Podcast thumbnail for wise athletes podcast

wise athletes podcast

Claim This Podcast

by wise athletes podcast

4.9(9 reviews)
193 episodes
Updated Daily
Accepts GuestsHas SponsorsLocation 🇺🇸
79

Podcast Authority

Beta
GoodBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality93
Social0
YouTube76
Engagement85

Podcast Overview

athletic longevity and peak performance as we age

Language

🇺🇲

Publishing Since

11/9/2020

Unlock The Full Podcast Authority Score Report

See how your podcast performs across key metrics

79

Podcast Authority

Beta
GoodBased on show quality, social media presence, reviews, charts, and more
Pod Engine
Quality93
Social0
YouTube76
Engagement85
8
Excellent Areas
3
Good Performance
8
Growth Opportunities
excellent
Episode Length
56 minutes
Performing excellently!
good
Publishing Consistency
Every 10 days

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

poor
Episode Thumbnails

Recommendations available

Unlock the full report to see detailed tips

+16 More Metrics

Unlock comprehensive insights including:

  • • YouTube presence analysis
  • • Social media reach metrics
  • • RSS compliance scoring
  • • Podcast 2.0 features
  • • Technical standards
What's Included in Your Full Report

Detailed Analytics

  • Complete breakdown of all 19 authority metrics
  • Personalized recommendations for each metric
  • Industry benchmarks and comparisons
  • Technical RSS feed analysis and compliance scoring

Growth Strategies

  • Step-by-step action plans for improvement
  • Quick wins to boost your score immediately
  • Pro tips from successful podcasters
Get your free podcast insights report

See how your show performs across every key metric

Instant delivery
No spam
Attract Better Guests

High authority scores make your podcast more attractive to industry leaders and influencers who want to appear on credible shows.

Secure Sponsorships

Sponsors look for podcasts with proven authority and engagement. Your score demonstrates your podcast's value to potential partners.

Grow Your Audience

Understanding your strengths and weaknesses helps you make data-driven decisions to expand your listener base effectively.

1 verified contact email on file for wise athletes podcast

Pitch yourself as a guest, propose sponsorships, or reach out directly to the host.

Recent Episodes

Episode thumbnail for #183 | VO2Max or What? | Mike T Nelson, PhD

June 24, 2026

#183 | VO2Max or What? | Mike T Nelson, PhD

Professional Supplements for Wise Athletes (click to see the huge "always on" discount) Affordable (best pricing by far) Blood Testing at GoodLabs (use code WISE for 20% discount) Mike T Nelson, PhD Dr. Mike blends deep academic knowledge with practical, field-tested insights to burn fat, build strength, and recover more effectively.PhD in Exercise Physiology from University of Minnesota BA in Natural Science from St. Scholastica MS in Biomechanics from Michigan Technological University Adjunct Professor in Human Performance for Carrick Institute for Functional Neurology Mike T Nelson website Dr Mike's Newsletter signup link There's a fight on the internet about VO₂max. One camp treats it as the single number that rules your healthspan — get it as high as humanly possible, no matter the cost. Another camp says it's overhyped, mismeasured, and not worth your attention at all. As usual, the loudest voices are the least useful. So I brought the question to someone I actually trust: Dr. Mike T. Nelson, back on the show for his fourth conversation with me. Mike is the rare internet fitness voice with both the science and the scruples, and he's written about this exact controversy. My question for him was simple and a little selfish: I'm 64, I don't have unlimited time or unlimited recovery. How much should someone like me actually be chasing VO₂max — and once I've got "enough," where should my effort go instead? His answer is what this episode is about, and it comes down to a sweet spot. Yes, VO₂max is one of the most powerful longevity predictors we've ever measured — climbing out of the bottom of the pack buys you more protection than almost anything else you can do. But the benefit curve flattens. There's a point where squeezing out another few percent costs enormous effort for very little return — effort that would do far more good aimed at whatever your real weak link is. Along the way Mike takes apart some sacred cows. Why zone 2, for most of us, is not the magic everyone says it is. How to actually program intervals so you're building speed instead of just collecting misery. Why your fading max heart rate might be partly a use-it-or-lose-it problem. And how something as quiet as your breathing rate while you sleep can tell you whether you're sabotaging your own oxygen delivery. If you've ever stared at the VO₂max number on your watch and wondered whether to celebrate it, panic about it, or ignore it — this one's for you. Key learnings VO2max predicts longevity — strongly, but with a caveat. The mortality benefit of moving from very unfit to fit appears larger than almost any other measured intervention, exceeding smoking cessation. But most of that effect comes from rescuing the bottom of the range, not pushing an already-good number higher. (Human observational data; reverse causality is a standing confounder. The "VO2max is overblown" controversy is mostly noise. The complaint that studies use METs and submax estimates rather than gold-standard lab tests is technically correct — but the surrogates and the lab measures largely agree, so the distinction doesn't change the practical conclusion. VO2max is limited by your weakest link — either oxygen delivery (heart, blood flow) or oxygen utilization(muscle, mitochondria). T...

Episode thumbnail for #182 | Leveraging Energy Stress | Jose Areta, PhD

June 14, 2026

#182 | Leveraging Energy Stress | Jose Areta, PhD

Professional Supplements for Wise Athletes (click to see the huge "always on" discount) Affordable (best pricing by far) Blood Testing at GoodLabs (use code WISE for 20% discount) Jose Areta, PhD Dr. José Areta is an Associate Professor in Exercise Metabolism and Nutrition at the School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University (UK). Originally from Argentina and trained first as a biologist (with a minor in zoology), he completed his PhD in exercise physiology and nutrition at RMIT University in Melbourne, then spent roughly three years as a postdoctoral researcher at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences before moving to Liverpool. His research centers on training–nutrition interactions in humans — how manipulating carbohydrate, protein, fat, and overall energy availability shapes adaptation to training and physical performance. In recent years his work has focused on the endocrine, metabolic, and physiological effects of energy deficiency, including the first dynamic proteomic profiling of how human skeletal muscle responds to a short-term energy deficit combined with exercise. He is also a practicing athlete, coach, and practitioner, and has roughly 60 peer-reviewed publications. Jose Areta, PhD profile Most of us treat an energy deficit as a problem to be corrected — a state where you've fallen below a known requirement, risking lost muscle and blunted performance. Areta's reframe: think of it as energy stress. Like exercise stress, it's a signal the body is built to adapt to, and — at least as a working hypothesis — one you may get better at handling with repeated, progressive exposure. We (probably) evolved under intermittent scarcity, and a body that responded to hunger by becoming weak and slow wouldn't have survived to find its next meal. The practical hook for the older athlete: if you're always in a calorie surplus to recover and build, you're adding fat alongside muscle. Energy stress, used deliberately, becomes the tool for managing body (low) fatness without sacrificing the performance and muscle you've worked for. Key learnings You can get stronger in a deficit without getting bigger. Energy deficit plus resistance training yields the same strength gains as energy-balanced training — but without the same hypertrophy. The gains come from neuromuscular adaptation, not added mass. (Function over form.) Protein is the lever that makes a deficit safe. Requirements rise to roughly 2.2 g/kg/day to preserve lean mass during a deficit. The threshold that matters: deficits beyond about 500 kcal/day impair muscle-building even with training; below that, recomposition (muscle gain + fat loss) stays achievable. Fat is the fuel; contractile muscle is largely spared. In Areta's short-term deficit study, energy came predominantly from fat oxidation, and most of the apparent "lean loss" was water — the contractile machinery was preserved. The deficit upregulates mitochondrial machinery. Deficit-plus-exercise increased mitochondrial protein synthesis and quality-control proteins — the stress acted as an adaptive signal, not just depletion. Meanwhile the collagen "scaffolding" proteins that rise with aging were reduced — though whether that's net-beneficial isn't yet settled. The body has no fixed metabolic rate. It adjusts expenditure and efficiency to energy ava...

Episode thumbnail for #181 | No Time for Pain | Rick Olderman MSPT

May 17, 2026

#181 | No Time for Pain | Rick Olderman MSPT

Professional Supplements for Wise Athletes (click to see the huge "always on" discount) Affordable (best pricing by far) Blood Testing at GoodLabs (use code WISE for 20% discount) Rick Olderman, MSPT Author of "Fixing You" series Author of Pain Patterns www.rickolderman.com This episode focuses on addressing chronic pain in older athletes using a comprehensive "systems thinking" approach to physical therapy. Rather than treating pain as an isolated symptom with a checklist of generic exercises, the discussion highlights the importance of diagnosing the underlying root causes through a simplified series of diagnostic tests. The conversation digs into how systemic bodily compensations hide underlying structural issues, how dysfunctional walking patterns directly trigger chronic lower body pain, and how most chronic back pain is mistreated by conventional physical therapy methods. Key Discussion Points Immediate Pain Feedback: Effective physical therapy should yield almost immediate feedback and pain relief during testing if the correct underlying trigger is successfully targeted and adjusted. The "Spaghetti Against the Wall" Approach: Conventional physical therapy often hands patients a long list of general exercises without meaningful, personalized testing to determine the specific cause of pain. The Deception of Painless Damage: Our bodies are masterful "compensation machines," meaning structural degradation (visible on MRIs) can silently accumulate completely under the radar long before rising to the level of actual pain. Walking as a Keystone: Chronic pain tracking from the lower back all the way down to the feet is heavily tied to dysfunctional walking patterns; fixing the gait is fundamental to resolving this pain. The Over-Striding Error: A highly common walking issue involves throwing the foot too far out in front of the body with a heavy heel strike, which locks the knee and shuts off the gluteus maximus. Activating the Glutes: To properly engage the glutes and control pelvic/hip mechanics, walkers must focus on moving their entire body forward with the advancing foot, ensuring the knee stays automatically softened. The Three Body Systems and Patterns: The human frame operates on three distinct systems (movement, fascial, and reflex neurological) that get trapped in three fundamental problematic patterns: extension (too arched), flexion (too flat), or side-bending (uneven pelvis). The Back Crease Photo Test: A simple diagnostic test for a side-bending problem is having a photo taken of your bare back; a larger crease at the waist on one side indicates an uneven pelvis and rib cage, which typically aligns with the side of sciatic or SI joint pain. The Prevalence of Extension Problems: Roughly 99% of patients with chronic back pain suffer from an extension problem (an over-arched back), which is easily identified if back pain worsens when laying flat with straight legs or standing. The Flaw in Standard Back Care: Most traditional physical therapy methods treat chronic back pain by prescribing back-arching and prone press-up exercises, which actually worsen pain for 99% of chronic patients because it reinforces their existing extension problem.

193 total episodes available with 2 transcripts

Recent guests on wise athletes podcast

Guests from recent episodes — sign up to see every guest that has ever appeared on this show.

Nayan Patel

Guest

Brendan Egan

Guest

Renee Fitton

Guest

Jim Martin

Guest

Hemal H Patel

Guest

Amanda Wiggins PhD

Guest

Michael Ormsbee PhD

Guest

Dr Ted Naiman

Guest

Frank Schwartz

Guest

Adrian Kelly

Guest

Richard LaFountain

Guest

Brandon Fell

Guest

Deep-dive analytics for wise athletes podcast

Frequently asked questions

Have a different question and can't find the answer you're looking for? Reach out to our support team by sending us an email and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.

What is wise athletes podcast?

athletic longevity and peak performance as we age

How often does this podcast release new episodes?

This podcast updates daily.

Where can I listen to this podcast?

This podcast is available on 10 platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. You can also use the RSS feed directly.

Does this podcast accept guests?

Yes, this podcast regularly features guests.

Legal Disclaimer

Pod Engine is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or officially connected with any of the podcasts displayed on this platform. We operate independently as a podcast discovery and analytics service.

All podcast artwork, thumbnails, and content displayed on this page are the property of their respective owners and are protected by applicable copyright laws. This includes, but is not limited to, podcast cover art, episode artwork, show descriptions, episode titles, transcripts, audio snippets, and any other content originating from the podcast creators or their licensors.

We display this content under fair use principles and/or implied license for the purpose of podcast discovery, information, and commentary. We make no claim of ownership over any podcast content, artwork, or related materials shown on this platform. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

While we strive to ensure all content usage is properly authorized, if you are a rights holder and believe your content is being used inappropriately or without proper authorization, please contact us immediately at hey@podengine.ai for prompt review and appropriate action, which may include content removal or proper attribution.

By accessing and using this platform, you acknowledge and agree to respect all applicable copyright laws and intellectual property rights of content owners. Any unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use of the content displayed on this platform is strictly prohibited.