Podcast thumbnail for SCOTUS Opinion Summaries

SCOTUS Opinion Summaries

Claim This Podcast

by SCOTUS Oral Arguments

5 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
24

Podcast Authority

Beta
PoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality29
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement50

Podcast Overview

Listen to summaries of Supreme Court written opinions. Read by an automated voice. For any questions, comments, feedback, or ideas, please contact me at scotus.cases.pod@gmail.com

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

3/26/2025

Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report

See how your podcast performs across key metrics

24

Podcast Authority

Beta
PoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality29
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement50
7
Excellent Areas
2
Good Performance
10
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Publishing Consistency
Every 5 days
Performing excellently!
good
Show Notes Quality
3.0/5

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

poor
Episode Thumbnails

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

+16 More Metrics

Unlock comprehensive insights including:

  • • YouTube presence analysis
  • • Social media reach metrics
  • • RSS compliance scoring
  • • Podcast 2.0 features
  • • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report

Detailed Analytics

  • Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
  • Personalized recommendations for each metric
  • Industry benchmarks and comparisons
  • Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring

Growth Strategies

  • Step-by-step action plans for improvement
  • Quick wins to boost your score immediately
  • Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report

See how your show performs across every key metric

Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests

High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.

Secure Sponsorships

Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.

Grow Your Audience

Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.

1 verified contact email on file for SCOTUS Opinion Summaries

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for Velazquez v. Bondi, Att'y Gen. | Case No. 23-929 | Opinion Date: 4/22/25

April 22, 2025

Velazquez v. Bondi, Att'y Gen. | Case No. 23-929 | Opinion Date: 4/22/25

<p>The question presented is: When a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, is a motion to reopen filed the next business day sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart?</p><p>The Supreme Court held: Under §1229c(b)(2), a voluntary-departure deadline that falls on a weekend or legal holiday extends to the next business day.</p><p>Please note that the opinion date is April 22, 2025.</p>

Episode thumbnail for Cunningham v. Cornell University | Opinion Date: 4/17/25 | Case No. 23-1007

April 17, 2025

Cunningham v. Cornell University | Opinion Date: 4/17/25 | Case No. 23-1007

<p>The question presented is: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C), or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision's text.</p><p>The Supreme Court held: To state a claim under §1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausi­bly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without ad­dressing potential §1108 exemptions.</p>

Episode thumbnail for Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn | Date Decided: 4/2/25 | Case No. 23-365

April 2, 2025

Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn | Date Decided: 4/2/25 | Case No. 23-365

<p>The question presented in this case is: Whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant's acts for purposes of civil RICO.</p><p>The Supreme Court held: Under civil RICO, §1964(c), a plaintiff may seek treble damages for business or property loss even if the loss resulted from a personal injury. </p>

5 total episodes available with 5 transcripts

Deep-dive analytics for SCOTUS Opinion Summaries

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is SCOTUS Opinion Summaries?

Listen to summaries of Supreme Court written opinions. Read by an automated voice.
For any questions, comments, feedback, or ideas, please contact me at scotus.cases.pod@gmail.com

How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates daily.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.