Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 10 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.

Two Paeds In A Pod

Claim This Podcast

by Dr Ian Lewins

4.7(15 reviews)

87 episodes

Updated Weekly

Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇬🇧

Podcast Overview

2 Paeds in a Pod is a clinical paediatrics podcast exploring the decisions, dilemmas, and systems that shape everyday practice. While rooted in paediatric emergency medicine, the conversations range across the breadth of paediatrics — from acute presentations and diagnostic uncertainty to wider service design, professional development, and the evolving evidence base. Each episode brings structured discussion to real-world clinical questions. Alongside practical case-based reflection, we highlight research that has caught our eye and consider how emerging evidence should — or should not — influence frontline care. This podcast is for paediatric consultants, trainees, advanced practitioners, and clinicians who want thoughtful, evidence-aware conversation grounded in the realities of modern practice. This podcast is for medical education purposes only and should not replace advice you have received from a medical practitioner.

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

9/15/2017

Visit Website View on Apple Podcasts RSS Feed

2 verified contact emails on file for Two Paeds In A Pod

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

See contact details

Recent Episodes

June 21, 2026

Episode 86: Mental Health Crisis on the Wards

EPISODE SUMMARYThis episode leads on a problem every acute paediatric unit now lives with: the child in mental health crisis admitted to a general children's ward while waiting for specialist care. A new UK consensus study sets out sixteen practical, risk-stratified strategies that a non-specialist team can use to keep these young people safer. The second story turns to the forearm fracture, with a large cohort showing that one child in eight returns to the emergency department within a week of casting — rising to one in four for reduced distal both-bone fractures — and a companion piece asking whether ultrasound can guide the reduction itself. What's Caught My Eye covers whether "highly toxic" drugs really threaten toddlers after a single dose, real-world evidence that earlier egg introduction cut egg allergy, and the refreshed top ten research priorities for paediatric emergency medicine across the UK and Ireland.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━MAIN STORY 1: Keeping children in mental health crisis safe on the ward━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Children and young people in mental health crisis are routinely admitted to acute paediatric wards that were never designed to hold them, cared for by staff with little mental health training. This UK mixed-methods study asked a deliberately practical question: while these young people are in our care, what can a general team actually do to reduce risk?Key findings:<ul><li>Twenty-six candidate risk-mitigation strategies were generated from a systematic review and qualitative interviews.</li><li>Sixteen reached expert consensus (≥70% agreement) for clinical usefulness among a panel of 16 healthcare professionals and experts by experience.</li><li>Prioritised strategies included structured safety checks on admission and daily thereafter, proactive environmental modification to remove triggers and ligature risks, one-to-one observation reframed around therapeutic engagement rather than surveillance, timely escalation to specialist mental health services, and routine multidisciplinary safety huddles.</li><li>Each strategy was mapped to clinical risk level (low, medium, high, very high) using a validated paediatric mental health risk assessment framework.</li></ul> For practice, this converts a familiar sense of helplessness into a structured, risk-matched checklist that any acute paediatric team in the NHS can adopt immediately, without waiting for system-level reform.The caveat: these are consensus-derived strategies from a small expert panel, not outcomes from a trial, so this is a framework for good practice rather than proof of reduced harm — and escalation to specialist services remains part of it, not an alternative to it.Reference: Kaltsa A, Marufu TC, Carter T, et al. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Published May 2026.DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328977" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328977</a>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━MAIN STORY 2: Forearm fractures — life after the cast, and guiding the reduction━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━The forearm fracture is everyday work in paediatric emergency medicine, but we rarely track what happens once the child leaves with a cast. This single-centre cohort quantified unplanned return visits within the first week, and a companion Archives piece asks whether point-of-care ultrasound could improve the reduction at the bedside.Key findings:<ul><li>Among 551 children treated with circumferential casting (from 4,661 forearm fractures reviewed), 67 (12.2%) made an unplanned return to the ED within seven days.</li><li>92.5% of returns were for pain and around 95% required cast modification.</li><li>Return rates varied sharply by pattern: distal radius and ulna 23.8%, midshaft both-bone 15.7%, distal radius alone 8.5%, other 5.5%.</li><li>Returns were more than three times as likely after reduction than after in-situ casting (16.1% vs 4.3%), peaking at 27.1% for reduced distal both-bone fractures.</li><li>There were no cases of compartment syndrome and 98.4% completed non-operative treatment successfully.</li></ul> The clinical bottom line is about specific, risk-matched safety-netting: a reduced distal both-bone fracture carries a one-in-four chance of a painful early return, so families with high-risk patterns need tailored expectations and follow-up rather than a generic discharge.This is single-centre data from outside the UK, so absolute rates will differ here, but the pattern — reduced wrist fractures being the ones that bounce back — will be familiar to any UK ED or fracture clinic, and the ultrasound question speaks to whether a better first-time reduction could cut returns at source.Reference: Romem R, Aliev E, Fainzack A, et al. Pediatric Emergency Care. Published June 2026.DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003637" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003637</a>Companion: Iio K, Harel-Sterling M, Freire GC. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Published June 2026.DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330589" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330589</a>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━WHAT'S CAUGHT MY EYE━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━1. Does one pill really kill?A prospective registry across 58 Spanish emergency departments examined accidental ingestions of "highly toxic" drugs — the agents reputed to kill a toddler in a single dose — in children under eight. Of 61 such ingestions, most often cardiovascular drugs and opioids, only four children (under 7%) were symptomatic, none needed advanced airway or circulatory support, and there were no deaths. It is a measured argument for evidence-based risk stratification over blanket alarm, though the number of genuinely toxic cases is small.Reference: Ramírez-Romero J, Mintegi S, Azkunaga Santibañez B, et al. Pediatric Emergency Care. Published June 2026.DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003634" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003634</a>2. Did earlier egg introduction actually cut egg allergy?Two population-based cohorts of twelve-month-olds in Melbourne, before and after guidelines changed to recommend earlier egg introduction, had egg allergy confirmed by skin prick test and oral food challenge. As the typical age of introduction fell from eight to six months, confirmed egg allergy dropped from 9.2% to 7.6% overall, and from 34.6% to 21.9% in the highest-risk infants with early eczema. It is real-world, population-level evidence that a weaning guideline change moved the dial — albeit an Australian before-and-after comparison rather than a trial.Reference: Koplin JJ, Shifti DM, Soriano VX, et al. JAMA Pediatrics. Published June 2026.DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2080" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2080</a>3. New research priorities for UK and Ireland PEMA James Lind Alliance priority-setting partnership rebuilt the research agenda for paediatric emergency medicine across the UK and Ireland, a decade on from the original and this time with patients and carers alongside clinicians. From 655 submitted questions, the process produced a new top ten research priorities agreed by consensus. These questions will shape what gets funded and studied in the specialty for the next decade, and the work comes from the PERUKI network.Reference: Sloane C, Waterfield T, Evans J, et al. Emergency Medicine Journal. Published June 2026.DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215836" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215836</a>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━KEY TAKEAWAYS━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━<ul><li>A general paediatric team is not powerless with a child in mental health crisis: daily structured safety checks, removing risks from the environment, and engagement-focused one-to-one care are all within reach, and there is now a consensus framework to organise them by risk level.</li><li>These are consensus strategies, not trial outcomes — use them as a structure for good practice, not as proof of reduced harm.</li><li>Most early returns after a forearm cast are pain and cast problems, not emergencies, but reduced distal both-bone fractures return roughly one time in four and warrant specific safety-netting.</li><li>In a large Spanish registry, accidental ingestions of even "highly toxic" drugs rarely caused symptoms and caused no deaths — grounds for sharper risk stratification.</li><li>Earlier egg introduction was followed by a measurable population fall in egg allergy, most markedly in infants with early eczema.</li></ul> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━FULL REFERENCE LIST━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━All articles retrieved from PubMed.<ol><li>Kaltsa A, Marufu TC, Carter T, et al. Risk mitigation for children and young people in mental health crisis admitted to acute paediatric care: a mixed methods exploratory study. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2026 (advance online).</li><li><a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328977" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328977</a></li><li>Romem R, Aliev E, Fainzack A, et al. Unplanned Return Visits to the Emergency Department...

June 7, 2026

Episode 85: The Trouble With Boluses

2 PAEDS IN A POD Episode 85 | The Trouble With BolusesReleased: 07/06/2026 | Runtime: ~20 minutesEPISODE SUMMARYThis episode leads on fluid in childhood sepsis. A new multicentre cohort from Australia and New Zealand found that mortality rose with the volume of bolus fluid given in the first day, but not with the total volume of fluid — a finding set alongside the recently published PRoMPT BOLUS trial, which showed that balanced fluid and saline produce the same kidney outcomes. The second story returns to the febrile infant for a third time, with a meta-analysis quantifying the risk of serious bacterial infection in the well sixty-to-ninety-day-old. What's Caught My Eye covers the TWIST score and ultrasound for the acute scrotum, nirsevimab versus the maternal RSV vaccine head to head, and language barriers and safety in the paediatric emergency department.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━MAIN STORY 1: How much fluid is too much in childhood sepsis? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Fluid is the first thing we reach for in the septic child, and the volume question has never been fully settled. This cohort measured the fluid children actually received in the first twenty-four hours and asked how it related to outcome, arriving just as PRoMPT BOLUS reported on the separate question of which fluid to use.Key findings:<ul><li>5,352 children with suspected community-acquired sepsis across 11 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand (2021–2023); median age 2.6 years.</li><li>In-hospital mortality was low at 1.1%; around 5.5% met Phoenix sepsis criteria.</li><li>Median total fluid in the first 24 hours was 40 mL/kg, of which the bolus component was 10 mL/kg.</li><li>Mortality rose with increasing bolus volume but not with increasing total fluid; the unadjusted odds ratio for death with more than 55 mL/kg versus less than 15 mL/kg of bolus fluid was 20.5 (95% CI 8.0–52.5).</li><li>For context, PRoMPT BOLUS (9,041 children, 47 departments, five countries) found no difference in major adverse kidney events between balanced fluid and 0.9% saline (3.4% vs 3.0%), with less hyperchloraemia in the balanced-fluid group.</li></ul> For practice, the converging message is that the fluid you choose matters less than hoped, while the volume you give may matter more than thought. This supports the titrated, reassess-after-each-bolus approach that NICE and APLS already ask for, rather than a fixed escalator.Important caveat: the bolus–mortality association is unadjusted and observational, and the sickest children in refractory shock receive the most bolus fluid, so this does not show that boluses cause harm and is not a reason to withhold fluid from a shocked child.Reference: Long E, Selman C, Borland ML, et al. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Published May 2026. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330189" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330189</a>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━MAIN STORY 2: How risky is the febrile two-month-old? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━The sixty-to-ninety-day-old is the febrile infant our guidelines treat least consistently — some pathways stop at sixty days, others lump the whole under-ninety group together. This meta-analysis supplies the missing denominator for that group, completing a run that has moved from risk stratification, through practice variation, to underlying prevalence.Key findings:<ul><li>59 studies, 20 distinct datasets, just under 34,835 well-appearing, previously healthy febrile infants aged 60–90 days.</li><li>Pooled prevalence of invasive bacterial infection was 1.11% (95% CI 0.84–1.47), roughly 1 in 90.</li><li>Almost all of that was bacteraemia at 1.01%; bacterial meningitis was rare at 0.11%, roughly 1 in 900.</li><li>Estimates held across every sensitivity analysis, including removal of the single largest study.</li></ul> The clinical bottom line is a number to carry into both your own reasoning and the conversation with parents: in the well infant in this band, meningitis risk of around one in nine hundred is a reasonable thing to weigh when deciding whether this particular baby needs a lumbar puncture or a more measured pathway with good safety-netting.These are international data, so map the figures onto your local febrile infant pathway and the NICE traffic-light thresholds rather than applying them in isolation.Reference: Dionisopoulos Z, Sabhaney V, D'Arienzo D, et al. JAMA Pediatrics. Published May 2026. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.1815" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.1815</a>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━.WHAT'S CAUGHT MY EYE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━1. TWIST and ultrasound for the acute scrotumA retrospective study of just over 500 boys aged fifteen and under with an acute scrotum tested how the TWIST score and point-of-care ultrasound perform in the hands of emergency physicians and paediatricians. The TWIST score had a sensitivity of around 91% and a negative predictive value of 99%, and adding ultrasound pushed sensitivity to 96% and negative predictive value to 100%. Worth your time because it supports front-door risk stratification of the acute scrotum, though the residual false negatives mean it cannot be used to rule torsion out.Reference: Nakamura T, Kinoshita M, Ihara T, et al. Emergency Medicine Journal. Published May 2026. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215067" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215067</a>2. Nirsevimab versus the maternal RSV vaccine, head to headA French national cohort of more than 164,000 infants across the 2024–25 season compared nirsevimab given at birth against maternal RSVpreF vaccination. Nirsevimab was associated with about a 22% lower chance of RSV-related hospitalisation (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70–0.86), but that advantage disappeared when the maternal vaccine had been given at least eight weeks before delivery. Worth your time because both products are now live in the UK, so this speaks directly to counselling families and to the timing of maternal vaccination.Reference: Valtuille Z, Fafi I, Kaguelidou F, et al. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. Published May 2026. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(26)00075-1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(26)00075-1</a>3. Language barriers and safety in the paediatric emergency departmentA scoping review of 33 studies mapped where, along the emergency care journey, language barriers threaten the safety of children's care. Risk appeared at every stage, but discharge — the moment we hand over safety-netting and home-care advice — was flagged most often. Worth your time as a pointed reminder that, in a multilingual NHS population, the discharge conversation is a safety-critical step rather than an afterthought.Reference: Odedra R, Averill P, Nijman RG, et al. Emergency Medicine Journal. Published May 2026. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215617" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215617</a>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━KEY TAKEAWAYS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━<ul><li>PRoMPT BOLUS shows balanced fluid and saline produce the same kidney outcomes in paediatric septic shock; the choice of fluid matters less than once hoped.</li><li>New observational data suggest it is bolus volume, not total fluid, that tracks with mortality — a reason to give a measured bolus, reassess, and only repeat if the child still needs it, not a reason to withhold fluid.</li><li>In the well sixty-to-ninety-day-old, invasive bacterial infection runs at about 1 in 90 and meningitis at about 1 in 900 — a denominator for proportionate investigation and honest parent conversations.</li><li>The TWIST score and ultrasound can risk-stratify the acute scrotum at the front door but cannot rule torsion out.</li><li>In a multilingual population, discharge and safety-netting are the highest-risk points for language-related harm.</li></ul> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━FULL REFERENCE LIST ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━All articles retrieved from PubMed.<ol><li>Long E, Selman C, Borland ML, et al. IV bolus, maintenance and medication carrier fluid in children with community-acquired sepsis: a multicentre cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2026. Advance online publication. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330189" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330189</a></li><li>Dionisopoulos Z, Sabhaney V, D'Arienzo D, et al. Prevalence of Invasive Bacterial Infections Among Febrile Infants Aged 60 to 90 Days: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. 2026. Advance online publication. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.1815" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.1815</a></li><li>Nakamura T, Kinoshita M, Ihara T, et al. Evaluating the TWIST score and point-of-care ultrasound for paediatric testicular torsion. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2026;43(6):334–340. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215067" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215067</a></li><li>Valtuille Z, Fafi I, Kaguelidou F, et al. Effectiveness of nirsevimab immunisation after birth versus RSVpreF maternal vaccination in...

May 24, 2026

Episode 84: The Febrile Infant Lottery

2 PAEDS IN A PODEpisode 84 | The Febrile Infant LotteryReleased: [24th May 2026] | Runtime: 19 minutes━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━EPISODE SUMMARY━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━This episode opens with a large London study showing that the care a febrile young infant receives depends heavily on which hospital they attend, with full adherence to national guidance achieved in only one in five presentations and over-investigation almost as common as under-investigation. The second main story examines a French randomised controlled trial of automated closed-loop oxygen titration in bronchiolitis — negative on its primary endpoint of length of stay, but with coherent secondary signals on saturation targeting and oxygen flow that make it a useful lesson in reading past the abstract. What's Caught My Eye covers a systematic review of electronic sepsis alerts in children, a multicentre cohort of in-hospital neonatal head injury on the postnatal ward, and a study asking whether comprehensive respiratory virus panels change outcomes in discharged children.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━MAIN STORY 1: How much does the febrile infant's hospital matter?━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━The febrile infant under ninety days is one of the highest-stakes presentations in paediatric emergency and acute care. National guidance exists precisely to compress that diagnostic uncertainty into something consistent. This retrospective study across twenty-one London hospitals, run through the London REACH network, tested whether care actually looks the same once that guidance is applied — and the answer is that it does not.Key findings:- 2,008 presentations of infants aged 90 days or younger; 41.1% were febrile at the point of assessment- Blood tests performed in 73.7% overall, but ranging from 55.4% to 96.7% across sites; lumbar puncture 40.8% overall, range 17.1% to 70.7%; urinalysis 63.4% overall, range 43.4% to 85.4%- Antibiotics started in 57.7% overall (site range 35.4% to 90.2%); admission in 63.5% overall (site range 46.7% to 99.2%)- Full adherence to national clinical practice guidelines in only 21.9% of presentations; partial adherence 24.4%; non-adherence 31.2%; over-adherence 23.5%- Adherence was higher in infants under 28 days and in those febrile during assessmentThe clinical message is that variation runs hard in both directions. We tend to fear under-investigation and the missed serious bacterial infection, but over-investigation — unnecessary lumbar puncture, septic screen, intravenous antibiotics and admission in a well baby — was almost as common, and it is not a neutral act. The practical focus for departments is the infant who is afebrile by the time they are assessed, where the guidance gives least direction and the variation is widest.This is London-specific, retrospective, and the study period overlaps the later pandemic, so the absolute numbers will not transfer directly to a district general setting.Reference: Habermann S, Hartzenberg R, Loucaides EM, et al. (London REACH Network). European Journal of Pediatrics. Published May 2026.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06938-y━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━MAIN STORY 2: Automated oxygen titration in bronchiolitis━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Oxygen titration in bronchiolitis is a constant low-level drain on nursing time across the winter. This trial tested whether handing the titration to a closed-loop device improves the outcome that matters to families and to flow — length of hospital stay.Key findings:- Multicentre randomised controlled trial, ten paediatric departments in France, 2018 to 2023; 103 infants aged 1 to 12 months with acute bronchiolitis requiring oxygen, severe bronchiolitis excluded- Primary endpoint negative: median stay 71.0 hours with the FreeO2 device versus 69.6 hours with manual titration (p=0.39)- Time within the target oxygen saturation zone 89.4% with automation versus 74.9% with manual titration (p<0.05)- Median oxygen flow 0.1 L/min with automation versus 0.3 L/min manual (p<0.05); no significant difference in re-hospitalisation at 7 or 30 days or in non-invasive ventilation useThe bottom line is that automated titration does not shorten length of stay, so it should not be argued for on that basis, but the secondary signals are coherent — better time in target range at lower oxygen flows. The wider teaching point is that a negative primary endpoint in an underpowered trial (103 infants over five years, across the pandemic) is not the same as nothing having happened; length of stay in bronchiolitis is driven by feeding and overall trajectory far more than by oxygen delivery precision, so it may always have been an insensitive endpoint for this intervention.This sits within the larger UK conversation on permissive hypoxaemia and oxygen saturation targets in bronchiolitis; it is worth reading alongside the BIDS trial and current oxygen-target guidance rather than in isolation.Reference: Cros P, Martin A, Consigny M, et al. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Published online May 2026 (advance online publication).DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329523━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━WHAT'S CAUGHT MY EYE━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━1. Do electronic sepsis alerts actually save children?A systematic review and narrative synthesis of twelve studies of EMR-embedded automated sepsis alerts in children under eighteen. Alerts improved process measures — faster time to antibiotics in four of six studies and faster fluids in two of five — without increasing hospital admissions or overall antibiotic use, but a mortality benefit was shown in only one study, in a PICU population. As more NHS trusts switch on electronic sepsis triggers, this is the honest evidence position to know: the process metrics move, the hard outcome data do not yet exist.Reference: Driver B, Babl FE, Cheng D, et al. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Published online May 2026 (advance online publication).DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70412---2. The neonatal head injury that happens on your postnatal wardA retrospective cohort across fifteen Italian maternity units of newborns who fell during routine postnatal stay, with the PECARN rule applied retrospectively. Thirty-nine newborns, median age at injury 32 hours, most falls at night in rooming-in; a quarter (25.6%) had a clinically important traumatic brain injury but none needed neurosurgery or had sequelae, while 88.9% of low-risk babies were imaged anyway. A low-severity, high-anxiety event most clinicians never see described, sitting right at the edge of where PECARN was never validated — the newborn.Reference: Corsini I, Cecchetti M, Giacalone M, et al. Hospital Pediatrics. Published online May 2026 (advance online publication).DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2025-008952---3. Does a bigger respiratory virus panel change anything?A retrospective cohort of 2,346 children discharged from a paediatric emergency department with a viral respiratory illness, comparing a limited three-pathogen panel against a comprehensive twenty-two-pathogen panel. There was no difference in seven-day return visit rate after adjustment (aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67–1.38) and no difference in interventions or disposition on return. For the well child being discharged with an obvious viral illness, the bigger panel did not change outcomes — a clean stewardship argument for testing less, not more.Reference: Stephan AM, Pérez-Lizardi JY, Stern LM, et al. Pediatric Emergency Care. Published online May 2026 (advance online publication).DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003622━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━KEY TAKEAWAYS━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━- Febrile infant care varies widely between hospitals, with full guideline adherence in only one in five presentations- Over-investigation of the well febrile infant is almost as common as under-investigation, and is not a harmless default; the afebrile-on-assessment infant is where guidance is weakest- Automated oxygen titration in bronchiolitis did not reduce length of stay, but a negative primary endpoint in an underpowered trial warrants reading the secondary data and asking what the trial was powered to find- Electronic sepsis alerts reliably speed up antibiotics and fluids but the mortality evidence is not yet established — useful context before a trust adopts one- For the well child discharged with a viral respiratory illness, a comprehensive virus panel did not improve outcomes over a limited one━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━FULL REFERENCE LIST━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━All articles retrieved from PubMed.1. Habermann S, Hartzenberg R, Loucaides EM, Lawson G, Carr D, Maconochie I, Nijman RG; London REACH Network. Variation in management of febrile infants younger than 90 days across London: a retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2026;185(6).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-06938-y2. Cros P, Martin A, Consigny M, Bihouee T, Masson A, Gaitan L, Roué JM. Automated oxygen flow titration for infants with bronchiolitis: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2026 (advance online...

87 total episodes available

Similar Podcasts

Discover related shows you might enjoy

The Rest Is Entertainment

Goalhanger

More or Less: Behind the Stats

BBC Radio 4

The Rest Is Politics

Goalhanger

The News Agents

Global

Off Menu with Ed Gamble and James Acaster

Plosive

Red Whale Primary Care Pod

Red Whale

Page 94: The Private Eye Podcast

NB Hot Topics Podcast

NB Medical Education

The Life Scientific

BBC Radio 4

The Romesh Ranganathan Show

Ranga Bee & Platform Media

Leading

Goalhanger

Comedy of the Week

BBC Radio 4

How To Fail With Elizabeth Day

Elizabeth Day and Sony Music Entertainment

Science Weekly

The Guardian

The Resus Room

Simon Laing, Rob Fenwick & James Yates

Deep-dive analytics for Two Paeds In A Pod

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is Two Paeds In A Pod?: 2 Paeds in a Pod is a clinical paediatrics podcast exploring the decisions, dilemmas, and systems that shape everyday practice.

While rooted in paediatric emergency medicine, the conversations range across the breadth of paediatrics — from acute presentations and diagnostic uncertainty to wider service design, professional development, and the evolving evidence base.

Each episode brings structured discussion to real-world clinical questions. Alongside practical case-based reflection, we highlight research that has caught our eye and consider how emerging evidence should — or should not — influence frontline care.

This podcast is for paediatric consultants, trainees, advanced practitioners, and clinicians who want thoughtful, evidence-aware conversation grounded in the realities of modern practice.

This podcast is for medical education purposes only and should not replace advice you have received from a medical practitioner.
How often does this podcast release new episodes?: This podcast updates weekly.
Where can I listen to this podcast?: This podcast is available on 10 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
Does this podcast accept guests?: No, this podcast does not typically feature guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.