Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 6 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Extreme-Lit Review

Claim This Podcast

by WOKESCREEN™

8 episodes

Updated Daily

Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸

Podcast Authority

Beta

PoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more

Quality54

Social0

YouTube0

Engagement0

Learn more

Podcast Overview

Dive into the underbelly of the extreme elements of the political and cultural domains with Kieran White, a seasoned journalist with nearly 20 years of experience. Explore the covert operations of militants and agitators shaping our world from the shadows. <a href="https://www.extremelitreview.com?utm_medium=podcast">www.extremelitreview.com</a>

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

1/13/2025

Visit Website View on Apple Podcasts RSS Feed

🇺🇸 Charts #3

Outreach generated

Apple 142

Spotify 827

Instant mention tracking

Perfect fit!

Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report

See how your podcast performs across key metrics

Podcast Authority

Beta

PoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more

Quality54

Social0

YouTube0

Engagement0

Learn more

Excellent Areas

Good Performance

Growth Opportunities

excellent

Publishing Consistency

Every 5 days

Performing excellently!

good

iTunes Tags

6.5/10

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

poor

Episode Thumbnails

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

+16 More Metrics

Unlock comprehensive insights including:

• YouTube presence analysis
• Social media reach metrics
• RSS compliance scoring
• Podcast 2.0 features
• Technical standards

What's Included in Your Full Report

Detailed Analytics

Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
Personalized recommendations for each metric
Industry benchmarks and comparisons
Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring

Growth Strategies

Step-by-step action plans for improvement
Quick wins to boost your score immediately
Pro tips from successful podcasters

Get your free podcast insights report

See how your show performs across every key metric

Instant delivery

No spam

Attract Better Guests

High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.

Secure Sponsorships

Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.

Grow Your Audience

Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.

1 verified contact email on file for Extreme-Lit Review

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

See contact details

Recent Episodes

February 21, 2025

Nazis, Pedophiles, and Collectivists

What is your child doing online? This question might stir concern in many parents. The truth is, as much as you think you know, there is always more you do not.We have heard numerous accounts of how various political groups on the left attempt to influence the minds of our youth, leading them further and further away from the natural healthy and nurturing influence of their parents. Similarly, the tactics of alt-right groups in influencing young minds are equally important to understand. The truth may or may not shock you, but they are doing the same thing, just in reverse.Why have you not heard about this, you may wonder? Well, to acknowledge this predatory behaviour would require the admission that the right also has its problems. You may have noticed yourself that so much political capital has been placed into looking externally, however, to look internally into one’s political backyard is seen as a betrayal, to acknowledge White Supremacy, Neo-Nazis, and identitarianism, is to be branded a leftist and thus there is no incentive to call out the bad on their ‘team’.There is a very simple and logical answer to why this is the case, and we can approach it from a few broken-down avenues below:Influencer Class — It is well known that the way in which you maximise the earning potential of your audience is to share content that has the following ingredient; Fear of the ‘other’, helplessness, the feeling that the influencer holds the solution to all these orchestrated woes. Outside of the ‘influencer’ realm, this is otherwise known as the Dialectic—a tactic in which an individual (the influencer in this case) requires a self-serving outcome (financial gain and notoriety in this case) and thus proposes a problem (fear tactics evoking feelings of dread) to a group (the audience in this case). At this point, the group are feeling helpless and seeking a leader to solve the newly introduced problem. The individual will now swoop in knowing of the unspoken power he/she now holds over the group and will propose a solution (give financial support, consume more content, proliferate self-serving messages/content of the powerful individual). Feeling helpless, they accept the solution set-forth by the individual — this is crucially constructed to make it feel like it was the autonomous decision of the group or the individuals. This then achieves the goal set out by the individual and thus manipulates the group into doing what he or she wants.Political Class — A fearful group is a group that can be more easily controlled; the real skill that is required is how to become the trusted voice when all others are framed as the enemy. Propaganda is a very powerful tool that has been around as long as man would tell stories. Its utility in capturing and massaging the narrative for self-serving effects is immeasurably high. Therefore there are many reasons why the political class sees utility in denying the extremes within its own side of the political fence. One of the most obvious is to do so would provide ammunition to their political counterparts in a way that they would not do themselves. Another reason is the crux of politics as a whole, it is about neo-tribalistic interests.Politics is a performance art, it is there to bamboozle and capture your mind, it is there to reinforce the in-group and out-group dynamics of the tribe in which the ‘other’ is treated with suspicion until proven safe. As we will explore further on, nothing short of a full conversion deems them safe within the eyes of the tribe.All this said the act of tribalistic thinking is a natural response to an otherwise unnatural stimulus. It has been pointed out that the collectivist mindset is of a lower intelligence level than the individualistic one as it inherently lacks dexterity and is weighed down by generalised analysis of a problem.All of this comes together as a perfect solution to the disaffected, confused, and undeveloped mind. The one-size-fits-all approach offered by the tribal worldview does well to define clear—albeit artificial—boundaries, rules, and expectations. It essentially outsources the logic, reason, and analysis that humans do so well, to the collective and thus removes a layer of responsibility.However, it's crucial to understand that the influencer class and the political class, while distinctly different in their motives and methods, are not isolated in their operations. They simultaneously feed off the actions of each other, creating a symbiotic relationship where one cannot thrive without the assistance of the other. This dynamic ensures that fear, propaganda, and the narrative of control are perpetuated across different platforms, enhancing the reach and impact of radical ideologies on our youth.We hope you enjoyed that free preview. The Extreme Lit-Review is exclusively funded by our readers. If you would like to listen to the full episode and support our work, then please subscribe below.Theoretical FrameworkIn social psychology, there is a theory that I always come back to when discussing topics such as these and it is Terror Management Theory. Back in 2019, I conducted extensive research into the underground clandestine networks of BLM, QAnon, and the anti-lockdown movements. One of the things I discovered was that the way in which these groups recruited, mobilised, and communicated was like nothing I had ever seen before when it came to similar movements.Terror Management Theory (TMT) explains how fear and acknowledgement of one's mortality leads us to seek safety within a like-minded group and, most importantly, find those who share our cultural worldviews. It is important to find those who share one’s own cultural worldviews within this dynamic so that one can counteract mortality with a cultural immortality that outlasts the individual. In some situations, we see the pursuit of literal immortality through spirituality as an antidote to mortality salience. Now, this awareness could have natural or unnatural origins; however, it is that fear that prompts us to find a 'tribe'. As the fear grows, we become wary of others who do not share our strict views, and thus, over time, the in-group out-group dynamic grows with the tribe becoming ever more pure in their homogeneity.Another theory highly relevant here is Compensatory Control Theory (CCT). This theory suggests that when individuals find modern life difficult to navigate or understand, they may seek refuge in conspiracy theories or religion. Both provide a simplified framework that not only explains the workings of the world in comprehensible terms but also shifts the responsibility for life's complexities onto an external force, rather than attributing it to one's actions or decisions. It is crucial to emphasise, however, that this does not imply that those who engage with these belief systems do so for ulterior motives. Here, the term "conspiracy theorist" is not used pejoratively but rather to indicate the tendency to reduce complex situations to simplistic, often fantastical, 'truths.' Moreover, individuals who might be subject to CCT often experience what could be described as a significant moment of awakening or realisation, typically following a period of intense stress or helplessness. This leads to an exploration of whether adopting a new spiritual worldview is a coping mechanism or an organic awakening.When we consider these different psychological theories we start to understand the cognitive operating system of the tribalistic mindset and we can start to understand how it maps on to the world in which we live fraught with uncertainty and the foreboding everpresent messages of almost certain armageddon on all fronts. It is therefore easy to see how, just as gender ideology has found a way to exploit the messy and confusing journey of puberty, tribalistic extremes are able to prey on the power vacuums and the fight-or-flight dynamic informing the decisions of a very large proportion of society.Both Terror Management Theory (TMT) and Compensatory Control Theory (CCT) tackle the phenomena from two distinct angles. CCT deals with the circumstances through which our young find answers within groups like the Groypers, offering a framework to understand why they might turn to such collectives for simplification and control in a complex world. On the other hand, TMT provides a more profound 'why', explaining how the fear of mortality and the anxiety of modern life prompt individuals to seek safety within like-minded groups. This not only addresses their existential fears but also leads to the secondary effect of reinforcing in-group/out-group dynamics. Through emotional grooming via these fears and anxieties, the group ensnares young individuals, deepening their commitment to the collective's worldview.Collectivism vs. IndividualismPossibly one of the most controversial elements we must consider is how the preference for collectivist or individualistic ideologies might indirectly reflect cognitive capabilities. A study by Stolarski, Jasielska, and Zajenkowski (2015), titled "Are all smart nations happier? Country aggregate IQ predicts happiness, but the relationship is moderated by individualism-collectivism," provides insight into this topic. According to their research, while collective strategies would have been advantageous for survival in small, ancient tribes, in today's world, such collectivism does not always promote individual happiness or human flourishing in the same way. The paper suggests that in individualistic societies, where personal autonomy and self-development are prioritised, intelligence plays a significant role in achieving higher levels of life satisfaction. Here, individuals are less constrained by communal expectations, allowing for better information processing and decisions that align with personal interests rather than the collective's "greater good."However, this does not mean that collectivism in its pure form is inherently harmful. The study indicates that in collectivist cultures, happiness is derived differently, with social bonds and community integration playing crucial roles. The implication isn't that logic or reason are absent but rather that they are applied towards different ends, focusing on group harmony and shared goals rather than individual optimisation.When observing the in-group/out-group dynamics, which are foundational for identitarian movements on both the far left and far right, it's evident that these dynamics prioritise group cohesion and cultural purity over individual rational decision-making — as explained by the Terror Management Theory. This can lead to narratives that might not always align with logical or reasoned approaches but are instead designed to protect and perpetuate the group's cultural worldview.Thus, according to Stolarski et al.'s research, Individualistic environments leverage intelligence directly for personal satisfaction. Collectivist settings, however, channel it towards communal benefits at the cost of individual autonomy in decision-making.The social ostracisation of the white male archetype through media and political messaging has led individuals with a natural proclivity towards individualism to feel marginalised. In this context, they seek safety and kinship within a tribe. The prevailing societal messaging, especially around identity politics concerning race and gender, with institutions promoting black-only spaces, provides no deterrent for young minds to lean into group identities. Through the lens of CCT and TMT, we see how these paths naturally guide individuals into the grip of a tribe that enforces collective expectations, leading to group-based interests. When applied to groups like the Groypers and White Wellbeing, this becomes ethnocentric through white identitarian ideology. This shift often occurs during a rebellious phase, which in previous generations might have manifested in different forms of anti-establishment rebellion. Today, for some, joining the Groyper movement is less about ideological commitment and more an immature rebellion against perceived societal constraints on their speech, thoughts, and actions.Do you know someone who would benefit from reading this article?The GroypersYou may have either heard the names, seen the mascot, or heard the rhetoric, but do you really know who the Groypers are and what they stand for? We have to go back to around 2019 to see the emergence of this fledgling white nationalist movement. Founded by Mexican/American Nick Fuentes, who came to prominence as a result of a weakened alt-right sphere, while not directly attributing the title of ‘Nazi’ or ‘Neo-Nazi’ to his world views, has been quoted as having a deep admiration of both Adolf Hitler and larger Nationalist Socialist world views and policies.As we have touched on before in our exclusive investigation into the White Lives Matter Activist Manual and the Go Free movement headed up by Jason Köhne, these are no longer your wife-beater-wearing tatted obese men in rural Kentucky, this is a much more digitally attuned movement that — just like the left — has its tentacles in every aspect of society, including your child’s Roblox game. Our report uncovered white-only art websites, ‘anti-white’ trauma therapists, as well as white-only dating platforms.The Groypers’ belief system can be more neatly—yet not exclusively—placed into the box of White identitarian/Supremacist movements with more of an emphasis on the Supremacy elements due to the strong rhetoric of racial superiority. When confronted with this, many point to the addition of a few non-white groupers, however, this fact does not invalidate the Supremacy claims. Additionally, there has been quite a lot of controversy surrounding this movement outside of the rhetoric of its figurehead or supporters. The controversy includes semi-influential individuals who have decided to become internally associated with the movement and its causes that seem to run contrary to the stated beliefs of the movement.Ali Alexander, for example, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/stop-the-steal-organizer-ali-alexander-apologizes-after-being-accused-of-asking-teen-boys-for-sexual-pics/">issued an apology</a> after initially denying allegations of sending inappropriate messages to minors. Later, Milo Yiannopoulos reported on a situation involving Alexander where serious misconduct was alleged with an individual who was 18 at the time in 2016, leading to significant legal claims regarding the individual's health. Yiannopoulos referenced legal documents to support his report, though the details are too sensitive to reproduce here. For those interested, the documents can be reviewed at this <a target="_blank" href="https://x.com/Nero/status/1816938748355182615">link</a>.The allegations surrounding Ali Alexander are particularly significant because he was a key figure in the Groyper movement and a close confidant of Nick Fuentes. His alleged misconduct in grooming young individuals not only highlights the predatory nature of some within this group but also serves as a physical manifestation of how these groups psychologically manipulate and ensnare young minds. This behaviour mirrors the emotional grooming discussed under TMT, where the fear and anxiety of the young are exploited to reinforce group loyalty and control. It is important to clarify that we are not in a position to confirm the accuracy of these allegations against Mr. Alexander.Additionally, there has been a fascinating phenomenon of females latching onto the movement seemingly for financial gain rather than a long-lasting commitment to the movement as a whole. The Groyper movement is inherently male chauvinistic in its view of women and their role in society with some saying that it is misogynistic. Therefore the presence of women within the movement is akin to a Jew working with the Nazis; it may have its mutually beneficial logic, to begin with, but ultimately is destined for failure.One such woman who is antithetical to the group’s values: she is in an open marriage, was a porn actress during her college days, and was engaged to a convicted paedophile, whom she defends to this day. Additionally, her spiritual views are completely at odds with the strict Catholic sensibilities of the Groypers. When analysing the interaction and interplay between these 'satellites' and the main group, it becomes clear that this association is a facade. Although not ignored, it is tolerated because it allows the Groypers to expand their outreach. These 'satellites' serve as vectors for the group's message, mirroring the antisemitic, racist, and provocative rhetoric to exploit the typical Groyper adherent for monetary gain. It is a relationship of convenience.There is a common misconception that the Groypers are conservative in origin, however, this could not be further from the truth. Their underlying ideology is fundamentally at odds with Conservatism.One Dimensional ThinkingAs we previously touched upon, the reductionist view of the world such as the common one in which the Jews are the cause of all worldly ills is indicative of the phenomenon explained in the Terror Management Theory as well as the Compensatory Control Theory.It is clear to an independent thinker that no group is a monolith and that while it may well be true that an individual may happen to be Jewish, as long as there is one other person who deviates from the behaviour of that one individual, it is no longer logically consistent to use the collective attribution of blame.However, when your worldview is informed through the ingroup outgroup dynamic and there is an inherent fear of the other, it becomes clear as to how one would then project this collectivist framework onto others. TMT speaks to this clearly and is extremely accurate in its analysis given the demographic makeup of the Groypers. These are young males who are deeply disillusioned with the world around them and they are not wrong to notice this, however, they become ripe pickings for the snake-oil salesmen such as Fuentes that offer a final solution.How you may ask is it that so many of our young fall into this trap? For this we need to again view the phenomenon through the Compensatory Control Theory. These are young men who have had to face the brunt of messaging asserting that their immutable characteristics are the most important thing about an individual, and on this basis, they have been ranked as the lowest of the low. As with the White Lives Matter movement, we saw how they had appropriated the identitarian race essentialism that was born out of the CRT arena, and used for their own racial means. We had a brewing race war happening in our classrooms, in our entertainment industries, and in our politics. It would take exceptional grit to not succumb to the alluring illusionary safety of a tribe.Therefore we have a system that has failed young males, one that has attacked and demonised their very existence and then leaves these people disillusioned with the world around them feeling as though they do not belong. In other situations, it is the same thing that brings children to believe that they are trans, it is the same playbook, just different vectors of attack.The internet is a dark place and it is one that the alt-right knows well, they are culturally attuned and digitally astute.The AntidoteUltimately, I do not believe that the blame for the rise of figures like Fuentes lies solely with them; they are symptoms of a larger societal problem. For too long, we've focused on the emergence of questionable characters who capture the zeitgeist, yet their success is often a byproduct of the failures in leadership at various levels — from family to societal structures. If there were healthy leaders providing direction, purpose, and a sense of belonging, there would be no power vacuum for these charlatans to fill. The success of figures like Jordan Peterson, who, while not perfect, offers guidance to young men feeling lost and emasculated, underscores this point, showing that better alternatives can mitigate the influence of radical figures.We must ask why there's a newfound admiration for historical despots like Adolf Hitler or current leaders like Putin; it's because they present a stark contrast to the weak leadership and influence in these young men's lives, fostering distrust in traditional sources of information. A logical mind recognises the complexity of historical figures, understanding that even the most controversial have their nuances. However, the warped perspective driven by CCT leads some to reject objective truths, resulting in extreme beliefs like holocaust denial.Dismissing individuals associated with groups like the Groypers or ANTIFA as merely fringe or foolish overlooks the root causes of their rise. We're witnessing a significant mainstreaming of identitarian ideologies, not due to superior PR, but because of a parasitic strategy that exploits societal leadership vacuums. Promoting individualism, critical thinking, and strong, healthy leadership is crucial. We all share the responsibility to provide alternatives, filling these vacuums before they become breeding grounds for radical groups. Only by fostering environments that encourage personal growth and autonomy can we counteract the allure of collective tribalism that groups like the Groypers exploit.We hope you enjoyed that free preview. The Extreme Lit-Review is exclusively funded by our readers. If you would like to listen to the full episode and support our work, then please subscribe below. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe</a>

February 6, 2025

What are QUEER Stick and Poke Tattoos?

As with the very purpose of this podcast, we believe it is of utmost importance to avoid generalisations or conflating groups as being synonymous simply because they may share some overlapping tendencies, grievances, beliefs, or tactics.We have emphasised the significance of prefixes within the terms used in these circles. Communism, for example, is not a monolith. It is an umbrella term that, while carrying a singular meaning on its own, encapsulates a rich tapestry of rival beliefs. Among these is the anarchist faction often referred to as anarcho-communism or, in some contexts, ANTIFA.What, then, are the aims, ambitions, and beliefs of groups that further fracture and find context within the trans movement? This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">www.extremelitreview.com/subscribe</a>

February 5, 2025

What Are 'Affinity Groups'?

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://www.extremelitreview.com?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_7">www.extremelitreview.com</a> There is a common misconception that the militant tactics of the far left operate in the same way their ideologies do. This is not the case.One of the key techniques that has made these groups successful in militant uprisings is the use of 'Affinity Groups.' While the term might suggest a simple gathering of like-minded friends, it functions more like a quasi-paramilitary sleeper cell or a small battalion in this context. As we will explore in this operations manual, 'Affinity Groups' serve not only as an integral support network adhering to anarcho-communist values but also as precision tools in the revolutionary arsenal.

8 total episodes available

Deep-dive analytics for Extreme-Lit Review

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is Extreme-Lit Review?: Dive into the underbelly of the extreme elements of the political and cultural domains with Kieran White, a seasoned journalist with nearly 20 years of experience. Explore the covert operations of militants and agitators shaping our world from the shadows. <a href="https://www.extremelitreview.com?utm_medium=podcast">www.extremelitreview.com</a>
How often does this podcast release new episodes?: This podcast updates daily.
Where can I listen to this podcast?: This podcast is available on 6 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
Does this podcast accept guests?: Information about guest appearances is not available.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.