a><br>Website: <a href="https://www.wegesq.com">https://www.wegesq.com</a><br>Subscribe, rate, and share Exhibit A-List to stay updated on new episodes.</p><p><br></p>

Episode thumbnail for Florida Sues ChatGPT, Cassie Left the Country & the $642 Deli Platter That Cost JPMorgan Millions

June 8, 2026

Florida Sues ChatGPT, Cassie Left the Country & the $642 Deli Platter That Cost JPMorgan Millions

<p>Episode 40 is here and every story this week is about what happens when institutions, celebrities, and corporations overestimate their ability to control the outcome.</p><p>JPMorgan fired a senior wealth manager who had been there over a decade and managed nearly a billion dollars in client assets. The stated reason: a $642 deli platter submitted on an expense report for a Super Bowl client event. A FINRA arbitration panel just awarded him $4.25 million. Jasmine explains what a U5 termination filing is, why a defamatory U5 follows a financial professional for the rest of their career, and why JPMorgan&#39;s attempt to challenge the award is an uphill battle under the Federal Arbitration Act.</p><p>Florida became the first state in the country to sue OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman personally in an 83-page complaint filed June 1st. The lawsuit ties ChatGPT to a mass shooting at Florida State University, accuses OpenAI of addicting children with no parental oversight, and seeks to hold Altman personally liable for what Florida calls an utter disregard for the risk to human life. Jasmine breaks down the product liability theory, why the personal liability claim against Altman is the most aggressive part of the complaint, and what the First Amendment fight inside this case is going to look like.</p><p>Cassie Ventura filed a court declaration in May stating she no longer lives in the United States and has no plans to return. After years of litigation, a federal trial, and testimony that described the worst years of her life, she quietly collected a reported $30 million in settlements, had her third baby, and left. Jasmine talks about what this means legally and what it means humanly.</p><p>Megan Thee Stallion is being sued for $1.2 million in allegedly unpaid styling fees by celebrity stylist Eric Archibald and his agency Six K. Megan&#39;s team is calling the invoices fraudulent. The stylist says he spent two years trying to collect. Jasmine explains the breach of contract framework, why the fraud counter-argument is actually a significant escalation, and what the signed agreement should have looked like before the first event was ever styled.</p><p>And Amazon Studios and Vice Studios just got sued for defamation over their Prime Video docuseries Hollywood Hustler: Glitz, Glam, Scam. The plaintiff, Julio Hallivis, was the business partner of convicted $650 million Ponzi schemer Zach Horwitz. He says he had no knowledge of the scheme and that the documentary implied he was complicit without ever giving him a chance to respond. Jasmine explains defamation by implication, why the private figure standard makes this case more viable than it might appear, and what documentary filmmakers owe to private individuals who appear adjacent to public stories.</p><p>Plus a full round of Sustained or Overruled on every story.</p><p>Follow Jasmine:Instagram: ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq%E2%81%A0%E2%81%A0">https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq⁠⁠</a>TikTok: ⁠⁠<a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer%E2%81%A0%E2%81%A0">https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer⁠⁠</a>Website: <a href="https://www.wegesq.com">https://www.wegesq.com</a>Subscribe, rate, and share Exhibit A-List to stay updated on new episodes.</p><p><br></p>

42 total episodes available

Deep-dive analytics for Exhibit A-List

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is Exhibit A-List?

Where pop culture gets cross-examined.

Hosted by New York attorney Jasmine Weg, Exhibit A-List breaks down the biggest celebrity and entertainment headlines through a lawyer’s lens — from viral lawsuits and Hollywood contracts to the wild legal twists hiding in your newsfeed. Smart, witty, and a little bit savage, this is where the courtroom meets the group chat.

New episodes every week.

📌 Instagram (law & BTS): https://www.instagram.com/jasminewegesq

📌 Instagram (podcast): https://www.instagram.com/exhibitalistpod

🎥 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jas_the_lawyer

How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates daily.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.