We talk candidly "off the record" on practical advice, and provide insight on issues across the legal landscape. As counsel for the defense, we speak from a position of authority, giving our audience the info they need to make the best decisions for themselves. With a variety of hosts and personalities, our discussions give you the opportunity to learn something new and offer a different point of view.
Off The Record
Claim This Podcastby Imhoff and Associates
5.0(4 reviews)
6 episodes
Updated Inactive
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
Podcast Overview
We talk candidly "off the record" on practical advice, and provide insight on issues across the legal landscape. As counsel for the defense, we speak from a position of authority, giving our audience the info they need to make the best decisions for themselves. With a variety of hosts and personalities, our discussions give you the opportunity to learn something new and offer a different point of view.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
10/1/2022
Reach the team behind Off The Record
Verified contact details for this show aren't on file yet — sign up to get notified when they land.
Recent Episodes
February 1, 2024
The Art of Defense: An Introduction to Imhoff and Associates
<p>Imhoff and Associate’s Shannon Dorvall, general counsel and Shannon Leis, managing attorney, introduce us to Imhoff and Associates through their experiences with the firm as well as their appreciation for it’s commitments to justice.</p><p><strong>What you will hear</strong></p><ul><li>Introduction</li><li>Second chair</li><li>Ethos and its application</li></ul><br/><p><strong>Quotes</strong></p><p>“Human connection is one of the reasons why our firm is amazing”</p><p><strong>Mentioned</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.criminalattorney.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Imhoff and Associates</a></p><p>If you enjoyed this episode of Off The Record Podcast, make sure to <strong>subscribe</strong> and drop us a <strong>five-star review</strong>.</p>
January 1, 2024
The Impact of AI on the Criminal Justice System - A Technological Revolution
<p>Shannon Dorvall, counsel for defense at Imhoff & Associates and Shannon Leis, managing attorney of Imhoff and Associates take a deep dive into the pros and cons of AI technology in the criminal justice system.</p><p><strong>What you will hear</strong></p><ul><li>AI and how it can help criminal defense lawyers</li><li>AI challenges and considerations</li><li>Access to justice</li><li>AI gone wrong sample case</li><li>Ethical concerns and predictive AI</li><li>Types of AI and AI learning</li><li>Jury selection</li><li>Photographic use of AI and Daubert</li></ul><br/><p><strong>Quotes</strong></p><p><br></p><p>“AI tends to make racially biased decisions.”</p><p>“A lawyer should be aware of changes in the law in its practice, including any benefits or risks associated with relevant technology.”</p><p>“AI is not perfect. It is based on human intelligence and you know humans are nothing if not flawed.”</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Mentioned</strong></p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.criminalattorney.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Imhoff and Associates</a></p><p>Daubert standard</p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/27/nyregion/avianca-airline-lawsuit-chatgpt.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Mata vs. Avianca</a></p><p><br></p><p>If you enjoyed this episode of Off The Record Podcast, make sure to <strong>subscribe</strong> and drop us a <strong>five-star review</strong>.</p>
January 1, 2023
Shannon Leis - Truths and Misconceptions about your Miranda Rights
<p>Shannon Leis is the managing attorney of Imhoff and Associates and your host for today’s show. In this episode we are discussing Miranda warnings. We'll discuss the origination, substance, subsequent decisions, and the future of Miranda.</p><p><strong>What you will hear</strong></p><ul><li>Miranda Warnings history and definition</li><li>When the warning must be provided</li><li>Interrogation and evidence of guilt</li><li>The Public Safety Exception</li><li>The Jailhouse Informant Exception</li><li>Violating a right v violating a rule protecting a right</li><li>The future of Miranda warnings</li><li>Alito, Clarence Thomas and stripping protections for the rights and remedies of the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments</li></ul><br/><p><strong>Quotes</strong></p><p>“Miranda was one of several groundbreaking decisions aimed at protecting the right to the accused handed down by the Warren Court that fundamentally changed criminal procedure.” </p><p>“A traffic stop is not considered custody. Police are not required to provide Miranda warnings for an investigative stop and although these warnings are not required, that does not mean anything you say can't be used against you, because it certainly will. So be mindful of your mouth when the officer is asking questions, assume everything you do and say is being recorded and will be used against you.”</p><p>“While Miranda remains settled law, the effect of these subsequent decisions prevents Miranda from protecting people from police abuse, especially members of marginalized communities as it was intended to.”</p><p>“If you're interrogated in custody without Miranda warnings and make a statement, then testify at trial and give contradictory testimony, the prosecutor can use your statement to impeach the testimony in court.</p><p>“It is now irrelevant whether a suspect was cognitively or mentally impaired at the time, they waived their rights as long as police coercion is not involved.”</p><p>“To exercise your right to remain silent, you are required to speak…..So you need to invoke your right to remain silent in order to prevent your silence from being used against you.”</p><p>“No one should ever speak to law enforcement without a lawyer. They are not there to help you despite what they might claim. They can lie to you. They can trick you. Do not speak to law enforcement without a lawyer.” </p><p>“False confessions of people proven factually innocent by DNA account for 29% of wrongful convictions.”</p><p>“Miranda is important and necessary. It should be built upon and strengthened, not weakened.”</p><p><strong>Mentioned</strong></p><p>Arizona v Miranda 1966</p><p>Warren Court</p><p>Gideon v Wainwright</p><p>Harry v New York 1971</p><p>Rhode Island v Innis 1980</p><p>New York v Quarles 1984</p><p>Illinois v Perkins 1990</p><p>Marilyn v Shatzer 2010</p><p>Berghuis v Thompkins 2010</p><p>Salinas v Texas 2013</p><p>Vega v Tico 2022</p><p>Dickerson v United States</p><p>Map v Ohio</p><p><a href="https://www.criminalattorney.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Imhoff and Associates</a></p><p><a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&sectionNum=422" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">California Penal Code 4.22</a></p><p>If you enjoyed this episode of Off The Record Podcast, make sure to <strong>subscribe</strong> and drop us a <strong>five-star review</strong>.</p>
6 total episodes available
Deep-dive analytics for Off The Record
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Off The Record?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates inactive.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Information about guest appearances is not available.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.