Stories you can trust about BC politics, policies, leadership, and more at www.northernbeat.ca <br/><br/><a href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast">northernbeatnews.substack.com</a>
Northern Beat News Podcast
Claim This Podcastby Northern Beat News
28 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇨🇦
9
Podcast Authority
BetaPoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality17
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement0
Podcast Overview
Stories you can trust about BC politics, policies, leadership, and more at www.northernbeat.ca <br/><br/><a href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast">northernbeatnews.substack.com</a>
Language
🇺🇲
Publishing Since
4/12/2025
Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report
See how your podcast performs across key metrics
9
Podcast Authority
BetaPoorBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Quality17
Social0
YouTube0
Engagement0
6
Excellent Areas
2
Good Performance
11
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Episode Length
58 minutes
Performing excellently!
good
Publishing Consistency
Every 12 days
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
poor
Episode Thumbnails
Recommendations available
Unlock the full report to see detailed tips
+16 More Metrics
Unlock comprehensive insights including:
- • YouTube presence analysis
- • Social media reach metrics
- • RSS compliance scoring
- • Podcast 2.0 features
- • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report
Detailed Analytics
- Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
- Personalized recommendations for each metric
- Industry benchmarks and comparisons
- Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring
Growth Strategies
- Step-by-step action plans for improvement
- Quick wins to boost your score immediately
- Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report
See how your show performs across every key metric
Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests
High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.
Secure Sponsorships
Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.
Grow Your Audience
Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.
1 verified contact email on file for Northern Beat News Podcast
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
June 12, 2026
PODCAST: Joan Young on why landowners must be heard
<p><p>“You can't have two sets of owners having ownership interests, with mutually exclusive rights, over the same piece of land. It just, in our view, doesn't work."</p></p><p></p><p>As litigator for Montrose Properties, Joan Young has taken on an unenviable but some say, noble task. </p><p>Last month, Young was in the BC Supreme Court petitioning to reopen the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/25/14/2025BCSC1490cor1.htm">Cowichan Tribes v Canada</a> trial to add Montrose as a defendant. If successful, Montrose will speak not only for its own interests as the largest property owner within the newly declared 800 acres of Aboriginal title land in Richmond, but also for the 150 or so others who were deliberately shut out of the 11-year-long court proceedings that led to the <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/explainer-cowichan-aboriginal-title-decision/">landmark ruling</a>.</p><p>Young sat down with us this week to explain how property titles are affected by the Cowichan Tribes decision, why Montrose is compelled to be the voice of landowners and take the extraordinary step to apply to reopen the trial, and what’s at stake if it doesn’t succeed.</p><p><strong>Watch the full podcast:</strong></p><p>Precedent-setting decision</p><p>In August 2025, Madame Justice Barbara Young (no relation to Joan) issued the decision that rocked property owners in Richmond and beyond, marking the first time a court found Aboriginal title co-exists with private property. Overnight, Montrose Properties was thrust into ground zero of what may well be the epic societal conundrum of our time.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Who owns the land in British Columbia?</p><p>Framed as reconciliation, the current provincial and federal governments have committed to implementing the principles of a <a target="_blank" href="https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf">United Nations declaration</a> that equates Indigenous land claims with land ownership. Given there are 2.3 million private properties in BC and enough overlapping Aboriginal title claims to cover up to 120 per cent of the province, the math doesn’t lead anywhere harmonious.</p><p>And if the Cowichan Tribes case is an indication of how the courts will treat private property owners whose land falls within an Indigenous land claim; <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/one-two-sucker-punch-bc-ottawa-bury-province-under-aboriginal-title-chaos/">how weakly</a> governments will <a target="_blank" href="https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/nothing-to-fear-from-sunshine-coast-land-deal-ndp">defend </a>those public interests, and how vociferously Indigenous groups will pursue Aboriginal title, landowners might be on their own. Because so far in this case, the burden of defending what most consider an inalienable right in a democracy—<a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/covert-haida-bc-government-court-action-may-strip-landowner-protections/">property ownership</a>—has landed on squarely Montrose’s head.</p><p>Despite more than a decade of legal proceedings, none of the parties of the Cowichan Tribes case, particularly Cowichan, Canada and BC, notified private landowners their property fell within the title claim area. And neither Canada nor BC argued to protect private property to the full extent they could have, according to Young.</p><p>If this a trend, there will be consequences. The first casualty may be the very cause the courts and governments are purportedly pursuing. </p><p>When the system for generations says private property is the most reliable investment we can make, then allows that foundation to erode without notice or voice, says Young, public support for reconciliation will erode with it.</p><p><strong>Podcast excerpt: ‘A death knell for reconciliation’</strong></p><p>If you enjoyed the podcast, consider <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe"><strong>upgrading to paid</strong></a>—support independent news! All fees go to our sweatshop teeming with freelance writers and producers.</p><p>Thanks as always for your support and interest in the endlessly eventful politics and public policy ecosystem in BC.</p><p></p><p>—Fran</p><p><strong>Podcast producers: Rob Shaw and Zach Proulx</strong></p><p>Feedback: Fran@NorthernBeat.ca</p><p>For more BC politics: Northernbeat.ca</p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe</a>
June 4, 2026
PODCAST: Political skeet-shooting with Keith Baldrey & Vaughn Palmer
<p>Listen to the 5-minute highlights reel:</p><p>If you follow BC politics, veteran political journalists <strong>Vaughn Palmer</strong> and <strong>Keith Baldrey</strong> need no introduction. </p><p>For everyone else, Vancouver Sun political columnist, Palmer, and Global BC legislative bureau chief, Baldrey, have chronicled the triumphs and disasters of 11 premiers (“and counting:” Vaughn). </p><p><p>“If [BC Conservatives] stick to the economy, I think they can stick together. If they stray into social conservatism and faith and all that that goes with that, it’s going to be a problem.” —Keith Baldrey</p></p><p>They’ve seen governments rise and fall and rise again. They’ve watched political stars burn bright and flame out or fade away as a new wave of legislators took their place. They’ve heard eloquent speeches, tedious pontificating and everything in between. They’ve analyzed more laws, public policies, election campaigns, press conferences, official reports and legislative maneouverings than the cabinet ministers and Premier running the province.</p><p>With 40 years of backstory, they see the whole iceberg. They can spot patterns, smell trouble and contextualize the significance before it's barely hit the radar of mere mortals.</p><p><p>“Horgan was more inclusive, a team leader, a chair of the board, and he delegated. Eby doesn’t do any of those things.” –Vaughn Palmer</p></p><p>Both Vaughn and Keith stopped by Northern Beat this week to share their insights into the session’s top story, leadership styles of past and present premiers, where the newest <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/does-kerry-lynne-findlay-have-what-it-takes-to-be-premier-of-bc/">BC Conservative leader</a> can take her caucus if she chooses, how some First Nations leaders have dangerously over-reached, why both major parties are in flux, and more.</p><p><strong>Podcast excerpt: ‘You don’t need to be a 10 to get elected in BC’</strong></p><p></p><p>Hope you enjoy this pod as much I did. Let us know what you think!</p><p>As always, thanks for supporting independent news. Please share our stories and pods and consider subscribing if you haven’t already. All subscriber fees to to our freelance writers, helping us get more great content, one story at a time.</p><p>Cheers, </p><p></p><p>—Fran </p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe"><strong>Upgrade to paid</strong></a> </p><p><strong>Podcast producers: Rob Shaw & Zach Proulx</strong></p><p>Feedback: Fran@NorthernBeat.ca</p><p>More BC politics: www.northernbeat.ca</p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe</a>
May 6, 2026
Werner Stump: 'We really have to take a pause'
<p></p><p>“The only way that we can create a sustainable long-term situation is if we have this foundation of equality… there needs to be only one class of British Columbians.”</p><p>—Werner Stump</p><p></p><p>The BC Cattlemen’s Association is throwing its considerable weight behind a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the BC NDP government’s most contentious legislation. </p><p>If successful, the case could radically <a target="_blank" href="https://www.conversationsthatmatter.ca/episodes/606-dripa-and-legal-consequences">change the course</a> of reconciliation in the province and neutralize what critics view as a direct threat to BC’s governance structure. </p><p>And it would force BC Premier David Eby's hand on <a target="_blank" href="https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/vaughn-palmer-bc-premier-david-eby-not-in-charge-dripa-first-nations">what to do</a> with his prized Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, but most certainly <a target="_blank" href="https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/vaughn-palmer-dripa-troubles-dragging-down-david-eby-bc-ndp-government">not in the way he likes.</a></p><p>Why are the province’s cattle ranchers wading into the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/19044">DRIPA</a> legal fray as an intervenor in the court challenge?</p><p>“It’s hard to imagine who might not be interested with DRIPA because it impacts potentially, in my opinion, pretty much everybody in the province,” says association president, Warren Stump. </p><p><strong>Listen to the audio highlight reel:</strong></p><p>[<a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe"><strong>Upgrade to Paid</strong></a>]</p><p>DRIPA confusion</p><p>DRIPA channels the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (<a target="_blank" href="https://www.ohchr.org/en/indigenous-peoples/un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples">UNDRIP</a>) into BC law. But Aboriginal law experts say UNDRIP does not conform with Canadian constitutional law and threatens our governance structure in BC. </p><p>UNDRIP stipulates all legislation must be co-developed with First Nations, groups that have no electoral accountability to the broader public governed by those the laws.</p><p>As well, any territory an Indigenous group choses to claim is treated as owned, bypassing the onerous burden of proof required under constitutional law. And use of that land, including resource development, requires the community's free, prior and informed consent. In BC, those territorial claims cover almost all of the province.</p><p>Shoving this framework into practice has triggered chaos on the ground as government decision-makers, Indigenous communities and non-Indigenous residents and businesses scramble to understand how to comply.</p><p>Ranchers are at the bleeding edge of this land-use imbroglio. Their livelihoods depend on grazing tenures and water rights on Crown land. </p><p>“We're just feeling a lot of uncertainty as to where those things lie and where the rights to those things lie in the future,” says Stump, who wrote about how DRIPA leads to a system of <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/if-dripa-stands-it-will-make-bc-an-undemocratic-society/">unworkable co-governance.</a></p><p>Podcast excerpt: ‘The biggest misstep’</p><p>Secret deals and mounting uncertainty</p><p>This crisis has been brewing for years.</p><p>According to Stump, the cattle sector first noticed international investors getting spooked by the uncertainty in BC’s market after the government’s botched attempt to amend the Land Act in spring 2024.</p><p>The Land Act changes would have handed First Nations statutory decision-making power (aka <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/news/proposed-legislative-changes-give-indigenous-nations-statutary-power-on-land-use/">a veto</a>) over land use. The NDP government ultimately <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/bc-ndp-pause-indigenous-statutory-decision-making-land-use/">backed down </a>amid public anger, just months before the provincial election. But the retreat was superficial. Similar powers <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/ndp-land-deals-are-faustian-bargain-for-indigenous-consent-says-ex-deputy/">quietly resurfaced</a> in “reconciliation” agreements the BC government subsequently signed in the name of DRIPA.</p><p>Take the agreement with shíshálh Nation which recognizes rights and title, grants joint and sole decision-making over land use, transfers Crown land, formalizes a controversial co-managment dock management plan and commits to <a target="_blank" href="https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/natural-resource-stewardship/consulting-with-first-nations/first-nations-negotiations/first-nations-a-z-listing/sechelt-sh-sh-lh-first-nation/sh-sh-lh-nation-british-columbia-foundation-agreement#2024FoundationAgreementRenewal">$80 million</a> in funding over five years. It was signed two months before the election and <a target="_blank" href="https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/secrecy-over-bc-land-management-deals-destroys-ndp-credibility">kept secret</a> from the public for five months. </p><p><a target="_blank" href="https://phara.ca">Pender Harbour and Area Residents Association</a> pushed back with <a target="_blank" href="https://phara.ca/phara-files-updated-legal-action-to-strike-down-dripa-post/">a lawsuit</a> that evolved into the constitutional court challenge the cattlemen are now joining.</p><p><p>“The PHARA litigation is entirely about what does this UNDRIP mean? Is it sound to have DRIPPA as a foundation moving forward? Is it consistent with Canadian law? Is it consistent with our rights and freedoms under the Charter of Canada?”</p></p><p>The lawsuit alleges DRIPA fails to balance Indigenous and non-Indigenous rights, it exceeds the province’s constitutional jurisdiction by expanding Indigenous resource management, and breaches people’s democratic rights by ceding governance to individuals with no duty or accountability to the public affected by their decisions. </p><p></p><p></p><p>‘Existential threat’ to the rule of law</p><p>The legal landscape was already a minefield of uncertainty for private property owners. The <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeat.ca/opinion/covert-haida-bc-government-court-action-may-strip-landowner-protections/">BC government-Haida agreement</a> awarded Aboriginal title over private land, then the <a target="_blank" href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com/p/special-cowichan-aboriginal-title">Cowichan Tribes</a> BC Supreme Court decision found Aboriginal title over private property in Richmond BC, followed by the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1772569109838/1772569128589">federal government-Musqueam</a> rights recognition agreement that recognized Aboriginal title somewhere in the Lower Mainland.</p><p>Layered onto all of this is the <a target="_blank" href="https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2023/2023bcsc1680/2023bcsc1680.html">Gixaala</a> BC Court of Appeal decision which found the province in violation of its own DRIPA-<a target="_blank" href="https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/bills/billsprevious/2nd42nd:gov29-3">related legislation</a>, penned by then-Attorney General David Eby, that directs all laws “must” conform to the Declaration Act.</p><p>The Premier denounced the Gixaala ruling and vowed to correct course. This was followed by three months of indecision and two months of political whiplash, featuring a series of flip-flops as the Premier pivoted weekly on how best to manage First Nations’ demands versus “significant legal liabilities” and the “existential threat” created by his own legislation.</p><p>Unsurprisingly, capital is nervous.</p><p>“They’re looking at British Columbia and saying, ‘Hey, these guys don’t have their act together. We don’t know what the rules are.’</p><p>“Anyone can challenge any law in British Columbia and question whether it’s consistent with the principles of UNDRIP. So that does leave us in a position of essentially we don’t know where we stand.”</p><p>Enjoy the podcast and let us know what you think.</p><p>Thanks for supporting independent media.</p><p></p><p>—Fran</p><p><strong>Podcast producers: Rob Shaw and Zach Proulx</strong></p><p></p><p>Feedback: Fran@Northernbeat.ca</p><p>For more BC politics: Northernbeat.ca</p><p></p><p></p> <br/><br/>This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=CTA_2">northernbeatnews.substack.com/subscribe</a>
28 total episodes available
Recent guests on Northern Beat News Podcast
Guests from recent episodes — sign up to see every guest that has ever appeared on this show.
Trevor Halford
Guest
Tom Isaac
Guest
Merlin Blackwell
Guest
John Rustad
Guest
Kurtis Rabel
Guest
James Wall
Guest
Marcel Woodill
Guest
Leonard Krog
Guest
Julius Bloomfield
Guest
Tom Dyas
Guest
Jillian Skeet
Guest
Barbara Kane
Guest
Similar Podcasts
Discover related shows you might enjoy
Political Capital with Rob Shaw
CHEK Podcasts
Hotel Pacifico
Air Quotes Media
BIGGER THAN ME PODCAST
Aaron Pete
The Jas Johal Show
CKNW / Curiouscast
The Mike Smyth Show
The Mike Smyth Show
Mornings with Simi
Curiouscast
PolitiCoast
Leg-in-Boot Media
The Herle Burly
Air Quotes Media
Culture Lab with Kyla and Gabe
Air Quotes Media
Curse of Politics: The Herle Burly Political Panel
Air Quotes Media
Hub Podcasts
Hub Canada Media
Full Comment
Postmedia
The Line
Matt Gurney and Jen Gerson
The Loonie Hour
Steve Saretsky
Michael Campbell's Money Talks
HPC Inc.
Deep-dive analytics for Northern Beat News Podcast
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is Northern Beat News Podcast?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates daily.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 4 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.