In That Case is a podcast from Shook, Hardy & Bacon featuring candid discussions between attorneys in the firm’s Orange County Office.

In That Case
Claim This Podcastby Shook, Hardy & Bacon
Podcast Authority
Beta
Podcast Overview
In That Case is a podcast from Shook, Hardy & Bacon featuring candid discussions between attorneys in the firm’s Orange County Office.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
3/14/2024
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
Podcast Authority
Beta
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
See how your show performs across every key metric
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
1 verified contact email on file for In That Case
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes

March 20, 2025
Regulating the Regulators: The Legal Battle Over EPA's Clean Air Authority
<p>In this episode of In That Case, Shook attorney Henry Adams discusses Ohio v. EPA, a case examining the EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act and its regulation of interstate pollution through the Good Neighbor Rule. The conversation explores the legal and procedural challenges surrounding the EPA’s rejection of multiple state implementation plans (SIPs) and the subsequent federal implementation plan (FIP) and the broader implications for administrative law and agency power. The hosts break down key arguments from the majority and dissenting opinions, highlighting the complexities of regulatory decision-making and judicial oversight.</p><p><strong>Case</strong>: Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/a/adams-henry">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Henry Adams.</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/locations/orange-county">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Orange County office.</p><p><br></p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>

February 5, 2025
Redefining Administrative Enforcement Power / Environmental Implications
<p>In this episode of In That Case, Kansas City attorney Joseph Zaleski unpacks the Supreme Court's landmark 2024 administrative law decision in SEC v. Jarkesy. The Court ruled that a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission civil administrative enforcement action seeking civil penalties violated the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial. Joe explores the historical precedents, the public rights doctrine, and what this decision means for the future of administrative enforcement, particularly in environmental law and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency enforcement. Listen for an insightful discussion on how this ruling could reshape the scope of federal administrative enforcement in the future.</p><p><strong>Case</strong>: SEC v. Jarkesy</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/professionals/z/zaleski-joe">Click here </a>to learn more about Shook attorney Joseph Zaleski.</p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/services/practices/environmental/toxic-tort-and-exposure-litigation">Click here</a> to learn more about Shook's Toxic Tort and Exposure Litigation practice.</p><p><br></p><p>Please follow us on social media at:</p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&-bacon/">https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&-bacon/</a></p><p>YouTube: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ</a></p><p>Instagram: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/">https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/</a></p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.shb.com/">www.shb.com</a></p>

November 20, 2024
Edward Danielyan - When Is Arbitration Just Another Contract?
Shook attorney Edward Danielyan explores the California Supreme Court's ruling in Quach v. Commerce Club, redefining arbitration boundaries in employment disputes.
12 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for In That Case
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is In That Case?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates bi-weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 7 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Information about guest appearances is not available.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.