Podcast thumbnail for BJGP Interviews

BJGP Interviews

Claim This Podcast

by The British Journal of General Practice

5.0(4 reviews)
241 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇬🇧
78

Podcast Authority

Beta
GoodBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality89
Social0
YouTube82
Engagement85

Podcast Overview

Listen to BJGP Interviews for the latest updates on primary care and general practice research. Hear from researchers and clinicians who will update and guide you to the best practice. We all want to deliver better care to patients and improve health through better research and its translation into practice and policy. The BJGP is a leading international journal of primary care with the aim to serve the primary care community. Whether you are a general practitioner or a nurse, a researcher, we publish a full range of research studies from RCTs to the best qualitative literature on primary care. In addition, we publish editorials, articles on the clinical practice, and in-depth analysis of the topics that matter. We are inclusive and determined to serve the primary care community. BJGP Interviews brings all these articles to you through conversations with world-leading experts. The BJGP is the journal of the UK's Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP). The RCGP grant full editorial independence to the BJGP and the views published in the BJGP do not necessarily represent those of the College. For all the latest research, editorials and clinical practice articles visit BJGP.org (https://bjgp.org). If you want all the podcast shownotes plus the latest comment and opinion on primary care and general practice then visit BJGP Life (https://www.bjgplife.com).

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

9/25/2020

Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report

See how your podcast performs across key metrics

78

Podcast Authority

Beta
GoodBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality89
Social0
YouTube82
Engagement85
8
Excellent Areas
3
Good Performance
8
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Episode Length
16 minutes
Performing excellently!
good
Publishing Consistency
Every 8 days

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

poor
Episode Thumbnails

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

+16 More Metrics

Unlock comprehensive insights including:

  • • YouTube presence analysis
  • • Social media reach metrics
  • • RSS compliance scoring
  • • Podcast 2.0 features
  • • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report

Detailed Analytics

  • Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
  • Personalized recommendations for each metric
  • Industry benchmarks and comparisons
  • Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring

Growth Strategies

  • Step-by-step action plans for improvement
  • Quick wins to boost your score immediately
  • Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report

See how your show performs across every key metric

Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests

High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.

Secure Sponsorships

Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.

Grow Your Audience

Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.

Reach the team behind BJGP Interviews

Verified contact details for this show aren't on file yet — sign up to get notified when they land.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for Parents as partners - Improving paediatric safety in general practice

June 23, 2026

Parents as partners - Improving paediatric safety in general practice

<p>Today, we’re speaking to Dr Tom Purchase, a GP and Health and Care Research Wales NIHR doctoral fellow.</p><p>Title of paper: Co-generating ideas for safer paediatric care in general practice with parents and stakeholders</p><p><strong>Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0690" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0690</a></strong></p><p>Research has highlighted the important role parents play in in paediatric patient safety, for example, through mitigating safety incidents in general practice, yet their perspectives have rarely shaped system-level improvements. This study co-generated and prioritised ideas for change with parents and key stakeholders, identifying feasible and impactful strategies to improve paediatric safety in primary care. These strategies centred around practice communication, accessing care records and results, and fostering a culture of shared learning and development. Parents are willing and able to contribute meaningfully to safety improvement efforts, and their insights align with national patient safety priorities. Clinicians and policy makers can use these findings to strengthen collaboration with families, tailor safety interventions to local needs, and embed parent voices into the design of safer care systems.</p><p><strong>Transcript</strong></p><p>This transcript was generated using AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Please be aware it may contain errors or omissions.</p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:00:00.480 - 00:00:49.500</p><p>Hello and welcome today to BJGP Interviews. I'm Nada Khan and I'm one of the Associate editors of the Journal. Thanks for listening again to this podcast.</p><p></p><p>In today's episode, we're talking to Dr. Tom Purchase. Tom is a GP and a health and Care Research Wales NIHR Doctoral Fellow.</p><p></p><p>We're here today to talk about the paper he's just published in the bjgp and the paper is titled Co Generating Ideas for Safer Pediatric Care in General Practice with Parents and Stakeholders.</p><p></p><p>So, hi, Tom, it's really great to meet you and to talk about your work, but before we talk about the study itself, I'm interested to know what first got you interested in pediatric patient safety in general practice.</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:00:50.060 - 00:02:26.850</p><p>Thanks. It's born, I think, out of an extension of the work that we've been doing within the patient safety team within Cardiff University.</p><p></p><p>So a lot of what we do is looking at incident reports, safety incident reports, and trying to pick out what are the, you know, high level key learning points and takeaway messages from those.</p><p></p><p>And then within the team, we started to think about, as well as the types of incidents and the types of harms that are occurring within pediatric incidents. For example, how are parents involved?</p><p></p><p>And it was a bit of a novel approach to what we normally do, trying to have that extra aspect within the incidents and figuring out how parents were either helping to contribute or to mitigate against the incidents, not just looking at the incidents themselves. So that was the starting point, really.</p><p></p><p>And then once we'd started digging into that data and identifying that, actually the majority of the time, which is in one of the papers that was published last year in BJGP, 77% of the reports we were looking at specifically around general practice showed that parents were taking these mitigatory actions that, you know, positive actions that were able to prevent harm or further harm from occurring to their child, for example, chasing results or chasing referrals or importantly, being able to speak up. And then that highlighted, I think, the importance of parents being able to have a voice and advocating on behalf of their child.</p><p></p><p>And that really sparked, I think, the interest, and therefore this part of the.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:02:26.850 - 00:02:46.490</p><p>Project, and I think that's a really interesting thing about this paper, is that it focuses on parents and parents not just as observers of care, but as active contributors to safety. And I wonder what your thoughts are about why that's an important shift in how we think about these things.</p><p></p><p>I think you've touched on it a bit, but yeah, I'm interested to know a bit more about that.</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:02:46.810 - 00:03:55.980</p><p>I think it is a really important aspect of care, but also particularly safety, which maybe is untapped in terms of parents as a resource as to how we can keep children safe.</p><p></p><p>We know that children on the whole are more, maybe not more vulnerable, but certainly are a vulnerable group when it comes to patient care in general and patient safety.</p><p></p><p>And that's because they're so heavily reliant on others to speak on their behalf, to make sure somebody else is looking out for their healthcare needs. And therefore they are probably playing a part within the world of patient safety.</p><p></p><p>And there are good studies from hospital relating to incident reports that show that parents are capable of picking up issues early on. They're able to detect issues that maybe other parts or people within the system aren't detecting.</p><p></p><p>And as I mentioned, our paper from last year specifically looking at general practice showed that parents are able to prevent harms from reaching their children. So they're playing a substantial part already.</p><p></p><p>And from a systems perspective, that is mainly parents figuring out workarounds within a system that really isn't, I don't think, designed to support them as well as it could be.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:03:56.460 - 00:04:33.810</p><p>And I guess that's kind of the crux of what you were doing here.</p><p></p><p>So I guess before we get into findings, just, you know, a quick word about the methods because you worked here with groups of parents to develop ideas for improving pediatric patient safety in, in general practice, in primary care, and then you explored those ideas with a wider group of stakeholders and that included clinicians, managers and policymakers, and then brought them all together to co generate ideas for safer care. And it was really interesting because the parents generated 16 different ideas for improving safety.</p><p></p><p>And were there any that particularly surprised you and jumped out at you?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:04:34.450 - 00:05:33.980</p><p>I don't think necessarily any were too surprising on the basis that we. I don't think I really had any thoughts going into it as to what they might say.</p><p></p><p>But I guess what did surprise me more was that some of the ideas that we then took forward to the stakeholder group kind of highlighted some disparities or some clear disagreements between the parents who were accessing our services and the people who work within the services. And how we viewed, I suppose, viewed what's actually happening, that kind of work is imagined and how we think things are going and the work is done.</p><p></p><p>I guess what the parents were trying to do to come up with the idea is to bridge that gap unknowingly. I suppose maybe what's surprising is that none of them, I didn't think any of the ideas were necessarily too resource intensive.</p><p></p><p>You know, I think what was quite reassuring is that lots of what the parents were saying were actually relatively simple things that we might be able to enact or at least adopt or adapt, you know, to our own environments.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:05:34.540 - 00:05:47.730</p><p>And a lot of the ideas seem to center, I think, around communication, access to records and test results, and actually just helping parents to speak up. And why do you think those themes emerge so strongly?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:05:48.450 - 00:07:24.990</p><p>I think that comes back to maybe that difference between how we like to think the system's functioning and how parents think the system's functioning as healthcare professionals and parents.</p><p></p><p>Because we know from a thematic analysis we did, which is also going to be published in bjgp, from these discussions we've had with the parents, that a lot of them said they felt the need to fight in order to be heard.</p><p></p><p>So although within, say, pediatrics and GP training programmes and CBDs and everything we have to do for revalidation, taking ideas, concerns, expectations, collateral histories, making sure we're really considering that the holistic approach is all considered clinically, what you're then getting, I suppose, from the parents is that maybe we're not doing it as well as we could be.</p><p></p><p>And one parent within the workshop said, I know as a parent you are expected to advocate for your child, but what it surprises me is how regularly you have to do it and sometimes it feels like a full time job.</p><p></p><p>And I think that one really struck a chord in terms of really emphasizing how much extra effort and how much work parents are feeling they need to put in. And I think that also implies that the system isn't making it as easy as possible for them to be able to do the right thing.</p><p></p><p>So I can't necessarily explain unfortunately why they feel that those areas needed to be targeted.</p><p></p><p>I guess it's because there are barriers that we are not tackling correctly in order to help parents to speak up more efficiently and certainly to be listened to.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:07:26.840 - 00:07:35.160</p><p>And one of the stakeholder priorities was this idea of a designated parent advocate. Can you tell us a bit more about that idea and why it resonated?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:07:35.640 - 00:09:21.810</p><p>Yeah, sure.</p><p></p><p>I really liked that one and I thought it was an interesting one because again, it...

Episode thumbnail for From symptoms to signals: Using AI for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer

June 16, 2026

From symptoms to signals: Using AI for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer

<p>Today, we’re speaking to Dr Garth Funston, a GP and Clinical Senior Lecturer in Primary Care Cancer Research at Queen Mary University of London. </p><p>Title of paper: Using large language models to identify pre-diagnostic clinical features of ovarian cancer from healthcare records: a population-based case-control study</p><p><strong>Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0366" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0366</a></strong></p><p>Most women with ovarian cancer present with symptoms, but many symptoms are recorded only in free text healthcare records and missed by studies and clinical decision support tools that rely on coded data. We found that using large language models (LLMs) to extract symptoms from free text records substantially increased symptom detection and strengthened associations with ovarian cancer. Incorporating LLM-extracted symptom information into research and clinical decision tools may support identification of women at higher risk of cancer and aid appropriate investigation.</p><p></p><p><strong>Transcript</strong></p><p>This transcript was generated using AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Please be aware it may contain errors or omissions.</p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:00:00.800 - 00:00:50.940</p><p>Hi and welcome to BJGP Interviews. I'm Nada Khan and I'm one of the Associate editors of the Journal. Thanks for listening to this podcast today.</p><p></p><p>In today's episode, we're talking to Dr. Garth Funston, who is an academic GP and clinical senior Lecturer in Primary Care Research at Queen Mary University of London.</p><p></p><p>We're here to talk about his recent paper in the BJDP which is titled Using Large Language Models to Identify Pre Diagnostic Clinical Features of Ovarian and Cancer from Healthcare Records.</p><p></p><p>So, Garth, thanks so much for talking to us again today, but I wonder, just before we get into the AI side of this paper, can you briefly explain the clinical problem you're trying to address here with ovarian cancer diagnosis in general practice?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:00:51.500 - 00:01:55.010</p><p>So most women with ovarian cancer are diagnosed after they develop symptoms and see their doctor. The challenge is that most symptoms are really non specific. There's no real red flag symptoms for ovarian cancer.</p><p></p><p>That makes it a real clinical challenge for the GP to kind of recognize it and perform tests.</p><p></p><p>So the symptoms are things like abdominal and pelvic pain, persistent bloating, urinary urgency and frequency, things that we see really frequently in gp. So knowing when to consider ovarian cancer is the big challenge.</p><p></p><p>And we know that certainly a proportion of women see their GP multiple times before the diagnosis. Now we're lucky for ovarian cancer in that we have reasonably good triage tests and CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound.</p><p></p><p>So the challenge really is to identify women with these non specific symptoms early so as we can work out who to test and hopefully improve early diagnosis and on outcomes in that way.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:01:55.250 - 00:02:14.530</p><p>Yeah, and I'm sure you're well aware of sort of the body work around this area and people like Willie Hamilton, who's done work around early diagnosis of ovarian cancer, along with Claire Bankhead, and they did some really interesting work around things like bloating, didn't they? But that was slightly different, I think, and a little bit that's some time ago now, isn't it?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:02:14.930 - 00:02:39.230</p><p>Yeah, it was some time ago. I think all of that is, you know, fundamental and still holds true.</p><p></p><p>And they did a lot of work around things like IBS and in women over, over 50 and things like that that are kind of these subtle signs that we need to be aware of with ovarian cancer.</p><p></p><p>So, yeah, we know there's lots of features that are associated with ovarian cancer, but it's recognizing when to invest to get those features because they're so common.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:02:39.630 - 00:02:49.310</p><p>Yeah. And do you think that's why it's described as difficult to diagnose early in general practice? Is it because the symptoms are so common?</p><p></p><p>What are your thoughts on that?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:02:49.390 - 00:03:48.750</p><p>I think there's a few reasons.</p><p></p><p>I think ovarian cancer used to be called, certainly in the media, the kind of the silent killer and terminology, which I really, really frustrates me, because we know it's not. We know that most women of symptoms for diagnosis. We actually know that from this paper and other papers that are symptoms in early stage cancer.</p><p></p><p>But that kind of thought around ovarian cancer still holds. Secondly, the symptoms are nonspecific, they're reasonably common. I mean, you know, I probably see a.</p><p></p><p>A patient with abdominal pain most days and it's kind of working out which ones to investigate for ovarian cancer. Yeah. And so I think those are the main things. And thirdly, it's, you know, it's not the most common common cancer.</p><p></p><p>GP will see people probably only encounter a case of ovarian cancer every three to five years, a new case. And that's the extra challenge. It's kind of suspecting it when it's a rare thing in primary care.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:03:49.100 - 00:04:03.500</p><p>Yeah. And one thing I found really interesting about this work is that you're using free text clinical records rather than just coded data.</p><p></p><p>So can you tell us a little bit about the data you accessed here and why it was so important to use this free text data?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:04:04.220 - 00:05:09.600</p><p>So a lot of the work that we do with primary care data focuses on coded data and certainly within the uk, because that's really the data we can actually access within UK for research purposes. But up to 80% of clinical information is not in that coded format, it's in the free text.</p><p></p><p>And work from people like Sarah Price in the past have shown that often subtle things that we need to pick up are in the free text and GPS don't code that.</p><p></p><p>So it's something I've been really keen to use in research for many years now to try and look at what extra information is there in the free text that could help us in both research and clinical practice and kind of picking up these cancers. And the data we accessed was from the United States, it was from healthcare clinics associated with the University of Washington.</p><p></p><p>And that included kind of coded data, but also the free text medical records of patients which had been anonymized and were accessed in a kind of a safe and appropriate way.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:05:10.000 - 00:05:40.140</p><p>Yeah.</p><p></p><p>And I think a lot of clinical staff listening to this will certainly, certainly appreciate that a Lot goes into the notes that we just type in that doesn't really get coded. So it's phenomenal that you're able to access that data.</p><p></p><p>And this paper uses large language models or LLMs, which some people might associate, associate with tools like ChatGPT, but just at a very basic level. Can you just talk us through what actually is a large language model and what sort of it was used for in this, in this study?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:05:40.950 - 00:06:49.130</p><p>Large language models, lots of people use them on a daily basis. Absolutely right.</p><p></p><p>Things like ChatGPT, they're essentially a tool for our purposes which we use to extract information from the free text medical records. Now natural language processing approaches have been used actually for many years, kind of rule based approaches.</p><p></p><p>Other models, these require lots of training. You need to lots of highly annotated records and notes to train the models.</p><p></p><p>Advantage of large language models, things like GPT, is they need less annotated notes and we did still do some of that, but they require less and that makes them much easier to apply and use in practice. We use them in this setting to effectively pull out key information on symptoms.</p><p></p><p>We predefined a list of 17 symptoms from the literature which were associated with ovarian cancer and we used the large language models to go through the notes, pull out information on those symptoms that we could use in the study alongside the coded data.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:06:50.090 - 00:07:03.350</p><p>And I think that as we've been discussing, these large language models are probably really useful for this kind of data. I think especially because a lot of general practice is narrative and contextual as we've been discussing as well.</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:07:03.350 - 00:07:38.940</p><p>Yeah, I think, I mean there's two challenges with using free text data. One is access requirements because there's lots of concerns around confidentiality. The other is just the volume of it.</p><p></p><p>You've got these massive records that you know, contain lots of information, lots of writing, go back years. How do you actually process that to find the key information that you need?</p><p></p><p>I think large language models are a really useful tool here because with a bit of training you can use them to actually extract the information that's pertinent to your kind of question.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:07:39.340 - 00:07:48.620</p><p>So let's go into what you found and I'm really interested to know about what kind of patterns or features was this model able to identify before an ovarian cancer diagnosis.</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:07:49.180 - 00:09:06.690</p><p>So we looked at 17, 17 features. We find actually that 14 of the features were more frequently recorded within the free text and coded...

Episode thumbnail for When mothers need more: Postnatal care and complex social needs

June 9, 2026

When mothers need more: Postnatal care and complex social needs

<p>Today, we’re speaking to Dr Clare Macdonald, an Academic Clinical Lecturer in General Practice based at the University of Birmingham.</p><p>Title of paper: Complex social needs and maternal postnatal care: what can primary care do?</p><p><strong>Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2026.0069" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2026.0069</a></strong></p><p>Throughout the discussion we use the terms ‘woman’ and ‘women’, but we know that not all those who give birth will identify as women and intend this to mean all those who give birth.</p><p><strong>Transcript</strong></p><p>This transcript was generated using AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Please be aware it may contain errors or omissions.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:00:00.480 - 00:00:51.740</p><p>Hello and welcome to BJ GP Interviews. I'm Nada Khan and I'm one of the Associate Editors of the Journal. Thanks for listening to this podcast today.</p><p></p><p>In today's episode, we're speaking to Dr. Claire MacDonald. Claire is an academic clinical lecturer in general practice, and she's based at the University of Birmingham.</p><p></p><p>We're here today to talk about the editorial she's just published in the May issue of the bjgp, and it's titled Complex Social Needs and Maternal Postnatal Care. What Can Primary Care Do?</p><p></p><p>So, hi, Clare, it's lovely to meet you and to talk about this brilliant editorial, but before we get into the editorial itself, I wonder if you can just talk us through what you actually mean by complex social needs in the context of postnatal care.</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:00:51.980 - 00:02:21.290</p><p>Yeah.</p><p></p><p>So I think when we talk about social complexity in the postnatal population, we're talking about women who have multiple factors that might be influencing how they can access care or influencing the clinical and social risks that they have. So for most people, the time after they've had a baby results in some social change.</p><p></p><p>Even in the most straightforward, most brilliantly supported, most physically well person, there are big social changes. And that is a period of a complex time to navigate and finding your way and your identity as a family with a new baby and so on.</p><p></p><p>When we talk about complex social needs, we're talking about women who face other aspects of adversity.</p><p></p><p>So it might be that they have housing instability, it might be that they have experienced domestic abuse or they continue to experience domestic abuse, that they have a history of safeguarding issues, safeguarding for themselves or safeguarding concern, concerns about other children or other family members.</p><p></p><p>And when we see women who have overlapping social risk factors that produces this kind of network of complexity that puts them at compounded additional risk and they need additional help in navigating their health needs in that time.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:02:21.450 - 00:02:47.310</p><p>And I wonder why you felt that this was an important issue to highlight right now. So is there anything in particular that makes you think that this is the right time to sort of look into this?</p><p></p><p>I know that there's a complex picture in terms of sort of maternal care, and if we look at things like the cost of living crisis, which is compounding a lot of the pressures that people are facing. But talk me through what your impetus was in thinking about this as a now issue.</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:02:48.110 - 00:05:26.470</p><p>Yeah, that's right.</p><p></p><p>So maternity services are really high profile in the news a lot at the moment, but from a secondary care perspective, and quite rightly, there's a spotlight on the poor care that some women and their families and their babies receive from secondary care. And there are, you know, huge pieces of work being done to improve that, to improve outcomes and to improve people's experiences.</p><p></p><p>But that focus tends to be on intrapartum care.</p><p></p><p>So the care that people receive in hospital around the time of birth, sometimes there's a little bit of focus on antenatal care as well and reducing risk during pregnancy, there's a lot less focus on what looks like the less exciting time of preconception care and then postnatal care. So after women get discharged from maternity services, we know that they're often left feeling a little bit isolated in the healthcare context.</p><p></p><p>Some qualitative research that we've done in the past, looking at women's experiences of postnatal care, women told us that they were surprised about they'd had so many appointments during pregnancy and then so much healthcare retention in the first few days after birth, and then they were just surprised. No, you know, they had a baby and no one was really interested in their health anymore. And that genuinely came as a surprise to them.</p><p></p><p>We know that maternal mortality in the uk, which, thankfully, in absolute numbers, is. Is quite small, but it's certainly higher than it could be and maybe should be, particularly compared to other kind of similar European countries.</p><p></p><p>And there are actually more maternal deaths postnatally, so in the sort of later postnatal period, six weeks to a year after birth, than there are in that sort of antenatal, intrapartum and early postnatal period. And all of the political drive tends to be about reducing maternal mortality in its traditional definition of being up to six weeks after birth.</p><p></p><p>But as GPs, where we can really have an impact is in those late maternal deaths.</p><p></p><p>And of course, very few of us, thankfully, will be involved in the care of a woman who dies in that period, because they are small in absolute numbers. But there are all the women who do not die, but have those risk factors and have that complexity.</p><p></p><p>And the longer they live with those sort of adverse health conditions and adverse social conditions, that is dramatically reducing their quality life course health. And we can really step in, in that postnatal period to look at how we can influence that.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:05:26.870 - 00:05:49.080</p><p>Yeah, and you've mentioned about the kind of care that women get in during their pregnancy. And sometimes, I'm sure for some women, the postnatal period can feel already pretty fragmented for those reasons.</p><p></p><p>But how do you think that that fragmentation can become amplified for women with complex social needs? Do you have any thoughts about that?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:05:50.280 - 00:08:25.320</p><p>Absolutely. So a Lot of people will know how to contact their gp, right?</p><p></p><p>I think if you ask people, most people have probably got that number saved in their phone or they know where their GP practice is.</p><p></p><p>But after you have a baby, women are then given all these kind of new healthcare professionals who are interested and involved and it's impossible to know how that all fits together.</p><p></p><p>So the midwife will typically follow women up for that kind of, you know, 10 to 14 days postnatally, usually just at the time the midwife is giving you the final sign off appointment. Within a day or two, you have an appointment with the health visitor, which again is somebody new, and then you might have a follow up.</p><p></p><p>For example, if a woman's had a third degree tear or is having some additional hospital follow up because of hypertension or gestational diabetes, then the hospital are involved and then they come back to the GP.</p><p></p><p>And I often feel like, for us as GPs, women, as soon as they're pregnant, they can generally self refer to the midwife and they get kind of lifted out of the primary care system to an extent.</p><p></p><p>We might not see them through their whole pregnancy, then they have a baby, we might or might not get a discharge summary that gives us some details about the birth and then we invite them for their postnatal consultation and in that time, you know, they've had an entire pregnancy, a huge life changing event, and then we get to see them for this one appointment. And it's so complicated.</p><p></p><p>Often for women who are not sure where they're going to get their next meal from, how can they be giving any kind of cognitive time to figuring out if the midwife told the health visitor and if the health visitor told the GP and if they're worried that their bleeding's gone on for a bit too long, do they try and phone the woman who came on Thursday or the woman who came on Monday, or do they come back to their gp?</p><p></p><p>We're asking a lot and we also place a lot of burden on women to retell their story because information transfer is not always timely, it's not always sufficiently detailed.</p><p></p><p>And again, for women who are living in more precarious social situations, that burden then of having to, you know, they're juggling and the, you know, the mental load of everything they're trying to figure out. And then we're asking them, can you remember if your blood pressure was high during your pregnancy?</p><p></p><p>Whereas we should know that we should have that information from those other services. So that fragmentation in services really means that the burden is unduly placed on women to kind of patch that up.</p><p></p><p>And we need to find a better way of dealing with that.</p><p></p><p>Speaker A</p><p>00:08:25.640 - 00:08:38.260</p><p>One of the things I think that comes through really strongly is that some of the women with the greatest needs often face the biggest barriers, care. And what kind of barriers are we talking about here that these women are facing?</p><p></p><p>Speaker B</p><p>00:08:38.980 - 00:10:06.270</p><p>The Embrace report, which is well, well worth a look at at least their infographics, I think for every gp, it's just a...

241 total episodes available

Recent guests on BJGP Interviews

Guests from recent episodes — sign up to see every guest that has ever appeared on this show.

Professor Helen Atherton

Guest

Dr Sara Noden

Guest

Dr Nishi Yarger

Guest

Dr Cini Bhanu

Guest

Dr Jamie Scuffell

Guest

Dr Steve Bradley

Guest

Deep-dive analytics for BJGP Interviews

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is BJGP Interviews?

Listen to BJGP Interviews for the latest updates on primary care and general practice research. Hear from researchers and clinicians who will update and guide you to the best practice. We all want to deliver better care to patients and improve health through better research and its translation into practice and policy.

The BJGP is a leading international journal of primary care with the aim to serve the primary care community. Whether you are a general practitioner or a nurse, a researcher, we publish a full range of research studies from RCTs to the best qualitative literature on primary care. In addition, we publish editorials, articles on the clinical practice, and in-depth analysis of the topics that matter. We are inclusive and determined to serve the primary care community.

BJGP Interviews brings all these articles to you through conversations with world-leading experts.

The BJGP is the journal of the UK's Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP). The RCGP grant full editorial independence to the BJGP and the views published in the BJGP do not necessarily represent those of the College.

For all the latest research, editorials and clinical practice articles visit BJGP.org (https://bjgp.org).

If you want all the podcast shownotes plus the latest comment and opinion on primary care and general practice then visit BJGP Life (https://www.bjgplife.com).

How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates daily.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 10 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.