阿薩姆是來自馬來西亞的前新聞工作者,這個頻道主要分享針對社會現象的個人看法和社會觀察。 任何合作請聯繫asamlaksa@gmail.com。
linktr.ee/asam0701/
Podcast produced by a former print journalist who covered political news and current affairs in Malaysia. Podcasts are in Mandarin, all views are mine.

by asam0701
阿薩姆是來自馬來西亞的前新聞工作者,這個頻道主要分享針對社會現象的個人看法和社會觀察。 任何合作請聯繫asamlaksa@gmail.com。 linktr.ee/asam0701/ Podcast produced by a former print journalist who covered political news and current affairs in Malaysia. Podcasts are in Mandarin, all views are mine.
Language
🇨🇳
Publishing Since
8/27/2022
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

June 4, 2026
<p>隨著團結政府走到選舉季節,華社對於「投小黨等於分散票數」的態度有所鬆動,而在拉菲茲另起爐灶後,很多人也在討論是否要投同心黨。本集認為小黨能成事的關鍵在政治資源和傳統盟友的關係,特別是同心黨當宣布上陣全柔議席,就會對上行動黨的議席,部分上屆微差獲勝的席位或有危險。</p><p>拉菲茲的強項雖然是在提出政策以及打輿論戰,但他還是有基層經營的軟肋,他沒有打地方議題獲得成功的紀錄,以及「公式之王」、補選時罵選民帶來的高傲形象,這些都對征戰半城鄉及鄉區不利。最後我想說,有競爭的民主是健康的民主,惟選民投選時要務實看待同心黨的可能性和侷限。</p><p>-00:00 核心命題:小黨能否能氣候?</p><p>-05:31 關鍵(1):從舊有政黨帶來的政治資源</p><p>-08:00 拉菲茲派系@柔佛</p><p>-12:07 關鍵(2):要和火箭等傳統盟友對打?</p><p>-15:57 拉菲茲的弱項:地方議題 &高傲形象</p><p>-19:03 選民會如何決定?我和身邊的例子</p><p>-23:05 競爭型民主是健康的民主</p><p><br></p><p>阿薩姆的社會觀察: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/asam0701" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">https://www.instagram.com/asam0701</a></p><p>打賞辛苦更新的asam: <a href="https://www.buymeacoffee.com/asam0701" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">https://www.buymeacoffee.com/asam0701</a></p>

May 20, 2026
<p>本集兆鴻來分享《都市更新法》如何被右翼騎劫的團隊合作研究報告,該團隊發現反對都市更新法的網絡輿論裡面有疑似被右翼騎劫的痕跡,有網軍操作(CIB, Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour)之嫌。我國的網軍操作或許有新面貌,去年8月法案提呈國會之際,threads竟然是收集到最多貼文的社群媒體?</p><p>團隊使用主題分析發現,臉書上最高比例是「馬來土著威脅」主題和「樹立政治敵人」主題交叉,比如說「行動黨試圖學新加坡把馬來人趕出城市」,Threads上最高比例則是「種族宗教團結」與「樹立政治敵人」交叉。</p><p>此外,雖然有些政治人物在努力傳播類似論述,比如布城國會議員拉基吉丁和伊斯蘭黨青年團,但有其他網紅的傳播力是他們的兩倍,因此主要傳播路徑未必是政治人物,甚至他們懂得利用其他有組織力的網絡比如電召車司機群體散播論述。未來的國州選舉輿論戰,都可以留意這些群體和節點。</p><p>-00:00 研究方法:關鍵字、時間點、社交平台</p><p>-04:45 鎖定網軍帳號方法:Copy Pasta & 非真人帳號</p><p>-07:19 主題分析:最王道的還是種族宗教</p><p>-13:21 超級傳播者群像:他們甚至敢拖王室下水?</p><p>-16:45 炎上的土壤:都市青年面對的租房購屋難題</p><p>-20:20 圓桌討論(1):公共政策應先解決中庸選民需求</p><p>-23:23 圓桌討論(2):個人化story可防止騎劫</p><p>-28:15 都更法真正的缺失:租戶權益、對發展商官商勾結的疑慮</p><p>-31:02 放眼森甲柔州選和全國大選:右翼言論會再燒起來</p><p>-34:08 多媒體委員會MCMC應做到的事</p><p><br></p><p>阿薩姆的社會觀察:<a href="https://www.instagram.com/asam0701" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">https://www.instagram.com/asam0701</a></p><p>點此打賞努力剪片的asam: <a href="https://www.buymeacoffee.com/asam0701" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">https://www.buymeacoffee.com/asam0701</a> </p>

May 13, 2026
<p>本集來賓是媒人在乎(ReformMYMedia)的周兆鴻來作客,為大家講解該組織最近參與的研究計劃。這份報告集結中國試圖通過數部電影作品中的地圖彰顯聲討九段線海域的決心,但東南亞各國也不是省油的燈,Chagee九段線地圖事件就在越南和大馬掀起抵制。雖然Chagee很快改變過來,但以大馬人對星巴克和麥當勞的杯葛都取得成功的情況,或讓品牌清楚知道,他們可以輕易複製這個成功。</p><p>儘管Freedom House報告認為中國大使館在大馬努力發文章的成效有限,但asam和兆鴻都未必認同這樣的看法,並提出反例。最後,兆鴻認為我國政府應與其他東南亞國家攜手捍衛國際法庭認為九段線沒有法理依據的裁決,同時民眾也能更積極為此發聲。</p><p>-00:00 來賓介紹&研究報告的用意</p><p>-04:09 九段線來龍去脈、中國不承認國際海洋法公約</p><p>-06:22 用動畫和電影中的地圖吃東南亞國家的豆腐</p><p>-09:30 Chagee九段線地圖的負面聲量數據</p><p>-15:56 Freedom House認為中國官方文章戰影響有限?</p><p>-19:03 資訊戰例子:福島處理水排海、俄烏戰爭</p><p>-24:27 ISEAS報告:大馬人因為反美而選擇親中?</p><p>-28:15 印尼其實也有領海糾紛</p><p>-30:15 未來方向:東南亞各國應凝聚力量、大馬要積極發聲</p><p>-36:00 政府應開始本土主權的輿論戰打好地基</p><p><br></p><p>阿薩姆的社會觀察IG: <a href="https://www.instagram.com/asam0701" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">https://www.instagram.com/asam0701</a></p><p>這邊打賞辛苦剪片的asam: <a href="https://www.buymeacoffee.com/asam0701" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferer">https://www.buymeacoffee.com/asam0701</a></p>
Discover related shows you might enjoy
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
阿薩姆是來自馬來西亞的前新聞工作者,這個頻道主要分享針對社會現象的個人看法和社會觀察。 任何合作請聯繫asamlaksa@gmail.com。
linktr.ee/asam0701/
Podcast produced by a former print journalist who covered political news and current affairs in Malaysia. Podcasts are in Mandarin, all views are mine.
This podcast updates daily.
This podcast is available on 7 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.