我们从来不是在理解世界，而是理解让我们以特定的方式参与世界。非典型青年学者们从日常生活和流行文化的角度思考性别、阶级与权力的问题。
歧义 Disagreement
Claim This Podcastby Evan
4.4(20 reviews)
42 episodes
Updated Bi-weekly
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇨🇳
Podcast Overview
我们从来不是在理解世界，而是理解让我们以特定的方式参与世界。非典型青年学者们从日常生活和流行文化的角度思考性别、阶级与权力的问题。
Language
🇨🇳
Publishing Since
1/12/2023
1 verified contact email on file for 歧义 Disagreement
Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.
Recent Episodes
April 6, 2026
Vol.31 大都市爱情法与东亚酷儿政治
<p>本期节目围绕2024年上线的韩国酷儿电视剧《大都市爱情法》展开讨论。我们从剧情、人物关系和各自的观看感受谈起，逐渐进入这部剧所处的社会语境，并借此重新讨论东亚脉络中的“酷儿政治”。与此同时，我们也将它与其他东亚酷儿影视作品放在一起比较，试着去理解不同文本如何处理欲望、亲密关系、身份认同与社会规训之间的张力。围绕这部剧，我们也谈到许多由文本延伸出的议题：性与爱、空间与时间、HIV、出柜与家庭、恐同与自我厌恶，以及父权、宗教、阶级、城乡与跨国流动、劳动与工作、性别气质、自杀、死亡、记忆、创伤与危机。比起单纯讨论它“讲了什么”，我们更关心的是，这部剧如何借由自身的叙事与视听方式，让这些原本纠缠在一起的经验和结构得以浮现。</p><p><strong>主持</strong></p><p>Evan，传播学（文化研究）博士生，性别与情感政治</p><p><strong>嘉宾</strong></p><p>河西，人类学博士，酷儿研究</p><p>惠风，社会学博士生，男性气质与性研究</p><p><strong>相关推荐阅读材料/影视</strong></p><p>含蓄美学与酷儿政略 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/b941kdGIdNqgzN1wgdQF6Q?scene=1</p><p>向后感受：失落与酷儿历史的政治 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/SODldJ3LIITL5WXqt4QhRA?scene=1</p><p>酷儿身体与酷儿感受 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/DGZj2IM8Aaqh8CWrtVM3DQ?scene=1</p><p>酷儿理论：协商交叉性 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_l8j1Z7PzPNY6dPtko3opA?scene=1</p><p>时间性与酷儿乌托邦 <a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/-hG1YsZLIpgqc57a2e7_ew?scene=1">mp.weixin.qq.com</a></p><p>劳伦·贝兰特：欲望/爱 <a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/iRKxlF_IeMw6LX5zPi8gSA?scene=1">mp.weixin.qq.com</a></p><p>性与女性主义 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/qJZAcpBNQpf11sEbtGBnsg?scene=1</p><p>伊丽莎白·弗里曼：酷儿与非当下 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2E_jsHK80lU1BZDQmVPnHQ</p><p>杰克·哈伯斯坦：失败的酷儿艺术 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ePf7VMZrUldFhrrVByOExg</p><p>穆尼奥斯：感受（酷儿）乌托邦 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/KAFr4IKWr75lSGS1TOTGww</p><p>Berry, C. (2000). Happy alone? Sad young men in East Asian gay cinema. Journal of Homosexuality, 39(3-4), 187-200.</p><p>Martin, F. (2010). Backward glances: Contemporary Chinese cultures and the female homoerotic imaginary. Duke University Press.</p><p>Gitzen, T. (2023). Banal security: Queer Korea in the time of viruses. Helsinki University Press.</p><p>白先勇，《孽子》</p><p>不后悔 (2006) https://movie.douban.com/subject/2055699/?dt_dapp=1&dt_platform=com.douban.activity.wechat_friends</p><p>华语酷儿银幕史：四十年血泪欢歌，一束关不住的春光 https://b23.tv/nYsg3Ow</p><p><strong>本期配乐</strong></p><p>Suran - Erotic Joke</p>
January 2, 2026
Vol.31 把“欲望”作为方法
<p>本期节目围绕罗丽莎（Lisa Rofel）的《欲望中国》（Desiring China）展开讨论。在书中描绘的九十年代已过去近三十年的今天，我们重新审视“欲望主体”的变迁轨迹。节目从我们重读此书的感受出发，交换彼此在阅读中产生的疑问，并以此为契机，探讨进入2026年之际欲望生产条件所经历的变化。同时，我们也分享了这本书对我们各自研究带来的启发。最后，通过分析罗丽莎写作时所处的“位置性”，我们进一步反思了当下知识分子在公共言说中所承担的伦理责任。</p><p><strong>主持：</strong>Evan</p><p><strong>嘉宾：</strong>Lemon、河西</p><p><strong>播客中提到的相关推荐阅读材料：</strong></p><p>戴锦华. (2018). 隐形书写: 90年代中国文化研究. 北京大学出版社</p><p>译文 | 探询至善：安玛丽·摩尔的告别演讲（2025） https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/4D1jHXaI34IrhO3Up1CRxA?scene=1&click_id=28</p><p>伊夫·塞吉维克：偏执式阅读与修复式阅读 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/vOJEkmghHNzHG0YAeSqNIA</p><p>脆弱不安的生命：暴力、哀悼与政治 （朱迪斯·巴特勒） https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/3hT0UvtUoReOwMfI3N4yBA</p><p>酷儿身体与酷儿感受 （萨拉·艾哈迈德）https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/DGZj2IM8Aaqh8CWrtVM3DQ</p><p>丁瑜. (2016). 她身之欲: 珠三角流动人口社群特殊职业研究. 社会科学文献出版社</p><p>肖索未. (2018). 欲望与尊严：转型期中国的阶层、性别与亲密关系. 社会科学文献出版社</p><p>裴谕新. (2013). 欲望都市: 上海70后女性研究. 上海人民出版社</p><p>Ho Sik Ying. (2006). The (Charmed) Circle Game: Reflections on Sexual Hierarchy Through Multiple Sexual Relationships. Sexualities. 9(5): 547–64.</p><p>Harriet Evans. (2020). Beijing from Below: Stories of Marginal Lives in the Capital's Center. Duke University Press.</p><p>Judith Farquhar. (2002). Appetites: Food And Sex in Post-Socialist China. Duke University Press（中译本：《饕餮之欲》）</p><p>Kimberly Kay Hoang. (2015). Dealing in Desire: Asian Ascendancy, Western Decline, and the Hidden Currencies of Global Sex Work. University of California Press.</p><p>Petrus Liu. (2023). The Specter of Materialism: Queer Theory and Marxism in the Age of the Beijing Consensus. Duke University Press.</p><p>Sang Young Park. (2021). Love in the Big City. Grove Press</p><p>Tomasz Jedrowski. (2020). Swimming in the Dark. Bloomsbury.</p><p>Wang Hui. (2009). The End of the Revolution: China and the Limits of Modernity. Verso Books.</p><p>Ye Shana. (2024). Queer Chimerica: A Speculative Auto/Ethnography of the Cool Child. University of Michigan Press.</p><p><strong>本期配乐：</strong>万能青年旅店 - 十万嬉皮</p>
September 22, 2025
Vol 30 怨恨的政治与被争夺的受害者身份
<p>这一期节目，我们从温迪·布朗（Wendy Brown）在《受伤的依恋》（Wounded Attachment）一文中对身份政治的诊断谈起，回到自由主义政治的内在矛盾：它一边以承认来纳入差异，一边又通过同质化和规训消解差异。布朗借用尼采的对怨恨的批判，指出身份政治往往把能动性建立在过去的伤口上，结果陷入受害者话语的自我循环。但在今天，我们看到这种“受伤的依恋”不仅是边缘群体的困境，它甚至能跨越阶级、种族和性别，把各种恐惧和不安投射到他者身上，形成新的怨恨联盟。我们既回顾布朗的洞见，也反思她的局限，追问：当伤口被转化为政治资本，谁的痛苦被放大，谁的死亡无人哀悼？我们又如何在创伤、怨恨与欲望之间寻找别的政治可能？</p><p><strong>嘉宾：</strong>一块红布（豆瓣同名），<a href="https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/podcast/68535b858926937d4714b823">花果山上</a>主播</p><p><strong>主播：</strong>Evan，文化研究学者</p><p><strong>时间轴：</strong></p><p>00:00:19 社交媒体上的受害者身份政治</p><p>00:03:43 身份政治与自由主义的内在矛盾</p><p>00:08:46 治安秩序与政治的区别</p><p>00:11:55 中产阶级作为政治想象的框架</p><p>00:15:57 布朗与福柯权力观的差异</p><p>00:23:21 布朗借鉴尼采对怨恨政治的批判</p><p>00:30:40 布朗模棱两可的老左派立场</p><p>00:35:23 布朗的理论中的主体姿态</p><p>00:45:06 缺失的情动视角</p><p>00:57:10 受害者身份的不等价</p><p>01:01:56 哀悼的政治</p><p><strong>推荐阅读：</strong></p><p>Judith Butler, Precarious Life</p><p>Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism</p><p>Sara Ahmed, The Cultural Politics of Emotion</p><p>Wendy Brown, States of Injury</p><p><strong>本期配乐：</strong>祁紫檀 - 后青年启示录</p>
42 total episodes available
Similar Podcasts
Discover related shows you might enjoy
Deep-dive analytics for 歧义 Disagreement
Frequently asked questions
Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
- What is 歧义 Disagreement?
- How often does this podcast release new episodes?
This podcast updates bi-weekly.
- Where can I listen to this podcast?
This podcast is available on 8 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.
- Does this podcast accept guests?
Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.
Legal Disclaimer
Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.
All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.
We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.
While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.
By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.