Conversations on intellectual property law, innovation, and global patent litigation with leading experts.
IP Talks
Claim This Podcastby Jan-Willem Prügel
13 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇩🇪
Podcast Overview
Conversations on intellectual property law, innovation, and global patent litigation with leading experts.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
10/1/2024
1 verified contact email on file for IP Talks
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
February 10, 2026
#13 How Copyright struggles with GenAI(Oren Bracha – Season 2 – Episode 7)
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="559" src="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Art_Oren-1024x559.png" alt="" class="wp-image-424" srcset="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Art_Oren-1024x559.png 1024w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Art_Oren-300x164.png 300w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Art_Oren-768x419.png 768w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Art_Oren-1536x838.png 1536w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Art_Oren-2048x1117.png 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure> <figure class="wp-block-audio"><audio controls src="https://iptalks-podcast.b-cdn.net/ip_talks_podcast_s2_e7_oren.mp3"></audio></figure> <p><strong>Professor Oren Bracha</strong> (University of Texas School of Law) informs us about what today’s debates over <strong>generative AI and copyright</strong> get right—and wrong. </p> <p>Bracha explains why many infringement claims based on <strong>AI training</strong> misunderstand what copyright is designed to protect, and why courts may be stretching familiar tools like <strong>fair use</strong> to address broader social concerns. The conversation also explores who should be liable when AI outputs are infringing, and why a <strong>risk-based, negligence-style approach</strong> could better address systemic harms. </p> <p>A wide-ranging discussion blending legal history, doctrine, and policy in the age of machine-made culture.</p> <div data-wp-interactive="core/file" class="wp-block-file"><object data-wp-bind--hidden="!state.hasPdfPreview" hidden class="wp-block-file__embed" data="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_Bracha_Generative-AIs-Two-Information-Goods.pdf" type="application/pdf" style="width:100%;height:600px" aria-label="Einbettung von 2025_Bracha_Generative AI's Two Information Goods."></object><a id="wp-block-file--media-9f7ef557-14d4-4905-99b7-f62f1070d3d0" href="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_Bracha_Generative-AIs-Two-Information-Goods.pdf">2025_Bracha_Generative AI’s Two Information Goods</a><a href="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_Bracha_Generative-AIs-Two-Information-Goods.pdf" class="wp-block-file__button wp-element-button" download aria-describedby="wp-block-file--media-9f7ef557-14d4-4905-99b7-f62f1070d3d0">Herunterladen</a></div> <div data-wp-interactive="core/file" class="wp-block-file"><object data-wp-bind--hidden="!state.hasPdfPreview" hidden class="wp-block-file__embed" data="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2024_Bracha_The-Work-of-Copyright-in-the-Age-of-Machine-Production.pdf" type="application/pdf" style="width:100%;height:600px" aria-label="Einbettung von 2024_Bracha_The Work of Copyright in the Age of Machine Production."></object><a id="wp-block-file--media-7716dd54-9303-422d-9dd0-464d4f581cf8" href="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2024_Bracha_The-Work-of-Copyright-in-the-Age-of-Machine-Production.pdf">2024_Bracha_The Work of Copyright in the Age of Machine Production</a><a href="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2024_Bracha_The-Work-of-Copyright-in-the-Age-of-Machine-Production.pdf" class="wp-block-file__button wp-element-button" download aria-describedby="wp-block-file--media-7716dd54-9303-422d-9dd0-464d4f581cf8">Herunterladen</a></div>
February 3, 2026
#12 Disrupting Patent Prosecution with AI (Kristine Pashin – Season 2 – Episode 6)
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="559" src="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Art_Kristine-1024x559.png" alt="" class="wp-image-419" srcset="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Art_Kristine-1024x559.png 1024w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Art_Kristine-300x164.png 300w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Art_Kristine-768x419.png 768w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Art_Kristine-1536x838.png 1536w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Art_Kristine-2048x1117.png 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure> <figure class="wp-block-audio"><audio controls src="https://iptalks-podcast.b-cdn.net/ip_talks_podcast_s2_e6_kristine.mp3"></audio></figure> <p>In this episode of IP Talks, host Jan-Willem Prügel interviews Kristine Pashin, a Silicon Valley-based scientist and entrepreneur, about her work in the patent space. <br><br>Kristine, a Stanford graduate with a background in neural tissue engineering and biotech, co-founded Article IP, a company focused on streamlining the patent drafting and management process through an AI-powered platform. </p> <p>The platform can transform technical inventions into provisional patents and manage portfolios efficiently, drastically reducing the time and cost traditionally associated with patent drafting. </p> <p>Additionally, she co-founded Cadence Law Group to provide legal services that complement Article IP’s offerings. </p> <p>Jan and Kristin discuss the challenges and future goals of Article IP, its investor relationships, and Kristine’s commitment to innovation and transparency in the IP landscape. The episode also explores her personal journey, the technical and business expertise of her team, and their mission to democratize access to intellectual property.</p>
January 26, 2026
#11 – Myths in IP Law (Jessica Silbey – Season 2 – Episode 5)
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="1024" src="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-27-2026-12_37_18-AM.png" alt="" class="wp-image-403" srcset="https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-27-2026-12_37_18-AM.png 1024w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-27-2026-12_37_18-AM-300x300.png 300w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-27-2026-12_37_18-AM-150x150.png 150w, https://ip-talks.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-27-2026-12_37_18-AM-768x768.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure> <figure class="wp-block-audio"><audio controls src="https://iptalks-podcast.b-cdn.net/ip_talks_podcast_s2_e5_jessica_silbey.mp3"></audio></figure> <p>In this episode of <strong>IP Talks</strong>, guest is Professor Jessica Silbey, a leading U.S. scholar of intellectual property law, talks about how creativity and innovation actually work – and why intellectual property law often gets it wrong.</p> <p>Drawing on her interdisciplinary background in law, literature, and cultural studies, Jessica challenges the dominant assumption that IP law primarily incentivizes creativity through economic rewards. Based on extensive qualitative research with artists, scientists, and innovators, her book The Eureka Myth shows that creative work is driven less by ownership and exclusion, and more by intrinsic motivation, collaboration, identity, and community.</p> <p>The conversation explores how the “lone genius” narrative embedded in copyright and patent law fails to reflect the deeply iterative and collective nature of real-world innovation. She discusses how this mismatch affects patent inventorship disputes, why U.S. patent law’s refusal to recognize simultaneous invention is problematic, and how doctrines such as fair use, idea–expression, and de minimis copying could be applied more generously to align law with creative practice.</p> <p>The episode also dives into the often-overlooked doctrine of fact exclusion in copyright law, tracing its historical roots and explaining why keeping facts in the public domain is essential for democratic discourse and freedom of information. Turning to AI, Professor Jessica offers a nuanced perspective on training data, authorship, and control, arguing that copyright should focus on human agency rather than machine output.</p> <p>The discussion concludes with reflections on potential copyright reform, the risks of over-enforcement in the digital age, and the broader role of IP law in supporting creativity, innovation, and democratic values.</p>
13 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for IP Talks
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is IP Talks?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.