With the help of AVEVA and Schneider Electric, this show explores the principles of Industry 4.0 through the insights of industry practitioners. Take an in-depth look at leveraging smart manufacturing technologies to drive industry innovation. Hear about firsthand experiences in implementing real-world manufacturing solutions. Our hope is that you will gain valuable knowledge about the challenges and successes encountered from their journeys, offering practical lessons for applying these insights to your own digital transformation efforts.
Practitioners Unplugged
Claim This Podcastby IndustrialSage
21 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
51
Podcast Authority
BetaFairBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality59
Social0
YouTube76
Engagement32
Podcast Overview
With the help of AVEVA and Schneider Electric, this show explores the principles of Industry 4.0 through the insights of industry practitioners. Take an in-depth look at leveraging smart manufacturing technologies to drive industry innovation. Hear about firsthand experiences in implementing real-world manufacturing solutions. Our hope is that you will gain valuable knowledge about the challenges and successes encountered from their journeys, offering practical lessons for applying these insights to your own digital transformation efforts.
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
8/8/2024
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
51
Podcast Authority
BetaFairBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality59
Social0
YouTube76
Engagement32
8
Excellent Areas
2
Good Performance
9
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Episode Length
53 minutes
Performing excellently!
good
Podcast 2.0 Features
5 fields
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
poor
Publishing Consistency
Every 33 days
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
+16 More Metrics
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report
See how your show performs across every key metric
Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Secure Sponsorships
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Grow Your Audience
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
1 verified contact email on file for Practitioners Unplugged
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
July 28, 2026
Insurance Companies Are Engineering Firms First
<div style="border-left: 4px solid #f57b20; padding: 16px 20px; background: #f9f9f9; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <p><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></p> <ul> <li>HSB was founded in 1865 as an engineering and standards organization, not an insurer, and it still leads with inspection and engineering before underwriting today.</li> <li>Equipment risk reduction is driving a shift in insurance, moving the industry from backward-looking actuarial underwriting toward real-time, observable risk powered by connected equipment data.</li> <li>In HSB’s own performance guarantee assessments, proven, connected technology has reduced the risk profile on a single piece of equipment by as much as 90 percent.</li> <li>The “Uber for machines” model, in which OEMs sell equipment outcomes instead of the equipment itself, depends entirely on connected data and an insurer willing to help absorb the financial risk.</li> <li>Insurance has always responded after a loss. Technology is what finally makes prevention affordable and scalable enough to change that.</li> <li>Equipment-as-a-service adoption is limited more by culture than by technology, and the CFO’s financial case is often what tips an organization toward change.</li> </ul> </div> <p>Equipment risk reduction has always been part of HSB’s business. What’s changed is how the company gets there. John Stokes, SVP of Technology Risk Solutions at HSB, joins <a href="https://www.industrialsage.com/practitioners-unplugged-by-industrialsage/">Practitioners Unplugged</a> hosts Dante Vaccaro and Sree Hameed. Together, they explain why real-time equipment data is turning industrial insurance from a backward-looking payout into a genuine prevention strategy.</p> <h2>An Engineering Company First, an Insurance Company Second</h2> <p>HSB, short for Hartford Steam Boiler, marks its 160th anniversary this year. The company’s founding story has little to do with underwriting. In 1865, steam boilers were exploding at a rate of roughly once every four days across American industry. Most people considered it an act of God, comparable to an earthquake or a hurricane.</p> <p>That changed when a boiler explosion aboard the steamship <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultana_(steamboat)" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sultana</a> on the Mississippi River killed more than 1,100 passengers. It remains the deadliest maritime disaster in U.S. history, and it became a tipping point for boiler safety nationwide.</p> <p>In response, HSB’s founders created the Hartford Standards: specifications for how boilers should be designed, manufactured, and maintained. Those standards became the foundation of the codes that steam boiler and pressure vessel operators still follow today. Notably, HSB issued its first insurance policy only after establishing itself as an engineering and standards organization.</p> <p>That order has never reversed. HSB employs nearly 3,000 people worldwide, and more than half hold a technical or engineering background. Inspection and engineering come first. Insurance comes second.</p> <h2>From Actuarial Underwriting to Real-Time, Observable Risk</h2> <p>For most of the insurance industry’s history, risk has been priced through actuarial underwriting. That means measuring risk based on how losses trend over time. It’s a backward-looking method, and one that depends on getting eyes on equipment in person, which is slow and expensive.</p> <p>In fact, Stokes describes a shift already underway, one where connected equipment and real-time data start to replace estimation with observation.</p> <blockquote><p>“We’re moving away from this model where insurers are estimating risk only through these actuarial principles, and now we’re onto these more observational, observable and measurable risk through real-time insights from connected equipment and data.”</p> <p><cite>John Stokes, SVP, Technology Risk Solutions, HSB</cite></p></blockquote> <p>That shift matters for claims, too. Richer data, Stokes says, will improve the experience for every stakeholder in the chain: the insured, the OEM, and the insurer itself.</p> <h2>Equipment Risk Reduction in Practice: Cutting Risk by Up to 90 Percent</h2> <p>The clearest evidence for equipment risk reduction through technology comes from HSB’s own performance guarantee work. Stokes points to vibration monitoring on rotating equipment as a concrete example. Picture a motor driving a pump in a wastewater facility, or an industrial fan in a data center. Traditional vibration monitoring flags a problem only after it already exists, usually forcing an unplanned overhaul, repair, or replacement. Machine learning applied to that same data works differently. It catches the first anomaly and turns a catastrophic failure into a minor maintenance task instead.</p> <blockquote><p>“We’ve done performance guarantees where it’s been in our assessment that the presence of technology can reduce that risk on a single piece of equipment by as much as 90 percent. That is strong and really impactful when it comes to insurance costs.”</p> <p><cite>John Stokes, SVP, Technology Risk Solutions, HSB</cite></p></blockquote> <p>That number changes the calculation for manufacturers weighing a technology investment against its return. Factor in what that level of equipment risk reduction saves on insurance costs and maintenance budgets. The technology can pay for itself well before the depreciation schedule says it should.</p> <h2>The “Uber for Machines” Model: Selling Outcomes, Not Equipment</h2> <p>Stokes draws a direct comparison to Uber’s disruption of transportation. The technology, not a better vehicle, made that model work. He argues the same shift is underway in industrial equipment, with OEMs moving from selling machines to selling outcomes.</p> <blockquote><p>“Think about an Uber for machines model where OEMs are not just selling equipment, they’re selling outcomes. Equipment as a service. No capital expense required upfront. The customer is really paying for that equipment based upon how it performs and what it ultimately produces.”</p> <p><cite>John Stokes, SVP, Technology Risk Solutions, HSB</cite></p></blockquote> <p>Rolls-Royce proved this concept decades ago with its <a href="https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/press-releases-archive/yr-2012/121030-the-hour.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Power-by-the-Hour model</a> for jet engines. Airlines paid a flat hourly rate rather than buying engines outright. Stokes sees the same logic extending into manufacturing plants and logistics centers, especially as robotics make automated production lines more common. The model only works if three things are true. The equipment must be connected, the data must be available, and someone on the other end must know what that data actually means. Without all three, Stokes is direct: it doesn’t work financially for anyone in the chain.</p> <h2>“Hope Is Not a Strategy”: Why Prevention Beats Payout</h2> <p>In practice, the obstacle to wider adoption of these models is rarely the technology itself.</p> <blockquote><p>“We’ve all heard hope is not a strategy, right? And there’s a lot of ways to plan for the bad things that are gonna happen, and I think insurance is just one of those. The basic principle of insurance is that it responds when something bad’s already happened. Mitigation and prevention are much more important, and that’s where technology plays a role in many use cases, if not all.”</p> <p><cite>John Stokes, SVP, Technology Risk Solutions, HSB</cite></p></blockquote> <p>Relatively small technology investments, Stokes notes, aren’t always easy to implement. That’s largely because of a cultural divide: OEMs and their customers have operated the same way for decades. Evolving that mindset, from “bad things are gonna happen, that’s why I need insurance” to “I have things at my disposal to keep those bad things from happening,” takes time.</p> <h2>The CFO Is the Real Catalyst for This Shift</h2> <p>Stokes is direct about where the decision to adopt these new models ultimately gets made: the CFO’s office. The conversation has to pencil out financially before it goes anywhere else, and it can’t only be about day-to-day operations. It has to show an improvement to the top and bottom line. That means more revenue from producing more with new technology, without shelling out significant capital. It also means lower ongoing operational costs for the equipment itself.</p> <p>Notably, insurance has a role in that financial case, too, not just paying for unexpected equipment damage but standing behind the overall financial model of an as-a-service arrangement. As more OEMs and end users test these waters together, equipment risk reduction stops being a technology story. It becomes a finance story, and that’s exactly the audience Stokes believes will ultimately drive this shift.</p> <h2>Frequently Asked Questions</h2> <h3>HSB and Equipment Risk Reduction</h3> <p><strong>What is HSB, and how is it connected to insurance?</strong><br /> HSB (Hartford Steam Boiler) is a specialty insurer and inspection company founded in 1865, now part of Munich Re. It provides equipment breakdown insurance and other technical risk coverage, with roots in industrial engineering and safety standards rather than traditional underwriting.</p> <p><strong>How much can technology reduce equipment risk, according to HSB?</strong><br /> In HSB’s own performance guarantee assessments, proven, connected technology has reduced the risk profile on a single piece of equipment by as much as 90 percent, according to John Stokes, SVP of Technology Risk Solutions at HSB.</p> <p><strong>Why is insurance moving from actuarial underwriting to real-time risk monitoring?</strong><br /> Actuarial underwriting prices risk based on historical loss trends, a backward-looking approach. Connected equipment and IoT sensors now let insurers like HSB observe risk in real time, enabling more accurate pricing and earlier intervention before failures occur.</p> <h3>Equipment-as-a-Service Business Models</h3> <p><strong>What is the “Uber for machines” model in manufacturing?</strong><br /> It describes a shift where OEMs sell equipment outcomes rather than the equipment itself, similar to Rolls-Royce’s Power-by-the-Hour model for jet engines. Customers pay based on performance rather than upfront capital expense, and the model depends entirely on connected equipment data.</p> <p><strong>What does “equipment as a service” mean for manufacturers?</strong><br /> Equipment as a service shifts ownership away from the manufacturer’s balance sheet. Instead of a capital purchase, the manufacturer pays based on the equipment’s output or uptime, while the OEM retains responsibility for keeping it running.</p> <p><strong>What’s the biggest barrier to adopting predictive, technology-driven insurance models?</strong><br /> According to Stokes, the barrier is cultural, not technical. OEMs and end users have operated the same way for decades, and shifting from a reactive mindset to a preventive one takes time, even when the financial case is strong.</p> <p><strong>Keep practicing, keep learning, keep transforming.</strong></p> <p> </p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>To follow more of HSB’s work, visit <a href="https://www.munichre.com/hsb/en.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HSB’s site</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/hsb" target="_blank" rel="noopener">connect with HSB on LinkedIn</a>. For another Practitioners Unplugged conversation on shifting from reactive to predictive operations, see <a href="https://www.industrialsage.com/episode-15-from-run-to-failure-to-predictive-operations-transforming-water-infrastructure/">Episode 15 on transforming water infrastructure</a>.</strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;">To submit a request for a new episode topic from Practitioners Unplugged, visit <a href="https://www.industrialsage.com/contact/">our contact page.</a></p> <p style="font-style: normal; text-align: center;">Explore more about <a href="https://www.se.com/us/en/">Schneider Electric</a> & <a href="http://www.aveva.com/en/">AVEVA</a></p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.industrialsage.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Presented-By-Aveva-SE-lockup_Color_Alt_Singleline-300x33.png" alt="" width="600" height="66" /></p>
July 1, 2026
The Skills Gap Is a Leadership Gap: What 300 Manufacturing Conversations Reveal
<p><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></p> <ul> <li>When a company has known about the skills gap long enough without acting, the problem has shifted from a talent pipeline issue to a leadership accountability issue.</li> <li>Change management is not a project phase with a defined start and finish. It is the continuous operating mode every manufacturer navigating digital transformation needs to internalize now.</li> <li>Most companies being pushed for an AI strategy are not yet ready for one. A coherent data strategy and clear organizational goals for the next three to five years come first.</li> <li>Young workers are not persuaded by executive pitches for manufacturing careers. They are moved by peers their own age who are visibly thriving in the industry.</li> <li>Lasting trust with communities, customers, and future employees is built through a bigger story: community impact, national security, and career fulfillment, not product launches and trade show schedules.</li> </ul> <h2>Get future Practitioners Unplugged episodes</h2> <p>Join manufacturing executives getting new conversations and key insights in their inbox.<br /> <button style="display: inline-block; background: #ff6d00; color: #ffffff; padding: 14px 28px; border: none; border-radius: 3px; font-weight: bold; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.2; cursor: pointer;"><br /> Subscribe Now<br /> </button></p> <p>Three hundred conversations across nearly a decade of manufacturing. That is the vantage point Chris Luecke brings to Practitioners Unplugged as Founder and Host of Manufacturing Happy Hour, one of the most recognized independent podcasts in the industry.</p> <p>Chris started the show in 2016 while working at Rockwell Automation, recording from an iPhone as a way to build credibility in a competitive sales role. What followed was a cross-industry window into what is actually happening at the plant floor and leadership team level across every corner of manufacturing.</p> <h2>Four Patterns From 300 Manufacturing Conversations</h2> <p>In Episode 20, Chris joins hosts Dante and Sree to break down what a decade of listening has revealed. Four patterns emerge consistently: a skills gap that has quietly become a leadership gap, a change management challenge that organizations keep solving backwards, an AI rush that is skipping a critical step, and a talent attraction problem that executives are consistently approaching the wrong way.</p> <h2>The Shift From Skills Gap to Leadership Gap</h2> <p>The phrase Chris carries with him from his interviews came from Jason T. Ray of Paperless Parts. Ray’s company helps machine shops and job shops with quoting, and his take was direct: “We’ve known about the skills gap for a long time, and at some point, when you’ve known about a problem long enough, it’s not a skills gap anymore. It’s a leadership gap.”</p> <p>Indeed, Chris has watched that observation hold up across hundreds of subsequent conversations. The pattern is consistent. Walk into a facility with strong culture, modern technology, and leaders who hold themselves accountable. The talent conversation there sounds entirely different. Those companies are not complaining about pipeline. They are asking a more useful question: how do we find people with the right character so we can train them for the skills we need?</p> <p>By contrast, the facilities throwing their hands up tend to share a common profile: managers instead of leaders, a culture that leads with consequences rather than development, and a workforce problem acknowledged for years without meaningful action.</p> <p>Ultimately, the labor market is the same for everyone. The difference is leadership.</p> <h2>Change Management Is a Habit, Not a Phase</h2> <p>One of the most common patterns Chris hears from manufacturers who struggled with digital transformation: change management was called in after the technology was already deployed and adoption had stalled. A central team rolled out a system, resistance followed, and someone scrambled to fix what should have been part of the plan from the beginning.</p> <p>His reframe is direct. The question is not whether to start change management before, during, or after your next initiative. For any company that has not already internalized it, the most important shift is making it a habit.</p> <blockquote><p>“It’s not before, during, or after. It’s just where we are in our change management journey. We are always going to be going through one.”</p> <p><cite>Chris Luecke, Founder and Host, Manufacturing Happy Hour</cite></p></blockquote> <p>Whether the change is a full system replacement or a software update to existing automation equipment, the goal is the same: ingrain the reality that change is continuous. Digital transformation was never a destination with a defined endpoint. It is a different way of thinking about how a business operates going forward. The organizations navigating it best are not managing through change. They have made it part of their identity.</p> <h2>Why an AI Strategy Without a Data Foundation First Gets the Sequence Wrong</h2> <p>As a podcaster, Chris has noticed something revealing. He receives a steady stream of requests from technology companies wanting to talk about what their AI is doing for manufacturing. Calls from manufacturers ready to describe what AI is actually doing for their operations are far fewer.</p> <p>In fact, that gap is not surprising. Many of the companies now rushing to define an AI strategy are working through the same underlying infrastructure problems they faced during Industry 4.0. The pattern repeats: technology gets deployed ahead of organizational readiness, and adoption stalls.</p> <blockquote><p>“Everyone wants to have an AI strategy right now when really I think some people should still be thinking about what their data strategy is.”</p> <p><cite>Chris Luecke, Founder and Host, Manufacturing Happy Hour</cite></p></blockquote> <p>The sequence matters. Before asking what AI could do for an operation, a manufacturer needs to understand what the organization actually wants to accomplish over the next three to five years. What would being more productive look like, and what business impact would it create? Technology executes strategy. It does not create it. Reversing that order already cost manufacturers one expensive cycle with Industry 4.0, and the companies that skipped the foundation are now being asked to skip it again.</p> <h2>Who Actually Recruits the Next Generation</h2> <p>The conventional manufacturing talent pitch relies on executives and industry veterans making the case to young people. Chris is direct about why this approach keeps falling short.</p> <blockquote><p>“An 18-year-old isn’t gonna wanna listen to a 39-year-old like me or a 55-year-old saying, ‘Hey, there’s a great career in manufacturing ahead for you.’ It’s a data point.”</p> <p><cite>Chris Luecke, Founder and Host, Manufacturing Happy Hour</cite></p></blockquote> <p>Instead, what actually moves behavior is peer influence. A 23-year-old from the same neighborhood, building a real career in manufacturing, making real money, and carrying no student debt: that is a story an 18-year-old can see themselves in. It is not a statistic. Rather, it is evidence.</p> <p>Therefore, Chris’s call to action for manufacturers is to stop trying to be the messenger and start enabling their youngest high performers to tell the story. The companies winning on talent are not just hiring young workers. They are creating conditions where those employees thrive visibly, so the next wave of candidates can look at that and think: that could be me.</p> <p>This is not a new dynamic. After all, every generation has listened to its peers first. The manufacturers who understand that are the ones building pipelines that actually fill.</p> <h2>The Bigger Story Manufacturers Are Missing</h2> <p>Manufacturers tend to default to a narrow content and communication strategy: announce the new product, promote the upcoming trade show, share the latest certification. Chris has no argument against any of those. But he argues consistently that manufacturers are missing a much more powerful opportunity by stopping there.</p> <p>The topics that build real trust over time connect manufacturing to something larger: career fulfillment, community development, national security. Those are the stories that, told consistently over years, make a company trusted rather than simply recognized.</p> <blockquote><p>“There are too many manufacturers that miss the opportunity for more general trust-building and relationship-building in manufacturing.”</p> <p><cite>Chris Luecke, Founder and Host, Manufacturing Happy Hour</cite></p></blockquote> <p>In turn, that trust has direct business consequences: stronger sales relationships, a more compelling employer brand, and a talent pipeline built on genuine credibility rather than recruiting budgets. The manufacturers willing to build community one relationship at a time, through honest storytelling and local presence rather than product roadshows, are the ones developing a durable competitive advantage.</p> <p>The call to action from Chris is straightforward: start. Share the stories that demonstrate how much you care about the industry beyond the specific thing you are currently selling. Show up in your community. Build your audience one by one. Most competitors will not put in that kind of consistent work, which is exactly why it works.</p> <p><strong>Keep practicing. Keep learning. Keep transforming.</strong></p> <p> </p> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>To follow more of Chris Luecke’s work across manufacturing media, visit <a href="https://manufacturinghappyhour.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">manufacturinghappyhour.com</a> or <a href="https://linkedin.com/in/cwluecke" target="_blank" rel="noopener">connect with him on LinkedIn</a>.</strong></p> <p style="text-align: center;">To submit a request for a new episode topic from Practitioners Unplugged, visit <a href="https://www.industrialsage.com/contact/">our contact page.</a></p> <p style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; text-align: center;">Explore more about <a href="https://www.se.com/us/en/">Schneider Electric</a> & <a href="http://www.aveva.com/en/">AVEVA</a></p> <p style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-size: 18px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif;" src="https://www.industrialsage.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Presented-By-Aveva-SE-lockup_Color_Alt_Singleline-300x33.png" alt="" width="600" height="66" /></p>
June 2, 2026
How CESMII’s i3X Is Ending Manufacturing’s API Chaos
<p data-start="843" data-end="867"><strong data-start="843" data-end="867">Executive Key Points</strong></p> <ul> <li>Why manufacturers cannot skip the three smart manufacturing imperatives on the path to AI readiness</li> <li>How graph relationships, not hierarchies, connect equipment failures to real business impact</li> <li>Why generative AI cannot compensate for semantic inconsistency in your manufacturing data</li> <li>How i3X eliminates API chaos across mixed-vendor environments with a free, open-source specification</li> <li>What “a brutal mirror” reveals about where your operation actually stands on digital transformation</li> </ul> <h2>Get future Practitioners Unplugged episodes</h2> <p>Join manufacturing executives getting new conversations and key insights in their inbox.<br /> <button style="display: inline-block; background: #ff6d00; color: #ffffff; padding: 14px 28px; border: none; border-radius: 3px; font-weight: bold; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.2; cursor: pointer;"><br /> Subscribe Now<br /> </button></p> <h2><b>“If you get the model right, the applications emerge from the model.”</b></h2> <p>Someone smarter than Jonathan Wise said that to him once. He has not forgotten it.</p> <p>The problem is that manufacturing has been doing the opposite for decades. Applications get deployed first, each one carrying its own implicit data model, locked inside its own platform, inaccessible to anything around it. The result is an industry drowning in data it cannot use, chasing AI initiatives that stall before they deliver, and wondering why the promise of smart manufacturing keeps slipping further out of reach.</p> <p>Jonathan Wise, Vice President of Technology and Chief Architect at CESMII, returned to Practitioners Unplugged for Episode 19 to explain exactly why this keeps happening, and what manufacturers and vendors can do about it right now.</p> <h2><b>The Foundation Most Manufacturers Are Skipping</b></h2> <p>CESMII has organized the path to a functional smart manufacturing operation into three imperatives. Jonathan was direct about why the sequence matters: “You can’t do i3X without having worked on the previous two.”</p> <p>Imperative one is modeling your data into shareable templates. Every system in your operation already has some version of a data model, but those models are inconsistent and non-portable. Jonathan compared it to class definitions in software development: “In a strongly typed software development environment, I can’t even run the code if any of my data doesn’t comply with the class that it claims to be of.” CESMII’s preferred format for this is an OPC UA node set, a common templating language any vendor can use to share information templates between systems.</p> <p>Imperative two adds context by connecting those component models through graph relationships. This is where most organizations stop short. A hierarchical model, like an ISA-95 asset hierarchy, captures the static layout of a plant. Graph relationships capture how things interact over time. As Jonathan explained: “Material has a relationship with the machine for some period of time, and then that relationship goes away. An operator has a relationship with the machine for some period of time, and then that relationship goes away or maybe changes to point to a different operator.”</p> <p>Dante put the business case plainly: “I drive predictive analytics in a motor. Okay, your machine’s gonna fail. But what’s the impact? That’s gonna impact this order number. That’s gonna impact my cost of quality. It’s gonna impact my shipping downstream.” Without graph relationships, that chain of impact is invisible.</p> <h2><b>Why AI Cannot Fix a Broken Foundation</b></h2> <p>This is the part most organizations do not want to hear. Generative AI cannot compensate for poor data infrastructure, no matter how capable the model.</p> <p>Jonathan explained why: “The generative AI that we’re using to generate text depends on relationships between tokens that were learned over a massive corpus of semantically consistent, structurally consistent words. We have no semantic or structural consistency, never mind across our industry, even within an enterprise.”</p> <p>Sree offered a sharp observation in response. The one place inside most enterprises where semantic consistency actually exists is finance and accounting. That consistency is top-down enforced, and it is precisely why AI tools can now work meaningfully against financial data and APIs. Manufacturing has no equivalent, and closing that gap is exactly what imperative three is designed to address.</p> <h2><b>Imperative Three: i3X and the End of API Chaos</b></h2> <p>After analyzing 50 smart manufacturing projects nationwide, CESMII identified eight to ten functions that any complete information system must be able to perform: exploring the information model, querying objects, accessing historical data, subscribing to changes, and writing back updates. Those functions became the foundation of i3X, an open-source API specification designed to eliminate what Jonathan calls “API chaos” across mixed-vendor environments.</p> <p>The scale of that chaos is real. A typical manufacturer runs 10 to 30 software packages, each with its own proprietary API, each requiring custom integration work to share data with anything else. Every upgrade, every platform transition, every new tool added to the stack breaks something. i3X addresses that problem by giving every platform a common compatibility layer, a single agreed-upon interface that any application can work against regardless of what sits underneath.</p> <p>The specification is fully open source, MIT licensed, and free. As Jonathan put it: “You don’t have to be a CESMII member. You don’t have to sign up for anything. You can go read it right now on GitHub and see the demo endpoint live and interact with it live, for zero dollars with no license, no requirements at all.”</p> <p>Adoption has moved faster than expected. After a community preview at the Prove It conference and a beta announcement at Hannover Messe, approximately 30 vendors had already committed to implementation. Most wrap an existing API in two weeks or less. A junior developer can work through the SDK in 20 to 30 minutes. AI-assisted setup takes around three minutes.</p> <h2><b>A Brutal Mirror for Manufacturers and Vendors Alike</b></h2> <p>Working group member Matt Paris described i3X with a phrase Jonathan clearly appreciated: “i3X is a brutal mirror.”</p> <p>For manufacturers who have already done the foundational work, i3X lights up quickly and validates the investment. For those who have not, it makes the gaps impossible to ignore. “You can’t pretend you’re done. You can’t pretend you’re Industry 4.0 or AI-ready. You don’t have the primitives necessary to complete that modernization.”</p> <p>Sree framed the longer arc for business leaders watching from a distance. The parallel to HTTP and HTML is instructive. Twenty years ago, business systems connected to users through a wide variety of proprietary protocols. Gradually, the industry agreed to eliminate that unnecessary variety, and an explosion of value followed. i3X is making the same bet for manufacturing data.</p> <p>For vendors, Jonathan’s call to action was unambiguous: stop selling integration complexity as a service. “Just wiring things up over and over and over again isn’t actually returning value to your customers. Working against a model to predict something, to optimize something, to help relieve a business constraint, there’s a ton of value to be had and harvested there.”</p> <h2><b>Where to Start</b></h2> <p>For end users, start by asking your vendors where they are on their i3X adoption journey. For vendors who have not yet engaged, the barriers are low and the working group is active. For those who want to shape the specification before it potentially moves to a formal standards body, the GitHub is open and all discussions are transparent.</p> <p>The i3X specification, SDK, and live demo endpoint are available now at <a href="https://www.i3x.dev/">i3x.dev</a>. To learn more about CESMII’s broader knowledge programs, technology initiatives, and how to get involved in the collaborative ecosystem, visit <a href="http://cesmii.org">CESMII.org</a>.</p> <p>The promise of AI in manufacturing does not fail because the ambition is wrong. It fails because the foundation was never built. CESMII’s three imperatives, and i3X as their culmination, are the most credible framework available for manufacturers who are ready to stop talking about Industry 4.0 and actually build it. The tools are free. The community is open. The only thing left is the decision to start.</p> <p><strong>Keep practicing. Keep learning. Keep transforming.</strong></p> <p style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; text-align: center;">To submit a request for a new episode topic from Practitioners Unplugged,<br /> visit <a href="https://www.industrialsage.com/contact/">our contact page</a></p> <p style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; text-align: center;">Thanks for reading. Don’t forget to <a href="https://www.industrialsage.com/subscribe/">subscribe to our weekly newsletter</a> to get every new episode, blog article, and content offer sent directly to your inbox.</p> <p style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; text-align: center;">Explore more about <a href="https://www.se.com/us/en/">Schneider Electric</a> & <a href="http://www.aveva.com/en/">AVEVA</a></p> <p style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; text-align: center;"><img decoding="async" style="font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; font-size: 18px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif;" src="https://www.industrialsage.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Presented-By-Aveva-SE-lockup_Color_Alt_Singleline-300x33.png" alt="" width="600" height="66" /></p>
21 total episodes available with 1 transcripts
Deep-dive analytics for Practitioners Unplugged
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Practitioners Unplugged?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.