JurisDictions: International law podcast

About JurisDictions: International law podcast

How is it that a movie about a children’s toy can raise tensions over territorial sovereignty? And why is it that certain international disputes draw more global attention than others? This monthly educational podcast by the Asser Institute, research centre for international and European law, explores such questions. It focuses on the stories behind international legal concepts and issues that shape our world.

Publisher

T.M.C. Asser Instituut

Category

science

Language

en

Explicit

No

First episode

1 Aug 2022

Latest episode

10 Mar 2026

Latest episodes

15 episodes in the feed.

1. 

   10 Mar 2026

   Marketing Justice

   We sometimes hear discussions that frame international dispute settlement in the language of markets. Consider the various discussions surrounding how international actors engage in ‘forum shopping’, looking for their preferred international dispute settlement venue amongst various available options. But what happens when we begin imagining courts and tribunals as active participants in this market? In what sense could we speak of courts and tribunals engaging in marketing? Guests Dr Georgia Antonopoulou (https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/law/antonopoulou-georgia), Assistant Professor in Commercial Dispute Resolution, Birmingham Law School, College of Arts and Law. Professor Christine Schwöbel-Patel (https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/people/christine_schwobel-patel/), Warwick Law School, the University of Warwick Host Eduardo Silva de Freitas (https://www.asser.nl/who-we-are/eduardo-silva-de-freitas-llm-llb/), PhD candidate at Erasmus University Rotterdam and junior researcher in private international law at the T.M.C. Asser Institute. Further reading Christine Schwöbel-Patel, 'Spectacle in international criminal law: the fundraising image of victimhood (https://academic.oup.com/lril/article/4/2/247/2222519)' (2016) 4 London Review of International Law 247. Christine Schwöbel-Patel, 'The ‘Ideal’ Victim of International Criminal Law (https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/29/3/703/5165646)' (2018) 29 European Journal of International Law 703. Georgia Antonopoulou, 'The ‘Arbitralization’ of Courts: The Role of International Commercial Arbitration in the Establishment and the Procedural Design of International Commercial Courts (https://academic.oup.com/jids/article/14/3/328/7076733)' (2023) 14 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 328. Georgia Antonopoulou, 'Forum Marketing in International Commercial Courts? (https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article/44/4/860/7706098)' (2024) 44 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 860.

2. 

   9 Dec 2025

   Strategic Litigation: An interview with Nani Jansen Reventlow

   In this episode, Taylor Kate Woodcock (https://www.asser.nl/who-we-are/taylor-kate-woodcock-llm/), Researcher in Public International Law at the Asser Institute interviews Nani Jansen Reventlow (https://www.nanijansen.org/about/), author and award-winning human rights lawyer specialised in strategic litigation at the intersection of human rights, social justice, and technology. Founder of Systemic Justice (https://systemicjustice.ngo/) and the Digital Freedom Fund (https://digitalfreedomfund.org/), Nani has overseen litigation worldwide, leading cases before national courts, the European Court of Human Rights, African Court on Human and Peoples Rights, and UN Human Rights Committee, amongst others. Nani joins Taylor to explain strategic litigation, her trajectory in the field and experiences working with marginalized communities in trauma informed ways, providing practical insights and hope for the pursuit of material, structural change through strategic litigation. For more information on Nani Jansen Reventlow’s recent and upcoming publications, see: ·        N Jansen Reventlow - Radical Justice: Building the world we need – Available in Dutch (https://radicalerechtvaardigheid.nl/) and for Pre-order in English (https://radicaljusticebook.com/) ·        Read more about Intersectionality and Human Rights: Reimagining European Court of Human Rights Judgments – Edited by Nani Jansen Reventlow, Eddie Bruce-Jones, Lyn K. L. Tjoin Soei Len and Adam Weiss here (https://intersectionalrewrites.org/).

3. 

   6 Oct 2025

   The Externalisation of Migration

   In this episode, Flora Bensadon and Irem Cakmak are joined by Zoe Bantleman, Dr Kris van der Pas and Dr Annick Pijnenburg to discuss the externalisation of migration. What is meant by the externalisation of migration? What legal, political and moral considerations does it raise? And to what extent may contemporary externalisation efforts be seen as a wider pushback against international law? Note: From 20:10 Dr Van der Pas discusses the upcoming changes to the connection requirement in EU law and from 30:18 Dr Pijnenburg briefly discusses the Italy-Albania deal and litigation and again the connection requirement. There have been some developments since the podcast was recorded: The European Commission published its proposal (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52025PC0259) to change the connection requirement and the Court of Justice of the EU ruled (https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=49E31B0606E42EC020757A0DB47BDFA9?text=&docid=303022&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=23465858) on a preliminary question that affects the Italy-Albania deal. Speakers Zoe Bantleman (https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/people/zoe-bantleman) – Barrister, Legal Director of the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA), and DPHil Migration Studies Student, University of Oxford Dr Kris van der Pas (https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/nl/medewerkers/k-vdrpas) – Postdoctoral Researcher, Tilburg University Dr Annick Pijnenburg (https://www.ru.nl/personen/pijnenburg-a) – Assistant Professor, International and European Law, Radboud University Hosts Flora Bensadon – Intern, TMC Asser Institute Irem Cakmak – Intern, TMC Asser Institute

4. 

   30 Jul 2025

   ‘The litmus test of Palestine’ - A conversation with Ammar Hijazi, Ambassador and Head of the Palestinian Mission to the Kingdom of the Netherlands

   In a brand-new episode of JurisDictions, the Asser Institute’s international law podcast, researcher Dr Carl Lewis interviews Ammar Hijazi, Ambassador and Head of the Palestinian Mission to the Kingdom of the Netherlands and Permanent Representative of the State of Palestine to International Organizations in The Hague. One year after the International Court of Justice delivered its Advisory Opinion (https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/node/204160) on the legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem (19 July 2024), Ambassador Ammar Hijazi (https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/node/204756) reflects on his role as ambassador, the importance of pursuing justice within existing international legal mechanisms, as well as the need for states to show commitment to international law. “(…) today we see the final episodes of our erasure taking place in Palestine. These are now very clear, in terms of law. Everybody knows where everything stands. And it is up to States. Do they want this system to continue? Or do they want it to collapse on the basis of a few interests here and there, or on sheer power and bullying? That's a determination that is not up to the Palestinians. This is why it is a litmus test. Everybody's looking at Palestine.”

5. 

   27 Jun 2025

   Establishing the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine: An Interview with H.E. Dr Anton Korynevych

   Ambassador Anton Korynevych discusses with Dr. Gabrielė Chlevickaitė the establishment of a special tribunal to prosecute the crime of aggression against Ukraine in this interview.

6. 

   21 Mar 2025

   Rights, Transfers, and Transnational Law: Exploring Football's Legal and Regulatory Landscape

   In this episode, we reflect on international sports law and the governance of football. Joined by Dr. Antoine Duval, we discuss the complexities of the football transfer system, particularly considering historical shifts following two landmark judgements: the Bosman (European Court of Justice, 1995) and the Diarra (Court of Justice of the European Union, 2024) rulings. How have these landmark rulings offered the possibility for the football transfer system to shift in favour of players? What even is a football transfer? And, more broadly, what legal and ethical issues arise around the ‘world's game' and football mega events like the upcoming 2034 FIFA Men’s World Cup, which will be hosted by Saudi Arabia? In this episode, we discuss all of this and more. Guest: Dr Antoine Duval, Senior Researcher in International Law, TMC Asser Institute Host and Editor: Flora Bensadon, Research Trainee, TMC Asser Institute Editor: Dr Carl Lewis, Researcher in Public International Law, TMC Asser Institute Further reading: A Duval, 'Football at a Crossroads (https://verfassungsblog.de/football-at-a-crossroads/)' (2024) Verfassungsblog B (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61993CJ0415)osman (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61993CJ0415) (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61993CJ0415)ruling (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61993CJ0415) (Case C415/93 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61993CJ0415)): (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61993CJ0415) Union royal belge des sociétés de football association ASBL, Royal club liégeois SA v Jean March Bosman and others and Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v Jean-Marc Bosman. Diarra (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62022CJ0650&qid=1742551785269)ruling (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62022CJ0650&qid=1742551785269) (Case C-650/22 (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62022CJ0650&qid=1742551785269)): (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62022CJ0650&qid=1742551785269) Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) v BZ. For further information, news and readings on questions of transnational sports law please visit the Asser International Sports Law Centre (https://www.asser.nl/sportslaw/about-the-centre/) webpage.

7. 

   19 Dec 2024

   The Rules of Modern Warfare and Ancient Traditions

   Dr. Robert Heinsch, Dr. Raj Balkaran, and Dr. Christina Kilby discuss how ancient Dharmic traditions inform modern International Humanitarian Law, highlighting the significance of humanity, distinction, and proportionality in warfare.

8. 

   19 Apr 2024

   Gaza and the International Legal Community(?): South Africa v Israel at the ICJ

   The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has now provided two orders of provisional measures in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) case, following the further deterioration of the humanitarian situation in Gaza since the 26th of January 2024. But what are provisional measures? What does it mean to invoke a breach of an obligation owed to the ‘international community’? What implications follow from these proceedings beyond the peace palace? And in what sense could it be argued that the ICJ may be denying reality? In this episode, we discuss all of this and more. Guests: Dr León Castellanos-Jankiewicz, Senior Researcher in International Law at the TMC Asser Institute Dr Shahd Hammouri, Lecturer in Law at the University of Kent Dr Giulia Pinzauti, Assistant Professor in International Law at Leiden University Dr Sarah Thin, Assistant Professor in International and European Law at Radboud University Host: Dr Carl Lewis, Researcher in Public International Law, TMC Asser Institute

9. 

   8 Feb 2024

   Why so serious? The importance of (fictional) maps in international law

   Why do states take maps so seriously? What role do they play in the international legal order? And how do international courts take them into consideration? We discuss all of this and more, with an eye to the ongoing Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela) case at the International Court of Justice. Guests: Dr Yusra Suedi, Lecturer in International Law at the University of Manchester. Dr Brendan Plant, Hopkins–Parry Fellow and Director of Studies in Law at Downing College, University of Cambridge. Prof Krista Wiegand, Professor in International Relations at the University of Tennessee, Mr William Worster, Senior Lecturer at The Hague University of Applied Sciences Hosts: Dr Carl Lewis, Researcher in Public International Law, TMC Asser Institute Ms Miranda Lalla, Student in the Advanced LLM in Public International Law, Leiden University and Intern, TMC Asser Institute Related Works: Bendel J and Suedi Y, Public Interest Litigation in International Law (https://www.routledge.com/Public-Interest-Litigation-in-International-Law/Bendel-Suedi/p/book/9781032560052) (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2024). Plant B, ‘Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. V. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.) (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-legal-materials/article/abs/arbitral-award-of-oct-3-1899-guy-v-venez-decision-on-jurisdiction-icj/42C7BEC2EE959A9C684C0E60646856E4)’ (2021) 60 International Legal Materials 1112. Powell EJ and Wiegand KE, The Peaceful Resolution of Territorial and Maritime Disputes (https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-peaceful-resolution-of-territorial-and-maritime-disputes-9780197675649?cc=nl&lang=en&) (Oxford University press 2023). Riddell A and Plant B, Evidence before the International Court of Justice (https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/12977) (British Inst of Internat Comparative Law 2011). Suedi Y, ‘Man, Land and Sea: Local Populations in Territorial and Maritime Disputes before the International Court of Justice (https://brill.com/view/journals/lape/20/1/article-p30_3.xml)’ (2021) 20 The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 30. ——, ‘Man, Land and Sea: Local Populations in Territorial and Maritime Disputes before the International Court of Justice (https://cil.nus.edu.sg/blogs/man-land-and-sea-local-populations-in-territorial-and-maritime-disputes-before-the-international-court-of-justice-an-introduction/)’ <https://cil.nus.edu.sg/blogs/man-land-and-sea-local-populations-in-territorial-and-maritime-disputes-before-the-international-court-of-justice-an-introduction/> accessed 8 February 2024. Worster WT, ‘The Frailties of Maps as Evidence in International Law (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3089117)’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 570. ——, ‘Maps Serving as Facts of Law in International Law (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3073565)’ (2018) 33 Connecticut Journal of international law 278.

10. 

    6 Jul 2023

    [Hague Courts] (2/2) International Criminal Court arrest warrants for President Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova: What are the legal and political implications? Part 2

    In this two-part episode, Carl Lewis is joined by an expert panel - Julie Fraser, Victoria Kerr, Sergii Masol, and Owiso Owiso -  to unpack some of the political and legal implications of the arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova. In part two, the conversation continues by considering the debate around the crime of aggression and the call for a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression and how this relates to the two arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC). They further discuss the question of double standards raised as a result of these arrest warrants and their impact on gender stereotypes about men and women in conflict. Finally, they consider whether this is a transformational moment for the ICC and international criminal justice more broadly. Panelists: Julie Fraser (https://www.uu.nl/staff/jafraser) - Assistant Professor with the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM) and the Montaigne Centre at Utrecht University. Victoria Kerr (https://www.asser.nl/about-the-asser-institute/whos-who/VictoriaKerr) - Consultant with the Asser Institute Sergii Masol (https://academy-humanrights.uni-koeln.de/en/guest-programme/sergii-masol) - Postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Cologne Owiso Owiso (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-0565) – International lawyer and independent consultant specialising in international criminal law and transitional justice Resources and recommended reading: 1) O. Owiso - An Aggression Chamber for Ukraine Supported by the Council of Europe -  https://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/30/an-aggression-chamber-for-ukraine-supported-by-the-council-of-europe/ (https://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/30/an-aggression-chamber-for-ukraine-supported-by-the-council-of-europe/) 2) P. Labuda - Beyond rhetoric: Interrogating the Eurocentric critique of international criminal law’s selectivity in the wake of the 2022 Ukraine invasion - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/beyond-rhetoric-interrogating-the-eurocentric-critique-of-international-criminal-laws-selectivity-in-the-wake-of-the-2022-ukraine-invasion/BD9D81E2CFA79A7930769DD0F18BBA63 (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/beyond-rhetoric-interrogating-the-eurocentric-critique-of-international-criminal-laws-selectivity-in-the-wake-of-the-2022-ukraine-invasion/BD9D81E2CFA79A7930769DD0F18BBA63) 3) S. Masol -  Ukraine and the International Criminal Court: Between Realpolitik and Post-truth Politics - https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/20/1/167/6580701 (https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/20/1/167/6580701) DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed by individuals in their personal capacity are their own and do not reflect the views or positions of their respective organizations.

11. 

    6 Jul 2023

    [Hague Courts] (1/2) International Criminal Court arrest warrants for President Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova: What are the legal and political implications? Part 1

    In this two-part episode, Carl Lewis is joined by an expert panel - Julie Fraser, Victoria Kerr, Sergii Masol, and Owiso Owiso -  to unpack some of the political and legal implications of the arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova. In part one, they discuss the background to the ICC Arrest Warrants and the role of immunity and jurisdiction. They address the question of head of state immunity and the practical considerations of the arrest warrants. They also deliberate on the reaction to these arrest warrants in Ukraine and Russia and the choice of charges raised by the ICC. Panelists: Julie Fraser (https://www.uu.nl/staff/jafraser) - Assistant Professor with the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM) and the Montaigne Centre at Utrecht University. Victoria Kerr (https://www.asser.nl/about-the-asser-institute/whos-who/VictoriaKerr) - Consultant with the Asser Institute Sergii Masol (https://academy-humanrights.uni-koeln.de/en/guest-programme/sergii-masol) - Postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Cologne Owiso Owiso (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-0565) – International lawyer and independent consultant specialising in international criminal law and transitional justice Resources and recommended reading: 1) O. Owiso - An Aggression Chamber for Ukraine Supported by the Council of Europe -  https://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/30/an-aggression-chamber-for-ukraine-supported-by-the-council-of-europe/ (https://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/30/an-aggression-chamber-for-ukraine-supported-by-the-council-of-europe/) 2) P. Labuda - Beyond rhetoric: Interrogating the Eurocentric critique of international criminal law’s selectivity in the wake of the 2022 Ukraine invasion - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/beyond-rhetoric-interrogating-the-eurocentric-critique-of-international-criminal-laws-selectivity-in-the-wake-of-the-2022-ukraine-invasion/BD9D81E2CFA79A7930769DD0F18BBA63 (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/beyond-rhetoric-interrogating-the-eurocentric-critique-of-international-criminal-laws-selectivity-in-the-wake-of-the-2022-ukraine-invasion/BD9D81E2CFA79A7930769DD0F18BBA63) 3) S. Masol -  Ukraine and the International Criminal Court: Between Realpolitik and Post-truth Politics - https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/20/1/167/6580701 (https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article/20/1/167/6580701) DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed by individuals in their personal capacity are their own and do not reflect the views or positions of their respective organizations.

12. 

    8 Jun 2023

    [Hague Courts] The Peace Palace and the 'building' of the international community with Prof. Tanja Aalberts and Dr Sofia Stolk

    In this episode, Prof. Tanja Aalberts and Dr Sofia Stolk share their research on the ‘building’ of the international community - The Peace Palace. What role did a curious ritual of gift-giving play in constituting the international community? What transnational, bureaucratic and monetary considerations (and bickering) were at play in the construction of the Peace Palace? If you want to read more about what is discussed in this episode, please check out the articles by our guests below- (both open access): T. Aalberts. and S. Stolk. Building (of) the international community: a history of the Peace Palace through transnational gifts and local bureaucracy (https://academic.oup.com/lril/article/10/2/169/6692741) T. Aalberts. and S. Stolk. The Peace Palace: Building (of) The International Community (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/peace-palace-building-of-the-international-community/7E5F3322BC17D99B056E1A79FBCAC901) And also have a look at the Legal Sightseeing website: www.legalsightseeing.org (http://www.legalsightseeing.org)

13. 

    27 Feb 2023

    [Hague Courts] Kiobel v Shell: The story behind the lawsuit dismissed by the Hague District Court with Dr Lucas Roorda

    In this episode, Dr Lucas Roorda (https://www.uu.nl/staff/LRoorda) joins us to discuss the Kiobel v Shell case, and the story behind the lawsuit that was dismissed by the Hague District Court in 2022. In particular, we discuss the procedural history of the decision, transnational litigation and how this case may be considered to illustrate procedural unfairness at play between individuals and corporations. Decision: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/#!/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2022:2449 (https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/#!/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2022:2449) Disclaimer by Dr Roorda: During the podcast, the ‘Southern DC Circuit’ was mentioned in deciding Kiobel, but it was the Southern District Court of NY (SDNY), and the 2nd Circuit on appeal. It was also mentioned that Kavanaugh was on the Circuit Court deciding Kiobel on appeal, but that is not correct – Kavanaugh was the dissenting judge on the DC Circuit in Doe v. Exxon (I), the case that created the Circuit split with Kiobel.

14. 

    6 Dec 2022

    [Hague Courts] Questioning nationality at the ICJ: Looking back at the Nottebohm case with Dr Péter D. Szigeti

    In this episode, Carl discusses the International Court of Justice’s 1955 Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) judgment with Dr Péter D. Szigeti (https://apps.ualberta.ca/directory/person/szigeti) of the University of Alberta. What is special about this case? What questions has it left open? And ought the ICJ reconsider the role international law perhaps should play in respect to certain questions concerning the nationality of individuals? Judgments Nottebohm (https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/18/judgments) (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) - Literature recommended by Dr Szigeti: Cindy G. Buys, Nottebohm's Nightmare: Have We Exorcised the Ghosts of WWII Detention Programs or Do They Still Haunt Guantanamo?, 11 Chicago-Kent J. Int'l & Comp. L. 1-73 (2011) Peter J. Spiro, Nottebohm and 'Genuine Link': Anatomy of a Jurisprudential Illusion, Investment Migration Working Papers IMC-RP2019/1 (2019) Atossa Araxa Abrahamian, The Cosmopolites: The Coming of the Global Citizen (2015) Noora Lori, Offshore Citizens: Permanent Temporary Status in the Gulf (2019)

15. 

    1 Aug 2022

    [Hague Courts] The ICJ: More than a dispute settlement body? A conversation with Prof. Ingo Venzke

    Carl discusses the case of Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), currently pending at the International Court of Justice,  with Prof. Ingo Venzke of the University of Amsterdam. Does it make sense to speak of universal values and their evocation in international law? Was the reaction of the Court in its ‘Order of 16 March 2022’ expected? What is the value of provisional measures set up by the Court? Follow the developments of the case:  https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/182 (https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/182)

Who has been a guest on JurisDictions: International law podcast

Names identified in recent episode analyses. Showing up to five guests.

• HE Dr Anton Korynevych
• Dr. Robert Heinsch
• Dr. Raj Balkaran
• Dr. Christina Kilby

Reach and audience

Public platform figures. Ratings count people who left a rating, not total listeners.

YouTube views

67,003

Score snapshot 15 Sept 2025

Spotify

5.0 / 5

22 ratings

Podcast Authority Score: 38 / 100

A composite of feed quality, social presence, YouTube performance and engagement. Read the methodology.

Quality

21

Social presence

0

YouTube

85

Engagement

51

Contact JurisDictions: International law podcast

Guest appearances

Does not typically book guests

Based on episode analysis; this does not confirm that the show is currently accepting guests.