Podcast thumbnail for Improving Development Evaluation

Improving Development Evaluation

Claim This Podcast

by David Wand

3.5(2 reviews)
31 episodes
Updated Bi-weekly
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇨🇦
15

Podcast Authority

Beta
PoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality9
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement51

Podcast Overview

<p>Join Dr. David Wand as he takes you on a provocative, investigative journey challenging Canadian &amp; American international development organizations as well as international organizations to improve their performance measurement frameworks (PMFs) or Activity Monitoring and Evaluation (MEL) Plans. In Season 1, part 1 of the episode, Dr. Wand will introduce you to an international development organization and one of its projects where flaws in their PMF will be identified. In part 2 of the episode, the international development organization and evaluation experts will be invited to discuss Dr. Wand's critique and offer solutions to improving the evaluation of the project.</p><p>For Season 2, Dr. Wand expands the scope of his podcast to include USA government funded international development projects by acquiring Activity Monitoring Evaluation Learning Plans (MEL Plans) or their equivalent as well as continue acquiring Canada government funded international development projects that require PMFs or their equivalent. For Season 2 the focus of the podcast has also been improved whereby several projects from the same international development organization are covered in the same episode exposing how the international development organization fails to properly measure and evaluate whether its expected outcomes have been achieved. This is despite these organizations falsely claiming on their websites that they have achieved these outcomes at the expense of the taxpayer.</p>

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

10/7/2023

Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report

See how your podcast performs across key metrics

15

Podcast Authority

Beta
PoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality9
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement51
4
Excellent Areas
3
Good Performance
12
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Episode Length
9 minutes
Performing excellently!
good
Website Presence
1 link(s)

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

needs improvement
Publishing Consistency
Every 22 days

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

+16 More Metrics

Unlock comprehensive insights including:

  • • YouTube presence analysis
  • • Social media reach metrics
  • • RSS compliance scoring
  • • Podcast 2.0 features
  • • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report

Detailed Analytics

  • Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
  • Personalized recommendations for each metric
  • Industry benchmarks and comparisons
  • Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring

Growth Strategies

  • Step-by-step action plans for improvement
  • Quick wins to boost your score immediately
  • Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report

See how your show performs across every key metric

Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests

High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.

Secure Sponsorships

Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.

Grow Your Audience

Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.

Reach the team behind Improving Development Evaluation

Verified contact details for this show aren't on file yet — sign up to get notified when they land.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for GCERF post evaluation fails to show effectiveness in countering violent extremism in Nigeria

June 24, 2026

GCERF post evaluation fails to show effectiveness in countering violent extremism in Nigeria

<p>In this episode, Dr. Wand explains how a poorly designed evaluation framework with invalid outcome indicators leads to a post-project evaluation that fails to demonstrate effectiveness in countering violent extremism in Nigeria. Dr. Wand reviews the evaluation report produced by the Global Community Engagement Resilience Fund (GCERF) available at <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.gcerf.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Nigeria-Results-Paper-Round-2-Funding-2019-21.pdf">https://www.gcerf.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Nigeria-Results-Paper-Round-2-Funding-2019-21.pdf</a>. </p><p>Dr. Wand's review covers the following findings with detailed examples:</p><ol><li>Expected outcomes cannot be claimed to be achieved as GCERF claims as the outcome indicators depend on biased self-reporting rather than objective measures. Examples include GCERF claims of Community Action Response Teams being 'fully functionable' but with no objective measures of functionality.</li><li>GCERF claims of high levels of confidence by beneficiaries are questionable as methods of measuring these confidence levels are not provided.</li><li>Outcome indicators measuring skill acquisition for concrete skills such as the ability to mediate or manage conflicts or the ability to identify and report early warning signs of conflict are absent yet GCERF assumes without data that this skill acquisition occurred and that conflict mediation or management was successful.</li><li>GCERF makes 'impact' claims beyond the project despite no evidence such as reductions in violence and alcohol in specific communities.</li></ol><p>Recommendations to include data sources and methods of data collection and analysis are provided to enable GCERF to support their claims that currently cannot be supported as well as ensuring that outcome indicators actually measure the expected outcomes.</p><p>To receive discounts for the purchase of sunglasses or polo shirts or travel bags/backpacks/wallets designed for the Global South use the following link:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://mydeals.page/1hjl">https://mydeals.page/1hjl</a></p><p>Donate here: <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/ZAQD8888DEDXL">https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/ZAQD8888DEDXL</a></p><p>Or at <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://buymeacoffee.com/davidwand">buymeacoffee.com/davidwand </a>to help the podcast.</p>

Episode thumbnail for Humber Polytechnic International Development Institute fails to properly evaluate its $2 Million Kenya & Ethiopia STEM Education for Empowerment project

June 19, 2026

Humber Polytechnic International Development Institute fails to properly evaluate its $2 Million Kenya & Ethiopia STEM Education for Empowerment project

<p>In this episode, Dr. Wand reviews the Humber Polytechnic International Development Institute (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://humber.ca/global/international-development-institute-idi">https://humber.ca/global/international-development-institute-idi</a>) $2 Million Kenya &amp; Ethiopia STEM Education for Empowerment project's Performance Measurement Framework (PMF). He concludes that <strong>Humber Polytechnic International Development Institute cannot make the claim that it has achieved 8 of the 9 expected Outcomes for the project since 18 out of the 19 outcome indicators are not valid measures of the Outcomes</strong>, <strong>or for the 1 valid outcome indicator fail to show the necessary statistical analysis that would support the project's claim that the outcome was achieved statistically significantly rather than due to chance.</strong></p><p>Details about the project can be found here: <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://w05.international.gc.ca/projectbrowser-banqueprojets/project-projet/details/p007925001"><strong>https://w05.international.gc.ca/projectbrowser-banqueprojets/project-projet/details/p007925001</strong></a></p><p>The PMF and Dr. Wand's critique are available by emailing evaluatecanadaaid@gmail.com.</p><p>The PMF and the critique will be shared with Humber Polytechnic along with an invitation for them to respond to the critique by attending a future podcast. It will also be shared with the Secretary of State for International Development as well as the shadow critics for all the opposition parties.</p><p>To receive discounts for the purchase of sunglasses or polo shirts or travel bags/backpacks/wallets designed for the Global South use the following link:</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://mydeals.page/1hjl">https://mydeals.page/1hjl</a></p><p>Donate here: <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/ZAQD8888DEDXL">https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/ZAQD8888DEDXL</a></p><p>Or at <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://buymeacoffee.com/davidwand">buymeacoffee.com/davidwand </a>to help the podcast.</p>

Episode thumbnail for GCERF fails to validly measure rehabilitation of Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters - Western Balkans

June 1, 2026

GCERF fails to validly measure rehabilitation of Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters - Western Balkans

<p>The Global Community Engagement Resilience Fund (GCERF) (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://gcerf.org">gcerf.org</a>) has been funding organizations in Bosnia &amp; Herzegovina, Kosovo, Albania, and North Macedonia to deliver psychological services to Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters to enable them to become first, rehabilitated, and then reintegrated into their communities. Unfortunately, GCERF has failed to provide any valid measures of rehabilitation for these foreign terrorist fighters despite making claims of achieving subsequent reintegration for these fighters as shown by the absence of any rehabilitation outcome indicators in their "Results from Round 1 and Round 2 Funding in the Western Balkans (2020-2025)" report.</p><p>In this episode, Dr. Wand recommends that GCERF draw upon 4 valid measures of rehabilitation specific to Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters, including the <strong>Violent Extremism Risk Assessment VERA </strong>and the <strong>TRAP-18 (Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol) </strong>psychometric tools.</p><p>He also identifies flaws in statistical analysis such as aggregating outcome indicators across different projects within a country as well as aggregating outcome indicators across different countries that hinders GCERF's ability to use evaluation results to improve service delivery at the project level. He also notes the improper use of comparing averages of percent indicators rather than using medians that fails to recognize extreme percent values that can distort the overall percent indicator.</p><p>For receiving a discount on the products recommended when visiting the Global South, use the following link: <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://mydeals.page/1hjl">https://mydeals.page/1hjl</a></p><p>Donate here: <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/ZAQD8888DEDXL">https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/ZAQD8888DEDXL</a></p><p>Or at <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://buymeacoffee.com/davidwand">buymeacoffee.com/davidwand </a>to help the podcast.</p>

31 total episodes available

Deep-dive analytics for Improving Development Evaluation

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is Improving Development Evaluation?
<p>Join Dr. David Wand as he takes you on a provocative, investigative journey challenging Canadian &amp; American international development organizations as well as international organizations to improve their performance measurement frameworks (PMFs) or Activity Monitoring and Evaluation (MEL) Plans. In Season 1, part 1 of the episode, Dr. Wand will introduce you to an international development organization and one of its projects where flaws in their PMF will be identified. In part 2 of the episode, the international development organization and evaluation experts will be invited to discuss Dr. Wand's critique and offer solutions to improving the evaluation of the project.</p><p>For Season 2, Dr. Wand expands the scope of his podcast to include USA government funded international development projects by acquiring Activity Monitoring Evaluation Learning Plans (MEL Plans) or their equivalent as well as continue acquiring Canada government funded international development projects that require PMFs or their equivalent. For Season 2 the focus of the podcast has also been improved whereby several projects from the same international development organization are covered in the same episode exposing how the international development organization fails to properly measure and evaluate whether its expected outcomes have been achieved. This is despite these organizations falsely claiming on their websites that they have achieved these outcomes at the expense of the taxpayer.</p>
How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates bi-weekly.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 9 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.